42 CHAPTER 6
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
6.2. Recommendations
The following recommendations are suggested for further research:
Further studies should include recirculation of a portion of the effluent in the system in the two-stage anaerobic digestion for dilution of the feed and to simulate the performance of such an unusual design in the Sumo modelling software.
Consideration in calibrating the model to an existing working digester and assess if the empirical kinetic and stoichiometric values are representing digester performance, will greatly enhance the simulator predictability of PSW treatment.
Further research should consider performing a dynamic simulation and assessment how the model responds at different SRTs and HRTs.
Further research may consider additional post-treatment processes for the removal of PO43- and NH3.44
CHAPTER 7
REFERENCES
CHAPTER 7 REFERENCES
Adeyemo, O.K., Ayodeji, I.O. and Aika-Raji, C.O., 2002. The water quality and sanitary conditions in a major abattoir (Bodija) in Ibadan, Nigeria. African Journal of Biomedical Research, 5(1-2). pp.53-55.
Al-Ghouti, M.A., Khraisheh, M.A.M., Allen, S.J. and Ahmad, M.N., 2003. The removal of dyes from textile wastewater: a study of the physical characteristics and adsorption mechanisms of diatomaceous earth. Journal of Environmental Management, 69(3), pp.229-238.
Anderson, G.K., Kasapgil, B. and Ince, O., 1994. Microbiological study of two-stage anaerobic digestion during start-up. Water Research, 28(11), pp.2383-2392.
Barbut, S. 2015. The Science of Poultry and Meat Processing. University of Guelph, Ontario.
Basitere, M., Rinquest, Z., Njoya, M., Sheldon, M.S. and Ntwampe, S.K.O., 2017. Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater using a static granular bed reactor (SGBR) coupled with ultrafiltration (UF) membrane system. Water Science and Technology.
Basitere, M., Williams, Y., Sheldon, M.S., Ntwampe, S.K.O., De Jager, D. and Dlangamandla, C., 2016. Performance of an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactor coupled with anoxic and aerobic bioreactors for treating poultry slaughterhouse wastewater. Water Practice and Technology, 11(1), pp.86-92.
Batstone, D.J., Keller, J., Angelidaki, I., Kalyuzhnyi, S.V., Pavlostathis, S.G., Rozzi, A., Sanders, W.T.M., Siegrist, H. and Vavilin, V.A., 2002. The IWA anaerobic digestion model no 1 (ADM1). Water Science and Technology, 45(10), pp.65-73.
Boubaker, F. and Ridha, B.C., 2008. Modelling of the mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of olive mill wastewater with olive mill solid waste using anaerobic digestion model No.
1 (ADM1). Bioresource technology, 99(14), pp.6565-6577.
Boopathy, R., 2000. Factors limiting bioremediation technologies. Bioresource technology, 74(1), pp.63-67.
Blumensaat, F. and Keller, J., 2005. Modelling of two-stage anaerobic digestion using the IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1). Water Research, 39(1), pp.171-183.
46 Bustillo-Lecompte, C. F., Ghafoori, S. & Mehrvar, M. 2016. Photochemical degradation of an actual slaughterhouse wastewater by continuous UV/H2O2 photoreactor with recycle.
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 4, 719-732.
Bustillo-Lecompte, C., Mehrvar, M. and Quiñones-Bolaños, E., 2016. Slaughterhouse wastewater characterization and treatment: an economic and public health necessity of the meat processing industry in Ontario, Canada. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 4(04), p.175.
Bustillo-Lecompte, C. F. & Mehrvar, M. 2015a. Slaughterhouse wastewater characteristics, treatment, and management in the meat processing industry: a review on trends and advances. Journal of Environmental Management, 161, 287-302.
Bustillo-Lecompte, C. F., Mehrvar, M. & Quiñones-Bolaños, E. 2014. Cost-effectiveness analysis of TOC removal from slaughterhouse wastewater using combined anaerobic–aerobic and UV/H2O2 processes. Journal of Environmental Management, 134, 145-152.
Bus, S., Yetilmezsoy, K. & Kocak, E. 2009. Anaerobic digestion technology in poultry and livestock waste treatment—a literature review. Waste Management & Research, 27, 3-18.
Canencia, O. P., Dalugdug, M. D., Emano, A. M. B., Mendoza, R. C. & Walag, A. M. P.
2016. Slaughter waste effluents and river catchment watershed contamination in Cagayan de Oro City, Philippines. Journal of Biodiversity and Environmental Sciences, 9, 142-148.
Cao, W. & Mehrvar, M. 2011. Slaughterhouse wastewater treatment by combined anaerobic baffled reactor and UV/H2O2 processes. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 89, 1136-1143.
Cheremisinoff, P., 1997. Handbook of engineering polymeric materials. CRC Press.
City of Cape Town. 2006. Wastewater and industrial effluent bylaw, 2016.
http://www.samfa.org.za/Library/WasteWaterLaws/CTWasteWaterByLaw.pdf.
Accessed date: 12/11/2018
Cohen, A., Zoetemeyer, R.J., Van Deursen, A. and Van Andel, J.G., 1979. Anaerobic digestion of glucose with separated acid production and methane formation. Water Research, 13(7), pp.571-580.
Copp, J.B., Jeppsson, U. and Rosen, C., 2003. Towards an ASM1–ADM1 state variable interface for plant-wide wastewater treatment modeling. Proceedings of the water environment federation, 2003(7), pp.498-510.
Coskun, T., Debik, E., Kabuk, H. A., Manav Demir, N., Basturk, I., Yildirim, B., Temizel, D. &
Kucuk, S. 2016. Treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater using a membrane process, water reuse, and economic analysis. Desalination and Water Treatment, 57, 4944-4951.
Debik, E. and Coskun, T.J.B.T., 2009. Use of the Static Granular Bed Reactor (SGBR) with anaerobic sludge to treat poultry slaughterhouse wastewater and kinetic modeling. Bioresource Technology, 100(11), pp.2777-2782.
Del Nery, V., Damianovic, M.H.Z. and Barros, F.G., 2001. The use of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors in the treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 44(4), pp.83-88.
Del Nery, V., Pozzi, E., Damianovic, M.H., Domingues, M.R. and Zaiat, M., 2008. Granules characteristics in the vertical profile of a full-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor treating poultry slaughterhouse wastewater. Bioresource technology, 99(6), pp.2018-2024.
Dendooven, L. & Escamilla-Silva, E. 2005. Poultry slaughter wastewater treatment with an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. Bioresource Technology, 96, 1730-1736.
Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF), 1996. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry (DWAF)(second edition), South African Water Quality Guidelines, Volume 1, Domestic Use. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria, South Africa.
Derbal, K., Bencheikh-Lehocine, M., Cecchi, F., Meniai, A.H. and Pavan, P., 2009.
Application of the IWA ADM1 model to simulate anaerobic co-digestion of organic waste with waste activated sludge in mesophilic condition. Bioresource Technology, 100(4), pp.1539-1543.
Dold, P.L. and Marais, G.V.R., 1986. Evaluation of the general activated sludge model proposed by the IAWPRC task group. Water Science and Technology, 18(6), pp.63- 89.
48 Ekama, G.A. and Marais, G., 1977. The activated sludge process. Part II–dynamic
behaviour. Water SA, 3(1), pp.18-50.
Evans, E.A., Ellis, T.G., Gullicks, H. and Ringelestein, J., 2004. Trickling filter nitrification performance characteristics and potential of a full-scale municipal wastewater treatment facility. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 130(11), pp.1280-1288.
Eze, C. N. & Eze, P. C. 2018. Effect of abattoir waste on the physicochemical and bacteriological qualities of new-artisan river in Enugu, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 37, 262.
Goel, P. K . 2006. Water pollution: causes, effects and control. New Age International. pp.
201-215
Ghosh, S., 1991. Pilot-scale demonstration of two-phase anaerobic digestion of activated sludge. Water Science and Technology, 23(7-9), pp.1179-1188.
Edition, F., 2011. Guidelines for drinking-water quality. WHO chronicle, 38(4), pp.104-8.
Henze, M., Gujer, W., Mino, T. & Van Loosdrecht, M. 2000. Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3, IWA publishing. pp. 45-70
Henze, M., Van Loosdrecht, M.C., Ekama, G.A. And Brdjanovic, D. Eds., 2008. Biological wastewater treatment. IWA publishing. pp.65-80
Henze, M., Gujer, W., Mino, T., Matsuo, T., Wentzel, M.C., Marais, G.V.R. and Van Loosdrecht, M.C., 1999. Activated sludge model no. 2d, ASM2d. Water Science and Technology, 39(1), pp.165-182.
Igoni, A.H., Ayotamuno, M.J., Eze, C.L., Ogaji, S.O.T. And Probert, S.D., 2008. Designs of anaerobic digesters for producing biogas from municipal solid-waste. Applied Energy, 85(6), pp.430-438.
Jhung, J.K. and Choi, E., 1995. A comparative study of UASB and anaerobic fixed film reactors with development of sludge granulation. Water Research, 29(1), pp.271- 277.
Judd, S., 2010. The MBR book: principles and applications of membrane bioreactors for water and wastewater treatment. Elsevier.
Kothari, C. R. 2004. Research methodology: Methods and techniques, New Age International.
Kato, M.T., Field, J.A., Versteeg, P. and Lettinga, G., 1994. Feasibility of expanded granular sludge bed reactors for the anaerobic treatment of low‐strength soluble wastewaters. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 44(4), pp.469-479.
Karakashev, D., Batstone, D.J., Trably, E. and Angelidaki, I., 2006. Acetate oxidation is the dominant methanogenic pathway from acetate in the absence of Methanosaetaceae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 72(7), pp.5138-5141.
Krakat, N., Demirel, B., Anjum, R. and Dietz, D., 2017. Methods of ammonia removal in anaerobic digestion: a review. Water Sccience and Technollogy, 76(8), pp.1925- 1938.
Koch, G., Kühni, M., Gujer, W. and Siegrist, H., 2000. Calibration and validation of activated sludge model no. 3 for Swiss municipal wastewater. Water Research, 34(14), pp.3580-3590.
Mach, K.F. and Ellis, T.G., 2000. Performance characteristics of the static granular bed reactor. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, 2000(11), pp.764-781.
Mamais, D., Jenkins, D. and Prrr, P., 1993. A rapid physical-chemical method for the determination of readily biodegradable soluble COD in municipal wastewater. Water Research, 27(1), pp.195-197.
Mao, C., Feng, Y., Wang, X. and Ren, G., 2015. Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, pp.540-555.
Marais, G. and Ekama, G.A., 1976. The activated sludge process part I-steady state behaviour. Water sA, 2(4), pp.164-200.
Melcer, H., 2004. Methods for wastewater characterization in activated sludge modelling.
IWA publishing.
Molapo, N.A., 2009. Waste handling practices in the South African high-throughput poultry abattoirs (Doctoral dissertation, Bloemfontein: Central University of Technology, Free State).
Metcalf, E. 2003. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse. 4th ed. New York:
McGraw-Hill.
50 Muha, I., Zielonka, S., Lemmer, A., Schönberg, M., Linke, B., Grillo, A. and Wittum, G., 2013. Do two-phase biogas plants separate anaerobic digestion phases?–A mathematical model for the distribution of anaerobic digestion phases among reactor stages. Bioresource Technology, 132, pp.414-418.
Njoya, M., 2017. Reactor reconfiguration for enhanced performance of a down-flow expanded granular bed reactor (DEGBR) for poultry slaughterhouse treatment (Master dissertation, Cape Peninsula University of Technology).
Ojekunle, O.Z. and Lateef, S.T., 2017. environmental impact of abattoir waste discharge on the quality of surface water and ground water in abeokuta. journal of environmental and Analytical Toxicology, 7(509), pp.2161-0525.
Orhon, D. and Çokgör, E.U., 1997. COD fractionation in wastewater characterization—the state of the art. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology: International Research in Process, Environmental and Clean Technology, 68(3), pp.283-293.
Ostrem, K.M., Millrath, K. and Themelis, N.J., 2004, January. Combining anaerobic digestion and waste-to-energy. In 12th Annual North American Waste-to-Energy Conference (pp. 265-271). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
Pina, S., Buti, M., Cotrina, M., Piella, J. & Girones, R. 2000. HEV identified in serum from humans with acute hepatitis and in sewage of animal origin in Spain. Journal of Hepatology, 33, 826-833.
Rajeshwari, K.V., Balakrishnan, M., Kansal, A., Lata, K. and Kishore, V.V.N., 2000. State-of- the-art of anaerobic digestion technology for industrial wastewater treatment. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 4(2), pp.135-156.
Rinquest, Z., 2017. Poultry slaughterhouse wastewater treatment using a static granular bed reactor (SGBR) coupled with a hybrid sidestream membrane bioreactor (Master dissertation, Cape Peninsula University of Technology).
Salminen, E. and Rintala, J., 2002. Anaerobic digestion of organic solid poultry slaughterhouse waste–a review. Bioresource technology, 83(1), pp.13-26.
Schmidt, J.E. and Ahring, B.K., 1996. Granular sludge formation in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors. Biotechnology and bioengineering, 49(3), pp.229-246.
Schober, G., Schäfer, J., Schmid-Staiger, U. and Trösch, W., 1999. One and two-stage digestion of solid organic waste. Water Research, 33(3), pp.854-860.
Song, T., Li, S., Ding, W., Li, H., Bao, M. and Li, Y., 2018. Biodegradation of hydrolyzed polyacrylamide by the combined expanded granular sludge bed reactor-aerobic biofilm reactor biosystem and key microorganisms involved in this bioprocess. Bioresource technology, 263, pp.153-162.
South Africa. 1998. National Water Act, No 36 of 1998.
http://www.dwa.gov.za/Documents/Legislature/nw_act/NWA.pdf. Accessed date:
10/10/2018
South Africa. 1997. Water Services Act, No 108 of 1997.
http://www.dwaf.gov.za/Documents/Legislature/a108-97.pdf. Accessed date:
10/09/2018
Seghezzo, L., Zeeman, G., Van Lier, J. B., Hamelers, H. & Lettinga, G. 1998. A review: the anaerobic treatment of sewage in UASB and EGSB reactors. Bioresource Technology, 65, 175-190.
Siegrist, H., Renggli, D. and Gujer, W., 1993. Mathematical modelling of anaerobic mesophilic sewage sludge treatment. Water Science and Technology, 27(2), pp.25- 36.
Sivagurunathan, P., Kumar, G., Bakonyi, P., Kim, S.H., Kobayashi, T., Xu, K.Q., Lakner, G., Tóth, G., Nemestóthy, N. and Bélafi-Bakó, K., 2016. A critical review on issues and overcoming strategies for the enhancement of dark fermentative hydrogen production in continuous systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41(6), pp.3820- 3836.
Stets, M., Etto, R., Galvão, C., Ayub, R., Cruz, L., Steffens, M. & Barana, A. 2014. Microbial community and performance of slaughterhouse wastewater treatment filters.
Genetics and Molecular Research, 13, 4444-4455.
Tawfik, A., Sobhey, M. and Badawy, M., 2008. Treatment of a combined dairy and domestic wastewater in an up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor followed by activated sludge (AS system). Desalination, 227(1-3), pp.167-177.
Whitman, W.G., 1923. The two-film theory of gas absorption. Chemical and Metallurgical ., 29, pp.146-148.
52 Verheijen, L., Wiersema, D. & Hulshoff Pol, L. 1996. Livestock and the Environment–Finding a Balance. Management of Waste from Animal Product Processing. Coordinated by the FAO, USAID and World Bank.
Von Sperling, M. 2017. Wastewater characteristics, treatment and disposal, IWA publishing.
Weber, T. J. 2007. Wastewater treatment. Metal Finishing, 105, 699-714.
Wentzel, M.C., Mbewe, A. and Ekama, G.A., 1995. Batch test for measurement of readily biodegradable COD and active organism concentrations in municipal waste waters. WATER SA-PRETORIA-, 21, pp.117-117.
Youn, S. Y., Jeong, O. M., Choi, B. K., Jung, S. C. & Kang, M. S. 2017. Comparison of the antimicrobial and sanitizer resistance of Salmonella isolates from chicken slaughter processes in Korea. Journal of Food Science, 82, 711-717.
Zahller, J.D., Bucher, R.H., Ferguson, J.F. and Stensel, H.D., 2007. Performance and stability of two-stage anaerobic digestion. Water environment research, 79(5), pp.488-497.
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Model overview Table A-1: Key parameters
Symbol Name Value Unit
µNITO Maximum specific growth rate of nitrifiers 0,9 1/d
KNHx,NITO,AS Ammonia half saturation for NITOs 0,7 g N/m3
µOHO Maximum specific growth rate of OHOs 4 1/d
KSB,AS Substrate half saturation for OHOs 5 g COD/m3
KO2,OHO,AS O2 half saturation for OHOs 0,05 g O2/m3
µPAO Maximum specific growth rate of PAOs 0,9 1/d
KPO4,PAO,AS PO4 half saturation for PAOs 0,3 g P/m3
qHYD Hydrolysis rate coefficient 2 1/d
Table A-2: Methylotroph kinetics
Symbol Name Value Unit
µMEOLO Methylotroph maximum specific growth rate 1,3 1/d
KMEOL,AS Methanol half saturation coefficient 0,5 g COD/m3
KO2,MEOLO,AS O2 half saturation for MEOLOs 0,05 g O2/m3
KNO3,MEOLO,AS NOx half saturation for MEOLOs 0,03 g N/m3
bMEOLO Aerobic decay rate coefficient for methylotrophs 0,05 1/d
qMEOL Methanol degradation rate in anaerobic environments 10 1/d
54 Table A-3: Heterotrophic kinetics
Symbol Name Value Unit
µOHO Maximum specific growth rate of OHOs 4 1/d
KSB,AS Substrate half saturation for OHOs 5 g COD/m3
KO2,OHO,AS O2 half saturation for OHOs 0,05 g O2/m3
KVFA,AS VFA half saturation for OHOs 0,5 g COD/m3
KMEOL,OHO,AS Methanol half saturation for OHOs (aerobic) 0,1 g COD/m3
KNO3,OHO,AS NOx half saturation for OHOs 0,03 g N/m3
ηOHO,anox Anoxic growth reduction for OHOs 0,6
bOHO Aerobic decay rate coefficient for OHOs 0,62 1/d
µFERM,OHO Fermentation rate coefficient 0,4 1/d
KSB,ana,AS Substrate half saturation during fermentation 5 g COD/m3
Table A-4: Hydrogenotrophic methanogen kinetics
Symbol Name Value Unit
µHMETO Maximum specific growth rate of HMETO 1,3 1/d
KH2,HMETO,AS H2 half saturation for HMETO 0,1 g COD/m3
KO2,HMETO,AS Oxygen half saturation for HMETO 0,05 g O2/m3
KNO3,HMETO,AS NOx half saturation for HMETO 0,05 g N/m3
bHMETO Decay rate for HMETO (aerobic) 0,13 1/d
pHlow,HMETO pH inhibition - low value 5,5 pHunit
pHhigh,HMETO pH inhibition - high value 9,5 pHunit
Table A-5: Phosphate-Accumulating Organisms kinetics
Symbol Name Value Unit
µPAO Maximum specific growth rate of PAOs 0,9 1/d
KPO4,PAO,AS PO4 half saturation for PAOs 0,3 g P/m3
µPAO,lim Maximum specific growth rate of PAOs, P limited 0,49 1/d
KPHA,AS PHA half saturation coefficient 0,1 g COD/m3
KO2,PAO,AS Oxygen half saturation for PAOs 0,05 g O2/m3
KNO3,PAO,AS NOx half saturation for PAOs 0,03 g N/m3
ηPAO,anox PAO anoxic growth factor 0,33
bPAO Aerobic decay rate coefficient for PAOs 0,05 1/d
bPPLO,ana Anaerobic maintenance PP cleavage 0,03 1/d
qPAO,PHA PHA storage rate 2 1/d
KSTO,VFA,AS VFA half saturation for storage 5 g COD/m3
KPPLO,AS PP-low half saturation for storage 0,01 g P/m3
KMg,PAO,AS Mg limitation for PP storage (counter-ion) 0,001 g Mg/m3
KK,PAO,AS K limitation for PP storage (counter-ion) 0,001 g K/m3
KCa,PAO,AS Ca limitation for PP storage (counter-ion) 0,001 g Ca/m3
KPP,lim,AS PP limitation as nutrient 0,002 g P/m3
KPO4,lim,AS PO4 limitation as nutrient 0,005 g P/m3
Table A-6: Parameters for half saturation coefficients in biofilms
Symbol Name Value Unit
fKS,biofilm Diffusion factor for half saturation coefficients 0.1 -
56 Table A-7: Nitrifiers kinetics
Symbol Name Value Unit
µNITO Maximum specific growth rate of nitrifiers 0,9 1/d
KNHx,NITO,AS Ammonia half saturation for NITOs 0,7 g N/m3
KCO2,NITO,AS CO2 half saturation for NITOs 44 g TIC/m3
KCO2,NITO,sidestream CO2 half saturation for NITOs 176 g TIC/m3
KCO2,NITO,pH,AS HCO3- half saturation for NITOs 1 mmol [HCO3-]/L
KCO2,NITO,pH,sidestream HCO3- half saturation for NITOs 4 mmol [HCO3-]/L
KO2,NITO,AS Oxygen half saturation for NITOs 0,25 g O2/m3
KO2,NITO,sidestream Oxygen half saturation for NITOs 0,5 g O2/m3
KNO3,NITO,AS Half saturation for anoxic conditions for NITOs 0,03 g N/m3
bNITO Aerobic decay rate coefficient for NITOs 0,17 1/d
KNH3,NITO,AS Free ammonia half saturation for NITOs 9999000 mmol/L
KNH3,NITO,pH,AS Ammonium half saturation for NITOs 9999 g N/m3
Table A-8: Volatile Fatty Acid (Acido) clastic methanogen kinetics
Symbol Name Value Unit
µAMETO Maximum specific growth rate of AMETO 0,3 1/d
KVFA,AMETO,AS VFA Haldane half saturation for AMETO 400 g COD/m3
KVFA,INH,AMETO,AS VFA Haldane inhibition for AMETO 99999 g COD/m3
KO2,AMETO,AS Oxygen half saturation for AMETO 0,05 g O2/m3
KNO3,AMETO,AS NOx half saturation for AMETO 0,05 g N/m3
bAMETO Decay rate for AMETO (aerobic) 0,03 1/d
KNHx,AMETO,pH,AS NHx non-competitive inhibition AMETO 2500 g N/m3
KNH3,AMETO,pH,AS NH3 non-competitive inhibition AMETO 24 mmol/L
pHlow,AMETO pH inhibition - low value 5,5 pHunit
pHhigh,AMETO pH inhibition - high value 9,5 pHunit
Table A-9: Precipitation kinetics
Symbol Name Value Unit
qCaCO3,PREC CaCO3 precipitation rate parameter 0 g.m-3.d-1
qCaCO3,DISS CaCO3 redissolution rate parameter 0 g.m-3.d-1
qSTR,PREC Struvite precipitation rate parameter 10 g.m-3.d-1
qSTR,DISS Struvite dissolution rate parameter 1 g.m-3.d-1
qACP,PREC ACP precipitation rate 0 g.m-3.d-1
qACP,DISS ACP dissolution rate 0 g.m-3.d-1
qVivi,PREC Vivianite precipitation rate parameter 0,01 g.m-3.d-1
qVivi,DISS Vivianite dissolution rate parameter 0,001 g.m-3.d-1
KSTR,INH,DISS Inhibition coefficient for STR redissolution 0,01 g TSS/m3
KACP,INH,DISS Inhibition coefficient for ACP redissolution 0,01 g TSS/m3
KCaCO3,INH,DISS Inhibition coefficient for CaCO3 redissolution 0,01 g TSS/m3
KVivi,INH,DISS Inhibition coefficient for Vivi redissolution 0,01 g TSS/m3
Table A-10: Parameters for gas transfer
Symbol Name Value Unit
fkLaN2 Nitrogen mass transfer parameter 100 %
fkLaCO2 Carbon dioxide mass transfer parameter 100 %
fkLaCH4 Methane mass transfer parameter 100 %
fkLaH2 Hydrogen mass transfer parameter 100 %
fkLaNH3 Ammonia mass transfer parameter 0 %
fkLaO2 Oxygen mass transfer parameter 100 %
58 Table A-11: Hydrous Ferric Oxides kinetics
Symbol Name Value Unit
qHFOH,AGING Aging coefficient for XHFO,H 450 1/d
qHFOL,AGING Aging coefficient for XHFO,L 0,1 1/d
qP,COPREC Maximum P binding and coprecipitation rate on XHFO,H 360 1/d
qP,BIND Maximum P binding rate on XHFO,L 0,3 1/d
qHFOH,DISS Redissolution rate coefficient - XHFO,H,P 36 1/d
qHFOL,DISS Redissolution rate coefficient - XHFO,L,P 36 1/d
qHFO,RED HFO (ferric) reduction rate 2 1/d
qFe,OX Ferrous oxidation rate 1 1/d
KP,DISS Inhibition coefficient for SPO4 for redissolution 0,03 g P/m3
KP,BIND Half saturation coefficient for SPO4 0,1 g P/m3
Table A-12: Diffusion coefficients - colloidal compounds
Symbol Name Value Unit
DCB Diffusion coefficient of colloidal biodegradable substrate 0.000025 cm2.s-1
DCU Diffusion coefficient of colloidal unbiodegradable organics 0.000025 cm2.s-1
Table A-13: Hydrous Ferric Oxides stoichiometry
Symbol Name Value Unit
ASFH Active site factor for HFOH 1,2 mol P.mol Fe-1
ASFL Active site factor for HFOL 0,6 mol P.mol Fe-1
Table A-14: Common switches
Symbol Name Value Unit
KNHx,BIO,AS NHx half saturation for biomasses 0,005 g N/m3
KPO4,BIO,AS PO4 half saturation for biomasses 0,002 g P/m3
KCO2,BIO,AS CO2 half saturation for autotrophs (except NITO) 4,4 g TIC/m3
ηb,anox Anoxic reduction for decay 0,5
ηb,ana Anaerobic reduction for decay 0,1
ηHYD,anox Anoxic reduction for hydrolysis 0,5
ηHYD,ana Anaerobic reduction for hydrolysis 0,5
mtox,anox Anoxic increasing factor for decay of anaerobs 5
mtox,aer Aerobic increasing factor for decay of anaerobs 10
mtox,ana,max Anaerobic increasing factor for decay of aerobs 10
KCAT,AS Sodium half saturation for synthesis inorganics 0,1 g/m3
KAN,AS Choride half saturation for synthesis inorganics 0,1 g/m3
pHlow pH inhibition - low value 3 pHunit
pHhigh pH inhibition - high value 11 pHunit
Table A-15: Conversion kinetics
Symbol Name Value Unit
qHYD Hydrolysis rate coefficient 2 1/d
qFLOC Flocculation rate coefficient 50 1/d
KFLOC,AS Flocculation half saturation coefficient 0,001 g COD/m3
KHYD,AS Hydrolysis half saturation coefficient 0,05 g COD/m3
qAMMON Ammonification rate coefficient 0,05 1/d
qSPB Phosphate release rate coefficient 0,5 1/d
qXE Endogenous residue conversion rate coefficient 0,007 1/d
qASSIM Assimilative nutrient production rate coefficient 1 1/d
KNHx,ASSIM,AS Assimilative NHx half saturation 0,0005 g N/m3
KNOx,ASSIM,AS Assimilative NO3 half saturation 0,001 g N/m3
KOHO,ASSIM,AS Assimilative OHO half saturation 0,001 g COD/m3
KCO2,ASSIM,AS Assimilative CO2 half saturation 5 g TIC/m3
60 Table A-16: Temperature dependency
Symbol Name Value Unit
θµ,OHO Arrhenius coefficient for OHO growth 1,04
θFERM,OHO Arrhenius coefficient for fermentation (OHO) 1,04
θb,OHO Arrhenius coefficient for OHO decay 1,03
θµ,MEOLO Arrhenius coefficient for MEOLO growth 1,06
θb,MEOLO Arrhenius coefficient for MEOLO decay 1,03
θµ,PAO Arrhenius coefficient for PAO growth 1,04
θµ,PAO,lim Arrhenius coefficient for PAO growth (P limited) 1,04
θq,PAO,PHA Arrhenius coefficient for PHA storage 1,04
θb,PAO Arrhenius coefficient for PAO decay 1,03
θb,PPLO,ana Arrhenius coefficient for anaerobic PP storage 1,03
θµ,NITO Arrhenius coefficient for NITO growth 1,072
θb,NITO Arrhenius coefficient for NITO decay 1,03
θµ,AMETO Arrhenius coefficient for AMETO growth 1,03
θb,AMETO Arrhenius coefficient for AMETO decay 1,03
θµ,HMETO Arrhenius coefficient for HMETO growth 1,03
θb,HMETO Arrhenius coefficient for HMETO decay 1,03
θq,FLOC Arrhenius coefficient for flocculation 1
θq,HYD Arrhenius coefficient for hydrolysis 1
θq,AMMON Arrhenius coefficient for ammonification 1
θq,SPB Arrhenius coefficient for PO4 conversion 1
θq,XE Arrhenius coefficient endogenous residual conversion 1
θq,ASSIM Arrhenius coefficient assimilative kinetics 1
θq,Fe,OX Arrhenius coefficient for ferrous iron oxidation kinetics 1,04
θq,HFO,RED Arrhenius coefficient for ferric iron reduction kinetics 1,04
Tbase Arrhenius base temperature 20 Co