Black, C.A. 1973. Soil-Plant Relationships. 2n d Edition. Wiley Eastern Private Limited. New Delhi.
Blake, G. R.1965. Methods of Soil Analysis: Bulk Density. C. A. Black (ed).
Agron. 9. Am. Soc. Agron. Madison, Wis. Dalam : Buol, S. W., F. D.
Hole, dan R. J. Mc Cracken. 1978. Soil Genesis and Classification. Second Indian Reprint. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. New Delhi, Bombay, Calcuta.
Blake, G. R. and Hartge. 1986. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods: Bulk Density . Klute. A (ed). American Society of Agronomy-Soil Scie nce Society of America. Minnesota.
Boekel, P. 1963. Soil Structure and Plant Growth . Neth. J. Agr. Sci. 11, 120-127.
Dalam : Hillel, D. 1971. Soil and Water: Physical Principles and Proceses. Academic Press. New York.
Borg, H. 1982. Estimating Soil Hydaraulic Properties from Textural Data. Ph.D.
thesis. Washingthon State Univ., Pullman (Diss. Abstr. 83-03292).
Dalam : Saxton, K. E., W. J. Raws, J. S. Rornberger, and R. I. Papendick.
1986. Estimating Generalized Soil-Water Characteristics from Texture.
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50:1031-1036.
Buol, S. W., F. D. Hole, dan R. J. Mc Cracken. 1978. Soil Genesis and Classification. Second Indian Reprint. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.
New Delhi, Bombay, Calcuta.
Croney, D. and J. D. Coleman. 1954. Soil Structure in Relation to Soil Suction (pF). J. Soil Sci. 5:75-84. Dalam: Klute, A (ed). 1986. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods: Laboratory Methods. American Society of Agronomy-Soil Science Society of America. Minnesota.
Dane, J. H. and A. Klute. 1977. Salt Effect on The Hydraulic Properties of Swelling Soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41: 1043-1049. Dalam : Hillel, D.
1980. Fundamental of Soil Physics. Academic Press, New York.
Elrick, D. E. and C. B. Tanner. 1955. Influence of Sample Pretreatment on Soil Moisture Retention. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. Proc. 19:279-282. Dalam : Klute, A (ed). 1986. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods: Laboratory Methods. American Society of Agronomy-Soil Science Society of America. Minnesota.
Emerson, W. W. 1938. Soil Stucture. Imperial Bur. Soil Sci. Tech. Commun. 317.
Dalam : Hillel, D. 1971. Soil and Water. Physical Principles and Processes. Academic Press. New York.
Gardner, W. 1920. The Capillary Potensial and Its Relation to Soil Moisture Content. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 10:357-359. Dalam: Hillel, D. 1980.
Fundamental of Soil Physics. Academic Press. New York.
Giyanto, I. 2004. Karakterisasi Kelembaban Tanah dalam Kaitannya dengan Sifat Fisika Tanah pada Berbagai Tekstur dan Jenis Tanah. Skripsi. Fakultas Pertanian. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.
Grim, R. E. 1958. Organization of Water on Clay Mineral Surfaces and Its Implications for The Properties of Claywater System. Water and Its Conduction Soils. Highway Res. Board. Spec. Rep 40. Nat. Acad. Sci. Nat.
Res. Council. Publ. 629, pp 17-23. Dalam : Hillel, D. 1971. Soil and Water. Physical Principles and Proce sses. Academic Press. New York.
Grossman, R. B., B. R. Brasher, D. P. Franzmeizer, dan J. L. Walker. 1968. Linier Extensibility as Calculated from Natural Clod Bulk Density Measurements. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 32 : 5 70-73. Dalam: Buol, S.
W., F. D. Hole, dan R. J. Mc Cracken. 1978. Soil Genesis and Classification. Second Indian Reprint. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.
New Delhi, Bombay, Calcuta.
Hartge, K. H. 1965. Vergleich der Schrumpfung Ungestorter Boden und Gekneteter Pasten. Z. Friedr. Wilh. Univ. Jena. (math-nat. reihe) 14 : 53-57. Dalam: Blake, G. R. and Hartge. 1986. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogic al Methods: Bulk Density. Klute, A. (ed).
American Society of Agronomy-Soil Science Society of America.
Minnesota.
.1968. Heterogenitat oles Bodens Oder Quellung? Trans. Int.
Congr. Soil Sci, Soil Sci. 69: 487-496. Dalam: Blake, G. R. and Hartge.
1986. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods: Bulk Density. Klute, A. (ed). American Society of Agronomy-Soil Science Society of America. Minnesota.
Hillel, D. 1971. Soil and Water. Physical Principles and Processes. Academic Press. New York.
. 1980. Fundamental of Soil Physics. Academic Press, New York.
Indranada, H. K. 1986. Pengelolaan Kesuburan Tanah. PT. Bina Aksara. Jakarta Jenny, H. 1932. Studies on The Mecanism of Ionic Exchange In Colloidal
Alluminium Sillicates. J. Phys. Chem. 36, 2217-2258. Dalam: Hillel, D.
1971. Soil and Water. Physical Principles and Processes. Academic Press.
New York.
.1938. Properties of Colloid. Stanford Univ. Press, Polo Alto, California.
Dalam : Hillel, D. 1971. Soil and Water. Physical Principles and Processes. Academic Press. New York.
Klute, A (ed). 1986. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods: Laboratory Methods. American Society of Agronomy-Soil Science Society of America. Minnesota.
Peck, A. J. 1969. Entrapment, Stability, and Persistence of Air Bubbles In Soil Water. Aust. J. Soil. Res. 7:79-90. Dalam: Hillel, D. 1980. Fundamental of Soil Physics. Academic Press, New York.
Raws, W. J., D. L. Brakensiek, and K. E. Saxton. 1982. Estimation of Soil Water Properties. Trans. ASAE 25:1316-1320. Dalam: Saxton, K. E., W. J.
Raws, J. S. Rornberger, and R. I. Papendick. 1986. Estimating Generalized Soil-Water Characteristics from Texture. Soil Sci. soc. Am. J. 50:1031-1036.
Reeve, M. J., P. D. Smith, and A. J. Thomasson. 1973. The Effect of Density on Water Retention Properties of Fields Soil. J. Soil. Sci. 24:335-367. Dalam:
Klute, A (ed). 1986. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods: Laboratory Methods. American Society of Agronomy-Soil Science Society of America. Minnesota
Richards, L. A. 1965. Methods of Soil Analysis: Physical Condition of Water in Soil. C. A. Black (ed). Agron 9. Am. Soc. Agron. Madison. Wis. Dalam:
Buol, S. W., F. D. Hole, dan R. J. Mc Cracken. 1978. Soil Genesis and Classification. Second Indian Reprint. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.
New Delhi, Bombay, Calcuta.
Rowell, D. L. 1937. Soil Science: Methods and Applications. Second Reprint.
Longman Singapore Publishers (Pte) Lt d. Singapore.
Russel, E. W. 1938. Soil Stucture. Imperial Bur. Soil Sci. Tech. Commun. 317.
Dalam : Hillel, D. 1971. Soil and Water. Physical Principles and Processes. Academic Press. New York.
Russel, M. B. 1941. Pore-size Distribuiton As A Measure of Soil Structure. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc.6:108-112. Dalam: Hillel, D. 1980. Fundamental of Soil Physics. Academic Press, New York.
Salter, P. J. and J. B. Williams. 1965. The Influence of Texture on the moistu re Characteristiss of Soil. Part I : A Critical Comparison of Techniques for Determining The Available Water Capacity and Moisture Characteristics Curve of Soil. J. Soil Sci. 16:1 -15. Dalam: Klute, A. (ed). 1986. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods : Laboratory Methods.1986. American Society of Agronomy-Soil Science Society of America. Minnesota
Sharma, M. L. and G. Uehara. 1968. Influence of Soil Structure On water Relations in Low Humic Latosols: I Water Retention. Soil Sci. Soc. Am.
Proc. 32:765-770. Dalam: Klute, A. 1986. (ed). Methods of Soil Analysis.
Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods : Laboratory Methods. 1986.
American Society of Agronomy-Soil Science Society of America.
Minnesota.
SCS-USDA. 1967. Soil Survey Investigations Report no. 1. Soil Survey Laboratory Methods and Procedure for Collecting Soil Samples. U.S.
Govt Printing Office. Washington. Dalam: Buol, S. W., F. D. Hole, dan R.
J. Mc Cracken. 1978. Soil Genesis and Classification. Second Indian Reprint. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. New Delhi, Bombay, Calcuta.
Soil Survey Staff. 1960. Soil Classification, A Comprehensive System- 7t h Aproximation. U.S. Dept. Agr. U. S. Govt Printing Office. Washington.
Dalam : Buol, S. W., F. D. Hole, dan R. J. Mc Cracken. 1978. Soil Genesis and Classification. Second Indian Reprint. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co.
New Delhi, Bombay, Calcuta.
. 1967. Supplement to Soil Classification , A Comprehensive System- 7t h Aproximation. U.S. Dept. Agr. U. S. Govt Printing Office.
Washington. Dalam: Buol, S. W., F. D. Hole, dan R. J. Mc Cracken. 1978.
Soil Genesis and Classification. Second Indian Reprint. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. New Delhi, Bombay, Calcuta.
Young, K. K. dan J. D. Dixon. 1966. Overestimation of Water Content at Field Capacity from Sieved Sample Data. Soil Sci. 101: 104-107. Dalam : Hillel, D. 1971. Soil and Water. Physical Principles and Proces ses. Academic Press. New York.
Veihmeyer, F. J. and A. H.Hendrickson. 1950. Soil Moisture in Relation to Plant Growth. Annual Rev. Plant Physiol. 1: 285-304. Dalam: Black, C.A.
1973. Soil-Plant Relationships. 2nd Edition. Wiley Eastern Private Limited.
New Delhi.
LAMPIRAN
Tabel Lampiran 1. Hasil Pengukuran Sifat Fisik Tanah untuk Contoh Tanah
Tabel Lampiran 2. Hasil Pengukuran Dbm/Bobot Isi Lembab (g/cm3) dan Dbd/Bobot Isi Kering (g/cm3) pada Jenis Contoh Tanah Utuh.
Grumosol Cihea Latosol Darmaga Regosol Laladon
Dbm Dbd COLE Dbm Dbd COLE Dbm Dbd COLE
Tabel Lampiran 3. Data Pengukuran Sifat Fisik untuk Contoh Tanah Terbagi
Grumosol Cihea Latosol Darmaga Regosol Laladon
BI (g/cm3) 1.00 0.90 1.10
Tabel Lampiran 4. Data KA (%v) Hasil Persamaan Raws et al. (1982)
Grumosol Cihea Latosol Darmaga Regosol Laladon Tekanan
Tabel Lampiran 5. Hasil Penetapan Distribusi Ukuran Pori
Grumosol Cihea Latosol Darmaga Regosol Laladon
Utuh Terbagi Utuh Terbagi Utuh Terbagi PM = Pori Mikro (RPT- (PDSC+PDS+PDL+PAT)
Tabel Lampiran 6. Data Pengukuran Tekstur
Fraksi Tanah Grumosol Cihea Latosol Darmaga Regosol Laladon
% pasir 16.86 3.46 30.45
% debu 31.35 19.07 49.80
% liat 51.79 77.48 19.75
Kelas Tekstur Liat Liat Lempung
Tabel Lampiran 7. Kisaran Nilai Kadar Air Gravimetrik (% berat) Tanah (Rowell, 1937)
KA Gravimetrik (g H2O per 100 g tanah kering oven) Kering Udara Layu Permanen Kapasitas Lapang Jenuh Tekstur Tanah
...%.berat...
Ringan 1-2 3-6 6-16 21-31
Sedang 2-5 12-15 27-35 31-47
Berat 5-10 24-34 38-53 38-90
Tabel Lampiran 8. Hasil Penetapan KA (% berat), Dbm, Dbd, KAKL Metode Alhrick dan Bouyoucos pada Jenis Contoh Tanah Utuh
Hasil Penetapan KA (% berat ), Dbm dan Dbd pada pF 1 Grumusol Cihea
No C BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) KA (% v) rata-rata
Hasil Penetapan KA (% berat ), Dbm dan Dbd pada pF 2 Grumusol Cihea
No C BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) KA (% v) rata-rata
Tabel Lampiran 8. Lanjutan
Hasil Penetapan KA (% berat ), Dbm dan Dbd pada pF 2.54 Grumusol Cihea
No C BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) KA (% v) rata-rata
Hasil Penetapan KA (% berat ), Dbm dan Dbd pada pF 3 Grumusol Cihea
No C BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) KA (% v) rata-rata
Tabel Lampiran 8. Lanjutan
Hasil Penetapan KA (% berat ), Dbm dan Dbd pada pF 3.5 Grumusol Cihea
No C BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) KA (% v) rata-rata
Tabel Lampiran 8. Lanjutan
Penetapan KA (% berat ), Dbm dan Dbd pada pF 4.2 Grumusol Cihea
No C BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) KA (% v) rata-rata
*** = tidak dipakai, karena nilainya menyebabkan nilai KA (% b) rata -rata pF 2.54 lebih rendah dari KA (% b) rata-rata pF 3 + = tidak dipakai, karena nilainya menyebabkan nilai KA (% v) rata -rata pF 3.5 lebih besar dari KA (% v) rata-rata
pF 4.2
Tabel Lampiran 8. Lanjutan
Hasil Penetapan Kadar Air Kapasitas Lapang (% berat) Metode Alhrick Grumusol Cihea
No. Ulangan BC BC+T L BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata
1.1 14,909 29,995 15,086 25,202 10,293 46,566
1.2 12,807 27,836 15,029 22,948 10,141 48,200
1.3 14,395 32,702 18,307 26,860 12,465 46,867
2.1 13,357 28,145 14,788 23,418 10,061 46,983
2.2 13,165 27,753 14,588 23,031 9,866 47,861
2.3 13,910 28,295 14,385 23,630 9,720 47,994
3.1 13,287 27,479 14,192 22,951 9,664 46,854
3.2 13,215 25,098 11,883 21,284 8,069 47,267
3.3 13,697 26,711 13,014 22,501 8,804 47,819
47,379
Hasil Penetapan Kadar Air Kapasitas La pang (% berat) Metode Bouyoucos Grumusol Cihea
No. Ulangan BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata
1.1 13,380 26,141 21,774 12,761 8,394 52,025
1.2 13,324 33,337 26,945 20,013 13,621 46,928
1.3 13,412 23,961 20,533 10,549 7,121 48,139
2.1 12,483 27,363 22,188 14,880 9,705 53,323
2.2 13,040 30,600 24,664 17,560 11,624 51,067
2.3 12,175 26,665 21,659 14,490 9,484 52,784
3.1 13,642 28,817 23,730 15,175 10,088 50,426
3.2 13,832 27,711 23,013 13,879 9,181 51,171
3.3 14,783 29,413 24,441 14,630 9,658 51,481
50.816
51
Tabel Lampiran 8. Lanjutan
Hasil Penetapan KA (% berat ), Dbm dan Dbd pada pF 1 Latosol Darmaga
No C BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) KA (% v) rata-rata
Hasil Penetapan KA (% berat ), Dbm dan Dbd pada pF 2 Latosol Darmaga
No C BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) KA (% v) rata-rata
Tabel Lampiran 8. Lanjutan
Hasil Penetapan KA (% berat ), Dbm dan Dbd pada pF 2.54 Latosol Darmaga
No C BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) KA (% v) rata-rata
Hasil Penetapan KA (% berat ), Dbm dan Dbd pada pF 3 Latosol Darmaga
No C BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) KA (% v) rata-rata
Tabel Lampiran 8. Lanjutan
Hasil Penetapan KA (% berat ), Dbm dan Dbd pada pF 3.5 Latosol Darmaga
No C BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rat a-rata KA (% v) KA (% v) rata-rata
Tabel Lampiran 8. Lanjutan
Hasil Penetapan KA (% berat ), Dbm dan Dbd pada pF 4.2 Latosol Darmaga
No C BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) KA (% v) rata-rata
*** = tidak dipakai, karena nilainya menyebabkan nilai KA (% v) rata -rata pF 3.5 lebih besar dari KA (% v) rata-rata pF 3
+ = tidak dipakai, karena nilainya menyebabkan nilai KA (% v) rata -rata pF 4.2 lebih besar dari KA (% v) rata-rata pF 3.5
Tabel Lampiran 8. Lanjutan
Hasil Penetapan Kadar Air Kapasitas Lapang (% berat) Metode Alhrick Latosol Darmaga
No. Ulangan BC BC+T L BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata
1.1 11,939 24,486 12,547 20,181 8,242 52,232
1.2 14,224 29,983 15,759 24,646 10,422 51,209
1.3 13,517 33,613 20,096 26,654 13,137 52,973
2.1 14,283 28,882 14,599 23,988 9,705 50,428
2.2 13,854 29,726 15,872 24,394 10,540 50,588
2.3 14,489 27,903 13,414 23,402 8,913 50,499
3.1 13,719 28,326 14,607 23,413 9,694 50,681
3.2 15,066 29,425 14,359 24,582 9,516 50,893
3.3 12,356 27,171 14,815 21,957 9,601 54,307
51,534
Hasil Penetapan Kadar Air Kapasitas Lapang (% berat) Metode Bouyoucos Latosol Darmaga
No. Ulangan BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata
1.1 14,048 28,745 23,968 14,697 9,920 48,155
1.2 13,593 32,861 26,706 19,268 13,113 46,938
1.3 14,137 32,539 26,731 18,402 12,594 46,117
2.1 13,753 31,728 25,404 17,975 11,651 54,279
2.2 13,229 29,485 23,924 16,256 10,695 51,996
2.3 14,002 29,134 24,021 15,132 10,019 51,033
3.1 15,582 31,134 25,621 15,552 10,039 54,916
3.2 14,875 29,656 24,825 14,781 9,950 48,553
3.3 13,079 34,200 27,206 21,121 14,127 49,508
50.166
56
Tabel Lampiran 8. Lanjutan
Hasil Penetapan KA (% berat ), Dbm dan Dbd pada pF 1 Regosol Laladon
No C BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b ) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) KA (% v) rata-rata
Hasil Penetapan KA (% berat ), Dbm dan Dbd pada pF 2 Regosol Laladon
No C BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) KA (% v) rata-rata
Tabel Lampiran 8. Lanjutan
Hasil Penetapan KA (% berat ), Dbm dan Dbd pada pF 2.54 Regosol Laladon
No C BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) KA (% v) rata-rata
Hasil Penetapan KA (% berat ), Dbm dan Dbd pada pF 3 Regosol Laladon
No C BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) KA (% v) rata-rata
Tabel Lampiran 8. Lanjutan
Hasil Penetapan KA (% berat ), Dbm dan Dbd pada pF 3.5 Regosol Laladon
No C BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) KA (% v) rata-rata
Tabel Lampiran 8. Lanjutan
Hasil Penetapan KA (% berat ), Dbm dan Dbd pada pF 4.2 R egosol Laladon
No C BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) KA (% v) rata-rata
Tabel Lampiran 8. Lanjutan
Hasil Penetapan Kadar Air Kapasitas Lapang (% berat) Metode Alhrick Regosol Laladon
No. Ulangan BC BC+T L BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata
1.1 14,663 34,876 20,213 29,348 14,685 37,644
1.2 14,491 29,755 15,264 25,637 11,146 36,946
1.3 13,703 36,283 22,580 30,099 16,396 37,717
2.1 13,116 32,595 19,479 27,669 14,553 33,849
2.2 13,288 28,546 15,258 24,662 11,374 34,148
2.3 12,603 32,634 20,031 27,424 14,821 35,153
3.1 13,671 28,306 14,635 24,169 10,498 39,408
3.2 13,027 27,883 14,856 23,703 10,676 39,153
3.3 14,902 30,333 15,431 26,055 11,153 38,357
36.930
Hasil Penetapan Kadar Air Kapasitas Lapang (% berat) Metode Bouyoucos Regosol Lala don
No. Ulangan BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata
1.1 13,873 30,180 26,088 16,307 12,215 33,500
1.2 13,693 29,331 25,597 15,638 11,904 31,368
1.3 13,195 32,445 28,089 19,250 14,894 29,247
2.1 13,466 28,273 24,828 14,807 11,362 30,320
2.2 12,907 30,016 26,085 17,109 13,178 29,830
2.3 12,996 29,845 25,911 16,849 12,915 30,461
3.1 13,228 29,606 25,729 16,378 12,501 31,014
3.2 12,475 29,119 25,204 16,644 12,729 30,757
3.3 12,685 34,471 29,290 21,786 16,605 31,201
30,855
61
Tabel Lampiran 9. Hasil Pengukuran Kadar Air (% b) pada Jenis Contoh Tanah Terbagi Penetapan KA pF 1 Grumusol Cihea (BI = 1.00)
No. Ulangan BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) rata-rata
1.1 14,44 27,72 22,42 13,28 7,98 66,42 *
1.2 13,67 24,18 20,44 10,51 6,77 55,24
1.3 14,25 27,74 20,78 13,49 6,53 106,58 *
55.24 55.24
Penetapan KA pF 2 Grumusol Cihea (BI = 1.00)
No. Ulangan BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) rata-rata
1.1 13,30 23,84 20,49 10,54 7,19 46,59
1.2 13,45 22,08 19,36 8,63 5,91 46,02
1.3 13,22 21,99 18,83 8,77 5,61 56,33
49.65 49.65
Penetapan KA pF 2.54 Grumusol Cihea (BI = 1.00)
No. Ulangan BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) rata-rata
1.1 13,40 22,20 19,77 8,80 6,37 38,15
1.2 13,39 24,33 21,24 10,94 7,85 39,36
1.3 12,78 20,47 18,31 7,69 5,53 39,06
38.86 38.86
Penetapan KA pF 4.2 Grumusol Cihea (BI = 1.00)
No. Ulangan BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) rata-rata
1.1 13,70 31,26 26,82 17,56 13,12 33,84
1.2 15,03 34,06 29,73 19,03 14,70 29,46
1.3 13,42 30,95 26,85 17,53 13,43 30,53
31.28 31.28
Keterangan: * = tidak dipakai karena nilai KA melebihi RPT tanah (55.97 %)
62
Tabel Lampiran 9. Lanjutan
Peneta pan KA pF 1 Latosol Darmaga (BI= 0.90)
No. Ulangan BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) rata-rata
1.1 15,62 20,56 18,67 4,94 3,05 61,97
1.2 13,78 20,16 18,02 6,38 4,24 50,47 **
1.3 14,31 22,25 18,33 7,94 4,02 97,51 *
61.97 55.77
Penetapan KA pF 2 Latosol Darmaga (BI = 0.90)
No. Ulangan BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) rata-rata
1.1 15,33 21,52 19,23 6,19 3,90 58,72
1.2 13,90 21,72 18,98 7,82 5,08 53,94
1.3 15,02 24,95 21,27 9,93 6,25 58,88
57.18 51.46
Penetapan KA pF 2.54 Latosol Darmaga (BI = 0.90)
No. Ulangan BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) rata-rata
1.1 14,45 22,41 19,56 7,96 5,11 55,77
1.2 13,52 21,37 18,55 7,85 5,03 56,06
1.3 13,19 21,19 18,38 8,00 5,19 54,14
55.30 49.79
Penetapan KA pF 4.2 Latosol Darmaga (BI = 0.90)
No. Ulangan BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) rata-rata
1.1 13,12 27,19 23,33 14,07 10,21 37,81
1.2 13,08 29,22 24,87 16,14 11,79 36,90
1.3 13,84 28,45 24,46 14,61 10,62 37,57
37.43 33.69
Keterangan: * = tidak dipakai karena nilainya lebih besar dari RPT (63.40 %).
** = tidak dipakai, karena nilainya menyebabkan KA (% b) pF 1 lebih kecil dari KA (% b) pF 2.
63
Tabel Lampiran 9. Lanjutan
Penetapan KA pF 1 Regosol Laladon (BI= 1.10)
No. Ulangan BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) rata-rata
1.1 13,16 21,57 19,00 8,41 5,84 44,01
1.2 14,88 26,45 22,87 11,57 7,99 44,81
1.3 14,16 24,26 21,27 10,10 7,11 42,05
43.62 47.98
Penetapan KA pF 2 Regosol Laladon (BI= 1.10)
No. Ulangan BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) rata-rata
1.1 13,16 18,57 17,09 5,41 3,93 37,66
1.2 13,63 23,87 21,23 10,24 7,60 34,74
1.3 13,76 19,96 18,27 6,20 4,51 37,47
36.62 40.28
Penetapan KA pF 2.54 Regosol Laladon (BI= 1.10)
No. Ulangan BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) rata-rata
1.1 14,07 19,41 18,07 5,34 4,00 33,50
1.2 13,42 21,69 19,70 8,27 6,28 31,69
1.3 13,81 22,30 20,67 8,49 6,86 23,76
29.63 32.59
Penetapan KA pF 4.2 Regosol Laladon (BI= 1.10)
No. Ulangan BC BC+TL BC+TK BKU BKM KA (% b) KA (% b) rata-rata KA (% v) rata-rata
1.1 12,97 31,37 28,70 18,40 15,73 16,97
1.2 14,21 31,48 28,98 17,27 14,77 16,93
1.3 13,56 29,36 27,08 15,80 13,52 16,86
16.92 18.61
64