• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Concluding Remarks

Dalam dokumen Cultural Psychology of Coping with Disasters (Halaman 164-169)

4.1.3 “Javanese” Psychologies 6

5.5 Concluding Remarks

References

Acker, J., Barry, K., & Essveld, J. (1991). Objectivity and truth. Problems in doing feminist research.

In M. Fonow & J. Cook (Eds.), Beyond methodology. Feminist scholarship as lived research (pp. 133–153). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Antlöv, H. (2005). The social construction of power and authority in Java. In H. Antlöv & J. Hellman (Eds.), The Java that never was. Academic theories and political practices (pp. 43–66). Münster:

LIT.

Beatty, A. (1999). Varieties of Javanese religion. An anthropological account. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Behnke, C., & Meuser, M. (1999). Geschlechterforschung und qualitative Methoden. Qualitative Sozialforschung 1. Opladen: Leske+Budrich.

Beittinger-Lee, V. (2009). (Un)civil society and political change in Indonesia. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; New York: Routledge.

Berg, E., & Fuchs, M. (1993). Kultur, soziale Praxis, Text. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Bergold, J., & Thomas, S. (2012). Participatory research methods: A methodological approach in motion [110 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1), http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1201304. Accessed 12 Dec 2013.

Berry, J., Poortinga, Y., Breugelmans, S., Chasiotis, A., & Sam, D. (2011). Cross-cultural psychology. Research and applications (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Birkmann, J., & Wisner, B. (2006). Measuring the un-measurable. The challenge of vulnerability.

Bonn: Publication Series of UNU-EHS No. 5.

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

Bonanno, G. A., Brewin, C. R., Kaniasty, K., & La Greca, A. M. (2010). Weighing the costs of disas-ter: consequences, risks, and resilience in individuals, families and communities. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11(1), 1–49.

Bourdieu, P. (2005). Die männliche Herrschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1996). Reflexive Anthropologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Brokensha, D., Warren, D., & Werner, O. (Eds.). (1980). Indigenous knowledge systems and development. Lanham: University Press of America.

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis.

London: Sage.

Chiwaka, E., & Yates, R. (n.d.). Participatory vulnerability analysis. A step–by–step guide for field staff. Actionaid International. http://www.actionaid.org.uk/sites/default/files/doc_lib/

108_1_participatory_vulnerability_analysis_guide.pdf. Accessed 27 March 2013.

Cisneros-Puebla, C. A. (2007). The deconstructive and reconstructive faces of social construc-tion. Kenneth Gergen in conversation with César A. Cisneros-Puebla. With an introduction by Robert B. Faux [83 paragraphs]. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(1). http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0801204. Accessed 6 Jan 2013.

Clarke, A. (2005). Situational analysis. Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Clifford, J. (1988). The predicament of culture. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Crowe, M., & Sheppard, L. (2010). Qualitative and quantitative research designs are more similar than different. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 8(4).

http://ijahsp.nova.edu/articles/Vol8Num4/crowe_8_4_.htm. Accessed 26 Jan 2013.

Dekens, J. (2007). Local knowledge for disaster preparedness. Kathmandu: International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD). Online: http://preventionweb.net/go/2693.

Accessed 10 May 2013.

Engler, S. (2004). Constructionism versus what? Religion, 34(4), 291–313.

Farnell, B. (2000). Getting out of the habitus: An alternative model of dynamically embodied social action. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 6(3), 397–418.

Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage.

Folkman, S. (1997). Positive psychological states and coping with severe stress. Social Science &

Medicine, 45(8), 1207–1221.

Gergen, K. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. London: Sage.

Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. M. (1997). Toward a cultural constructionist psychology. Theory &

Psychology, 7, 31–36.

Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.

Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.

Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Haseman, B. (2006). A manifesto for performative research. Media International Australia in-corporating Culture and Policy, theme issue Practice-led Research (no. 118), pp. 98–106.

http://eprints.qut.edu.au/3999/1/3999_1.pdf. Accessed 16 Feb 2013.

Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested self in the stress process:

Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337–421.

Hobfoll, S. E. (2011). Conservation of resources theory: Its implication for stress, health and resilience. In S. Folkman & P. E. Nathan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping (pp. 127–147). New York: Oxford University Press.

Holtzappel, C., & Ramstedt, M. (2009). Decentralization and regional autonomy in Indonesia.

Singapore, Leiden, Netherlands: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies; International Institute for Asian Studies.

Jigyasu, R. (2002). Reducing disaster vulnerability through local knowledge and capacity.

http://ntnu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:123824/FULLTEXT01. Accessed 6 June 2013.

Kalayjian, A., Kanazi, R. L., Aberson, C. L., & Feygin, L. (2002). A cross-cultural study of the psychosocial and spiritual impact of natural disaster. International Journal of Group Tensions, 31(2), 175–186.

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp.

559–604) (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Kim, U. (2000). Indigenous, cultural, and cross-cultural psychology: A theoretical, conceptual, and epistemological analysis. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(3), 265–287.

Kleinman, A., & Erin, F.-H. (2007). The experiential basis of subjectivity: How individuals change in the context of societal transformation. In J. Biehl, B. Good, & A. Kleinman (Eds.), Subjectivity.

Ethnographic investigations (pp. 52–65). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Lykes, M. (2001a). Activist participatory research and the arts with rural Maya women: Intercultur-ality and situated meaning making. In D. L. Tolman, & M. Brydon-Miller (Eds.), From subjects to subjectivities: A handbook of interpretive and participatory methods (pp. 183–199). New York: New York University Press.

Lykes, M. (2001b). Creative arts and photography in participatory action research in Guatemala.

In P. Reason, & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research. Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 363–371). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Markard, M. (2010). Kritische Psychologie: Forschung vom Standpunkt des Subjekts. In G.

Mey & K. Mruck (Eds.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie (pp. 166–181).

Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Manning, C., & van Diermen, P. (Eds.). (2000). Indonesia in transition: Social Aspects of Reformasi and Crisis. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mercer, J., Dominey-Howes, D., Kelman, I., & Lloyd, K. (2007). The potential for combining indigenous and western knowledge in reducing vulnerability of environmental hazards in small island developing states. Environmental Hazards, 7(4), 245–256.

Mercer, J. (2012). Knowledge and disaster risk reduction. In B. Wisner, J. C. Gaillard, & I. Kelman (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of hazards and disaster risk reduction (pp. 97–108). London:

Routledge.

Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Norris, F. H. (2006). Disaster research methods. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 19(2), 173–184.

Norris, F. H., Tracy, M., & Galea, S. (2009). Looking for resilience: Understanding the longitudinal trajectories of responses to stress. Social Science & Medicine, 68(12), 2190–2198.

Oliver-Smith, A. (1998). Disasters, social change, and adaptive systems. In E. L. Quarantelli (Ed.), What is a disaster? (pp. 231–233). London: Routledge.

Pakenham, K. I. (2011). Benefit finding and sense making in chronic illness. In S. Folkman & P. E.

Nathan, (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping (pp. 242–268). New York:

Oxford University Press.

Pargament, K. I. (2011). Religion and coping: The current state of knowledge. In S. Folkman & P.

E. Nathan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of stress, health, and coping (pp. 269–288). New York:

Oxford University Press.

Pargament, K. I., Koenig, H. G., & Perez, L. M. (2000). The many methods of religious coping:

Development and initial validation of the RCOPE. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(4), 519–

543.

Pemberton, J. (1994). On the subject of Java. New York: Cornell University Press.

Prawitasari-Hadiyono, J. E., Paramastri, I., Suhapti, R., Novianti, L. P., Widiastuti, T. R., &

Rengganis, N. (2009). Social artistry, lokales Wissen und Konflikte nach einem Erdbeben.

Zeitschrift für Psychodrama und Soziometrie, 8(2), 277–295.

Priya, K. R. (2004). Survivors’ suffering and healing amidst changing socioeconomic forces in two years of post-earthquake Kachchh. Psychology & Developing Societies, 16(1), 41–60.

Priya, K. R (2010). Research relationship as a facilitator of remoralization and self-growth: Post-earthquake suffering and healing. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 479–495.

Priya, K. R. (2012). Social constructionist approach to suffering and healing: Juxtaposing Cassell, Gergen and Kleinman. Psychological Studies, 57, 211–223.

Rabinow, P. (2007). Anthropological observation and self-formation. In J. G. Biehl, B. J. Good, & A.

Kleinman (Eds.), Subjectivity. Ethnographic investigations (pp. 98–127). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Ratner, C. (2008). Cultural psychology, cross-cultural psychology, and indigenous psychology.

New York: Nova Science Publishers.

Schlehe, J. (2006). Nach dem Erdbeben auf Java: Kulturelle Polarisierungen, soziale Solidarität und Abgrenzung. Internationales Asienforum, 37(3–4), 213–237.

Schwarz, S. (2012). Eine kritische und kultursensible Sicht auf das Mainstreaming von Gender in einem Katastrophenkontext: Umstrittene Gendergerechtigkeitsvorstellungen, ein heuristisches Modell sozialen Wandels und Strategieprozessvorstellungen. Betroffenen- und AktivistInnen-sichtweisen. Doctoral Dissertation, Fachbereich Erziehungswissenschaften und Psychologie, Freie Universität Berlin.

Sillitoe, P. (2010). Trust in development: Some implications of knowing in indigenous knowledge.

Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 16, 12–30.

Strauss, A. L. (1978). A social worlds perspective. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 1, 119–128.

Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Grounded Theory: Grundlagen Qualitativer Sozialforschung.

Weinheim: Beltz Psychologie Verlags Union.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1985). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Wikgren, M. (2004). Critical realism as philosophy and social theory in information science. Journal of Documentation, 61(1), 11–22.

Winter, R. (2010). Sozialer Konstruktivismus. In G. Mey & K. Mruck (Eds.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie (pp. 123–135). Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Wohlrab-Sahr, M. (1993). Empathie als methodisches Prinzip? Entdifferenzierung und Re-flexionsverlust als problematisches Erbe der „methodischen Postulate der Frauenforschung“.

Feministische Studien, 11(2), 128–139.

Wulf, C., & Zirfas, J. (2001). Das Soziale als Ritual: Perspektiven des Performativen. In C. Wulf, B. Althans, K. Audehm, C. Bausch, M. Göhlich, S. Sting, A. Tervooren, M. Wagner-Willi, & J.

Zirfas (Eds.), Das Soziale als Ritual (pp. 339–347). Opladen: Leske+Budrich.

Zaumseil, M. (2006a). Der alltägliche Umgang mit Schizophrenie in Zentral-Java. In E. Wohl-fart & M. Zaumseil (Eds.), Transkulturelle Psychiatrie. Interkulturelle Psychotherapie – Interdisziplinäre Theorie und Praxis (pp. 332–360). Berlin: Springer.

Zaumseil, M. (2006b). Beiträge der Psychologie zum Verständnis des Zusammenhangs von Kultur und psychischer Gesundheit bzw. Krankheit. In E. Wohlfart & M. Zaumseil (Eds.), Transkul-turelle Psychiatrie. InterkulTranskul-turelle Psychotherapie – Interdisziplinäre Theorie und Praxis (pp.

3–50). Berlin: Springer.

Zaumseil, M. (2007). Qualitative Sozialforschung in Klinischer Kulturpsychologie. Psychotherapie und Sozialwissenschaft, 9(2), 99–116.

Research Ethics: Between Formal Norms

Dalam dokumen Cultural Psychology of Coping with Disasters (Halaman 164-169)