• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Growth of the Albino rat with special reference to the influence of environment

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Growth of the Albino rat with special reference to the influence of environment"

Copied!
39
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

. G. N. M'URRAY.

BENEDICT, -F. G. 'AND MACLEOD; G. (1929) .. The Heat produCtion ·of the albino rat. II Influence of environmental temperature, age,. and sex;

comparison with the basal metabolism of man. J. Nutrition, Vol 1, pp. 367-398.

BENNHOLDT-THOMSEN, (1938). The acceleration of development in child- hood. J. Amer. M~d .Ass., Vol 110, p. 2021.

BERTELLI, E. (1936). Scientific managemen~ in rabbit b_reedi,ng . . Monthly Bul. · Agric. Sci. and Pract., Vol 27, pp. 453-458. ·

BISSONNETTE., T. H. (19a6).

Se~ual

photoperiodicity. Q'l{.art. Re1,. Biob., Vol. 11, pp. 371-386.

BONSMA, F-. N. AND OOSTHUIZEN, P. M. (1935). Milk production in Large Black sows and its importance in relation to the production of· weaners.

S. African J. Sci., Vol32, pp. 360-378.

BROWMAN, L. G. (1937)~ Light in its relation to activity and estrous rhythms i"n the albino rat. J. Expt. Zoiil., Vol. 75, pp. 375-388.

BYWATERS,~ J. H. (1937). The hereditary and environmental portions of the variance in weaning weights of Poland-China pigs. Genetics, Vol 22, pp. 457-468.

CARMICHAEL, W. J. AND RICE, J. B. (1920). Variations in farrow, with

special reference i1J the birth weight of pigs. Univ. IU. Agric. Exp.

Sta., Bul. No. 226, pp. 95.

CARREL, A. (1935). Man the Unknown . . H"amish Hamilton,' London.

CLORTE, J. H. L. (1939). Prenatal growth in the merino sheep. · Onderste- poort J. Vet. Sci. and An. Ind. Vol. 13, pp. 417-558.

COLE, H. H. AND HART, G. H. (1938). The effect. of pregnancy and lactation on growth in the rat. A nat. Rec., Vol. 70, Suppl. No. 3, p. 16.

COOLEY, C. L. AND SLONAK'ER, J. R. (1925). The effects of early and late breeding on the mother and the sex r.atio i11 the albino rat. Amer. J.

Phys_iol., Vol. 72, pp. 595-613. · ·

CREW, F. A. E. AND MIRSKAIA1 L. (1930). The lactation interval ~n the

·• mouse. Quart. J. Exp. Phy_stol., yol. 20, pp. 105-110. . · · DONALD, H. P. (1937). Suckiing and suckling preference in pigs. Empire

J. Erept. Agric., Vol. 5, pp. 361-368.

DONALDSON H. H. (1915). The Rat. Memoirs of the Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology No. 6.

'DUERST,: J. U. (1931). · Grundlagen der" Rinderzucht. Berlin. Verlag· von Julius Springer.

DUNLOP, G. AND HAMMOND, J. (1937). The growth an.d proportion~·'cif ·the rabbit's ear in relation to body weight. J . . Geneties, ·Vol.· 34, pp.

463-475.

EA'l'ON, 0. N. (1932). Correlation of hereditary and other. factors affecting growth in guinea-pigs. U.S. Dept. Agric., Tech. Bul. No. 279, I>P· 35.

ECKLES, C. H. ·· (1916). The nutrients required to develop the bovine fetus.

Missowri Auric. Expt. Sta., Res. Bul. No. 26, p. 36. '

ECKLES, C. ·H. (1919). A study of the birth weight. of calves. Jfiss·ouri Agric. &pt. Sta., Res. Bul. No. 35, p. 11.

EDWARDS, J. (1938). Season and rate of conception. Nature, :VoL· 142, p. 357.

ENGLE, E. T., CRAFTS, R. C. AND ZEITHAM·L~ C. E-.· (1tl38). "First·.estr.us

· in rats in relation to age, weight, and Jeiith.. Proc . .Soc. :&ip, Biol.

.. and .Med., Vol 37, pp. ·427-432.

36

4. 63

(2)

GROWTH OF THE ALBINO ll.AT.

iENZMANN, E. V. (1933). Milk-production curv~ of albino mice. A.nat Rec., . Vol. 56, pp. 345-358. ,

ENZMANN E. N. AND CROZIER, W. J. (1935). Relation between birth weight and litter size in multiparous mammals. J. Gen. PhysioL, Vol.

18, pp. 791-799. .

FRANZ, W. (1937) . . Was wissen wir tiber die Akklimatisations-und Siedlungs-moglichkeiten fiir die weisze Rasse in tropischen Liindern P A.rchiv f. Schiffs- u. Tropen-Hyg., Vol . 41_, pp. 359-365, 399-416, 446-459.

FREUDENBERGER, C. B. (1932). A comparison of the Wistar albino and the Long-Evans hybrid strain of Norway rat. A.mer. J. A.nat., Vol. 50, pp.

293-349.

GATES, W. H. (1915). Litter size, birth weight, and early growth rate of mice (Mus musculus). A.nat. Rec., Vol 9, pp. 183-193.

GOODADE, H. D. (1938).· A study of the 'nheritance of body weight ·in the albino mouse by selection. J. Heredity, Vol. 29; pp. 101-112.

GREENMAN, M. J. AND DUHRING, F. L. (1931). Breeding and Care of the Albin:o Rat for Research Purposes. The Wistar Inst. of A.nat. and BioL

Philadelphia. 2nd Ed. ·

GROBER, J. (1937). Personal communication to Dr. P. J. du Toit, Director

of Vet. Services. ·

HAIN, A. M. (1933). Increase in weight of the mother and of the foetus

du~·ing pregnancy (rat>. Q·uart. J. Expt. Physiol., Vol. 22, pp. 71-78.

HAIN, A. M. (1934). Some facts regarding growth of the Wistar rat under standard conditions in Britain (derivative Edinburgh stock). A.nat, Rec., Vol. 59, pp. 383-391.

HAIN, A. M. (1935). The effect (a) of litter size on growth and (b) of oestrone administered during lactation (rat). Qua1·t J. Exp. Physiol., Vol. 25, pp. 303-313.

HAIN,ES, G. (1928). The relation between size of litter, weights and mortality of guinea-pigs. Proc. A.mer. Soc. A.n. Prod., 1928, pp. 40-42.

HAINES, G. (1931).

A

statistical study of the relation between various expressions of fertility and vigour in the guinea-pig. J. A.gric. Res., Vol. 42, pp. 123-164.

HALL, V. E. AND PIERCE, G. N. (1934). Litter size, birth weight and growth to weaning in the cat. A.nat. Rec., Vol. 60, pp. 111-124.

HAMMO.NDi J. (1914)_. 0~ 8ome factors controlling fertility in domestic annna s. J. A.gnc. Set., Vol. 6, PJJ· 263-277.

HAMMOND, J. (1921). Further observations on the factors controlling fertility and foetal atrophy. J. Agric. Sci., Vol 11, pp. 337-366.

HAMMOND, J. (1925). Reproduction in the Rabbit. Oliver and Boyd.

Edinburgh.

HAMMOND, J, (1927). The Physiology of Reproduction in the Cow. Univ.

Press. Cambridge,

HAMMOND, J. (1932). Growth and Development of Mutton Qualities in the Sheep. Oliver and Boyd. Edinburgh.

HAMMOND, J. (1983). · Factors producing sterility with special reference to genetic causes. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., Vol. 26, pp. 1183-1185.

HAMMOND, J. (l93i!). The fertilisation of rabbit ova in relation to time . . A method of controlling the litter size, the duration of pregnancy and the weight of the young at birth. J. Exp. Biol., Vol. 11, pp 140-161.

464

(3)

G •. N. MURRAY.

HAMMOND, J. (1935). The changes in the reproductive organs of the rabbit during pregnancy. Transactions on the Dynamics of Development, Vol.

10, pp. 93-112.

HAMMOND, J. (1936). Environmental conditions and livestock breeding.

Problems of An. Hu.sbandry. U.S.S.R., No. 8.

HAMMOND, J. (1937). Pregnancy and nutrition o'f the embryo in t.h.e rabbit.

School Sci. Rev., No. 72, pp. 548-557.

HAMMOND, J. (1940). Farm Animals. Edward Arnold & Co. London.

HANSON, F. B. AND HEYS, F. (192'7). Differences in the growth curves of albino rats born during the four seasons of the year under uniform laboratory conditions. Anat. Rec., Vol. 35, pp. 83-89.

HANSON, .F. B. AND SHOLIES, F. N. (1924). Seasonal differences in sex ratio, litter size and birth weight of the albino rat under uniform laboratory conditions. Genetics, Vol. 9, pp. 363-367. ' HARRIS, G. W. (1936). The induction of pseudo-pregnancy in the rat by

electrical stimulation through the head. J. Physiol., Vol. 88 pp.

361-367.

HATERIUS, H. 0. (1933). Partial sympathectomy and induction of pseudo- pregnancy. Am. J. PhysioZ., Vol. 103, pp. 97-103.

HARTWELL, G. A., MOTTRAM, E. C. 'AND MOTTRAM, V. H. (1923). The

· technique of breeding rats for feeding experiments. Biochem. J., Vol.

17, pp. 208-215.

HEISER, V. G. (1938). We are what we eat. Reader's Digest, Vol. 32, No.

191, pp. 9-11.

HEMMINGSEN, A. M. AND KRARUP, N. B. (1937). Rhythmic diurnal variations in the oestrous phenomena of the rat and their susceptibility to light and dark. Dct. Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab. Bwlogiske Meddelelser, Vol. 13, No. 7, 61 p.

HESS, A. F. AND LUNDHAGEN, M. A. (1922). A seasonal tide of blood phosphate in infants. J. Amer. Med. Ass .• Vol. 79, pp. 2210-2212.

HITCHCOCK, F. A. (1927). The total energy requirement of the albino rat for growth and activity. Amer. J. Ph.ysioZ., Vol. 83, pp. '28-36.

HOLMGREN, I·. (1910). Cited after Nylin.

HUNTINGTON, ·E. (1938). Season of Birth: Its Relation to Human Abilities.

Chapman and Hall Ltd. London.

HUSZTI, ·D. (1930). Gewichtsanderung der ungarischen MangaliczasilUen wah rend der Zeit der Trachtigkeit und des Saugens; Entwicklung der in verschiedenen Alter entwohnten Ferkel. Kozl. az Osszehasonlit&.

JtJlet es Kortan Koribol. Vol. 20, No. 1-3. Abstract in Ziichtungskunde,

1~30, Vol. 5, p. 407.

IBS·EN, H. L. (1928). Prenatal growth in guinea-pigs, with special reference to environmental factors affecting weight at birth. J. Expt. Zool., Vol.

51,. pp. 51-91.

JACKSON, C. M. (1913). Postnatal growth and variability of the body and of the various organs in the albino rat. Am. J. Anat. Vol. 15, pp. 1-68.

JOHANSSON, I. (1931-32}. Problems in breeding for high prolificacy. Pig Breeder:!' Annual, Vol 11, pp. 80-87.

KEITH, T. B. (1930). Relation of size of swine lit.ters to age of dam and' 'to·

size of succeeding litters. J. Agric. Res., Vol. 41, pp. 593-600.

KING, H. D. (1915). On the weight of the albino rat at birth and the factors that influence it, Anat, Rec,, Vol. 9, pp, 213·231.

4{;5

(4)

GROWTH OF THE ALBINO RAT.

KING, H. D. (1916). The relation of age to fertility in the rat. Anat; Rec;, ·

Vol. 11, pp. 269-287. ·

.KING, H. D. (1921).--A comparitive study of the birth mortality in the

·albino rat and in man. Anat. Rec., Vol. 20, .pp. 321-354.

KING, H. D. (192~). Sea~onal variations in fertility and ,in the. sex ratio of mammals·wrth special reference to the rat. W. Ro1«e Arelwv /. Entw.

Me-chan., Vol. 112, pp. 61-111.

KING, H. D. (1935). Birth weight in the gray Norway rat and the factors that mfluence it. .4.nat_. Bee., Vol. 63, pp. 335-354.

. .

KOCH IE. W: (1935). Uber die Veranderung menschlichen Wachstnms im

~rsten Drittel des 20. Jahrhunderts. Johann Ambrosius Barth. Leipzig.

KOPEC, S. (1924). On the influence exerted by certain factors on. the birth

· 'Weights of rabbits. Anat. Bee., Vol. 27, pp. 95-118.

KOPEC, S. (1927). The morphogenetical value of the weight_ of rabbits at birth. J. Genetics, Vol. 17, pp. 187-198. .

KOPEC, S. (1932). Untersuchungen tiber die morphogenetische Bedeuting des Geburtsgewichtes ftir das Korpergewicht der Matise. Z.f. ind. Abst.-u ..

· Vererbungslehre, Vol. 63, pp. 94-111.

K~ALLINGER, H. F. AND GRUHN, R. (1938). Untersuchungen tiber Gesc'hlechtsleben und Fortpflanzung der Haustiere. Landw. Jahrbucher, Vol. 85, pp. 828-867.

LEE, M. 0:. (1926). · Studies on the oestrous cycle of the rat III. The effect

· of low environmental temperatures. ·Am. J. Physiol., Vol. 78, pp. 246-253.

LEIPOLDT, C. L. (1931). Race deterioration in the Union. Ra;nd Daily Mail, July, 21, 22, 23.

LONG, F. A. AND ·EvANS, H. M. (1922). The oestrous cycle in the rat and its associated phenomena. Mem. Univ. Cali/., No. 6, 137 p.

LUSK, G. (1928). The ·Elements of the Science of Nutrition. Fourth Edition.

W. B. Saunders Company. Philadelphia and London.

MACARTHUR, J. W. AND DAFOE,

A.

R. (19S9). Genetics of quintuplets: II.

Trends (!f growth in the Dionne. quintuplets. J. Heredity, Vol. 30, pp.

359-364.

McCAY, C. M. (1933). Is longevity compatible with optimum growth? Science-

. Vol. 77, p. 410. ·

MACDOWELL, E. C., ALLEN, E. AND MACDOWELL, C. G. (1928). The .. prenatal growth of the mouse. J. Gen. Physiol., Vol. 11, pp. 57-70. · MJA<;JDOWELL, fE. C., GATES, W. H. AND MACDOWELL, C. G. (1930). The . . influence of the .quantity of nutrition upon the growth of the suckling

mouse. J. Gen. Physiol., Vol. 13, pp. 529-545. · MACKEN:ZIE, W.

Vf.

(1938). South Africans know too little. about ;Ea$t

. . Afnca. The Outspan, March 18, p. 63.. . . McMEEKAN, C. P. (1936). Critical study of important factors in successful

pig-keeping . . New Zeala~ J. _Agric., V01 52, pp 278-289.

MADOMBER, D. (1934). · The effect of changes in the amount of -protein ·upon . pregnancy and lactation. Amer. J. Obstet. and Gynecol., Vol. 27, pp.

. . . 483-492. ' .

MENZIJDS-KITCHI~, A .. W. (1937). Fertility, morality, and growth rat.e in . . prgs. ·.J.-Agnc. Set., Vol. 27;:_pp. 611-625. · . - -

...

MERTON,_ H .. (1937-38). ~tudies on reproduction in. ~he . al)Jino .mouse, I.,

·:The. penod of gestatron and the ttme of <partuntwp. Proc. Roy. Soc:·' Edm., Vol. 58, pp. ·80-96; · · · ·

4C6'·

(5)

G. N: :M:'Oll:RA:Y:.

MILLS; C: -A: (1932 a); Climate as a factor in the health of man. Am.er. J. Hyg,; Vol. 15, pp. 573-592.

MILLS, C. A: (1932 b). Geographic variations in the female sexual functions.

Amer. J. Hyg., Vol. 15, ·PP· 593-600. . ·

MILLS, C. A. AND OGLE, ·C. (1933). Climatic basis for susceptibility to heat stroke or exhaustion. Amer. J. Hyg., Vol. 17, pp. 686-696. ·

MITRSKAIA, L. AND CREW, F. A. E. (1929-30). Maturity in the female mouse.

Proc·. Roy. Soc. Edin., Vol. 50, pp. 179-186. · MIRSKAIA, L. AND CREW, F. A. -E. (1930). On the genetic nature of the

·· time of attainment of puberty in the female mouse. Quart. J. Exp.

Physio~., Vol. ~0, pp. 299-304.

MIRSKAIA, L. AND CREW, F. A. E. (1930-31). On the pregnancy rate in the lactating mouse and the effect of suckling on the duration of pregnancy. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edin., Vol. 51, pp. l-7:

MOORE, C. U., PLYMATE, H. B., ANDREW, B. J. AND WHITE, V. (1932).

Studies in the B vitamins. I. Statistical comparison of small and large litters of rats on a normal stock diet. Amer. J. Physiol., Vol. 102, pp. 566-572.

MORRIS,

H'.

P. AND JOHNSON,· D. W. (1932). 'Effects of nutrition and here- dity upon litter size in swine and rats. J. Agric. Res., Vol. 44, pp.

511-521.

MORRIS, H. P., PALMER, L. S. AND ·KENNEDY, C. (1933). Fundamental food requirements for the growth of the rat. VII. An experimental study of inherit:wce as a factor influencing food utilization in the rat. Univ.

Minnesota Agric~. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bul. No. 92, 56 p.

MURRAY, G.~- (1!:)34) . . A statistical analysis of growth and carcase measure- ments of baconers. Onderstepoort .J. Vet. <Sci. and An. Ind., Vol. 2,

pp. 301-360. -

N~LlN, G. (1929)'. 'P(lriodical variations i~ growth, standard metabolism and oxvgen capacity of the blood in children. A.ct,.t Med. Scand., Suppl. 31, 207 p.

OGLE,· 0. (19B4),

Cli~atic

influence on the growth of the male albino

m~use.

Amer. J. Physiol., Vol. 107, pp. 635-640 .

. OUTHOUSE, J. AND MENDEL. L. B. (1933} .. The rate of growth. I. . It~ influence on the skeletal development of the albino rat. J. Exp. Zoal.,

Vol. .64, pp. 257-285. . . ·

PALM'ER, L. S. AND KENNEDY, C. (1931). The fundamental food require- ments for the growth of the rat. VI. Influence of the food consumption

· and the efficiency quotient of the anhnal. J. Biol. Chem., Vol. 90, pp.

545-564.

PARKES, A. S. (1923). Studies on sex-ratio and related phenomena. III.

Note on the influence of size of litter. Ann. Appl. Biol., Vol. 10, .pp'.

287-292. . ' .

PARKES, A. S. (1925). Studies on sex-ratio and related phenomena.

·vn.

The foetal sex-ratio in. pigs. rJ. Agric. S.Ci., Vol. 15, pp .. 284-299; . PARK_ES, A. S. (1926).· ·The growth of young mice according to size of 'litter.

' ' Ann. Appl. Biol., Vol. 13,. pp. 374-394. :

PA}tKES, A, S. ,(1929). Note on the growth of. young mice suckled by: ra,ts.

··~··· .Ann. ·A.ppl. Bibl., Vol.,16, pp: I71~173. . . · .

PR-ENTICE, J. H., BASKE.TT, R. G. AND ROBERTSON, G. S. (1930). The . r, nl!trition q~ th~ chick and its effect oil growth, mat,urity, egg prod)lction

;,, :j.ild mortahty. ·, 4th W9rld's Po~Itr;y _Con~te~s· !~Ir ~2-30, pp,-224-232.

QUINLAN, ,J. D. (UJ38). Personal communication to the author. ;': · · ·

' 467

(6)

GRQWTH OF THE ALBINO RAl'.

RADEMACHER, A. (1936). Bestehen Beziehungen zwischen Ebbe und Jnut und dem Eintritt der Geburten bei Rindern? Diss. Hannover.

ROBER'ISON, T. B. (1923). The Chemical Basis of Growth and Senescence.

Lippincott and Co. Philadelphia and London.

ROSS, G. A. P. (1935). Climate and clothing in. South Africa. S. African Med. J., Vol. 9, pp. 779-782.

SAMBOWSKY, P. E. (1932). S.tudium tiber die Milchswankungen der Sauen.

Poltawa No. 8. Abstr. in Ziichtungsk'll!TI,de, 1933, Vol. 8, p. 236.

SCHNEIDER, H. (1936). Das Gewichtsverhiilten neugeborener Ferkel des veredelten Landschweines in den ersten Lebenstagen. Diss. Leipzig.

SHELESNYAK, M. C. (1!}31). The induction of pseudo-pregnancy in the rat by means of electrical stimulation. Anat. Rec., Vol. 49, pp. 179-183.

SHERMAN, H. C. (1936). Nutritional improvement in health and longevity.

Sci. Monthly, Vol. 43, pp. 97-107.

SKAWRAN, P. (1937). Das Sud-Afrika Buch. Freiheitsverlag. G.M.B.H.

Berlin.

SLONAKER, J. R. (1925). The effect of copulation, pregnancy, pseudopreg- nancy: and lactation on the voluntary ·activity and food consumption o(

the albino rat. Amer. J. Physiol., Vol. 71, pp. 362-394

SLONAKER, J. R. (1927). ·Effect of different amounts of sexual indulgence in the albino rat. III Food consumption. Amer. J. Physiol., Vol 83, pp.

302-308.

SLONAKER, J. R. (1931, a). The effect of different per cents. of protein in the diet. I. Growth. Amer. J. Physiol., Vol. 96, pp. 547-556.

SLONAKER J. R. (1931, b). Effect of different per cents. of protein in the diet.

h .

Spontaneous activity. A mer. J. Physiol., Vol. 96, pp. 557-661. · SLONAKER, J. R. (1931, c). The effect of different per cents. of protein in the

. diet. III. 'Intake and expenditure of energy. Amer. J. Physiol., Vol.

97, pp. 15-21.

SLONAKER, J. R. (1931, d). Effect of different per cents. of protein in the diet. IV. Reproduction. A mer. J. Physiol., Vol. 97, pp. ·322-328.

SLONAKER, J. R. (1931, d.) The effect of different per cents. of protein in the diet. V. The offspring. Amer. J. Physiol., Vol. 97, pp. 573-580.

SLONAKER1 J. R. (1931, f). Effect of different per cents. of protein in the diet. \7I. 'Veight of mothers during gestation and lactation. Amer. J.

Physiol., Vol. 97, pp .. 626-634.

SLONAKER, J. R. AND ROBERTSON, D. L. (1925). The effect of compulsory work during gestation on the mother and young. Amer. J. Physiol., Vol. 72, pp. 502-548.

SMITH, A. D. B. (1930). Litter size. Is it inherited? Pig Breeders' Ann., Vol. 10, pp. 46-52 .

• SMITH, A. H. AND BING, F. C. (1928). Improved rate of growth of stock

· · albino rats. J. Nutrition, Vol. 1, pp. 179-189.

SMITH, A. D. B. AND DONALD, H. P. (1937). Weaning weights of pigs and litter sampling with reference to litter size. J. Agric. Sci., Vol Z7, pp.

485-502.

STOTSENBURG, J. M. (1!}15). The growth of the foetus of the albino rat from the thirteenth to the twenty-second day of gestation. Anat Rec., Vol. 9, pp. 667-682.

TISDALL, F. F. AND HARRIS, R. I. (1922). Calcium and phosphorus meta- bolism in patients with fractures. J. Amer. Med. Ass., Vol. 79, pp.

884-887.

-:!68

(7)

G. N. MURRAY.

VAN DER PLANK, C. M. (1939). Intra- und extra-uterine Entwicklul\g.

IV. lnternationaler Tierzuthtkongress. Ziirich, 9-12 August, p. 54.

VERGES, J. B. (1939). Effect of the plane of nutrition on the carcase quality of Suffolk cross lambs·. Suffolk Sheep Societ·y. 19'39 Year Book. pp.

27-37.

WALTON A.· AND H-AMMOND, J;· (1938): The maternal effects on growth and conformation in Shire horse-Shetland pony crosses. Proc. Boy. Soc.

B, Vol. 125, pp. 311-335.

WAN, S. AND WU, H. (1931). Relation between nutrition of mother and birth weight of young. Chinese J. Physiol., Vol. 5, pp. 53-70. Abstr. in Exp.

Sta. Rec., 1931, Vol., 65, p. 691.

WARWICK, B. L. (1928). Prenatal growth of swine. J. Morph. and Physiol., Vol. 46, pp. 59-84.

WEATHERFORD, H. L. (1929). A cytological study of the mammary gland:

Golgi apparatus, trophospongium and other cytoplasmic canaliculi mitochondria. Amer J. Anat., Vol. 44, p. 199-281.

WENCH, E. (1931). Dber die Beziehung zwischen der Entwicklung der Saugferkel und ihren spii.teren Mlastleistungen als Grundlage der Herden- und Zuchtwertbeurteilung. Z. f. Zuchtung, B, Vol. 22, pp. 1-33.

WHITNEY, L. F. (1939). The sex -ratio in dogs maintained under similar conditions. J. Heredity, Vol. 30, pp. 388-389.

WILD, H. (1927). Ergebnisse von Schweineleistungspriifungen, insonderheit Studien tiber die Ferkelentwicklung. Diss.' Berlin.

WISHART1 J. AND HAMMOND, J. (1933). A statistical analysis of the inter- relatiOns of litter size and duration of pregnancy on the birth weight of rabbits. J. Agric. Sci., Vol. 23, pp. 463-472.

WOLFF, G. (1935). Increased bodily growth of school children since the war.

The Lancet, Vol. 228, pp. 1006-1011.

WRIGHT, S. (192'2). The effect of inbreeding and crossbreeding on guinea- pigs. III. Crosses between highly inbred families. U.S. Dept. Agric.

Bul. No. 1121.

ZELLER, J. H., JOHNSON, T. G. AND CRAFT, W. A. (1937). The s~­

. nifi~ance of weight changes ~u sows during the gestation and suckling . penods. Proc. Am. Soc. Ant. Pro71., 30th Ann. Rpt., pp. 121-126.

469

(8)

.;;, ~:l 0

No. of Days after 'Service. Birth ... 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Served ... 0 No. Observat's

VIII. APPENDIX.

TABLE 1.

Average Da-ily Weight..;* Rel~tiv~ , Weig7lt and Increase in Weight during Pregnancy _ Qj Different Classes · of Rats.

. ....

I ·-·· ' .l!'ezqales put with Males Heavy Rats: -

I.

.Rats

that ·had One· or All Rats. when Vaginas Opened •. First Pregnancy., More Litters. D 'I Rela-D '1 D 'I Rela-D

. 1

D

. 1

Rela-D

. 1

. D . 1 Rela-· W · ht ai Y t' ai Y W · ht ai Y t' ai y W . ht ai y t' ai y Weight. · G a~ Y tive Daily e1g . G . 1ve G . e1g . G . 1ve G . e1g . G . 1ve G . Gain.

I

am. Weight. am. am. W . ht am. am. W . ht am. . am. Weight. ~ ; ~

.

. g. g.

% %

g.. g.

% %

~ ~

% %

-g. g.

% % .

247-3 '-48·4.

.. 255·0 -50·3 118·2 -23·3 193·6 -'45·2 156·1 -36·5 119·2 -23·3 .278·6 -~i)2·0 113·6 -,-21·2 305·3 8·3 141·5 3·8 238·8 10·2 192·6 8·2-295·7 7·8 142·5 3·7 330·6 6·6 134·8-' z:-7 297·0 8·7 137·7 4·0 228·6 .10·0 184·4 8·1 287·9 8·0 '138·8 3·9 324·0 9·5· 132·1 . 3·8 288·3 9·1 133·7 4·2 218·6 .10·2 176·3 8·2 279·9 9·1 134·9 <!·4 314·5 8·8 .1"28·2 3·6 279·2 9·2 129·5 4·3 208·4 8·8 1'68·1 7·1 270·8 9·2 l30·5 4·4 305·7 9·5 124·6 3'·8 270·0 7·9 125·2 3·7 199·6 7·8 161·0 6·3 261·6 7·6 126·1 3·7 296·2 8·3 120·8 3·5 262·1 5·4 121·5 2·5 191·8 5·6 154·7 4·5 254·0 5·7 122·4. 2·8 287·9 4·9'. 117·3 1·9 256·7 3·7 119·0 1·7 186·2 5·2 150·2 4·2 248·3 3·5. i19·6 J ·6 283·0 3·9 115·4 1·6 253·0 3·5 117·3 1·6 181·0 5·0 146·0 4·1 244·8 3·6 118·0 1·7 279·1 3·0 113·8 1·2 249·5 2·3 115·7 1·1 176·0 2·0 . 144·9 J ·6 241·2 1·8 116·3 0·9 276·1 3·0. '112·6 1·3 247·2 3;2 114·6 1·5 174·0 6·6 l40·3 5·3 239·4 . 3·0 115·4 1·5 273·1 2·9 111·3· 1·2 244·0 3·0 113·1 1·3 167·4 1·6 135·0 1·3 "236·4 3·7 113·9. .1·8 270·2 2·0 110·1 0·8 241·0 4·3 111·8 2·1 165·8 5·4 . 133·7 4·3 232·7 4·2 112·1 . 2·0 268·2 4·6 :109·3 l··8 236·7 2·5 109·7 1·1 160·4 4·4 ' 129·4 3·6 228·5 2·5 ll0·1 1·2 '263·6 2-r' 107·5 0··9 234·2 2·4 108·6 1·1 156·0 3·8 125·8 3·1 226·0 2·2 108·9 1·1 261·5 2·4 106·6 l:O 231·8 2·2 107·5 1·0 152·2 4·0 122·4 3·2 223·8 2·0 107·8 0·9 259·1 . 2·2 105·6 0·9 229·6 1·8 106·5 0·9 148·2 4·0 119·5 3·2 221·8 1·8 106·9: 0·9 256·9 . F6 104·7·. 0·6 224·8 2·5 105·6 1·1 144·2 3·0 116·3 2·4 220·0 3·1. 106·0 1·5 255·3 1·2 104·L 0·5 225·3 2·3 104·5 l·1 141·2 5·4 113·9 4·4 216·9 1·7 104·5 0·8 254·1-. 3:o 103·6 1·3 223·0 2·9 103·4 1·4 135·8 3·8 109·5 3·0 215·2 3·3 i03·7 1·6 25h1-2·0. 102·3 0·8 220·1 3·8 102·0 1·8 132·0 4·6 106·5 3·8 211·9 3·9 102·1-1·9 ,249:6 3·8 101·5 1·5 216·2 1·2 100·2 0·5 127·4 .2·2 102·7 1·7 '208·0 1·1 100·2 0·5 245·3 1·2 100 0·5 215·0 -0·7 99·7 -0·3 125·2 :1·2 101·0 1·0 206·9 -0·6 99·7 -0.·3 244·1 -1·2 99·5 ,..-' 0·5 215·7 -roo

-

124·0

-

100

-

207·5 -100 .,...,. 245·3 -100 - .(83) (5) (49) (29) -----------

*

Weight 23 days Lofore parturition taken a~ 100 and subsequent weights expressed as percentages of that weight to get relative weights.

c;

~

~ ...,

:zl

0 "":

~ >

t" t:d ,_. 21 0 ~ >

""

(9)

~

_.,

~ -J

,_..

TAllLE

2. A . ctual and Relati v e lnc1·ease in Weight of Rats during DijJe1·ent Periods of the Gestation Pe1•iod.

AcTUAL INCREASE.* RELATII'E INCREASF..* Class Up to 6-14 14-21 Gross Permanent Loss at of Rats. 6 Days. Days. Days. Increase. Increase. Parturition. Up to Per- 6 6-14 14-21 Gross rna- Days. Days. Days. In-nent Wght. Wght. Wght. Wght. Wght. Wght.

% % %

crease. In-

% % % % % % %

crease. g. g. g. g. g.

.

g.

%

I (I) All Rats ... 13·9 15·5 23·4 26·1 52·3 58·4 89·6 100 39·3 43·9 50·3 56·1 6·5 10·8 24·2 41·5 18·2 ( 2) Rats Served as 24·2 21·1 32·8 28·6 57·8 50·3 114·8 100 69·6 60·6 45·2 39·4 19·5 26·5 46·6 92·6 56·1 Vaginas opened 23·0 26·1 50·9 57·7 88·2 100 .39·8 45·1 48·4 (3} Heavy Rats 14·3 16·2 54·9 6·9 11·1 24·5 42·5 19·2 First Pregancy 22·2 26·1 51·5 60·4 85·2 100 33·3 39·1 (4) Rats that had ll·6 13·6 52·0 61·0 4·7 9·1 22·0 35·8 13·6 One and more Pregnancies *Actual and relatiYe weights obtained from Table l.

Loss at P~tr- turi- tion.

%

23·3 36·5 23·3 22·2 p

z "" ....

q ~ ~ >

... .

(10)

...,.

-4 l:l:)

\\'eight Classes iu g. First 'regnn.ncics . 110-139 140-169 170-199 200-229 230-2ii9 260-289 One and liinre p re7nwnri~s. 200-229

TABLE

4. Influence of 1¥cight at Service on the lnc1·ease in A ct ttal and Relativ e Weights at Different Periods of Pregnancy.

ACTUAL INC.REAS};. REI.A'riVE INCREASE. Up to 6-14 14-21 Gross Permanent Loss at Per- 6 Days. Days. Days. IncreasC'. Increase. Parturition. Up Gross rna- to 6 6-14 14-21 In-ncnt Days. Days. Days. In· crease. Wt. Per Wt., Per Wt.l Per Wt.l Per Wt. Per Wt. Per crease. Cent. • g. Cent. g. Cent. g. Cent. Cent. Cent.

%

0/ %

% %

g. g. g. /0

I I

24·2 21 ·1 32·8 28·6 57·8 50·3 ll4. ·8 100 69·6 60·6 4:3·2 39·4 19·5 26·5 46·6 92·6 66 ·1 14.·6 15·9 23 ·8

!

25 ·9 53·6 58·3 92·0 100 43·6 4.7·4 48·4. .'i2 ·6 9·4 1:3·3 34·4 59 ·1 28·0 13·4 15·8 21 ·3 25·2 49·9 59·0 84. ·6 100 41·0 48·:3 43·6 6l·5 7·2 11·4 26·8 45·4 22·0 14·6 16 ·9 21 ·9 25·4 49·8 57·7 86·3 100 36·5 42·3 49·8 57 ·7 6·9 10·2 23 ·4 40·5 17·1 15·2 15·9 27·5 28·7 53·0 55·4 95·7 100 4.4·5 46·!5 51 ·2 53·5 6·2 ll ·2 21 ·6 39·0 18·1 14·8 15·7 27·5 29·2 52·0· 55 ·1 94 -:~ 100 39·5 41 ·9 54·8 58 ·1 5·5 10·3 19 ·.3 33·3 14 ·8 12·6 14·4 20·8 23·9 53·8 61 ·7 87·2 100 33·6 38 ·:) 53·6 61 ·5 5·8 9·7 24·8 4.0 ·3 1.3·5 230-259 . 12 ·2 14 ·3 22·1 2:3 ·9 61 ·1 59·8 85·4 100 33·0 38·6 52·4 61 ·4 :3·1 9·3 21 ·5 3.3·9 13·9 260-289

I

9 ·4 10 ·9 22·9 26·5 1)4·2 62·6 86·5 100 :32 ·3 37·3 M·2 62·7 3·4 8·3 19·6 3l ·3 11 ·7

Loss at Par- turi- tion. Ol /0 36 ·i) 31 ·1 23·4 23·4. 20·9 20·5 24·8 22·0 19·6

Aver- age No. per Litter. - 7-4 7·3 7·0 7·0 6·0 7·6 6·9 7·2 -

~ ~ 0 ~ ..., t:li 0 "':! >-l t:li t=! > t:"' t:::l .... ~ 0 f;: > >-l

(11)

Influence of Weight of Females at Service on Increase in Weight during Pr_ egnancy.

First Pregnancies. Rats that had One or

}if

ore Litters.

- -

_j__

.

110-139 g. 140-169 g. 170-199 g. 200-229 g. 230-259 g. 260-289 g. 200-229 g. 230-259 g. 260-289 g.

No. of Days ~

Rela- Rela: Rela-

I

Rela- Rela- Rela- Rcla- Rela- Rela- Rela- Rela- Rei- Rela- :&ela- Rela- Rela- Rela-

after Service. Weight. tive tive Weigh_t. tive tive Weight. tive tive Weight. tive tive Weight tivc tive Weight. tive tive Weight. Rela-tive tive Weight. tive tive Weight. tive tive

Weight. Gain. Weight.

I

Gain. Weight. Gain. Weight. Gain. Weight. Gain. Weight. Gain. Weight. Gain. Weight. Gain. Weight. Gain.

-- g.

% %

g.

% %

g.

% %

g.

% %

g.

% %

g.

% %

g.

% %

g.

% %

g.

% %

'

[

.

Birth ... 22 21 193·6 238·8 156·1 192·6 -36·5 8-2 199·2 247·6 128·0 159·1 -31·1 5·0

227·51

271·1 122·0 145·4 -23·4 4·0 249·7 299·5 117·1 140·5 -23·4 289·8 118·1 -20·9 306·5 114·8 - 20·5 250·0 115·5 -24·8 270·7 113·9 -22·0 308·3 117·7 -19·6

3·4 341·0 139·0 4·4 361·3 135·3 2·3 303·6 140·3 4·6 '323·1 135·9 4·3 362·5 131·3 2·4 20 228·6 184·4 8·1 239·8 154·1 5·6 263·6 141·4 3·9 292·4 137·1 4·3 330'·2 134·6 3·1 355·0 133·0 2·1 293·6 135·7 4·0 312·9 131·6 3·1 355·7 128·9 4·2 19 218·6 176·3 8·2 231·0 148·5 3·6 256·5 137·5 5·6 283·1 132·8 4·4 322·7 131·5' 3·2 349·5 130·9 3·2 284·9 131·7 4·3 305·6 128·5 3·0 344·2 124·7 3·2 18 :17 208·4 199·6 168·1 161·0 7·1 6·3 225·4 215·4 144·9 138·4 6·5 5·4 24.5·9 237·3 131·9 127·2 4·7 3·3 273:7 263·8 12R·4 123·7 '" 4·7 3·6 306·0 314·8 128·3-124·7 3·6 2·8 341·0 333·0 127·7 124·7 3·1 4·1 267·1 275·7 127·4 123·4 4·0 3·6 298·3 289·6 125·5 121·8 3·7 3·0 335·3 325·1 121·5 117·8 3·7 3·6 16 191·ft 154·7 4·5 207·0. 133·0 5·2 231·0 123·9 3·3 256·1 120·1 1·9 299·2 121·9 2·7 322·0 120·6 2·1 259·2 ll9·8 1·7 282·3 118·8 . 2·8 315·3 114·2 1·6 15 186·2 150·2 4·2 198·8 127·8 3·1 224·8 120·6 2·0 252·0 118·2 1·1 292·3 119·2 1·8 314·5 117·8 2·0 255·5 118·1 2·6 275·7 116·0 1·6 310·7 112·6 0·9 14 181·0 146·0 4·1 194·0 124·7 1·2 221·2 118·6 2·0 249·7 ll7·1 1·7 288·0 117·4 1·6 309·3 115·8 1·1 249·8 115·5 0·4 272·0 114·4 1·9 308·3 111·7 1·3 13 176·0 141·9 1·6 192·2 123·5. 0·5 217·3 116·6 0·5 246·0 115·4 1·1 284·0 115·8 1·3 305·5 114·4 1·9 249·0 ll5·1 1·7 267·4 112·5 1·0 304·6 110·4 0·9 12 174·0 140·3 5·3 191·4 123·0 1·3 216·5 116·1 1·6 244·1 114·5 1·6 281·0 114·5 0·7 300·5 112·5 1·1 245·3 113·4 1·8 265·0 111·5 1·3 302·2 109·5 0·7 11 167·4 135·0 1·3 189·4 121·7 5·1 213·5 114·5 1·7 240·6 112·9 1·3 279·2 113·8 1·8 296·8 111·1 1·2 241·5 111·6 - 0·1 261·9 110·2 1·1 300·4 108·8 1·4 10 165·8 133·7 4·3 181·4 116·6 2·8 210·4 112·8 2·1 237·8 111· 6 2·1 274·7 112·0 1·9 293·5 . 109·9 1·2 241·6 Ill· 7 1·8 259:4 109·1 1·8 296·3 107·4 1·9 9 160·4 129·4 3·6 177·0 113·8 2·.4 206·3 110·7 1·0 233·4 109·5 0·9 270·2 ll0·1 ] ·5 290·3 108·7 i. 9 237·8 109·9 1·0 254·7" 107·2 0·5 291·1 105·5 1·0 8 156·0 125·8 3·1 173·4 111·4 1·1 204·5 109·7 1·0 231·5 108·6 1·1 266·3 108·6 1·5 285·3 .106·8 0·4 235·6 108·9 1·8 253·7 106·7 1·1 288·3 104·5 0·3 7 152·2 122·7 3·2 171·6 110·3 0·9 202·6 108·7 1·5 229·3 107·5 0·6 262·8 107·1 0·9 284·0 106·4 0·9 231·8 107·1 1·3 251·0 105·6 0·5 287·6 104·2 0·8 6 148·2 ll9·5 3·2 170·2 109·4 1·7 199·9 107·2 0 227·8 106·9 1·4 260·5 106·2 0·8 281·8 105·5 0·6 229·0 105·8 0·2 249·9 105·1 0·5 285·4 103·4 0·9 5 144·2 116·3 2·4 167·7 107·7 0·9 199·9 107·2 2·3 224·9 105·5 1·2 258·5 105·4 1·4 280·0 104·9 1·0 228·5 105·6 1·1 248·6 104·6 0 283·0 102·5 0·3 4 141·2 113·9 4·4 166·2 106·8 3·1 195·5 104·9 0·8 222·3 104·3 0·7 255·2 104·0 0·8 277·5 103·9 0·7 226·2 104·5 1·4 248·6 104·6 1·7 282·1 102·2 0·8 3 135·8 109·5 3·0 161·4 103·7 2·2 194·1 104·1 1·3 220·9 103·6 1·5 253·2 103·2 1·6 275·5 103·2 1·8 223·0 103·1 0·7 244·7 102·9 0·5 280·0 101·4 1·4 2 132·0 106·5 3·8 158·0 101·5 1·5 191·8 102·9 1·5 217·7 102·1 1·8 249·2 101·6 1·2 270·8 101·4 1·0 221·6 102·4 2·5 243·4 102·4 1·3 277·1 100·4 0·9

·1 127·4- 102·7 1·7 154·0 99·0 0·7 187·3 100·4 0·6 213·8 100·3 0·8 246·3 100·4. -0·3 268·0 100·4 0·2 216·2 99·9 0·4 240·3 101·1 1·5 274·5 99·5 0 Served ... 0 125·2

nn-o

1·0 153·0 98·3 -1·7 186·1 99·8 - 0·2 212·2 99·5 - 0·5 247·0 100·7 0·7 267·5 100·2. 0·2 215·4 99·5 - 0·5 236·9 99·6 - 0·4 274·6 99·5 - 0·5 No. of Observations.

124·0 100 (5) - 155·6 100

-

186·5 100

-

213·2 100 - 245·>3 100

-

267·0 100

-

216·4 100 237·7 100 - 276·0 100 -

(5) (15) (19) (6) (4) ·(II) (7) (10)

- --·· .. --- -- ... ~---· .. - ... _. .. _._ ---- ~ .. - -. -·· --... ··--.-. ...:. ·--- ' . ·-. ... ~--·- --- .. --- ... -·- -. ·--- . -- --- . -·- __ , ... -- ~ -_,... ·-. ,

38 473-474

473-474a 473-474b

(12)

Influence of Weight of Females at Service on Increase in Weight during Pr_ egnancy.

First Pregnancies. Rats that had One or

}if

ore Litters.

- -

_j__

.

110-139 g. 140-169 g. 170-199 g. 200-229 g. 230-259 g. 260-289 g. 200-229 g. 230-259 g. 260-289 g.

No. of Days ~

Rela- Rela: Rela-

I

Rela- Rela- Rela- Rcla- Rela- Rela- Rela- Rela- Rei- Rela- :&ela- Rela- Rela- Rela-

after Service. Weight. tive tive Weigh_t. tive tive Weight. tive tive Weight. tive tive Weight tivc tive Weight. tive tive Weight. Rela-tive tive Weight. tive tive Weight. tive tive

Weight. Gain. Weight.

I

Gain. Weight. Gain. Weight. Gain. Weight. Gain. Weight. Gain. Weight. Gain. Weight. Gain. Weight. Gain.

-- g.

% %

g.

% %

g.

% %

g.

% %

g.

% %

g.

% %

g.

% %

g.

% %

g.

% %

'

[

.

Birth ... 22 21 193·6 238·8 156·1 192·6 -36·5 8-2 199·2 247·6 128·0 159·1 -31·1 5·0

227·51

271·1 122·0 145·4 -23·4 4·0 249·7 299·5 117·1 140·5 -23·4 289·8 118·1 -20·9 306·5 114·8 - 20·5 250·0 115·5 -24·8 270·7 113·9 -22·0 308·3 117·7 -19·6

3·4 341·0 139·0 4·4 361·3 135·3 2·3 303·6 140·3 4·6 '323·1 135·9 4·3 362·5 131·3 2·4 20 228·6 184·4 8·1 239·8 154·1 5·6 263·6 141·4 3·9 292·4 137·1 4·3 330'·2 134·6 3·1 355·0 133·0 2·1 293·6 135·7 4·0 312·9 131·6 3·1 355·7 128·9 4·2 19 218·6 176·3 8·2 231·0 148·5 3·6 256·5 137·5 5·6 283·1 132·8 4·4 322·7 131·5' 3·2 349·5 130·9 3·2 284·9 131·7 4·3 305·6 128·5 3·0 344·2 124·7 3·2 18 :17 208·4 199·6 168·1 161·0 7·1 6·3 225·4 215·4 144·9 138·4 6·5 5·4 24.5·9 237·3 131·9 127·2 4·7 3·3 273:7 263·8 12R·4 123·7 '" 4·7 3·6 306·0 314·8 128·3-124·7 3·6 2·8 341·0 333·0 127·7 124·7 3·1 4·1 267·1 275·7 127·4 123·4 4·0 3·6 298·3 289·6 125·5 121·8 3·7 3·0 335·3 325·1 121·5 117·8 3·7 3·6 16 191·ft 154·7 4·5 207·0. 133·0 5·2 231·0 123·9 3·3 256·1 120·1 1·9 299·2 121·9 2·7 322·0 120·6 2·1 259·2 ll9·8 1·7 282·3 118·8 . 2·8 315·3 114·2 1·6 15 186·2 150·2 4·2 198·8 127·8 3·1 224·8 120·6 2·0 252·0 118·2 1·1 292·3 119·2 1·8 314·5 117·8 2·0 255·5 118·1 2·6 275·7 116·0 1·6 310·7 112·6 0·9 14 181·0 146·0 4·1 194·0 124·7 1·2 221·2 118·6 2·0 249·7 ll7·1 1·7 288·0 117·4 1·6 309·3 115·8 1·1 249·8 115·5 0·4 272·0 114·4 1·9 308·3 111·7 1·3 13 176·0 141·9 1·6 192·2 123·5. 0·5 217·3 116·6 0·5 246·0 115·4 1·1 284·0 115·8 1·3 305·5 114·4 1·9 249·0 ll5·1 1·7 267·4 112·5 1·0 304·6 110·4 0·9 12 174·0 140·3 5·3 191·4 123·0 1·3 216·5 116·1 1·6 244·1 114·5 1·6 281·0 114·5 0·7 300·5 112·5 1·1 245·3 113·4 1·8 265·0 111·5 1·3 302·2 109·5 0·7 11 167·4 135·0 1·3 189·4 121·7 5·1 213·5 114·5 1·7 240·6 112·9 1·3 279·2 113·8 1·8 296·8 111·1 1·2 241·5 111·6 - 0·1 261·9 110·2 1·1 300·4 108·8 1·4 10 165·8 133·7 4·3 181·4 116·6 2·8 210·4 112·8 2·1 237·8 111· 6 2·1 274·7 112·0 1·9 293·5 . 109·9 1·2 241·6 Ill· 7 1·8 259:4 109·1 1·8 296·3 107·4 1·9 9 160·4 129·4 3·6 177·0 113·8 2·.4 206·3 110·7 1·0 233·4 109·5 0·9 270·2 ll0·1 ] ·5 290·3 108·7 i. 9 237·8 109·9 1·0 254·7" 107·2 0·5 291·1 105·5 1·0 8 156·0 125·8 3·1 173·4 111·4 1·1 204·5 109·7 1·0 231·5 108·6 1·1 266·3 108·6 1·5 285·3 .106·8 0·4 235·6 108·9 1·8 253·7 106·7 1·1 288·3 104·5 0·3 7 152·2 122·7 3·2 171·6 110·3 0·9 202·6 108·7 1·5 229·3 107·5 0·6 262·8 107·1 0·9 284·0 106·4 0·9 231·8 107·1 1·3 251·0 105·6 0·5 287·6 104·2 0·8 6 148·2 ll9·5 3·2 170·2 109·4 1·7 199·9 107·2 0 227·8 106·9 1·4 260·5 106·2 0·8 281·8 105·5 0·6 229·0 105·8 0·2 249·9 105·1 0·5 285·4 103·4 0·9 5 144·2 116·3 2·4 167·7 107·7 0·9 199·9 107·2 2·3 224·9 105·5 1·2 258·5 105·4 1·4 280·0 104·9 1·0 228·5 105·6 1·1 248·6 104·6 0 283·0 102·5 0·3 4 141·2 113·9 4·4 166·2 106·8 3·1 195·5 104·9 0·8 222·3 104·3 0·7 255·2 104·0 0·8 277·5 103·9 0·7 226·2 104·5 1·4 248·6 104·6 1·7 282·1 102·2 0·8 3 135·8 109·5 3·0 161·4 103·7 2·2 194·1 104·1 1·3 220·9 103·6 1·5 253·2 103·2 1·6 275·5 103·2 1·8 223·0 103·1 0·7 244·7 102·9 0·5 280·0 101·4 1·4 2 132·0 106·5 3·8 158·0 101·5 1·5 191·8 102·9 1·5 217·7 102·1 1·8 249·2 101·6 1·2 270·8 101·4 1·0 221·6 102·4 2·5 243·4 102·4 1·3 277·1 100·4 0·9

·1 127·4- 102·7 1·7 154·0 99·0 0·7 187·3 100·4 0·6 213·8 100·3 0·8 246·3 100·4. -0·3 268·0 100·4 0·2 216·2 99·9 0·4 240·3 101·1 1·5 274·5 99·5 0 Served ... 0 125·2

nn-o

1·0 153·0 98·3 -1·7 186·1 99·8 - 0·2 212·2 99·5 - 0·5 247·0 100·7 0·7 267·5 100·2. 0·2 215·4 99·5 - 0·5 236·9 99·6 - 0·4 274·6 99·5 - 0·5 No. of Observations.

124·0 100 (5) - 155·6 100

-

186·5 100

-

213·2 100 - 245·>3 100

-

267·0 100

-

216·4 100 237·7 100 - 276·0 100 -

(5) (15) (19) (6) (4) ·(II) (7) (10)

- --·· .. --- -- ... ~---· .. - ... _. .. _._ ---- ~ .. - -. -·· --... ··--.-. ...:. ·--- ' . ·-. ... ~--·- --- .. --- ... -·- -. ·--- . -- --- . -·- __ , ... -- ~ -_,... ·-. ,

38 473-474

473-474b

473-474a

(13)

475-476a

475-476b

TABLE 5

(14)

475-476a 475-476c

b

(cont.)

(15)

475-476c 475-476b

TABLE 5 (cont.)

(16)

~ co ~

_, _,

TADLE

6. Influence of Lifter Size on the " lncrrn.~e in Artunl and Relatil'e 1Veights at Different Period.~ of Pregnancy.

I AcTcrAL INCREASE. RELATIVE J'CREAS:;), Litter Size. Up to 6-14 14-21 Gro~s Perman<>nt Loss at Per-Loss 6 Days. Days. Days. Increase. liH'I'I>IiSI>, Parturition. Up 6--14 14-21 Gms• 11!11.-at tn 6 Day~. Dn.,·s. In-rv·nt Par-Davs. 'Wt .. , O'

% %

cr(•a:ir· In-tarj. Wt.J

% \Yt..,

0/ Wt.l

%

Wt.J

%

Wt.J

% %

•0

%

r>f'c•asn. tion. tO f!· f!-g. g. !!. g. % Of.

' " I

Firs! Pugn.mcy. 2 and 3 •.•••.... 17·0 22·7 25·0 33·3 33·0 44·0 7.3·0 100 43·0 57·3 32·0 42·7 7·5 11·0 I4·5 33·0 I8·9 I4 ·1 4 and 5 ... 14·0 17 ·I 24·2 29·5 43·8 53·4 R2·0

roo

41 ·R 51·0 40·2 4!)·0 6·5 ll·I 20·2 37·8 I9·2 18·6 I 6and 7 ... I3·5 16·4 2I ·8 26·5 46·9 57 ·I 82·2 IOO 39·0 47·4 43·2 52·6 6·9 ll ·I 23·9 41 ·9 19·9 22·0 Sand 9 .. ~ ... 14-0 14·8 22·4 23-7 -~8·1 61-.'> 94-5 IOO 40·2 42·5 54-3 :')i ·5 6·7 lO ·6 27·6 44·9 19 ·1 2.i ·8 10 and ll ... 17 ·3 17 ·3 26·0 26 ·I 56·5 56·6 99·R 100 34·3 34·4 65-.''i 65·6 8·9 13 ·.i 29·3 -~I ·7 17-7 34·0 One and .11! 'lre Pre{Jrmncit_,, 5 ... I4 ·6 I5·8 25·8 28·0 51·8 56·2 92·2 100 50-8 55·1 41 ·4 44·9 5-6 9·9 19-8 3.3·3 I9 ·4 I5·9 6 and 7 ....•....• 11·7 14·6 19·8 24·8 48·4 60·6 79·9 IOO 30·6 38·3 49·3 6I ·7 5 ·I 8·5 2I·O 34·6 13·3 21·3 8 and 9 ... I2 ·4 13 ·2 22 ·I 23·5 59·5 63·3 94·0 IOO 36·7 39·0 57 ·3 61·0 5·4 9·6 25·7 40·7 15·9 24·8 1I ... 8·5 8·7 19·5 19·9 70·0 71·4 98·0 IOO 26·0 26·5 72·0 73·5 3·4 8·0 28·4 39·8 IO ·5 29·3 12 .••••.••••••••. 7 ·7 7·8 26·3 26·6 65·0 65·6 99·0 100 I4 ·7 I4·8 84·3 85·2 2·5 9 ·1 22·3 33·9 5·0 28·9 ----

p ?l

1::: c:t t:;i

~ .

(17)

~­ -.r \J:J

-TADLE

7. Loss at Parturition and Litter Weight of the Different Classes of Rats and of Different Litter Sizes.

\Veight of Young. Birth Adnexa. Per Cent. of Aver-Loss. Total LoEB No. age Maxi-Weight Per One Per One of Mother's after · Total. Total. Weight. Class. Lit-No. mum Young. Young. ters. Wt. Partu-

.

per rition . Litter. Wt'/ Per

I

Per

I

Per

I

Per

I

Per Young.,Adnexa. · Cent.* Wt. Cent.* Wt. Cnet.* Wt. Cent.* Wt. Cent.* g. g. g. g. g. g. g. Young Virgin ... 5 7·8 238·8 193·6 45·2 23·3 37·0 19·1 4·74 2·45 8·2 4-2 1·05 ·54 82 18 Plateau Virgin ... 49 7·0 295-7 247-3 48·4 19·6 36·0 14·6 5·12 2·07 12·4 5·0 1·77 ·72 74 26 One and More 29 7·5 330·6 278·6 52·0 18·7 38·8 13·9 5·19 1·86 13·2 4·7 1·76 ·63 75 25 PrcgnHncies All Rats ...• 83 7·2 305·3 255-0 50·3 19·7 37· I 14-5 5·12 2·01 13·2 5·2 1·83 ·72 74 26 Litter Size. 2 and 3 ... 3 2·7 302·3 270·3 32·0 ll·8 15·7 5·8 5·9 2·18 16·3 6·0 6·04 2·23 49 51 4 and 5 ... 15 4·8 3ll·5 271·7 39·8 14·6 24·1 8·9 5·01 1·84 15·7 5·8 3·27 1·20 61 39 6 and 7 ... 23 6·4 292·3 246·5 45·8 18·6 34·1 13·8 5·3 2·15 ll·7 4·7 1·83 ·74 74 26 8 and 9 ... 31 8·5 303·8 249·5 53·3 21·4 42·9 17·2 5·05 2·02 10·4 4·3 1·22 ·49 80 20 10 and ll ... 7 10·4 304·1 236·9 67·2 28·4 54·0 22·8 5· 18 2·19 13·2 5·6 1·27 ·54

so

20 12 ... '' .. '.'. 3 12 391·0 306·7 84·3 27·5 50·8 16-6 4·23 1·38 33·5 10·9 2·89 ·94 60 40 - * The percentages are expressed as ratios of weight at parturition.

l<'l I'd 0 ~ H ~ 0 1-,j H ~ tr:l

~

>-< !Z 0 I'd > H

(18)

G. N. MURRAY.

TADLE

8.

Weights of Pseudo Pregnant Rats.

No. of VIROIN RATS. RATS THAT HAD 0XE LITTER.

Dayg after Service. 1

I

g.

Served 0 ::!44 1 248 2 2!i3 3 2!i5 4 2ii6 5 258 6 261 7 267 8 267 9 268 10 268 l l 262 12 258 13 2!)6 14 258 15 258

Class of Rats.

2

I

3

g. g.

226 224 230 228 233 231 236 234 236 235 239 237 24:1 237 240 241 244 243 246 246 2;il 242 246 241 243 240 240 238 242 237 243 235

I

Number of

I

Female.

I

I

Young Virgins •••.. 2 4

"

5

Old females that had { one or two litters

3 1 6 8 28 9 10

I

Aver

I

Rel. 4

I

5

I

6

I

7

I

Aver.

I

Rei.

age. Wt. ago. Wt.

g.

%

g. g. g. g. g.

%

231 100 243 2fi4 281 2!i5 258 100 235 102 245 2ii8 282 2ii8 261 101 239 103 247 262 28ii I 2fi7 263 102 242 lO!i 25::! 266 284 263 "266 103 242 10ii 2ii6 268 293 263 270 105

245 106 •2;i7 270 204 ::!65 272 105

247 107 2ii8 272 2!)8 261\ 274 106 249 108 262 27ii 208 268 276 107 251 109 21\5 278 302 270 279 108 253 llO 266 282 30.6 270 281 100

2fi4 110 269 286 300 271 284

no

2.'i0 108 271 281 311 270 283 110 247 107 264 274 306 264 277 107 24ii 106 261 268 300 260 272 105 246 106 25ii 269 296 262 271 105 241\ 106 255 266 206 263 270 105

TABLE

9.

Weights of Uteri.

Weight when Killed.

g.

18.'5 200 193 174 190 195 195 255 286 243

WPight of dress!'d Uterus.

419

g.

0·38 0·47 1·02 0·5 0·5 0·4 0·36 1·15 0·7 0·8

Remarks.

Not served.

Not served.

Not served-Uterus (both horns) full of cl0ar fluid.

Rerved previous night.

Served previous night.

Served 30-36 hoUI's previously.

Served 30-36 hours previously.

Not served. FillPd with milky fluid. Weight of uterus when empty 0 ·7 g.

Not server!.

Not served.

(19)

,:.. 00 0

No. of Days Pregnant. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Unborn 22 Born 22

TADLE

10. Weiultts of Foetuses at Different Aues.

Number of Foetuses and Average Weight p~r Foetus of Indivi::lual Females. Total. N

I

Average

I

N A

wra~e I

N

I

Average AvC'rage Average No. Weight. o. Weight. o. Weight. o. Weight. No. Weight. No. "'dght. g. g. g. g. g. g. 7 ·07 6 ·13 5 ·06 8 ·06

- -

26 2·06 9 ·25 10 ·13 7 ·16 6 ·13 10 ·14 42 6·84 6 ·24 5 ·18 7 ·24 8 ·25

- -

26 6·00 10 ·39 7 ·39 6 ·38 7 ·42

- -

30 ll·85 9 ·84 10 ·68 3 ·68 10 ·76

- -

32 23·98 II 1·32 7 l·2 3 1·27 8 1·21

- -

29 36·49 9 2 .'!3 9 2·01 I 2 ·13 3 HJ6 7 1·96 29 59·04 5 2·79 9 3·56 4 3·32 10 3·37

- -

28 93·02 II 4·6 9 4·81 7 5·03 8 4·94

- -

35 168·59

- - - - -

-

- - - - - - - - - -

-

- - - - -

159

- '

Average Average Average No. Weight Weights per per of Female. Foetus. Angulo. g. g. 6·5 0·08 0·034 8·4 0·16 0·10 6·5 0·23 0·19 7·5 0·40 0·30 8·0 0·75 0·68 7·3 1·26 0·89 5·8 2·04 1·43 7·0 3·32 2·39 8·8 4·82 3·67

- -

5·09

-

5·09 5·93

Average Weights of Stntsen· burg. g. 0·040 0·112 0·168 0·310 0·548 1·00 1·58 2·63 . 3·98 4·63 -

Cl pj 0 ~ ...; I:Q

· o

"'l

~

tt.l > t" t:;:j

z

0 l::i.

>

...;

(20)

G. N. MURRAY.

TADLE

11.

Daily Treit;llfs antl Gains of Rats from Birth to TVeaning.

Age in Days.

I

Nnrnber

J

Average

I

Daily

I

Relative

of Hats. Weight. Gain. Gain.

g. g.•

%

Birth 1 ... ...•...•....•...• 159 147 5·09 5·:l7

-

·28

-

5·5 2 ... 143 6·08 ·71 13·2 3 ...•... I!{8 7·0!l 1·01 I6·6

4 ... 142 8·08 ·99 14·0

5 .•...•. 141 9 ·21 I ·13 14·0 li ... 140 10·53 I·32 14·3 7 ... I39 ll·!lO 1·37 13·0 8 ... I !!7 I:l·39 1·49 I2·5 9 ...•.. I37 l4·!l1 1·52 ll·4 10 ...•.• l:l7 16·f>O I·;i!l 10·7 II. ... 1:l5 18 ·1:3 1·63 9·9 I2 ... I35 19·8-i I·71 9·4 I3 .... : ... I33 21 ·56 1·72 8·7 14 ... 1:!3 2:!·13 1·57 7·3 15 ... 1:{3 24·65 1·52 6·6 1 li ................... 1:!3 2!i·98 1·33 5·4 17 ...••••... 1:13 27·52 1·54 5·9 18 ... 1:!9 28·91 1·39 5·1 19 ... I26 30·67 1·76 6·1 20 ... I23 3:!·G3 1·96 6·4

?1 ..••...•.••. •...•...••• Il9 35·0:3 2·40 7·4

22 ... 119 37·26 2·23 6·4

2:! ... 119 H!l·SO 2·54 6·8

2·1 ... 11!l 4:!·fi8 2·78 7·0

9--·l . • • • .••.• • • • • • •••.••• . • • 119 45 ·I fl 2 liS G·l 26 ... 119 47·!l2 2·76 6·1

27 ...•. 119 51·18 3·26 6·8

481

(21)

H::- 00 t..:J

Days Pregnant. 0 ... { 3 ... 4 ... 5 ... : .... 6 ... 7 ... 8 ... 9 ... 10 ... 11 ... 12 ... 13 ... 14 ... 15 ... 16... { 17 ... 18 ... 19... .

~

20 ... 21 ...

No. of Female. 116 118 109 165 117 135. 91 150 108 124 115 90 *83 59 *84 85 153 136 164 138 '56 148 58 Ill 119 126

Weight Weight when of Killed. Dressed Uterus. !!· g. 163 1·40 188 0·72 HiS 0·42 178 0·40 193 0·52 219 0·61 178 0·58 202 0·78 187 1·28 Hl9 1·2 203 2·5 204 3·08 246 3·0 185 10·45 210 7·28 264 15·42 229 10·4 233 20·0 209 18·75 230 30·9 252 35·25 258 33·25 266 25·8 236 48·65 297 70·4 263 57·7

TABLE

12. Weights of Ute1·i and Foetuses of Young Females.

Number of Numher of Living Foetuses. Dead Foetuses. Total Right Horn. -

- - - - -

5 5 7 5 6 6 3 4 3 3 3 2 5 4 5 3 4 4 5 2

No. of Foe- Left Total. Right Left Total. tuses. Horn. Horn. Horn.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -

-

- - - - - - - -

-

- - - - - - - -

-~

- -

6 11

- - -

ll 6 11

- - -

11 5 12

- - -

12 3 8

- - -

8 6 12

- - -

12 4 10

- - -

10 7 10

- - -

10 5 9

- - -

9 3 6

- - -

6 7 10

- -

10 4 7

- - -

7 7 9

- - -

9 5 10

- - -

10 7 11

- - -

11 4 9

- - -

9 6' 9

- - -

9 l 5

-

2 2 7 5 9

- - -

9 6 11

- - -

11 7 9

- - -

9 *No. 83 Gestation probably "nly 12 days. *No. 84 Gestation probably 0nly 14 days.

Weight of Foetuses. g. Right Horn. Left Horn. Both Horns. Total.

I

Aver. Total.\ Aver. Total.

I

Aver.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

~

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

1·0 0·:!5 1·23 0·25 2·23 0·25 0·72 0·24 0·71 0·24 1·43 0·24 1·17 0·39 2·i0 0·39 3·87 0·39 1·17 0·39 1·57 0·39' 2·74 0·39 1·65 0·83 5·9 0·84 7·55 0·84 3·5 0·7 3·3 0·66 6·8 0·68 5·4 1·33 9·17 1·31 14·57 1·32 10·62 2 ·12 8·53 2·13 19 ·15 2·12 6·10 2·03 12·03 • 2 ·01 18 ·13 2·01 11·0 2·75 2·95 2·95 13·95 2·79 14·28 2·57 17·8 2·56 32·08 3·56 22·92 4·fi8 27·65 4·61 50·57 4·60 10·0 5·0 33·3 4·76 43·3 4·81

Cj) l:d 0 ~

~

0 1-:j 1-'l

~ ~ ~ ~

(22)

ll>-- 00 C.:l

*No. 83 Gestation probably ..,nJy 12 '"days. *No. 84 Gestation probably <mly 14 days . TAlll.E

13. Trei!Jltis of Uteri and Foetuses of Old Rats

(8

months old) Pregnant for the Fi1·st Time.

=:·.·c=.=:=·:.:.:.~:.==:::-·:=::.~-:."::-:-,..:=· =================;=:========= Days Pregnant. 0 ... . 3 ... .. 6 ... . 11. ... . 12 ... . 13 ... .. 14 ... . 15 ... . 16 ... . 17 ... . 18 ... . 19 ... ..

Nnm- bl'r of Fe- male. 8 C)-~<> 36 51 53 6 46 24 65 98

NnmF.R oF LIVIJ\0 FOETUSES. N!'~lllF.R OF DEAO FOETUSES. WEIGHT OF FOETUSE~. g. Weight' Weight when of 1 Killed DressPd ---;----~-1---~---,--- . Uterus. Right Horn. Left Horn.

Totn.J Num- b<>r of Foe-

Right Horn. Left Horn. Both Horns. Rie:ht H~rn. Left H-orn. Tota.J. Total. tt)se~. J!. I e:. I I I I

Tot ~t l.

)

Aver-~

Total.,

Aver-~ Tot~tl

) Aver- 1 J 1 I age. age. ' • age. ~56 257 301 271 267 260 283 286 299 275

0·87 0·!)8 3·C8 5·6 1·05 1·67 10·3 8·27 21·1 6·97

6 5 3 2 3 1

2 2 3 1 4

8 7 6 3 7 1

1 1 1 1

1 3 1 4 1 3 1 2

2 3 1 4 2 4 1 3

10 10 1 4 8 7 8 4

·36 ·07 ·14 ·07 I 0·50 I 0·07 1·15 I 0·38 1·14 I 0·38 I 2·29 I 0·38 1·37 0·69 0·68 0·68 2·05 0·68 3·46 1·15 4·94 1·24 8·4 1·2 2·13 2·13 --2·13 2·13

(jl

:-: ~

~

~

(23)

jj:>. 00 ~

-

DI\VS Pregn.mt. "'0 ... !. ... 12 ... 13 ... 14 ...•... 15 ... 16 ... 17 ... 18 ... 19 ... 20 ...

TADLE

14. Weights of Uteri and Foetuses of Females

(11

months old) that lw(l Tzco Litters.

Nnm- bcr Weight of when Fe-Killed. male. fl· 48 303 25 272 486 294 *86 260 t8 324 t68 253

- -

9 318 24 320 65 329 425 3"" ~J

.

NUMBER OF NUlfRER OF ToJtn.! WEIGHTS OF FOETUSES. g •• Weight LIVuw FuE'l't:SES. DEAIJ FuEl't:SES. Num- of ber Dressed of Right Horn. Uterus. Right Left Right Left Foe- Horn. Horn. Total. Horn. Horu. Tota.J. tuseR. Tota.I.J Aver- !!. >tge. / 0·79

- - - - - - - - -

0·65

- - - - - - - - -

3·17 3 4 7 1 1 2 9

- -

5·47 4 2 6

-

1 1 7 0·52 0·13 3·03 1 1 2 3 3 6 8

- -

7·07 3 2 5 1

-

1 6 0·6 0·2 -

- - - - -

-

- - -

21·45 4 6 10

-

2 2 12 3·27 6·82 16·66 2 1 3 2 2 4 7 2·52 1·26 14·5 3

-

3 3 2 5 8 5·88 1·96 23·85 2 2 4 3 1 4 8 6·71 3·36 • !\o. 86 Ge.-tation prol,,!.]y ne.uer 14 clayR. t ~o. 8 Gest•llit~u proba!>ly 1~-l:l •lays a~ foetuses could not be weighed.

t

No. 68 Gt:station probably n011.rer 14 days.

Left Horn. Both Horns. T !'

I

Aver-ota. nge.

I

Aver-Tot.al. >tge.

- - - - . - - - - . - - - -

0·28 0·14 0·80 0·13

- - - -

0·3 0·15 0·9 0·18

- - - -

4·31 0·72 7·58 0·76 1·30 1·30 3·82 1·27

- -

5·88 1·96 6·58 3·29 13·29 3·32 --

"

l:d 0

:a ...,

:::1 0 "l

...,

~ t<J > t"' t:::l H 7l 0 l:d

~

(24)

~ 00 ~

-

D1tys rregn-.nt. 7 ... 8 ... 11. ... 13 ... 13 ...•... 14 ... 14 ... 14 ... 14 ... 15 ••..•..•.• 15 ... 16 ... 18 ... 19 ••.••.•... 20 ... 21 ....•... 21. ...

Nnm- bt·r of Fe- male. 49 3 70 40 6 50 8 81 39 51 33 45 5 18 32 35 53

Weight when Kill I'd. f!· 294 285 287 224 218 325 228 244 314 294 246 312 275 294 30l 272 323

'fABLE

lo. Weights of Uteri and Foetuses of

a

Mixed Lot of Rats.

NUMBER OF NUMBER OF TOTAL AND AVERAGE Vi'EIGHTS OF FOETUSES. g. LI\'ING FoETt:SES. DEAD FoETIJSEs. TotAl Weight Num- of ber lm,•••~l of Right Horn. Left Horn. Both Horns. Uterus. Right Left Right Left Foe- Total. Total. Horn. Horn. Hvru. Horn. t"se.•. Total.

I

AvPr-Total.

I

A vPr· T.)tal.l Aver- g. ago. age. age. 0·92 5 5 10

- - -

10

- - - - - -

0·92 4 5 9 1

-

1 10

- - - - - -

1·36 4

-

4 1

-

1 5

- - - - - -

4·4 4 1 5 -3 3 8 ·25 ·06 ·05 ·05 ·28 ·06 4·42 2 6 8

-

1 1 9 ·13 ·06 ·35 ·06 ·48 ·06 8·0 6 4 10 1

-

1 11 ·77 ·13 ·55 ·14 1·32 ·13 6·0 4 3 7

-

1 1 8 ·61 ·15 ·5 ·17 1·11 ·16 5·5 1 5 6 1 1 2 8 ·1 ·1 ·66 ·13 ·76 ·13 8·45 5 5 10

- - -

10 ·72 ·14 ·7 ·14 1·42 ·14 9·1 5 2 7 1

-

1 8 1·17 ·23 ·53 ·26 1·7 ·24 9·75 3 5 8

- - -

8 ·78 ·26 1·19 ·24 1·97 ·25 12·62 5 2 7

- - -

7 2·03 ·41 ·92 ·46 !Hl5 ·42 34·6 4 4 8

-

1 1 9 4·93 1·23 4·ii 1·19 9·7 1·21 3J·8 1 6 7

- - -

7 1·9b 1·98 11·77 1·96 13·7.') 1·96 53·3 8 2 10

-

1 1 11 26·8" 3·36 6·82 3·41 33·7 :1·37 48·45 5 2 7

- - -

7 25·3 5·06 9·92 4·96 35·22 li·03 51·6 4 4 8

- - -

8 19·0 4·75 20·5 5·1 39·5 4·94 .. ~ --

Cl ;<l 1::: q ~ ~ ~

(25)

IV TAnLE

lflo

Pi 0 ~ Litter Si::e and Avera.!Je

lreight

at Birth. H

:::

0 ~';.~~:==::.:.=~. >:j Males. Females. :l\Jalcs and Females. H

:::

Number

I

Smoothed Sex Total t:J Litter Size. I of Weight. Ratio. Lit.ter

>

Litters. N b

I

Average Average

I

Average Weight. t"' Number. Number. W . it t:::l urn er. Weight. Weight.

....

mg J

z

f!· g. g. g. 0

--- ·

Pi 2 ... 3 3 5·80 3 5·90 6 5·85 5·6'7 100 11·7

> -

:" 3 ... 7 13 5·41 8 5·50 21 5·44 5·57 163 16·3 .

.

~ 4 ...•....•... 21 47 5·62 37 5·48 84 5·56 5·476 127 22·2 en ~ 5 ... 26 67 5·46 63 5·16 130 5·31 5·38 106 26·6 6 ...•... 29 92 5·28 82 5·32 174 5·30 5·29 112 31·8

.

7 ... 44 159 5·32 149 4·95 308 5·14 5·195 107 36·0 8 ... 55 200 5·ll 240 4·92 440 5·01 5·107 83 40·1 9 ... 46 180 5·03 234 4·82 414 4·90 5·017 77 44·1 10 ... 20 91 5·16 109 4·84 200 4·99 4·93 83 49·9 11 ..•... 19 109 5·10 100 4·91 209 5·01 4·845 109 55·1 12 ... 4 27 4·82 21 4·63 48 4·74 4·76 129 56·9 2-12 ... 274 988 5·19 1,046 4·!)6 2,034 5·07

-

94·5 37·7 -· ···-···--·--·--·-· ..

·· - · · ·· - - ---

Gambar

TABLE 4.  Influence of 1¥cight at Service on the lnc1·ease in Actttal and Relative Weights  at Different Periods of Pregnancy
TABLE 5 (cont.)
TABLE 12.  Weights of Ute1·i and Foetuses of Young Females.  Number of Numher of  Living Foetuses
TABLE 19.  Influence of Parity on Birth TTleioht and Litter Size.  ~ AvERAGE WEIGHT AT BIRTH
+2

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

As large data applications for Chinese e-commerce business is not yet mature, and the future development of large data needs to strengthen industrial clusters, and strengthen the