[BPS] Badan Pusat Statistik. 2009. Banten Dalam Angka 2009. BPS : Jakarta. _______________________. 2010. Banten Dalam Angka 2010. BPS : Jakarta. _______________________. 2011. Banten Dalam Angka 2011. BPS : Jakarta. _______________________. 2012. Banten Dalam Angka 2012. BPS : Jakarta. _______________________. 2013. Banten Dalam Angka 2013. BPS : Jakarta. Adisasmita, R. 2005. Dasar-dasar Ekonomi Wilayah. Penerbit Graha Ilmu,
Yogyakarta.
Averiana Meiyora. 2013. Dampak Ketersediaan Infrastruktur terhadap Kesejahteraan Masyarakat: Analisis Kabupaten/Kota di Indonesia 2009-2011 [Skripsi]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Daerah. Rencana Strategis Pemerintah Provinsi Banten. Banten.
Baltagi BH.2005. Econometrics Analysis of Panel Data Third Edition.England (GB) : John Wiley and Sons,Ltd.
Gujarati D., dan Zain S. 1998. Ekonometrika Dasar. Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta. Juanda B.2012. Ekonometrika : Pemodelan dan Pendugaan.IPB Press Bogor. Helena N. 2013. Pengaruh Ketersediaan Infrastruktur terhadap Ketimpangan
Pendapatan perkapita: Analisis Provinsi di Indonesia 2007-2011 [Skripsi]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Hirschman A. 1958. The Strategy of Economic Development. Yale University Press, USA.
Hidayatika DM. 2007. Peranan Infrastruktur Terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi di Pulau Jawa.Tesis Magister Sains. Program Pascasarjana UI, Jakarta.
Intan A. R. 2009. Dampak Otonomi Daerah terhadap Kemiskinan dan Distribusi Pendapatan Kabupaten dan Kota di Provinsi Banten [Tesis]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Kuncoro, M. 2010. Ekonomika Pembangunan : Masalah, Kebijakan, dan Politik. Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta.
Mankiw, N. Gregory. 2003. Pengantar Ekonomi. Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta. Meier G. M., and Stiglitz, J. E. 2001. Frontiers of Development Economics : The
Future in Perspectif. Oxford University Press, The World Bank, Washington D. C., USA.
Nachrowi, N., dan Hardius S. 2006. Pendekatan Populer dan Praktis Ekonometrika Untuk Analisis Ekonomi dan Keuangan. Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi UI, Jakarta.
Prasetyo R. 2008. Ketimpangan dan Pengaruh Infrastruktur terhadap Pembangunan Ekonomi Kawasan Barat Indonesia (KBI). Tesis Magister Sains Program Pascasarjana, UI, Jakarta.
Purnomo H. 2009. Dampak Pembangunan Infrastruktur terhadap Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Kabupaten Bekasi [Skripsi]. Bogor (ID): Institut Pertanian Bogor. Radiansyah D. 2012. Analisis Kontribusi Infrastruktur Terhadap Pertumbuhan
Ekonomi Regional Di Indonesia. Tesis Magister Sains.Program Pascasarjana, UI, Jakarta.
Sukirno, S. 2006. Ekonomi Pembangunan : Proses, Masalah, dan Dasar Kebijakan. Penerbit Kencana, Jakarta.
32
Suparmoko, M. 2001. Ekonomi Publik : Untuk Keuangan dan Pembangunan Daerah. Yogyakarta. Penerbit Andi.
The World Bank. 1994. World Bank Development Report 1994 : Infrastructure for Development. Oxford Press University. Jakarta.
Todaro, M.P. 2006. Pembangunan Ekonomi Edisi Kesembilan. Penerbit Erlangga, Jakarta.
Undang-Undang No.25 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perimbangan Antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah.
33 Lampiran 1. Data variabel operasional kabupaten/kota di Provinsi Banten
KT. CILEGON 2009 54.48 28018.8 240 4035 4 501 99.83 1838278 330.87 KT. CILEGON 2010 83.46 31259.03 251 4543 5 557 99.81 2966309 331.4 KT. CILEGON 2011 89.62 34490.32 252 4206 5 577 99.73 3486750 383.64 KT. CILEGON 2012 97.15 38218.71 241 4782 5 625 100 3707666 384.06 KT. SERANG 2009 8.51 4955.5 376 5023 5 372 99.26 1468925 307.27 KT. SERANG 2010 9.79 5657.12 365 5054 5 557 99.39 1468925 307.27 KT. SERANG 2011 10.68 6341.71 372 5184 5 387 99.15 1228690 307.27 KT. SERANG 2012 11.65 7085.63 385 5184 5 404 99.5 1017108 307.27 KT. TANGERANG 2009 28.18 49332.3 849 10940 23 1817 99.35 10241742 530.63 KT. TANGERANG 2010 31.65 56921.25 871 14016 23 2025 99.35 10241742 530.63 KT. TANGERANG 2011 34.45 63675.06 883 13002 18 2131 99.9 10241742 530.63 KT. TANGERANG 2012 36.94 70200.92 880 19029 18 2067 99.67 10241742 530.63 KT. TANGERANG SELATAN 2009 8.14 10183.2 602 5902 17 732 99.75 435171 640.93 KT. TANGERANG SELATAN 2010 9.00 11612.26 523 6501 18 806 99.55 450343 640.93 KT. TANGERANG SELATAN 2011 9.00 13223.88 511 9140 19 1130 99.84 735234 640.93 KT. TANGERANG SELATAN 2012 10.88 14971.05 571 9140 21 1428 99.74 9828969 640.93 LEBAK 2009 6.13 7523.5 1014 13004 3 232 83.55 3498549 833.9 LEBAK 2010 7.02 8456.67 1055 12865 3 403 92.86 3360342 837.96 LEBAK 2011 7.53 9312.03 1063 14149 3 406 98.14 3142427 835.96 LEBAK 2012 8.18 10271.99 1035 12862 3 501 98.46 3565353 837.96 PANDEGLANG 2009 6.57 7658 1074 15693 1 228 79.12 3442942 723.03 PANDEGLANG 2010 7.55 8680.17 1117 11914 1 202 92.69 3621580 723.03 PANDEGLANG 2011 8.12 9586.09349 1124 10960 1 167 97.97 3652472 723.03 PANDEGLANG 2012 9.01 10705.3194 1089 11927 1 259 97.67 3743061 723.03 SERANG 2009 8.30 11497.4 961 13266 2 330 96.94 6285261 997.64 SERANG 2010 9.05 12694.79 992 12368 3 467 96.94 3595997 997.65 SERANG 2011 9.86 14207.17 1020 10603 3 350 99.11 4704616 997.65 SERANG 2012 10.75 15714.91 1018 12701 2 318 99.19 4704616 997.65 TANGERANG 2009 11.29 30884.6 1276 15143 11 999 99.1 9828969 2080.35 TANGERANG 2010 12.30 34866.22 1372 15974 11 999 99.29 10440840 2080.35 TANGERANG 2011 13.53 39414.37 1374 16650 15 1331 99.69 8614148 2080.35 TANGERANG 2012 14.61 44119.45 1443 18045 17 1546 99.79 10703550 2080.35 jumlah guru (Orang)
KABUPATEN/ KOTA TAHUN
PDRB perkapita ADHB (juta) PDRB ADHK 2000 (juta) SEKOLAH (Unit) rumah sakit (Unit) Tempat tidur (Unit) Persentase RT (%) JAD (m³) Panjang jalan (km)
34
Lampiran 2. Uji Hausman pada persamaan pengaruh infrastruktur terhadap PDRB perkapita.
Correlated Random Effects - Hausman Test Equation: Untitled
Test cross-section random effects
Test Summary
Chi-Sq.
Statistic Chi-Sq. d.f. Prob. Cross-section random 40.091211 6 0.0000
Cross-section random effects test comparisons:
Variable Fixed Random Var(Diff.) Prob. LNPEND*DUM 0.087585 0.128340 0.000150 0.0009 LNKSHTAN 0.067715 0.087472 0.000055 0.0080 LNJLN*DUM 0.230782 0.289185 0.001083 0.0760 LNAIR 0.006415 0.006229 0.000001 0.8682 LIST*DUM 0.036233 0.036328 0.000124 0.9932 LIST 0.005973 0.005833 0.000000 0.5380
Cross-section random effects test equation: Dependent Variable: LNPDRB
Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 09/02/14 Time: 17:08 Sample: 2009 2012
Periods included: 4 Cross-sections included: 8
Total panel (balanced) observations: 32
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. C -6.083955 0.962794 -6.319059 0.0000 LNPEND*DUM 0.087585 0.071386 1.226915 0.2357 LNKSHTAN 0.067715 0.034769 1.947532 0.0672 LNJLN*DUM 0.230782 0.096006 2.403830 0.0272 LNAIR 0.006415 0.012785 0.501744 0.6219 LIST*DUM 0.036233 0.013949 2.597565 0.0182 LIST 0.005973 0.001549 3.856612 0.0012 Effects Specification Cross-section fixed (dummy variables)
R-squared 0.999334 Mean dependent var -4.912653 Adjusted R-squared 0.998854 S.D. dependent var 0.856899 S.E. of regression 0.029013 Akaike info criterion -3.942538 Sum squared resid 0.015151 Schwarz criterion -3.301279 Log likelihood 77.08061 Hannan-Quinn criter. -3.729979 F-statistic 2078.814 Durbin-Watson stat 1.992882 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000
35 Lampiran 3. Hasil estimasi Eviews 6.0 persamaan pengaruh infrastruktur terhadap PDRB perkapita
Dependent Variable: LNPDRB
Method: Panel EGLS (Cross-section weights) Date: 09/02/14 Time: 16:57
Sample: 2009 2012 Periods included: 4 Cross-sections included: 8
Total panel (balanced) observations: 32
Linear estimation after one-step weighting matrix
White period standard errors & covariance (d.f. corrected)
WARNING: estimated coefficient covariance matrix is of reduced rank
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob. LNKSHTAN 0.107618 0.013896 7.744509 0.0000 LNAIR 0.007700 0.004994 1.542003 0.1405 LIST 0.005572 0.000554 10.06618 0.0000 LNPEND*DUM 0.121430 0.078940 1.538245 0.1414 LNJLN*DUM 0.349600 0.044959 7.776022 0.0000 LIST*DUM 0.044195 0.005806 7.611851 0.0000 C -5.551520 0.178415 -31.11575 0.0000 Effects Specification Cross-section fixed (dummy variables)
Weighted Statistics
R-squared 0.999709 Mean dependent var -7.312540 Adjusted R-squared 0.999498 S.D. dependent var 3.452616 S.E. of regression 0.024932 Sum squared resid 0.011188 F-statistic 4752.183 Durbin-Watson stat 2.554831 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000
Unweighted Statistics
R-squared 0.999229 Mean dependent var -4.912653 Sum squared resid 0.017553 Durbin-Watson stat 1.722464
36
Lampiran 4. Uji Hausman pada persamaan pengaruh infrastruktur terhadap PDRB ADHK 2000
Correlated Random Effects - Hausman Test Equation: REM
Test cross-section random effects
Test Summary
Chi-Sq.
Statistic Chi-Sq. d.f. Prob.
Cross-section random 1618.145633 7 0.0000
** WARNING: estimated cross-section random effects variance is zero.
Cross-section random effects test comparisons:
Variable Fixed Random Var(Diff.) Prob.
LNKSHTAN 0.062053 -0.026776 0.005720 0.2402 LNAIR 0.014750 0.791970 0.000575 0.0000 LIST 0.007790 0.012069 0.000001 0.0000 LNPEND*D 0.213627 -0.868730 0.016125 0.0000 LNKSHTAN*D 0.025901 -0.012673 0.018310 0.7756 LIST*D 0.075474 -0.041182 0.000783 0.0000 LNJLN*D 0.380359 0.252880 0.046886 0.5560
Cross-section random effects test equation: Dependent Variable: LNPDRB
Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 08/23/14 Time: 11:48 Sample: 2009 2012
Periods included: 4 Cross-sections included: 8
Total panel (balanced) observations: 32
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
C 3.387289 2.084452 1.625026 0.1226 LNKSHTAN 0.062053 0.101027 0.614223 0.5472 LNAIR 0.014750 0.030421 0.484857 0.6340 LIST 0.007790 0.003518 2.214496 0.0407 LNPEND*D 0.213627 0.155102 1.377328 0.1863 LNKSHTAN*D 0.025901 0.153321 0.168935 0.8678 LIST*D 0.075474 0.028676 2.631968 0.0175 LNJLN*D 0.380359 0.217474 1.748986 0.0983 Effects Specification
Cross-section fixed (dummy variables)
R-squared 0.996530 Mean dependent var 9.030558 Adjusted R-squared 0.993672 S.D. dependent var 0.807234 S.E. of regression 0.064216 Akaike info criterion -2.348157 Sum squared resid 0.070102 Schwarz criterion -1.661094 Log likelihood 52.57052 Hannan-Quinn criter. -2.120415 F-statistic 348.6894 Durbin-Watson stat 1.213195 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000
37 Lampiran 5. Hasil estimasi Eviews 6.0 persamaan pengaruh infrastruktur terhadap PDRB ADHK 2000
Dependent Variable: LNPDRB
Method: Panel EGLS (Cross-section weights) Date: 08/20/14 Time: 12:57
Sample: 2009 2012 Periods included: 4 Cross-sections included: 8
Total panel (balanced) observations: 32
Linear estimation after one-step weighting matrix
White period standard errors & covariance (d.f. corrected)
WARNING: estimated coefficient covariance matrix is of reduced rank
Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.
LNKSHTAN 0.063688 0.027437 2.321233 0.0330 LNAIR 0.013742 0.017250 0.796606 0.4367 LIST 0.007807 0.000317 24.66482 0.0000 LNPEND*D 0.301534 0.063465 4.751224 0.0002 LNKSHTAN*D 0.141657 0.059829 2.367688 0.0300 LIST*D 0.079340 0.008178 9.701504 0.0000 LNJLN*D 0.366803 0.020610 17.79772 0.0000 C 4.085141 0.427344 9.559381 0.0000 Effects Specification
Cross-section fixed (dummy variables)
Weighted Statistics
R-squared 0.999119 Mean dependent var 16.15354 Adjusted R-squared 0.998393 S.D. dependent var 9.661898 S.E. of regression 0.057742 Sum squared resid 0.056680 F-statistic 1376.814 Durbin-Watson stat 2.145184 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000
Unweighted Statistics
R-squared 0.996090 Mean dependent var 9.030558 Sum squared resid 0.078983 Durbin-Watson stat 1.357282
38