1. Introduction
5.6 Future Work
This investigation dealt with plastic failure of straight, non-composite, symmetrical cellular beams. There is scope for further work investigating the behaviour of cellular beams which are curved, composite or asymmetric.
CHAPTER 6 REFERENCES
1. Trinchero, Paolo E. Serviceability Limit States of Composite Beams, MSc Thesis, University of the Witwatersrand, Appendix A, pp A.6 - A.7, 1993
2. Neubert, H.K.P., Strain gauges, Kinds and Uses, Macmillan, London, 1967.
3. Window, A.L. and Holister, G.S., Strain Gauge Technology, Applied Science publishers, London, 1982.
4. Redwood, RG and McCutcheon, JO Beam Tests with Unreinforced Web Openings. Journal of the Structural Division, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, January 1968, pp 1-17.
5. Nethercot, DA and Kerdal, D Lateral-torsional Buckling of Castellated Beams.
The Structural Engineer, Volume 60B, No 3, September 1982, pp53-61.
6. Maalek, S and Burdekin, FM Weld Quality Requirements for Castellated Beams.
The Structural Engineer, Volume 69, No 13,2 July 1991, pp243-254.
7. Hosain, MU and Speirs, WG Experiments on Castellated Steel Beams. Welding Research Supplement, August 1973, pp329-342.
8. Okubo, T and Nethercot, DA Web post strength in castellated steel beams.
Procedures of the Institute of Civil Engineers, Part 2, 1985,79, September,pp533- 557.
9. Westok. Cellular Beams. Information and beam section properties brochure, January 1993
10. Ward, JK. Design of Composite and Non-Composite Cellular Beams. SCI publication 100. The Steel Construction Institute, 1990.
11. Dougherty, B K. Castellated Beams: A state of the art report. South African Institute of Civil Engineers Journal, Second Quarter 1993, pp 12-20.
12. Redwood, RG Design of beams with web holes. Canadian Steel Industries Construction Council, Ontario, Canada, 1973.
13. Dougherty, BK. Ultimate load tests on beams with rectangular web openings.
Struct Engr, Vo158, No 3, Sept 1980.
14. Westok. Cellular Beams. Information and beam section properties brochure, July 1997
15. Ravinger, J and Lascekova, P. Experimental Verification of Thin-walled Girders with Circular Holes. Journal o/Constructional Steel Research 0143-974 X, 1989, pp301-316
At - Laboratory Tests
CHAPTER 7 APPENDICES
Detailed drawings of the test beams.
8-0-0-0 0
; I1, _Smm PLATE STIFFENER
BEAM 1A
Bmm PLATE STIFFENER
203 x 133 x 25 US
T
Smm PL~~E STIFFENER
ttOQ-O-O-O- OlOD-O - OO o j ,o 00- 00 Oll
-6mm PLATE STIFFENER
6mm PLATE STIFFENER
203 x 133 x 25 US
BEAM 1B
6rnm PLATE STIFFENER
Smm PLATE S~IFFENER
, 300
[t OOO 0 oc)[)- oo o 0 0
1 16mm PLATE STIFFENER
uO
! 3uu . .:.:
6mm PLATE STIFFENER
BEAM 2A
203 x 133 x 25 UB -
'_00 _ _ - - - -
jOO ---.---'~ ro
6mm PLATE STIFFENER
[fooo 00
;otOooo-o 0[0 0 00 0011
6mm PLATE STIFFENER
203 x 133 x 25 UB - - - 6mm PLATE STIFFENER
BEAM 2B
6mm PLATE
STIFFENER 6mm PLATE -
STIFFENER
If. 0
\
'- -Bmm PLATE \ STIFFENER
- 305 x 102 x 25 US
100
' - -Bmm PLATE STIFFENER
1-125
Bmm PLATE- - STIFFENER
lOOOoJJ
10mm PLATE STIFFENER
BEAM 3A
t
6~'5
Bmm PLATE STIFFENER
"" I C=_'--.,..-__
Bmm PLATE - -~
STIFFENER
BEAM 3B
305 x 102 x 25 US
~I-
Bmm PLATE - STIFFENER
J
...
o 00
1 toO oooooooo~ooooooooo II
8mm PLATE
~
6mm PLATE STIFFENER 6mm PLATE
STIFFENER .~ 305 x 102 x 25 UB STIFFENER
BEAM 4A
w..&.-_ _ _ _ P'
IIOD,,-I ---""",-0 _+---=---,---'-'''-_ -'=----I-~~ - '
-- 000000 000000 000000 /
L a " " , PLATE
~
,102,25U~a""'PLATE
LammPLATE BmmPlATE~ STIFFEI'£RSTlFFEr€R 305 STIFFENER STIFFEflER
BEAM 4B
Key
'" Strain gauge rosette
Ci>
Dial gauge- Three straight strain gauges
...-
...- o
Beam IB
Beam 2B
Beam 3A
Beam 3B
Beam 4B
-
,
Beams with m idpo in t lo a ding p
o 0-0 ( )0
,11OOOOC
Lateral support/
BEAM 1A
p
,v
D -
1 \
OO- OOC D-O OO()OOO -
BEAM 2A
I-
I'
>-
...
Vl
\0 tJoddns IOJ8 tO
l
--
if
-
~ 0 0 0
I ,0 - ODe 1 - - --
d
Beams with th irdpoint load ing
P
P/2 P/2
Lateral support
BEAM 1B
P
P/2 P/2
00 0000 - 0 - 0 0
BEAM 2B
0 0 0
...
...
-.J
00 -
P/2 P/2
- 0 - 0 00
' - - - Lateral support
BEAM 3B
000
Diagram (a)
oc)o
Diagram (b)
BEAM 4B
...
...
00
Appendix A2 - Ultimate load behaviour
Stress strain curves used for FEA material properties I
steel stress vs strain curves are plotted for SF and SP in Figs.A.3 & A.4.
350
300
250 ...
&'200
-
~ III III~ 150
III
100
50
0 0
(1600;310)
~~g;;;;;;;;-"!!' ..
__~_:":":
__~_!"!:"-
_:;_;:; __ ;:;;_;; __ ;: __;;_~
__ ;:;;_:;_ -;::::::::===("(1;9400;350)..
, I
,
2,000 6,000 10,000
mlcrostraln
--. SP flange
- SF flange
- simplified curve for FEA
14,000 18,000
FIG.A.3. - stress vs strain of flange, specimen SF & SP 350 ,,-===--a:;-,;.;--;.:,-;,;--_--iioii-,;,;--;;,;!,;;,!!-~!!I!!e!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!~~==~~:!!:!' (19500;340)
300 (1700;330)
-
Cl '1.200 250-
~ III In~ 150
-
III100
50
--. SP web - SF web
- simplified curve for FEA
O~---r---r---.---r--~--~--~--~--~~~
o
2,000 6,000 10,000mlcrostraln
14,000 18,000
FIG.A.4. - Stress vs strain of web, specimen SF & SP
Beam lA
N o
--
N N
Beam 2B
Beam3B
Beam4B
Graphical comparisons between theoretical and experimental stresses
Beam lA
250
ro
2000...
~ 150
l:l
100(j) ~ 50
o
Comparison with FEA
Beam 1 A - web post stresses
v
~ ~
v ....
L."...o
V
i--'""~
V
V--
V-~
o
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Load (kN)- -FEA - -Experimental
Comparison with FEA
Beam 1 A - opening centre stresses 400
l.
300~
';; 200
IJ)
~ 100
(J)
o
v
V. /
-
v.:: ~ v ...
h.::: ~
V V
Vo -
20 40 60 80 100 120 140Load (kN)
- -FEA - -Experimental
400
;f
300 :2 ~ 200Cl)
~ 100
Cl)
o
Comparison with FEA
Beam 1 A - opening side stresses
li
r--
~ ~-
I -
-
!--l -f.---
/"""
o
20 40 60 80 100 120 140Load (kN)
400
..--...
~
300
~
-200
Cl)Cl)
~ 100
Cl)
o
--FEA - - Experimental
Comparison with FEA
Beam 1 A - flange stresses ....,- -
v ...
/ ...-../" ~ ~
;:::::-.
~ ~ po-
,.Pr'"
:e
~~ ~
-
~ !-cI. -
...
o 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Load (kN)
--- 10 FEA -- 11 FEA -- 12 FEA
--- 10 Exp --- 11 Exp -- 12 Exp
Beam IB
400
~
300:2 -;;; 200
I/)
~ 100
Cl)
o
500
ro
400CL
e-
300~ 200
(l)
.!:J 100
Cl)
o
Comparison with FEA
Beam 1 B - web post stresses
v - v
~ ~
... ~ :::---
-
f-'-
f-'--
~o
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Load (kN)---FEA ---Experimental
Comparison with FEA
Beam 1 B - load opening stresses
/
1/ -~
..,.
~
~ :.-- .-"
-
.--f-""
o
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Load (kN)---FEA ---Experimental
Comparison with FEA
Beam 1 B - centre opening stresses
400
~
300~
-;;; 200
I/)
~ 100
Cl)
o
.-...-... /
v
....
:,...-...
... ....
~~ i-""'"
o
20 40 60 80 100 120 140Load (kN)
-
400~ 300
~
-- 200
en~
en100
Cl)
o
- -FEA ... Experimental
Comparison with FEA
Beam 1 B - flange stresses
"j
~ - - ' " ~
~ ~
~ ~
...
~- i--'
.-
~-
/"" r-JO
o 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Load (kN)
-- 10 FEA -- 11 FEA -- 12 FEA
-&- 10 Exp
- 9 -11 Exp --- 12 Exp
Beam 2A
Comparisons with FEA
Beam 2A - Web post stress
300
ro
a... 200
~ ' - "
f/)
:3
100...
W o
400
~
300~ --;; 200
f/)
~ 100
Cl)
o
... ~ ,,-/
V
...
~~
-
~
i,....--" ~
-- v
o
20 40 60 80 100 120 140Load (kN)
- -FEA --- Experimental
Comparison with FEA
Beam 2A - Flange stresses
V
, /
V ...-I--""
/ ~
~
---
~ ~
~ I-'
--
/ '/ " ~
o
20 40 60 80 100 120 140Load (kN)
- -FEA - -Experimental
Beam 2B
300
ro
250~ 200 -;; 150
:fl
100U5
'- 50o
500
ro
400Il...
e.
300::l
200Q)
!:; 100
Cl)
o
Comparison with FEA
Beam 2B - web post stresses
--
I-:: :;:..-
f-~
:::::
V--- ----
v ----
V--
...
o
20 40 60 80 100 120 140Load (kN)
- -FEA --- Experimental
Comparison with FEA
Beam 2B - load opening stresses
o
L V
V --
~ ~.;? v~
"""
v .---
.-V ---
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Load (kN)
- -FEA ---Experimental
Comparison with FEA
Beam 2B - centre opening stresses
400
;f
300~
:;; 200
If)
~ 100
Cl)
o
-400
co
a..300
~
';200
en ~100--
(J)
0
... ...- . / .&~
,
~ ~ /'",/ ' "
.-/ '
o
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Load (kN)- -FEA - - Experimental
Comparison with FEA
Beam 2B - flange stresses
L_
~
~."""
~ ~ P"'"
~
--- --- -
---
..
~o 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Load (kN)~ 10FE~ 11 FE~ 12FEA -e-
10 Exp -- 11 Exp- - 12 Exp
Beam3A
250
ro
200a.. ~ 150
::l
100U5
~ 50o
ro
600 500~ 400 ';; 300 :G 200
...
U5
100o
Comparison with FEA
Beam 3A - web post stresses
~ .--"
....- -
....-
,...-~
---
~ r-
--
f-
o
25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 Load (kN)-.-FEA - -Experimental
Comparison with FEA
Beam 3A - opening centre stresses
...
...:::
...
- -
...
~---
o
25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 Load (kN)-.-FEA - -Experimental
400
~300
~
-;;; 200
If)
~ 100
Cl)
o
Comparison with FEA
Beam 3A - opening side stresses
I
V
-
,..-v
d'... ..-
~ I - I -
--
o
25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200500 --400
coa..
~300
-- ~ 200
Q) ...
...
Cl)
100
o
Load (kN)
--FEA --Experimental
Comparison with FEA
Beam 3A - flange stresses
/
V
I
. / ~
I L.
~.... ,
---
~..,.
~~ ~
....-" ~
f--"
o 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200
Load (kN)- -10 FEA - -11 FEA - - 12 FEA - - 10 Exp - - 11 Exp -e- 12 Exp
Beam3B
250
ro
200a.. ~ 150
~ 100
en
~ 50o
Comparison with FEA
Beam 3B - web post stresses
~
lA'
~
~
~
~ V
!p"
v
/ ' , /
o
50 100 150 200Load (kN)
~FEA ..-Experimental
Comparison with FEA
Beam 3B - opening centre stresses
400
~300
~
';; 200
Cl)
~ 100
Cl)
o o ----
...-"
...
....-.;;::'
v ...
./~
.~
..-v
50 100 150 200
Load (kN)
~ FEA - -Experimental 250
250
m
250 300~ 200 ';; 150
~ 100
(7)
50o
400
~
300 :2 ';; 200Cl)
~ 100
U)
o
Comparison with FEA
Beam 3B - opening side stresses
/
--
/...
..--
... ~
...
...
o
50 100 150 200Load (kN)
---FEA - - Experimental
Comparison with FEA
Beam 3B - flange stresses
~
,,/'
~
V
----
.-::
::::::---
---
f-'--
,....-o
50 100 150 200Load (kN)
---FEA - -Experimental
250
250
Beam4A
200
~
150~
-;; 100
If)
~ 50
U5 o
500
ro
400a..
e-
300~ 200
Q)
.!:; 100
Cl)
o
Comparison with FEA
Beam 4A - web post stresses
v
~"
v
--:/
~ /"'"
,./
/~
/ '
o
20 40 60 80 100 120Load (kN)
~ FEA --Experimental
Comparison with FEA
Beam 4A - opening centre stresses
/ ~
1/ ,/
/ , , /
/'"
-
~
~ , , /
o
20 40 60 80 100 120Load (kN)
~FEA --Experimental
500
m
400a.. ~300
~ 200
Q)
~ 100
Cl)
o
Comparison with FEA
Beam 4A - opening side stresses
7
/ ~
/
~ !'--
~ V l.--- l.---
--
I--~
o
20 40 60 80 100 120500
rn- 400
CL ~
300
' - "
~
200
~
Ci5 100
o
Load (kN)
---FEA - -Experimental
Comparison with FEA
Beam 4A - flange stresses
'" ~
~
...
~ ::.,....-
~ /
~
~
.J' ~
~
. /
..-'
~
o 20 40 60 80 100 120
Load (kN)
-- 10 FEA --- 11 FEA -- 12 FEA
--e- 10 Exp -- 11 Exp -- 12 Exp
Beam 4B
300
ro
250~ 200 ';; 150
~ 100
~ 50
o
500
ro
4000...
~300
~ 200
Q)
.!:; 100
Cl)
o
Comparison with FEA
Beam 4B - web post stresses ,.,.
...
..
I-:::
? '
...
...
o
~ ~ W 00 100 1~ 1~ 1WLoad (kN)
- -FEA -M-Experimental
Comparison with FEA
Beam 4B -load opening stresses
o
~
,-
~ ...
'f'IY I--"
V ...-
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Load (kN)
- -FEA -M-Experimental
Comparison with FEA
Beam 4B - centre opening stresses 500
co
400CL
5
300~ 200
<l.l
.!:; 100
Cl)
o -- - -
...
....
~
~ p- I.---""
o
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160- m 300 400
0.. ~
'-"200
(/)(/)
~ 100
Cl)
o
Load (kN)
---FEA - - Experimental
Comparison with FEA
Beam 4B - flange stresses
/~ ~
-"~ IY
~ ~
~
"""
v
~
...
- ...
-
.,...
o 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Load (kN)-- 10 FEA -- 11 FEA -- 12 FEA
-&- 10 Exp -- 11 Exp -- 12 Exp
Appendix A3 - Deflections
Graphical comparisons between theoretical and experimental results
Steel Construction Institute method
... 16
~
12§ 8
:.;::;
()
~
4
ID
o 0
...
50 E
40~30
E
U o
20ID
'Q) 10
o 0
Comparison with SCI
Beam 1 A - vertical deflections
/
V
/ ~ L---
- v--- -~
p-
---:
~ ~::..-
~...:::::
~ ~ ~~
...
f.--
--
o
20 40 60 80 100 120o
Load (kN)
---V1 Exp ... V2 Exp-+- V3 Exp
-a- V1 SCI-9- V2 SCI-&-V3 SCI
Comparison with SCI
Beam 1 B - vertical deflections
~
~
~ p
~
~V
I--~~
v ---
~
~t:--
I-- ~~ ~ ~ ~ -~ F::;... I----"
20 40 60 80 100 120
Load (kN)
---V1 Exp ... V2 Exp-+- V3 Exp
-a-V1 SCI-9- V2 SCI-&- V3 SCI
..-
25
E 20 E --; 15
U
o 10;;:::: 5
(]) (])o 0
50
..-
E 40
--
E c:: en30
+::
o
20<.>
(])
ID
10o o
o
o
Comparison with SCI
Beam 2A - vertical deflections
~
-
~ ./
v---
.-:;::; !of""v ____
~ ~
~ ~ f--"_ ~
..
~ ~ I-" ....-I ~
-~
-
20 40 60 80 100 120
Load (kN)
---V 1 Exp --.-V2 Exp -+- V3 Exp
-a-V1 SCI-'i'-V2 SCI -&--V3 SCI
Comparison with SCI
Beam 2B - vertical deflections
V
l-::::::: ~
....,~ ~ I--"
~ ~~ ,::::;-
~ ~ ...
~
.::;:::;;- - ....--
~ F"""
-
/
~
..-
20 40 60 80 100 120
Load (kN)
---V1 Exp--.-V2 Exp-+-V3 Exp
-a- V1 SCI-'i'-V2 SCI --e--V3 SCI
---
20~
15...
§
10U
~5
ID
o 0
--- ~
20... 15
§
10:.;::;
(,)
~ 5
o
Q)o
Comparison with SCI
Beam 3A - vertical deflections
/ •
~
Z
....
~- v
~...-
~ ~ ~ f...--f-" ~:! -
~ ~...
:::::::::o
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Load (kN)---V1 Exp ... V2 Exp ... V3 Exp
-i3-V1 SCI-9-V2 SCI-&- V3 SCI
Comparison with SCI
Beam 3B - vertical deflections
...:
...-~
~ ~..--:: ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~
....
o
50 100 150 200Load (kN)
---V1 Exp ... V2 Exp ... V3 Exp
-i3-V1 SCI -9-V2 SCI-&-V3 SCI
50 ...-E 40 '-"'30 E c:
U o
20ID
'$
10o o
50 E40 '-"'30
E
cU o
20ID
'$
10o o
Comparison with SCI
Beam 4A - vertical deflections
...:::"
~ ...
...
~- ,.
,;"'"
-
~~ i-""'" ,,;r'
...- ..
~---- --:....
-*"f.::::: I---'"
o -
10 20 30 40 50 60 70Load (kN)
~ V1 Exp ... V2 Exp ~ V3 Exp
-er V1
sel
-9- V2sel
~ V3sel
Comparison with SCI
Beam 4B - vertical deflections
~ ~ , . /
/ . ~ le::?
~ ;:::;---...,.-:: ~
~ ~
v
~ ~
...
::S~~
....
---
P'"~ ~
- -- ---
.-
V
-
o
20 40 60 80 100 120Load (kN)
---V1 Exp ... V2 Exp ~ V3 Exp
-er V1 SCI-9-V2 SCI ~ V3 SCI
Simplified SeI method
Comparison with simplified SCI
Beam 1 A - vertical deflections
. -16
E
E 12--
rJ) c8
:;::; o
~ 4
c;:::::
o
Q)0
o
.".
. /
~ . / ~ ~ i::::=
-
~ ~ ~ l -V --
~-
I--!---...-::: ~ ~ :'---1-
--
20 40 60 80 100 120
Load (kN)
---V 1 Exp -.-V2 Exp ---V3 Exp
~ V1
sel s
-'0'-V2sel s
-e-V3sel s
Comparison with simplified SCI
Beam 1 B - vertical deflections
. -
50 E
40~30
E
U o
20Q)
'W
10o 0
o
v
~ t7
~ ~ I---
~.~ ~
...-J;:; ~ ~
~ ~
. -.-.
~~ ~ ...:: j;iiIP"
20 40 60 80 100 120
Load (kN)
---V 1 Exp -.-V2 Exp ---V3 Exp
~ V1
sel s
- 9 -V2sel s
-e-V3sel s
Comparison with simplified SCI
Beam 2A - vertical deflections
- 25
L/ 'IF
---
-"I,....e' ~
-
V l---" L..--F~ :::;",.... ~-~ __ r-
--
I.-~ ~
E 20
~ E 15
U o
10CL>
'Q)
5
o 0
o
20 40 60 80 100 120Load (kN)
---V1 Exp ~ V2 Exp ~ V3 Exp -e-V1
sel s
-Si'-V2sel s
-e-V3sel s
Comparison with simplified SCI
Beam 2B - vertical deflections
..-
50 E
40~30 E
U o
20CL>
~ 10
o o o
/ ' l / : :,/
--
~ :~-
...-::::: ~ ~
~ t;:::;:::::~
~ ~ ~ - --'
""""
~ ~
..." ~
20 40 60 80 100 120
Load (kN)
---V1 Exp ~ V2 Exp ~ V3 Exp -e-V1
sel s
-Si'-V2sel s
-e-V3sel s
Comparison with simplified SCI
Beam 3A - vertical deflections
20
...-...
E 15
- E §
10:;:;
<..>
~ 5
o
Q)o
7
•V-
?--~
~ ~.-
~ I#"" ~ ~ I.---r:.---
~
k
.-::; I-" I-" I,...r-
I--...
V---
~ P-o
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Load (kN)---V1 Exp -.- V2 Exp ....-V3 Exp
-e- V1
sel s
- 9 -V2sel s
--e-V3sel s
Comparison with simplified SCI
Beam 3B - vertical deflections
...-... 25
E
20 -15E
c:g
o 10Q)
'ID
5
o o o
v -
~ '7'
---
II" ~ L--.-:::;::. ~~ ~
~ ~
~ ;,.,.--.-'f'
~
"""""""
50 100 150 200
Load (kN)
---V1 Exp -.- V2 Exp ....-V3 Exp
-e-V1
sel s
- 9 -V2sel s
--e-V3sel s
Comparison with simplified SCI
Beam 4A - vertical deflections
... 50 E 40 -30 E c
:g o
20ID
'(j) 10
o o
.-
. , /
... ..
v..
~~ W" ... f*' ~ I--' W
~ pr .-1--'"" ~
~ 1-""...-I--" ~
. L ~ -:; .->
-
I--~ ~ ~ -~
~
~
~o
10 20 30 40 50 60 70Load (kN)
~ V1 Exp -.-V2 Exp ~ V3 Exp
-e-V1
sel s
-'i'-V2sel s
~ V3sel s
Comparison with simplified SCI
Beam 4B - vertical deflections
60 ...
E
-S40c
o
:.;::::;
~ 20
c;:::::
o
IDo o
--
--- ~
~
~ ~
?V
~~ ~ t:::-
I.-- I ---- -
~ ~
::..--~
...& ~
20 40 60 80 100 120
Load (kN)
~ V1 Exp -.-V2 Exp ~ V3 Exp
-e-V1
sel s
-'i'-V2sel s
~ V3sel s
Vierendeel method
Comparison with Vierendeel method Beam 1 A - vertical deflections
16
,.-...
~ 12
- §
8:.;:;
()
ID
to=:
4
o
IDo o
.,It
.--- ./'
/ ~
--
~v
- V
~ ~ ~-
I-~ ~ ~
- --
~ e-~ ~ ~
- ...
20 40 60 80 100 120
Load (kN)
--- V1 Exp -.- V2 Exp --- V3 Exp
--a--
V1
vier - 9 -V2
vier ~V3
vierComparison with Vierendeel method Beam 1 B - vertical deflections
50
,.-...
E
40 -30 E
cU o 20
ID
Q)
10 o o
o
/
.?
7...-
~~ ~...-:
::::..-
~ ~ v
.6" ~
-
.----
...:::
:::;..-...: ~
20 40 60 80 100 120
Load (kN)
--- V1 Exp -.- V2 Exp --- V3 Exp
--a--
V1
vier - 9 -V2
vier ~V3
vierComparison with Vierendeel method Beam 2A - vertical deflections
- E 25 20 -15 E
cU
o10
Q)
'ID 5
o o
o
/
"
V ...£ ,....
....--:
f--:::::; ...~
---- - --
~ :::::::--.-...-
r::::- - ---
...r:. ~
---- ....
-
::;::;.-20 40 60 80 100 120
Load (kN)
--- V1 Exp --.- V2 Exp ...- V3 Exp
-e-
V1
vier ~V2
vier ~V3
vierComparison with Vierendeel method Beam 2B - vertical deflections
50 E40 E -30
cU o 20
Q)
'ID 10
o o
/
/..
~~
r -
... ...-:: ~
/ ... ~
-
~
....-
~ :.--
-""~ ::::--
-- -
o 20 40 60 80 100 120
Load (kN)
--- V1 Exp --.- V2 Exp ...- V3 Exp
-e-
V1
vier ~V2
vier ~V3
vierComparison with vierendeel method Beam 3A - vertical deflections
20 ....-.
E 15 ...
E
o
j
•~
z
~
--:::::
~ ~.... -
.---.
~ ~ ~--- - ,,;-
..AI: ~
:::::::;
::::::::::: ~ ~... -- -
~ ~ ~ :;..-
o
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Load (kN)---V 1 Exp ---.-V2 Exp ---V3 Exp
-e-V1 vier --9-V2 vier -&-V3 vier
Comparison with Vierendeel method Beam 3B - vertical deflections
....-. 20
~
15§
10:;:.
Q) u
tt=
5
o
Q)o
~o
~
~ ~
~
50
"..::::::
~ ~
~
100 Load (kN)
...-:
...-: ~
V-
~ ~...
~
~
150
---V1 Exp ---.-V2 Exp ---V3 Exp
-e-V1 vier --9-V2 vier -&-V3 vier
200
Comparison with Vierendeel method Beam 4A - vertical deflections
-- E 40 50 -30 E
cU o 20
ID
'Q)
10
Cl
o
..-:::::~
~ r---
...-: ~
~ -"" ~~
~ ~ I,..-r I""'"
",..
Jlf--"
..,
.... .JP'"'---
.-::::: r....-
~
o 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Load (kN)
--- V 1
Exp --..-V2
Exp.-.-V3
Exp.
-e-
V1
vier -'9'--V2
vier -e-V3
vierComparison with Vierendeel method Beam 4B - vertical deflections
-- E 40 50 -30 E
cU
o20
ID
'Q)
10
Cl
o o
/
...
~ .-
-
~ ~
,.&:11 ~ ~
""
~ ~~ ~
....
~ i""""--
~ ~
- -
!---"20 40 60 80 100 120
Load (kN)
--- V1
Exp--..-V2
Exp.-.-V3
Exp-e-
V1
vier -'9'--V2
vier -e-V3
vierFinite Element Analysis method
...-..
20
~
15' - '
§ 10
U
~5
Q)
o 0
60
..--.
E 540
c
o
:;:;
~
20
tt= Q)
o o
Comparison with FEA
Beam 1 A - vertical deflections
, , /
v
./" l--
/
~
e---;::::. ::...--
,../'~ ~
I--k-::: :..--
-- --
1 I
::::::::
,...-f-;::: ::.---- ... V
f::::::: -
~
o 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Load (kN)
-- V1 FEA-- V2 FEA-- V3 FEA
-e-
V1 Exp -- V2 Exp -- V3 Exp
Comparison with FEA
Beam 1 B - vertical deflections V
./(f
1
. /
~
~/'" I
~
~ ~ v I
:::::::..;; ,.... b,...R
-
--'~
~ ~ ~
~
o 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
Load (kN)
-- V1 FEA-- V2 FEA-- V3 FEA
-e-
V1 Exp -- V2 Exp -- V3 Exp
--
E 30 -S20c o
:.;::::;
~ 10
;:;::::
o
Q)o
..-60
E
-S40c
o
:.;::::;
~ 20
;:;::::
Q)
o 0
Comparison with FEA
Beam 2A - vertical deflections ) 1 1
/ ,
/ '
~ v / /
~
~
~- ~ ---
~
~ ~-
~v
~
--- -
~~
o
20 40 60 80 100 120 140Load (kN)
- -V1 FEA---- V2 FEA- -V3 FEA ---V1 Exp ---.-V2 Exp - -V3 Exp
Comparison with FEA
Beam 2B - vertical deflections
v
~~
~
~ /...- ..:::;:
~ ~---
k:::::::: ~
--
...,
-
~-
f--f-'e")/
'}
l-.I
o
20 40 60 80 100 120 140Load (kN)
---V1 FEA---.-V2 FEA- -V3 FEA - - V1 Exp ----V2 Exp - -V3 Exp
20
-
E 15E c:: o 10
:;:;
U '+= ID
ID 5
o
o
-30 E E :::- 20
c<1>
E ~
10 co
Q.
o
(1)0
Comparison with FEA
Beam 3A - vertical deflections
1 I / I 1 ,
/ ' ~
'j I 1
v
~ 10'"~
. /
~
~~
I...-/ V
. / '
~ ~ V - --- ....
1--' ... I---'~ ~
f-"" ~ ~...-: r:;r
~
~ v
o
25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200o
Load (kN)
- -2 FEA ~ 3 FEA - -4 FEA -e- 2 Exp __ 3 Exp --- 4 Exp
Comparison with FEA
Beam 3B - vertical deflections
...
I 1 L.I/ /
~
~ 1-/--
~~ ~ i-'" .... 11'
~ p -
50 100 150 200
Load (kN)
-- V1
FEA~V2 FEA-- V3 FEA
-e-
V1 Exp -- V2 Exp --- V3 Exp
- E 150 E 100
...
c
o
:;::::;
~ 50
;;::
o
ID.-.50 E E 40
...
C 30
ID
~ 20
u ro
10
Q.
f/)
i:5
0
o
o
Comparison with FEA
Beam 4A - vertical deflections
/ I f /
!
I~ !
/ /
/~ I
-- ~ r: --- ---
~/
~
k::::::::
r:::-- -
~
o 20 40 60 80 100 120
Load (kN)
-- V1 FEA -- V2 FEA-- V3 FEA
-e-
V1 Exp -- V2 Exp -- V3 Exp
Comparison with FEA
Beam 4B - vertical deflections
",-
~ V I b::? ./" IT I
./.~ ~ I
~...,: ~ l"
, / . / p--
-
~~ .-/' ~ ~
-"/ ~
,..-
h ~
- --
~ ~
20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
Load (kN)-- V1 FEA-- V2 FEA-- V3 FEA
-e-