Chapter 6: Effects of some botanicals on growth and phytochemistry of nematode-infected
6.3. Results
157
158
2.5 mgmL-1 and 10 g/pot treatments over control plants. All growth parameters were significantly increased in nematode-infected plants that were treated with C. maxima (T8) when compared with nematode-infected control plants (Table 6.1).
159
Table 6.1. Effects of application of different botanicals on growth of Pelargonium sidoides 56-days after nematode application.
Treatments Plant species No. of leaves Leaf area
(cm2) Shoot length
(cm) Fresh root
weight (g) Fresh shoot
weight (g) Dry root
weight (g) Dry shoot weight (g) 10 g T1 104±4.01a 49.14±0.78e-i 32.43±0.57b-d 12.39±0.49h-j 89.42±2.52a 2.86±0.18c 12.54±0.29a
T2 34±0.27i-m 57.75±0.57b-f 24.33±1.37g-k 13.78±0.84g-j 34.99±2.69e-i 3.18±0.26g-i 4.96±0.85f-i T3 43±2.13d-h 68.66±1.37b-d 33.33±1.02bc 16.29±4.15d-i 39.66±1.93d-g 3.76±0.33d-i 6.01±0.19d-g T4 60±7.31b 49.60±1.02e-i 29.53±0.79c-f 15.04±2.38f-j 42.09±2.99de 3.47±0.11e-i 6.56±0.13d T5 42±1.25e-i 55.32±0.79c-f 21.50±0.29jk 22.98±2.09b-d 39.62±1.07d-h 5.30±0.11a-d 4.69±0.39g-j T6 33±0.94j-m 41.94±0.29f-j 30.17±1.03c-e 13.66±3.27g-j 27.38±5.08i-k 3.15±0.47g-i 5.35±0.18d-h T7 40±0.72f-j 71.28±1.03a-c 38.13±0.33a 30.04±3.35a 54.95±1.28bc 6.93±0.54a 8.44±0.56c T8 49±4.97c-e 86.62±0.33a 33.47±0.35bc 15.20±0.99e-j 54.57±2.23bc 3.51±0.71e-i 8.97±0.34bc 5.0 mgmL-1 T1 35.00±2.83h-m 49.67±3.93e-i 22.43±0.42i-k 18.53±0.97c-h 34.99±3.24e-i 4.28±0.22c-h 5.73±0.23d-h
T2 38.00±3.30g-l 38.90±4.66g-j 25.73±1.43f-i 20.64±3.17b-g 39.36±1.71d-h 4.76±0.73b-g 4.92±0.35f-i T3 36.00±0.94h-m 48.39±1.82f-i 22.23±0.43i-k 30.20±3.93a 41.98d±2.03e 6.97±0.50a 5.37±0.91d-h T4 38.00±0.94g-l 35.29±1.59h-k 23.33±±0.97h-k 11.03±0.78ij 30.87±0.50h-j 2.54±0.09i 3.76±0.18ij T5 28.67±3.07m 42.28±4.22f-t 26.63±0.57e-h 14.80±1.93f-j 36.41±4.51d-h 3.42±0.11e-i 4.91±0.45f-i T6 42.00 ±1.41e-i 48.42±1.25f-i 21.37±1.51j-l 22.11±0.76b-e 38.41±1.52d-h 5.10±0.26b-e 4.82±0.18g-i T7 48.67±3.54c-e 34.88±0.85i-k 21.87±1.48i-k 14.35±2.35f-j 40.82±3.78d-f 3.54±0.54e-i 5.08±0.73e-i T8 52.00±1.70bc 47.81±4.04f-i 31.90±0.38cd 21.38±2.57b-f 42.06±2.3de 4.93±0.59b-f 6.21±0.59d-f 2.5 mgmL-1 T1 45.67±2.13c-g 51.48±4.32e-h 33.27±0.43bc 25.47±0.78a-c 53.72±2.05c 5.87±0.18a-c 8.41±0.29c
T2 48.00±1.41c-f 65.13±5.22b-e 36.27±3.04ab 26.97±1.12ab 62.87±4.43b 6.23±0.26ab 9.84±0.85b T3 35.00±3.30h-m 51.38±0.77e-h 27.43±0.63e-g 11.82±1.42h-j 35.39±3.06e-i 2.73±0.33hi 6.42±0.19d-e T4 46.67±1.66c-g 35.55±2.06h-k 24.73±0.93g-k 12.23±0.47h-j 42.80±1.39de 2.82±0.11hi 5.84±0.13d-g T5 51.00±3.29b-d 42.62±0.37f-j 24.43±2.30g-k 21.38±0.48b-f 46.27±4.36cd 4.93±0.11b-f 6.33±0.39de T6 29.67±0.72lm 72.67±3.07ab 23.97±0.79g-k 12.45±2.03h-j 31.30±1.05g-j 2.88±0.47hi 4.42±0.18h-j T7 39.67±1.19f-j 47.12±8.24f-i 23.63±0.1.63g-k 14.04±2.5g-j 33.16±0.98f-i 3.24±0.54f-i 5.51±56d-h T8 30.00±2.16j-m 54.91±4.02d-g 29.07±1.06d-e 19.90±3.08c-g 34.061.85e-i 4.59±0.71b-g 5.49±0.34d-h Control N 19.00±1.24n 21.90±2.09k 17.47±0.59l 8.84±1.08j 19.15±1.15k 2.78±0.21hi 1.28±0.15k Control UNI 38.67±1.91g-k 29.94±3.57jk 20.63±0.78kl 16.70±1.43d-i 23.96±1.47jk 3.85±0.33d-i 3.32±0.27ij Columns represent mean ±standard error, n = 5. Different letter(s) indicate significant differences (p<0.05) between treatments as separated by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. T1 = P. sidoides, T2 = P. africana, T3 = S. aculeastrum, T4 = V. colorata, T5 = S. lancea, T6 = M. plumbea, T7 = C. sylvaticus, T8 = C. maxima, N = nematode-infested control (Untreated control) and UNI = uninoculated control (nematode free plants).
160
6.3.2. Effect of botanicals in chlorophyll and carotenoid contents
Chlorophyll and carotenoid contents were enhanced in all treated plants (Table 6.2). In the inoculated plants, reduction in Chlorophyll a+b and carotenoid contents were 70 and 51%, respectively, when compared to uninoculated (Table 6.2). Furthermore, there was a significant enhancement in plant pigmentation (chlorophyll a, b, and a+b and carotenoid) of P. sidoides plants treated with either C. maxima crude seed extracts or powdered treatments.
6.3.3. Effect of botanicals on biochemical attributes of African geranium
The protein, superoxide dismutase (SOD) and total phenolics content was increased in nematode-infected control by 1.45, and 1.45-fold and 331%, respectively, compared to the nematode free plants, with a reduction in carbohydrate content by 1.25-fold (Table 6.3). Relative to the untreated control, all tested botanicals yielded low phenolic levels. However, a slight increase was produced in plants treated with 5.0 mgmL-1 of C. sylvaticus (T7). On the other hand, seedlings treated with C. maxima (T8) at 5.0 mgmL-1 and 10 g significantly reduced the biochemical content, however, stimulated protein, SOD, and carbohydrate contents were observed on plants treated with 2.5 mgmL-1 (Table 6.3).
161
Table 6.2. Effect on Chlorophyll a, b, and a + b and carotenoid contents when plants were treated with different powered plant material against root-knot nematodes.
Trt Chlorophyll a µg g-1 FW
Chlorophyll b µg g-1 FW
Chlorophyll a+b µg g-1 FW
Carotenoid µg g-1 FW
Chlorophyll a µg g-1 FW
Chlorophyll b µg g-1 FW
Chlorophyll a+b µg g-1 FW
Carotenoid µg g-1 FW
Chlorophyll a µg g-1 FW
Chlorophyll b µg g-1 FW
Chlorophyll a+b µg g-1 FW
Carotenoid µg g-1 FW
GPM (10 g) 2.5 mgmL-1 5.0 mgmL-1
N 353±0.6f 108±0.2c 461±0.5f 105±0.3d 353±0.6h 108±0 2d 461±0.5f 105±0.3h 353±0.6h 108±0.2f 461±0.5f 105±0.3d U 920±22d 598±29ab 1518±50de 215±1.4e 920±22d 598±29a 1518±50bc 215±1.4f 920± 22f 598±29bc 1518±50cd 215±1.4c T1 1029 ±23b 571±35ab 1601±58cd 314 +2.2ab 944±27cd 613±61a 1557±87abc 245±1.4d 1057±3cd 418±2de 1475±4d 263±0.6b T2 1178±19a 706±51a 1884±70a 338±11.7a 1104±15a 594±37a 1698±52a 273±0.2b 770±21g 501±48cd 1271±70e 230±0.8c T3 974±8c 551±22b 1525±29de 293±0.7b 1005±24bc 611±54a 1617±78ab 264±0.3c 1219±7a 777±73a 1996±65a 318±19a T4 1012±5b 697±84a 1710±83bc 243±21 5cd 725±36g 301±13c 1027±23e 227±3.7e 1126±10b 687±24ab 1814±34b 317±1.5a T5 1057±11b 673±29ab 1731±39abc 322±1.1a 889±1de 535±2a 1424±2c 233±0.1e 982±23e 625±54bc 1607±76cd 259±2.7b
T6 814±8e 585±18ab 1399±26e 222±0.4de 819±10f 416±19b 1236±28d 244±5.4d 878±1f 345±1e 1223±1e 271±0.1b
T7 877±9d 571±27ab 1448±36de 251±1.4c 849±18ef 571±43a 1421±61c 207±1.7g 1072±10 c 564±29c 1637±39c 310±0.6a T8 1165±18a 686±49ab 1852±67ab 336±3 1a 1018±9b 649±22a 1667±30ab 282±0.9a 1015±10de 537±18cd 1552±26cd 267±0.9b
Columns represent mean ±standard error, n = 3. Different letter(s) indicate significant differences (p<0.05) between treatments as separated by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. T1 = P. sidoides, T2 = P. africana, T3 = S. aculeastrum, T4 = V. colorata, T5 = S. lancea, T6 = M. plumbea, T7 = C. sylvaticus, T8 = C. maxima, N = nematode-infested control (Untreated control) and U = uninoculated control (Nematode free plants).
162
Table 6.3. Effects of different botanical application on activity of phenols, SOD, protein and carbohydrate contents in Pelargonium sidoides roots.
Trt
Protein µg g-I FW
Carbohydrate µg g-I FW
SOD Unit/mg FW
Total phenolic (mg g−1
Protein µg g-I FW
Carbohydrate µg g-I FW
SOD Unit/mg FW
Total phenolic (μg mg−1
Protein µg g-I FW
Carbohydrate µg g-I FW
SOD Unit/mg FW
Total phenolic (μg mg−1
2.5 mgmL-1 5 mgmL-1 GPM (10 g)
UNI 8.6±0.03f 20.2±0.15cd 0.011±0.001i 6.05±0.29i-k 8.6±0.03f 20.2±0.15d 0.011±0.001i 6.05±0.29i-k 8.6 ± 0.03f 20.2±0.15a 0.011±0.001i 6.05±0.29i-k N 12.5±0.03abc 16.2±0.09d 0.016±0.001d 26.07±2.11b 12.5±0.03a 16.2±0.01e 0.016±0.001g 26.07±2.11b 12.5±0.03b 16.2±0.09a 0.016±0.001f 26.07±2.11b T1 8.1±0.05f 21.1±1.09cd 0.032±0.001a 6.22±0.26ij 9.5±0.05e 35.3±0.46ab 0.017±0.001f 25.75±5.26b 6.9±0.05h 14.0±1.30a 0.024±0.001e 9.64±5.64gh T2 13.2±0.05ab 21.8±0.10cd 0.020±0.001c 4.37±0.06jk 12.0±0.03b 39.1±4.52a 0.039±0.001b 8.07±0.99hi 10.8±0.05f 16.7±0.09a 0.044±0.001a 5.89±0.54i-k T3 11.9±0.05bcd 63.2±0.59a 0.011±0.001e 4.08±0.09jk 12.6±0.03a 23.2±0.85c 0.042±0.001a 19.82±3.77de 10.2±0.05g 14.8±0.56a 0.029±0.001c 11.92±2.28fg T4 10.5±0.03de 29.1±8.40bc 0.011±0.001e 6.12±0.33i-k 9.7±0.03e 12.7±0.63e 0.035±0.001c 8 22±0.89hi 11.0±0.03e 13.3±0.64a 0.036±0.001b 13.20±2.34f T5 11.2±0.03cde 14.7±0.70d 0.001±0.001h 11.51±0.56fg 11.2±0.03d 38.9±1.79a 0.032±0.001d 12.98±0.86f 12.7±0.1a 15.7±2.00a 0.025±0.001e 13.17±0.24f T6 9.6±0.03ef 19.6±0.46d 0.003±0.001f 4.87±0.20jk 9.7±0.07e 31.1±0.78b 0.020±0.001e 12.24±3.32f 12.3±0.03c 17.6±4.24a 0.025±0.001e 21.54±2.83cd T7 10.3±0.03de 34.5±0.78b 0.002±0.001g 3.64±0.21l 11.4±0.03d 15.3±1.02e 0.016±0.001g 29.98±4.12a 11.5±0.01d 13.1±3.64a 0.027±0.001d 17.82±3.89e T8 13.9±1.70a 16.7±0.09d 0.021±0.001b 11.28±0.27fg 11.8±0.03c 15.2±0.09e 0.012±0.001h 8 31±0.15hi 12.7±0.03a 14.0±6.12a 0.011±0.001g 9.49±0.60gh
Columns represent mean ±standard error, n = 3. Different letter(s) indicate significant differences (p<0.05) between treatments as separated by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. T1 = P. sidoides, T2 = P. africana, T3 = S. aculeastrum, T4 = V. colorata, T5 = S. lancea, T6 = M. plumbea, T7 = C.
sylvaticus, T8 = C. maxima, N = nematode-infested control (Untreated control), UNI = uninoculated control (nematode free plants) and SOD = superoxide dismutase.
163 6.3.4. Effect of botanicals on nematode infection
Effects of the botanicals and application methods were highly significant on the second-stage juveniles (J2s) in soil, eggs and J2s in roots and reproduction factor (Rf), contributing 17, 2, 1 and 5% in total treatment variation (TTV) of the four variables, respectively (Appendix 6.2).
The treatments had highly significant effects on number J2s in soil, number of eggs and J2s in roots and reproduction factor (Rf), with botanicals contributing 63, 96, 97 and 88% of TTV, respectively, while the application methods contributed 20, 1, 1 and 6%, respectively, in TTV of the four variables. Hence, Table 6.4 shows that treatments significantly reduced nematode infection in P. sidoides after 56-days of infestation. The application of C. maxima seeds as either crude extract (drenching) or ground meal reduced the number of eggs and juveniles by 97 and 90%, and 97 and 96%, respectively, at 5 mgmL-1 and 10 g compared to the untreated control.
The numbers of second-stage juveniles (J2s) and eggs on the root system of P. sidoides were less than that of untreated control; hence, similar trends were noted on the numbers of J2s in soil.
Potted soil treated with 10 g of P. africana, S. aculeastrum, V. colorata, M. plumbea, C.
sylvaticus and C. maxima had the lowest numbers of juveniles.
164
Table 6.4. Effect of botanical applications on nematode parameters after 56-days of inoculation with an initial population of 1 000 ± eggs and juveniles.
Trt 5 mgmL-1 2.5 mgmL-1 10 g
Eggs J2s in roots J2s in soil Eggs J2s in roots J2s in soil Eggs J2s in roots J2s in soil
N 413±2.96a 967±4.16a 1060±4.62b 413±2.95a 967±544.33a 1060±161.19b 413±73.63a 967±4.33a 1060±161.19b T1 47±2.35c 133±2.19c-f 40±1.77c 20±1.35c 120±3.10c-g 80±2.33e 47 ±14.40c 193±15.85b-d 353 ±23.72c T2 53±2.36c 73±1.66e-g 47±1.67c 27±1.67c 20±1.35fg 167±2.13cd 26 ±5.44c 27 ±18.85fg 48 ±14.40e T3 47±1.45c 27±1.67fg 60±1.77c 33±1.45c 7±1.02g 47±1.67e 7 ±5.44c 153±28.28c-e 60±5,44e T4 47±2.33c 100±2.13d-g 33±1.45e 47±2.42c 40±1.91e-g 87±2.52e 27±5.34c 27±3.99fg 80 ±19.63e T5 43±2.52b 227±1.66bc 100±2.81d 27±1.46c 67±1.65e-g 120±1.77d 193±23.73b 300±12.29b 1607 ±24.94a T6 47±1.94c 93±1.78d-g 40±1.35e 27±2.14c 87±2.35d-g 33±1.66e 33 ±14.40c 13 ±28.80g 53 ±5.44e T7 7±1.67c 47±1.02e-g 113±1.94d 40±2.28c 107±2.05d-g 80±1.91e 47 ±21.77c 67 ±18.86e-g 60 ±23.73e T8 13±1.23c 27±1.21fg 126±3.90d 53±2.19c 40±21.35e-g 73±1.05e 40 ±24.94c 48 ±21.77e-g 27 ±10.89e Columns represent mean ±standard error, n = 5. Different letter(s) indicate significant differences (p<0.05) between treatments as separated by Duncan’s Multiple Range Test. T1 = P. sidoides, T2 = P. africana, T3 = S. aculeastrum, T4 = V. colorata, T5 = S. lancea, T6 = M. plumbea, T7 = C. sylvaticus, T8 = C. maxima and N = nematode-infested control (Untreated control).
165
6.3.5. Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) profile of C. maxima seeds crude extracts
The gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) of the C. maxima seeds confirmed the presence of various bioactive compounds with different peak area percentages and retention time (Table 6.5; Figure 6.2a-c). The GC-MS chromatograms of the extract further revealed the presence of 141 compounds collectively in crude extracts of EtOAc, DCM, and PE, which manifest the presence of several classes of compounds like alkenes, aromatic hydrocarbon, fatty acids, fatty alcohols, esters, alkenes, aldehydes among others, of which 42, 49 and 50 of the compounds were found in EtOAc, DCM, and PE, respectively, with 13 compounds previously reported with nematicidal attributes (Table 6.6; Figure 6.3).
Figure 6.2a.Chromatogram of Petroleum ether (PE) Cucurbita maxima seed extracts obtained from GC-MS.
166
Figure 6.2b.Chromatogram of Dichloromethane (DCM) Cucurbita maxima seed extracts obtained from GC-MS.
167
Figure 6.2c. Chromatogram of Ethyl acetate (EtOAc) Cucurbita maxima seed extracts obtained from GC-MS.
169
23 8.318 Benzene, 1,2,4,5-
tetramethyl- 0.03 - - Aromatic
hydrocarbon
24 8.592 Benzene, 1,3-diethyl-5-
methyl- 0.01 - - Aromatic
hydrocarbon
25 8.738 1,3-Cyclopentadiene,
1,2,3,4-tetramethyl-5- methylene-
0.04 - - Alkene
26 8.806 Hexadecane, 1-chloro- 0.03 - - Aliphatics,
halogenated
27 8.889 Benzene, (1,2,2-
trimethylpropyl)-
0.03 - - Tricyclic
aromatic compound
28 9.263 Dodecane 0.08 - - Alkane
29 9.360 9.264 9.391 Octanoic acid 0.07 0.93 0.02 Medium-chain fatty acid 30 10.097 10.119 10.122 2-Decenal, (E)- 0.22 15.20 0.18 Medium-chain
aldehyde
31
11.223 11.296 12.320 13.755 14.735
2-methyltetracosane 3.85 - - Branched alkane
32 11.646 Tetradecane 0.79 - Alkane
33
12.167 12.214 12.830 13.566 13.795 13.944 13.981 14.038 14.146 14.195 14.351 14.427 14537 14.591 14.679 14.803 14.906 14.967 15.017 15.051 15.211 15.280 15.303 15.425 15.586 15.642 15.687 15.762
11.551 12.420 12.964 13.021 13.739 13.971 14.183 14.390 14.897 15.118 15.380 15.650 15.874 15.950 16.585 17.421 24.153
9,12-Octadecadienoic
acid (Z,Z)- 34.66 - 73.54 Lineolic acids and derivatives;
long-chain fatty acid
34 12.355 Naphthalene, decahydro-
1,5-dimethyl- 0.03 - - Aromatic
hydrocarbon
170 35
12.405 12.870 12.940 13.525 13.827 13.913 15.258
11.636 12.651 12.720 13.280 14.582 15.250 16.218
cis-13,16-Docasadienoic
acid 4 - 13.67 Long-chain
fatty acid
36 12.469 Z,E-3,13-Octadecadien-
1-ol
0.11 - - Fatty alcohol
37 12.525 Methyl 2-
octylcyclopropene-1- heptanoate
0.10 - -
38 12.599 16.717 cis-9-Hexadecenal 0.19 5.93 Monounsaturated
fatty aldehydes
39 12.728 Heptadecane, 2,6,10,15-
tetramethyl- 1.12 - - Long-chain
alkane
40 12.770 9,17-Octadecadienal,
(Z)- 0.08 - - Unsaturated
aldehyde
41 12.800 Isopropyl linoleate 0.13 - - Fatty acid ester
and an isopropyl ester
42 13.005
13.051 23.999 Oxacycloheptadec-8-en-
2-one, (8Z) 1.33 - 0.06 Alcohol
43 13.060 E,E,Z-1,3,12-
Nonadecatriene-5,14-diol
3.10 - - Fatty alcohol
44 13.180 23.140
23.200 23.468
Z,Z-8,10-Hexadecadien-
1-ol 3.86 - 0.34 Fatty alcohol
45 13.439 cis-7-Tetradecen-1-ol 0.26 - - Fatty alcohol
46 13.667 Oleyl alcohol,
heptafluorobutyrate 0.97 - - Ester
47 13.755 cis-11,14-Eicosadienoic
acid, methyl ester 0.58 - - Fatty acid methyl ester
48 13.685 (R)-(-)-14-Methyl-8-
hexadecyn-1-ol 0.44 - -
49 15.150 17-Octadecynoic acid 3.81 - - Acetylenic
fatty acid
50 15.797 n-Pentadecanol 0.87 - - Long-chain fatty
alcohol
51 15.930 6-Octadecenoic acid, (Z)- 1.37 - - Long-chain fatty
acid 52 16.125
17.377 Heptadecanoic acid,
heptadecyl ester 0.39 - - Fatty acid ester
53
16.161 16.200 16.225 16.257 16.345
17.173 Octadecanoic acid 2.10 2.69 Long-chain fatty acid
54
19.020 19.165 19.235 19.556 19.630 19.761
19.055 l-(+)-Ascorbic acid 2,6-
dihexadecanoate 13.32 13.85 - Ester