• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Solution of Tutorial 3 Exercise 3.1:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Solution of Tutorial 3 Exercise 3.1:"

Copied!
9
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

1/9

Course # 804314-2 : Heat Transfer (1)

Second Semester 1435/1436 H (2014/2015 G)

Solution of Tutorial 3

Exercise 3.1:

See lecture

Exercise 3.2:

The ratio of the length of the fin and its diameter is : L D D

L 25  

So, we can assume that the fin is very long fin (infinite fin), then its effectiveness is:

c

f hA

kP

where:

k = 237 W/mK,

h = 12 W/m2 K,

L = 10 cm = 0.1 m,

D = 4 mm = 0.004 m,

m 0125 . 0 m 004 .

0 

PD,

2 5 - 2

2 2

m 10 256 . 1 m 4

004 . 0 4

and  D   

Ac

So, the fin effectiveness is

198 . 10 140

256 . 1 12

0125 . 0 237

5  

  f

f

Umm Al-Qura University

College of Engineering & Islamic Architecture

Mechanical Engineering Department

(2)

2/9

Exercise 3.3

(a) The perimeter P of this fin: P  D0.005 m1.57102m (b) The area of conduction heat transfer Ac :

2 5 - 2

2 2

m 10 96 . 1 m 4

005 . 0

4    

 DAc

(c) The fin heat transfer rate:

The ratio of the length of the fin and its diameter is : L D D

L  20  

005 . 0

1 .

0 .

So, we can assume that the fin is very long fin (infinite fin). From table (case D):

b b

f M hPkAc hPkAc

q     

where

C 0 8 C ) 20 100

(    

Tb T

b

W 964 . 1 W 80 10

96 . 1 200 10

57 . 1

10  2   5  

qf

(d) The temperature of the end of fin:

From table (case D), the temperature distribution

mx b

b

T e T

T x

T

 ( )

T(x) (Tb T )e mx T

where 6.394

10 96 . 1 200

10 57 . 1 10

5

2

 

kAc

m hP

m in and C in where

; 20 80

)

(x e 6.394 T x

T   x  

The temperature in the end of fin is for x = L, thus

80 20

C 60 C

)

(    6.3940.1   

TL T x L e

(3)

3/9

Exercise 3.4

We can model the pot handle as an extended suface. Assume that ther is no heat transfer at the free end of the handle.

The condition matches that specified in the fins tables, case B. Use the following data:

h = 5 W/m2 °C,

L = 15 cm = 0.15m,

D = 3cm=0.03 m,

P  D0.03 m0.094m,

2 -4 2

2 2

m 10 068 . 7 m 4

03 . 0

4   

 DAc

b

TbT

 

 10020

C80C

or

kAc

mhP , MhPkAcb and the heat transfer rate through a plot handle is

 

mL M

qf  tanh , therefore:

The heat transfer rate through a plot handle:

(a) For aluminium (k = 237 W/mK):

675 . 10 1 068 . 7 237

094 . 0 5

4

 

kAc

m hP and

W 447 . 22 80 10 068 . 7 237 094 . 0

5 4

b       

hPkAc

M

So, the heat transfer rate through a plot handle is

W 5.524 W

) 15 . 0 675 . 1 tanh(

447 . 22 )

tanh(    

M mL qf

(4)

4/9 (b) Special metal (k = 3 W/mK):

888 . 10 14

068 . 7 3

094 . 0 5

4

 

kAc

m hP and

W 525 . 2 80 10 068 . 7 3 094 . 0

5 4

b       

hPkAc

M

So, the heat transfer rate through a plot handle is

W 2.467 W

) 15 . 0 888 . 14 tanh(

525 . 2 )

tanh(    

M mL qf

The temperature distribution along the pot handle:

The condition matches that specified in the fins tables, case B. the temperature distrubtion along the pot handle is:

 

) cosh(

) ( cosh )

( ) (

mL x L m T

T T x T b

x

b

 

 

 

 

T T T

mL x L x m

T ( b )

) cosh(

) ( ) cosh (

 

m in and C in ) ( where

; 20 ) 20 100 ) ( 15 . 0 cosh(

) 15 . 0 ( ) cosh

( T x x

m

x x m

T   

 

 

m in and C in ) ( where

; ) 20

15 . 0 cosh(

) 15 . 0 ( 80 cosh

)

( T x x

m

x x m

T  

 

(a) For aluminium (m 1.675):

 

m in and C in ) ( where

; ) 20

15 . 0 675 . 1 cosh(

) 15 . 0 ( 675 . 1 80 cosh )

( x T x x

x

T  

 

1.675(0.15 )

20 ; where ( )in C and in m cosh

539 . 77 )

(x x T x x

T     

At the end of the pot handle (x = L = 15cm = 0.15m):

 

0 20 97.539 C

cosh 539 . 77 ) 15 . 0

(       

T x L

The temperature at the handle (x=15 cm) is very hot at all. So, We can”t touch the end of the handle.

(5)

5/9 Plot the temperature distribution along the plot handle:

(b) For the Special (m14.888):

 

m in and C in ) ( where

; ) 20

15 . 0 888 . 14 cosh(

) 15 . 0 ( 888 . 14 80 cosh

)

( x T x x

x

T  

 

11.532(0.15 )

20 ; where ( )in C and in m cosh

954 . 16 )

(x x T x x

T     

At the end of the pot handle (x = L = 15cm = 0.15m):

 

0 20 36.954 C cosh

954 . 16 ) 15 . 0

(       

T x L

Plot the temperature distribution along the plot handle:

0 0.0375 0.075 0.1125 0.15 99

97

0 0.0375 0.075 0.1125 0.15 30

20 0.0 75 0.1 125 0.1

(6)

6/9 Comments: The temperature at the handle (x = 15 cm) is only 36.954 °C, not hot at all. So, We can touch the end of the handle.

This example illustrates the important role of the thermal conductivity of the material in the temperature disribution in a fin.

Exercise 3.5:

There are N fins in the array (for 1 m length), the total surface area is

AtNAfAb Where Af is the surface area of a single fin, and Ab is the area of the prime surface.

The total rate of heat transfer by convection is

b tube tube

f all

tube all

t

q q q N q q hA

q 

fins

 where

fins

  and  

In this equation , the heat transfer from a single fin is:

b f f

f

h A

q   

where f is the efficiency of a single fin.

) (

2 ) (

2 R

1

L t

fins

R

1

L N t A

tube

   

all

    

For L= 1m,

(7)

7/9

2 2

0.0565 m m

) 002 . 0 200 1

( 015 . 0 2

1m,

For L  A

tube

      

So, the total heat transfer is

qtNf hAfbhAbb

Note: So, the increase in heat transfer rate per meter as result of adding these fins is:

b f f f

fins

all

N q N h A

q    

In these equations, the following data are N = 200/m

) (

2 )

( in Graph R

22

R

12

A

A

f

s

 

c

    ( 120  25 )  C  95  C

 T

b

T

b

h = 50 W/m2K

To determine the fin efficiency (circular fin), we used graphical method (graph below) with the following data:

L = R2R1; where R1 = D1/2= 1.5 cm = 0.015 m, and R2 = D2/2= 3 cm = 0.03 m

Lc = L + t/2 = 1.5 cm + 1 mm = 1.51 cm;

2 -5

m 10 3.02 0.0151

002 .

0   

c

p

t L

A

R2c = R2 + t/2 = 3.1 cm ; So,

2 05 . 51 2 . 1

1 . 3

1

2

  

R R

c

So, we must use Cure 2 and We can calculate the surface area of a single fin: Af:

2 4 2

2 2 2

2 1 2

2

) 2 ( 2 . 02 1 . 51 ) cm 6 . 2 cm 6 . 2 10 m (

2 )

(       

 A in Graph  R R 

A

f s c
(8)

8/9

k = 50 W/mK, and hc = h = 10W/m2K

So, we obtain

33 . 10 0

02 . 3 50 0151 50

. 0

2 / 1 5 2

/ 3 2

/ 1 2

/

3

 

 

 

 

 

p

c

c

kA

L h

Using Curve of

2

1

2

R R

c

and 0 . 33

2 / 1 2

/

3

 

 

p c

c

kA

L h

Then the fin efficiency (from Graph) is

f

 0 . 88

So, we obtain the results below:

(9)

9/9

Heat transfer rate Expression Value (W)

From the tube (qtube) qtubehAbb 268.375

From a single fin (qf)

b f f

f

h A

q   

2.595

From N fins per meter (qall fins)

f fins

all

Nq

q 

519

The total per meter (qt)

tube fins

all

t

q q

q  

787.375

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Soybean crap area thu is **table causing, the production af soybean in the Distict Grtsls,,g,, t t rsne af the c*rr{ers ii Cental .I*ux saybew$uctr*ed

The number of Brønsted acid and the surface area affected to the conversion of isatin while the total acidity and the number of Lewis acid influenced the selectivity.. Keywords : AlCl

The surface area of titania- rice husk silica samples was varied as calcination temperature.. The lowest surface area was found for sample C and the highest one in

Zeolite with sufficient surface acidity, high specific surface area and higher thermal stability compared to clay is one of the silica alumina mineral for

The implicit conversion of an array name to a pointer to the initial element of the array is exten- sively used in function calls in C-style code.. The snag is that it is impossible

Caution is the better part of valor if an ugly green fin is spied slicing along the surface; thus advise the shark hunters who have spent years tracking down the tigers of the sea in

Through determination of specific surface area of coconut shell charcoal powder from methylene blue adsorption capacity, it was found that the coconut shell charcoal with particle size

The liquid and vapor temperatures recorded by these thermocouples confirm that the system is being maintained at the saturation state during the Nomenclature Af area enhancement factor