BAB VI SIMPULAN DAN SARAN
Lampiran 12 Hasil Output Analisis Data Penelitian
Pengetahuan petugas pelaksana MTBS
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Cukup 8 17.0 17.0 17.0
Baik 39 83.0 83.0 100.0
Total 47 100.0 100.0
Sikap petugas pelaksana MTBS
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Cukup 28 59.6 59.6 59.6
Baik 19 40.4 40.4 100.0
Total 47 100.0 100.0
Motivasi Kerja petugas pelaksana MTBS
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Sedang 1 2.1 2.1 2.1
Tinggi 46 97.9 97.9 100.0
Total 47 100.0 100.0
Masa Kerja petugas pelaksana MTBS
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Sedang 26 55.3 55.3 55.3
Lama 21 44.7 44.7 100.0
Total 47 100.0 100.0
Persepsi beban kerja petugas pelaksana MTBS
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Tinggi 20 42.6 42.6 42.6
Rendah 27 57.4 57.4 100.0
Kelengkapan Alat MTBS
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Tidak Lengkap 12 25.5 25.5 25.5
Lengkap 35 74.5 74.5 100.0
Total 47 100.0 100.0
Kelengkapan Obat MTBS
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Tidak Lengkap 26 55.3 55.3 55.3
Lengkap 21 44.7 44.7 100.0
Total 47 100.0 100.0
Pelatihan MTBS
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Belum Pernah 30 63.8 63.8 63.8
Pernah 17 36.2 36.2 100.0
Total 47 100.0 100.0
Kepemimpinan Kepala Puskesmas
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Cukup 13 27.7 27.7 27.7
Baik 34 72.3 72.3 100.0
Total 47 100.0 100.0
Ada Tidaknya Alokasi Dana MTBS
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Tidak Ada 39 83.0 83.0 83.0
Ada 8 17.0 17.0 100.0
Supervisi Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Rendah 21 44.7 44.7 44.7
Tinggi 26 55.3 55.3 100.0
Total 47 100.0 100.0
Evaluasi Kepala Puskesmas
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent Valid Rendah 28 59.6 59.6 59.6 Tinggi 19 40.4 40.4 100.0 Total 47 100.0 100.0 Implementasi MTBS
Frequency Percent Valid Percent
Cumulative Percent
Valid Rendah 29 61.7 61.7 61.7
Tinggi 18 38.3 38.3 100.0
2. Hasil Output Analisis Bivariat
1. Crosstab Variabel Pengetahuan dengan Implementasi MTBS Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Pengetahuan petugas pelaksana MTBS * Implementasi MTBS
47 100.0% 0 .0% 47 100.0%
Pengetahuan petugas pelaksana MTBS * Implementasi MTBS Crosstabulation Implementasi MTBS Total Rendah Tinggi Pengetahuan petugas pelaksana MTBS Cukup Count 6 2 8 Expected Count 4.9 3.1 8.0 % within Pengetahuan petugas pelaksana MTBS 75.0% 25.0% 100.0% Baik Count 23 16 39 Expected Count 24.1 14.9 39.0 % within Pengetahuan petugas pelaksana MTBS 59.0% 41.0% 100.0% Total Count 29 18 47 Expected Count 29.0 18.0 47.0 % within Pengetahuan petugas pelaksana MTBS 61.7% 38.3% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Pearson Chi-Square .721a 1 .396 Continuity Correctionb .203 1 .653 Likelihood Ratio .758 1 .384
Fisher's Exact Test .692 .334
Linear-by-Linear Association .706 1 .401
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,06.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .123 .396
N of Valid Cases 47
2. Crosstab Variabel Sikap dengan Implementasi MTBS Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Sikap petugas pelaksana
MTBS * Implementasi MTBS 47 100.0% 0 .0% 47 100.0%
Sikap petugas pelaksana MTBS * Implementasi MTBS Crosstabulation Implementasi MTBS
Total Rendah Tinggi
Sikap petugas pelaksana MTBS
Cukup Count 22 6 28
Expected Count 17.3 10.7 28.0
% within Sikap petugas
pelaksana MTBS 78.6% 21.4% 100.0%
Baik Count 7 12 19
Expected Count 11.7 7.3 19.0
% within Sikap petugas
pelaksana MTBS 36.8% 63.2% 100.0%
Total Count 29 18 47
Expected Count 29.0 18.0 47.0
% within Sikap petugas
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Pearson Chi-Square 8.341a 1 .004 Continuity Correctionb 6.669 1 .010 Likelihood Ratio 8.453 1 .004
Fisher's Exact Test .006 .005
Linear-by-Linear Association 8.164 1 .004
N of Valid Casesb 47
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,28.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .388 .004
N of Valid Cases 47
3. Crosstab Variabel Motivasi Kerja dengan Implementasi MTBS Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Motivasi Kerja petugas pelaksana MTBS * Implementasi MTBS
47 100.0% 0 .0% 47 100.0%
Motivasi Kerja petugas pelaksana MTBS * Implementasi MTBS Crosstabulation Implementasi MTBS
Total Rendah Tinggi
Motivasi Kerja petugas pelaksana MTBS
Sedang Count 0 1 1
Expected Count .6 .4 1.0
% within Motivasi Kerja
Tinggi Count 29 17 46
Expected Count 28.4 17.6 46.0
% within Motivasi Kerja
petugas pelaksana MTBS 63.0% 37.0% 100.0%
Total Count 29 18 47
Expected Count 29.0 18.0 47.0
% within Motivasi Kerja
petugas pelaksana MTBS 61.7% 38.3% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Pearson Chi-Square 1.646a 1 .199 Continuity Correctionb .059 1 .808 Likelihood Ratio 1.955 1 .162
Fisher's Exact Test .383 .383
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.611 1 .204
N of Valid Casesb 47
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,38.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .184 .199
N of Valid Cases 47
4. Crosstab Variabel Masa Kerja dengan Implementasi MTBS Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Masa Kerja petugas pelaksana MTBS * Implementasi MTBS
Masa Kerja petugas pelaksana MTBS * Implementasi MTBS Crosstabulation Implementasi MTBS
Total Rendah Tinggi
Masa Kerja petugas pelaksana MTBS
Sedang Count 22 4 26
Expected Count 16.0 10.0 26.0
% within Masa Kerja
petugas pelaksana MTBS 84.6% 15.4% 100.0%
Lama Count 7 14 21
Expected Count 13.0 8.0 21.0
% within Masa Kerja
petugas pelaksana MTBS 33.3% 66.7% 100.0%
Total Count 29 18 47
Expected Count 29.0 18.0 47.0
% within Masa Kerja
petugas pelaksana MTBS 61.7% 38.3% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Pearson Chi-Square 12.929a 1 .000 Continuity Correctionb 10.849 1 .001 Likelihood Ratio 13.499 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .001 .000
Linear-by-Linear
Association 12.654 1 .000
N of Valid Casesb 47
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,04.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .464 .000
5. Crosstab Variabel Persepsi Beban Kerja dengan Implementasi MTBS Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Persepsi beban kerja petugas pelaksana MTBS * Implementasi MTBS
47 100.0% 0 .0% 47 100.0%
Persepsi beban kerja petugas pelaksana MTBS * Implementasi MTBS Crosstabulation Implementasi MTBS
Total Rendah Tinggi
Persepsi beban kerja petugas pelaksana MTBS
Tinggi Count 13 7 20
Expected Count 12.3 7.7 20.0
% within Persepsi beban kerja petugas pelaksana MTBS
65.0% 35.0% 100.0%
Rendah Count 16 11 27
Expected Count 16.7 10.3 27.0
% within Persepsi beban kerja petugas pelaksana MTBS
59.3% 40.7% 100.0%
Total Count 29 18 47
Expected Count 29.0 18.0 47.0
% within Persepsi beban kerja petugas pelaksana MTBS 61.7% 38.3% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Pearson Chi-Square .160a 1 .689 Continuity Correctionb .009 1 .923 Likelihood Ratio .161 1 .688
Linear-by-Linear Association .157 1 .692
N of Valid Casesb 47
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,66.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .058 .689
N of Valid Cases 47
6. Crosstab Variabel Ketersediaan Peralatan dengan Implementasi MTBS Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Kelengkapan Alat MTBS *
Implementasi MTBS 47 100.0% 0 .0% 47 100.0%
Kelengkapan Alat MTBS * Implementasi MTBS Crosstabulation
Implementasi MTBS
Total Rendah Tinggi
Kelengkapan Alat MTBS Tidak Lengkap Count 6 6 12
Expected Count 7.4 4.6 12.0
% within Kelengkapan Alat
MTBS 50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
Lengkap Count 23 12 35
Expected Count 21.6 13.4 35.0
% within Kelengkapan Alat
MTBS 65.7% 34.3% 100.0%
Total Count 29 18 47
Expected Count 29.0 18.0 47.0
% within Kelengkapan Alat
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Pearson Chi-Square .934a 1 .334 Continuity Correctionb .387 1 .534 Likelihood Ratio .918 1 .338
Fisher's Exact Test .493 .265
Linear-by-Linear Association .914 1 .339
N of Valid Casesb 47
a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,60.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .140 .334
N of Valid Cases 47
7. Crosstab Variabel Ketersediaan Obat dengan Implementasi MTBS Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Kelengkapan Obat MTBS
* Implementasi MTBS 47 100.0% 0 .0% 47 100.0%
Kelengkapan Obat MTBS * Implementasi MTBS Crosstabulation
Implementasi MTBS
Total Rendah Tinggi
Kelengkapan Obat MTBS
Tidak Lengkap Count 20 6 26
Expected Count 16.0 10.0 26.0
% within Kelengkapan
Obat MTBS 76.9% 23.1% 100.0%
Expected Count 13.0 8.0 21.0 % within Kelengkapan Obat MTBS 42.9% 57.1% 100.0% Total Count 29 18 47 Expected Count 29.0 18.0 47.0 % within Kelengkapan Obat MTBS 61.7% 38.3% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Pearson Chi-Square 5.705a 1 .017 Continuity Correctionb 4.355 1 .037 Likelihood Ratio 5.785 1 .016
Fisher's Exact Test .033 .018
Linear-by-Linear
Association 5.584 1 .018
N of Valid Casesb 47
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,04.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .329 .017
N of Valid Cases 47
8. Crosstab Variabel Pelatihan dengan Implementasi MTBS
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Pelatihan MTBS *
Pelatihan MTBS * Implementasi MTBS Crosstabulation
Implementasi MTBS
Total Rendah Tinggi
Pelatihan MTBS Belum Pernah Count 24 6 30
Expected Count 18.5 11.5 30.0 % within Pelatihan MTBS 80.0% 20.0% 100.0% Pernah Count 5 12 17 Expected Count 10.5 6.5 17.0 % within Pelatihan MTBS 29.4% 70.6% 100.0% Total Count 29 18 47 Expected Count 29.0 18.0 47.0 % within Pelatihan MTBS 61.7% 38.3% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Pearson Chi-Square 11.752a 1 .001 Continuity Correctionb 9.708 1 .002 Likelihood Ratio 11.936 1 .001
Fisher's Exact Test .001 .001
Linear-by-Linear Association 11.502 1 .001
N of Valid Casesb 47
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6,51.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .447 .001
9. Crosstab Variabel Kepemimpinan dengan Implementasi MTBS Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Kepemimpinan Kepala Puskesmas * Implementasi MTBS
47 100.0% 0 .0% 47 100.0%
Kepemimpinan Kepala Puskesmas * Implementasi MTBS Crosstabulation Implementasi MTBS Total Rendah Tinggi Kepemimpinan Kepala Puskesmas Cukup Count 7 6 13 Expected Count 8.0 5.0 13.0 % within Kepemimpinan Kepala Puskesmas 53.8% 46.2% 100.0% Baik Count 22 12 34 Expected Count 21.0 13.0 34.0 % within Kepemimpinan Kepala Puskesmas 64.7% 35.3% 100.0% Total Count 29 18 47 Expected Count 29.0 18.0 47.0 % within Kepemimpinan Kepala Puskesmas 61.7% 38.3% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Pearson Chi-Square .469a 1 .493 Continuity Correctionb .122 1 .727 Likelihood Ratio .464 1 .496
Fisher's Exact Test .521 .360
Linear-by-Linear Association .459 1 .498
a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,98.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .099 .493
N of Valid Cases 47
10.Crosstab Variabel Alokasi Dana dengan Implementasi MTBS
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Ada Tidaknya Alokasi Dana
MTBS * Implementasi MTBS 47 100.0% 0 .0% 47 100.0%
Ada Tidaknya Alokasi Dana MTBS * Implementasi MTBS Crosstabulation Implementasi MTBS
Total Rendah Tinggi
Ada Tidaknya Alokasi Dana MTBS
Tidak Ada Count 27 12 39
Expected Count 24.1 14.9 39.0
% within Ada Tidaknya
Alokasi Dana MTBS 69.2% 30.8% 100.0%
Ada Count 2 6 8
Expected Count 4.9 3.1 8.0
% within Ada Tidaknya
Alokasi Dana MTBS 25.0% 75.0% 100.0%
Total Count 29 18 47
Expected Count 29.0 18.0 47.0
% within Ada Tidaknya
Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Pearson Chi-Square 5.496a 1 .019 Continuity Correctionb 3.783 1 .052 Likelihood Ratio 5.415 1 .020
Fisher's Exact Test .041 .027
Linear-by-Linear Association 5.379 1 .020
N of Valid Casesb 47
a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,06.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .324 .019
N of Valid Cases 47
11.Crosstab Vaariabel Supervisi dengan Implementasi MTBS Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Supervisi Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten * Implementasi MTBS
47 100.0% 0 .0% 47 100.0%
Supervisi Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten * Implementasi MTBS Crosstabulation Implementasi MTBS
Total Rendah Tinggi
Supervisi Dinas Kesehatan Kabupaten
Rendah Count 12 9 21
% within Supervisi Dinas
Kesehatan Kabupaten 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%
Tinggi Count 17 9 26
Expected Count 16.0 10.0 26.0
% within Supervisi Dinas
Kesehatan Kabupaten 65.4% 34.6% 100.0%
Total Count 29 18 47
Expected Count 29.0 18.0 47.0
% within Supervisi Dinas
Kesehatan Kabupaten 61.7% 38.3% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Pearson Chi-Square .334a 1 .563 Continuity Correctionb .076 1 .782 Likelihood Ratio .333 1 .564
Fisher's Exact Test .763 .391
Linear-by-Linear Association .327 1 .568
N of Valid Casesb 47
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,04.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .084 .563
12.Crosstab Variabel Evaluasi dengan Implementasi MTBS Case Processing Summary
Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Evaluasi Kepala Puskesmas
* Implementasi MTBS 47 100.0% 0 .0% 47 100.0%
Evaluasi Kepala Puskesmas * Implementasi MTBS Crosstabulation Implementasi MTBS
Total Rendah Tinggi
Evaluasi Kepala Puskesmas Rendah Count 22 6 28
Expected Count 17.3 10.7 28.0
% within Evaluasi Kepala
Puskesmas 78.6% 21.4% 100.0%
Tinggi Count 7 12 19
Expected Count 11.7 7.3 19.0
% within Evaluasi Kepala
Puskesmas 36.8% 63.2% 100.0%
Total Count 29 18 47
Expected Count 29.0 18.0 47.0
% within Evaluasi Kepala
Puskesmas 61.7% 38.3% 100.0% Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (2- sided) Exact Sig. (1- sided) Pearson Chi-Square 8.341a 1 .004 Continuity Correctionb 6.669 1 .010 Likelihood Ratio 8.453 1 .004
Fisher's Exact Test .006 .005
Linear-by-Linear Association 8.164 1 .004
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,28.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .388 .004