• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Appendix 1. Factor Loadings and Communalities of the Five Factors of the Questionnaire (using Principal Components Analysis) No.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Appendix 1. Factor Loadings and Communalities of the Five Factors of the Questionnaire (using Principal Components Analysis) No."

Copied!
2
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Appendix 1. Factor Loadings and Communalities of the Five Factors of the Questionnaire (using Principal Components Analysis)

No. Statement Text

Factor Loadings

Communality Factor Label

1 2 3 4 5 6

27 My research skills became more

sophisticated .771

Eigenvalue = 4.383 Variance = 13.696%

.734

General Perception After Completing the Preparatory Year 28 My scientific writing skills became

more sophisticated .762 .751

25 My thinking skills (e.g., interpretation, analysis, inference, explanation …) have improved

.695 .701

30 My skills of applying knowledge have

improved .640 .64

8 26 My computer skills became more

sophisticated .621 .558

24 I have confidence in my ability to

research information .575 .624

29 I can access and use learning resources

(e.g., library and internet resources) .565 .562

10 Interaction with my academic

counsellor was adequate and fruitful .799

Eigenvalue = 4.203 Variance = 13.133%

.740

Perception of Teachers, Teaching, and Assessment 9 My academic counsellor was helpful

.798 .73

5 7 Teachers motivated me to develop my

creative and innovative abilities .721 .663

8 Teachers showed attributes of professionalism (e.g., honesty, integrity, altruism …)

.647 .523

11 Teaching was interactive rather than

spoon-feeding .577 .523

5 The preparatory year provided activities which developed my various personal skills (e.g., social, physical, cultural, creative …)

.487 .517

14 Feedback on student assessment was

helpful .470 .567

6 Communication with teachers was easy .457 .567

(2)

Appendix 1 (continued) …

3 The preparatory year reinforced my

sense of responsibility .761

Eigenvalue = 3.893 Variance = 12.165%

.727

University Conduct

2 The preparatory year reinforced my

discipline .751 .713

1 The preparatory year made me self-

confident .704 .635

4 The preparatory year helped me adapt to the university educational environment

.678 .623

32 I feel that the preparatory year classes prepared me well for my major’s classes

.558 .638

31 Preparatory year classes helped me

select my major .479 .62

0 16 Student’s guidebook was informative

and adequate .770

Eigenvalue = 3.080 Variance = 9.625%

.670

Administrative and Regulatory Matters 15 Introductory (awareness) sessions were

planned with the newcomer students .655 .542

13 Assessment tasks (e.g., tests, projects,

assignments …) were appropriate .537 .521

12 Student support services (i.e., academic, social, psychological …) were adequate

.525 .586

17 Teaching timetables were set out

appropriately .449 .36

9 18 Academic affairs services (e.g.,

withdrawal, course additions and deletions, postponing, excuses …) were easily accessible

.445 .52

2 21 Food purchasing areas were suitable for

all students .765

Eigenvalue = 2.471 Variance = 7.722% .633

Facilities and Services 20 Places designated for student rest and

sitting were appropriate .732 .67

6 19 Facilities (e.g., library, computers, data-

shows, smart boards …) were

appropriate .593 .576

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

The results showed that the main factor determining the stock price of companies coded as CPIN issuers, namely forming 3 components, in HMSP which formed 5 components, in GGRM which

WeÞrst estimate the common factors in the dynamic factor model by employing the method of principal components and then test the nonlinear factor structure and the chaotic behavior

Journal homepage: https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JID Comparison of Principal Component Analysis and Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis in Bank Health Ratio Firdaus*, Sigit

ITEM TOTAL SCORE CORRELATIONS AND PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS AND EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS RESULTS OF THE PATIENT SATISFACTION QUESTIONNAIRE ON NURSING CARE QUALITY Original

2013 also conducted construct validity testing on Chapman’s FLL theory using factor analysis, from which five factors related to love languages were found, namely, sacrificial love,

3 September – December 2017 111 Application of Principal Component Analysis Technique to the Socio- economic Factors in Quality of the Lower Songkhram Wetland, Thailand Somphinith

Table 4.71: Communalities of 4 aspects related to Empowerment 99 Table 4.72: Factor Loading Based Principal Component Analysis with Varimax Rotation for 4 aspects Related to

The document discusses the Five-Factor Model of personality traits, which identifies five broad dimensions that describe individual differences in behavior and