• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

In my analysis and discussion of Baobab School and the foundation phase classrooms, informed by my research, I worked with Walton and Nel’s (2012, p.10) spider’s web analogy

of an inclusive school to act as a lens and heuristic to identify the criteria for the macro and micro levels of the web (refer to Figure 6.2 below).

Figure 6.2: An inclusive school conceived as a spider’s web [Source: Walton & Nel (2012:10)]

As depicted in the inclusion web, I began at the macro level by analysing and discussing the inclusive culture of the school which was at the centre of the web, and then the school’s inclusive policies, the “strengthening zone” of the web. This was followed by analysis and by addressing the macro level criteria in the “radii of the web”, and the organisation and practices to support inclusion at the school, all of which is included in the criteria presented in Table 6.1 below:

Table 6.1: Macro Level: Radii of Web

Radii of Web Evidence Cross

reference

Literature reference 1. Teacher training Interviews – Grade 1

and 2

4.3.2 4.4.2

Prinsloo et al., 2001 Swart et al., 2002 Walton, 2006

Engelbrecht et al., 2007 Schwille et al., 2007 Walton et al., 2009 Landsberg et al., 2011 Geldenhuys et al., 2013 McConnachie, 2013

Pienaar et al., 2013 Donohue et al., 2014 2. SBST (ILST) Interviews – Grade 1

and 2 4.3.3

4.4.3 South Africa. DoE, 2001

Walton, 2006 Walton et al., 2012 Pienaar et al., 2013 Donohue et al., 2014 Okeke et al., 2014 3. Support and

Specialist Personnel

Interviews – Grade 1, 2 and 3

4.3.2 4.4.2 4.5.1

Brice et al., 2000 Engelbrecht et al., 2001 Walton, 2006

Walton et al., 2012 Geldenhuys et al., 2013 Okeke et al., 2014 Engelbrecht et al., 2015 4. Instructional

practices

These will be more fully analysed in the micro level web as seen in Table 6.3 below

5. Assessment Modification 6. Individual Support

7. Accessibility Interviews – emergent factors – extrinsic barriers to learning - inappropriate LoTL

4.6.2

Prinsloo, 2001 Walton, 2006 Walton et al., 2012 Pienaar et al., 2013 Florian, 2014 Okeke et al., 2014

8. Reducing Exclusion and Welcoming Diversity

Overview of the

school 4.2

South Africa. DoE, 2001; Booth et al., 2002 Landsberg et al., 2011 Walton et al., 2012 Nel et al., 2013 Pienaar et al., 2013 Florian, 2014 Okeke et al., 2014 Engelbrecht et al., 2015

I then addressed the “frame of the web” at the macro level, which included links to the school’s community support structures as presented in Table 6.2 below:

Table 6.2: Macro Level: Frame of Web

Frame of Web Evidence Cross

reference

Literature reference

1. NGO’s Overview of the

school.

Classroom

observation – Grade 2, Lesson 3.

Interviews– Grades 1 and 2.

Emergent factors from the interviews.

4.2 5.3.3 4.3.2 4.4.2 4.6.2

Walton et al., 2012 Nel et al., 2013

2. DBST Interviews – Grades 1

and 2.

Emergent factors from the interviews.

4.3.2 4.4.2 4.6.2

South Africa. DoE, 2001

Walton et al., 2012 Geldenhuys et al., 2013 3. Social services Interviews – Grades 1

and 2

4.3.2 4.4.2

Walton et al., 2012 Nel et al., 2013 4. Parents Interviews – Grades 1,

2, and 3.

Emergent factors from the interviews.

4.3.2 4.4.2 4.3.3 4.5.1 4.6.2

Prinsloo, 2110 Swart et al., 2002 Engelbrecht et al., 2007 Landsberg et al., 2011 Walton et al., 2012 Pienaar et al., 2013 Donohue et al., 2014

5. Special Schools - -

6. Other Community Based Support (The university, fee-paying schools)

Interviews - Grades 1 and 2

4.3.2 4.4.2

Walton et al., 2012 Nel et al., 2013

7. Hospitals Interviews - Grades 1

and 2 4.3.2

4.4.2 Walton et al., 2012 Nel et al., 2013

Finally, I addressed the micro level criteria (Table 6.3 below), the teaching and learning strategies, practices, techniques and skills that the foundation phase teachers used in their classrooms to enable an inclusive education for their learners, including the learners experiencing barriers to learning, depicted as the radii in the micro level web (Figure 6.1 above).

Table 6.3: Micro Level: Radii of Web

Practices Evidence Cross

reference

Literature reference 1. Number of learners in the

classroom Emergent factors

from the interviews – extrinsic factors

4.6.2 Swart et al., 2002 Engelbrecht et al., 2007

Landsberg et al., 2011

Geldenhuys et al., 2013

Pienaar et al., 2013 2. Infrastructure and organisation

of the classroom

Overview of the school

Emergent factors from the interviews – extrinsic factors

4.2 4.6.2

Swart et al., 2002 Engelbrecht et al., 2007

Landsberg et al., 2011

Geldenhuys et al., 2013

Pienaar et al., 2013 Makoelle et al., 2016 3. Classroom and learner

resources

Emergent factors from the interviews – extrinsic factors

4.6.2 Swart et al., 2002 Engelbrecht et al., 2007

Landsberg et al., 2011

Geldenhuys et al., 2013

Pienaar et al., 2013 4. Shared sense of responsibility Overview of the

school

4.2 Brice et al., 2000 Engelbrecht et al., 2001

Beattie et al., 2006 Pienaar et al., 2013 Okeke et al., 2014 5. Positive attitude of the teacher Emergent factors

from classroom observations – classroom environment

5.5

Swart et al., 2002 Beattie et al., 2006 Nel et al., 2013 Donohue et al., 2014 6. Supportive classroom

environment

Emergent factors from classroom observations – classroom environment

5.5

Engelbrecht et al., 2001

Pienaar et al., 2013

7. Learners feeling comfortable,

safe and appreciated Emergent factors from classroom observations – classroom environment

5.5 Engelbrecht et al., 2001

Pienaar et al., 2013

8. Routine and structure Emergent factors from classroom observations – classroom environment

5.5

Engelbrecht et al., 2001

Pienaar et al., 2013

9. Positive reinforcement – praise Emergent factors from classroom observations – classroom environment

5.5 Engelbrecht et al., 2001

Pienaar et al., 2013

10. Discipline Emergent factors

from classroom observations – classroom environment

5.5

Engelbrecht et al., 2001

Pienaar et al., 2013

11. Planning, organisation and presentation of lessons (flexible implementation of the

curriculum, reviewing previous lesson, short and clear

instructions, repetition, use of a variety of examples, modelling think-aloud techniques)

Emergent factors from classroom

observations 5.5

Beattie et al., 2006 Pienaar et al., 2013 Okeke et al., 2014

12. Encouraging diverse learning styles

Emergent factors from classroom observations – accommodating different learning styles

5.5

Nel et al., 2013 Pienaar et al., 2013

13. Engaging learners – active involvement of learners

Emergent factors from classroom observations – active involvement of learners

5.5

Pienaar et al., 2013

14. Importance of reading Emergent factors from classroom observations – working in pairs and groups.

Interview with Grade 2 teacher – extrinsic factors – inflexible curriculum – reading.

Interviews – emergent factors – extrinsic factors.

5.5

4.4.2

4.6.2

Slavin, 2009