CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS
B. Suggestions
Based on conclusion above, the researcher would like to offer some suggestion. Firstly, it is for teacher. The teacher can improve their teaching ability, communicative to their students in order the students do not feel worry in learning reading and use the suitable media to ease students in understanding the text. Second suggestion is for students. The researcher hopes that students more diligent to improve their reading skill through memorizing vocabulary, pronouncing the words, reading the English text and so on. The last reason is for next researcher. If they want to research like those variables, they can develop or improve their research such as adding new variables, using different questionnaire, arranging suitable test and etc.
.
REFERENCES
Briggs, L.D, (1987). A Poor Attitude: A deterrent to reading improvement. scholar works, Western Michigan University. Retrieved From Http://Scholarworks.Wmich.Edu/Cgi/Viewcontent.Cgi?Article=1795&Contex
=Reading_Horizons
Brown, H, Douglas. Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices.
Cambridge UK: Longman.
Cara membaca tabel t. retrieved from http://www.spssstatistik.com
Davis, A. P. (2006). The Best teachers’ test preparation for the FTCE (Florida As Teacher Certification Examination): Elementary Education K-6. New Jersey: Research And Education Association, Inc.
Djuharie, S, Otong. (2008). Teknik dan membaca text-books 2: Extensive Reading Top-Down Reading. Yrama Widya.
Elhumaira, Syuqaira., Komariah, Endang., & Inayah, Nurul. (2017). The Correlation between Students’ Reading Speed and Their Reading Comprehension. Banda Aceh.
Ellis, Rod. (1978). Second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Erma, Eriska., Yulmiati, Erma., & Handayani. (2013-2014). the correlation between students’ reading motivation and students’ reading comprehension (A Study At Eleventh Grade of Sma Negeri 11 Padang). Padang.
Firdaus, Fabriana. (2015). penyebab 90 persen masyarakat indonesia tak suka membaca. Retrieved 15-10-2015 from Http://Amp-Rappler-Com.Cdn.Ampproject.Org/V/S/Amp.Rappler.Com
Grabe, W., Stoller, F.L. 2002. Teaching and Researching Reading. England: Pearson Education Limited.
Guilford, J. P. (1956). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York: Mc Graw-Hill Book Co. Inc.
Hansford, C, B., and Hattie, A, J. (1982). The relationship between self and achievement and performance measures Vol. 52, No. 1. University Of New England. Australia.
Harmer, J. (2006). The practice of english language teaching 4th edition. Cambridge UK: Pearson Longman.
Hartati, Ima. Hartati., & Syafri, K, Erni. (2014). The Correlation Between Reading Motivation And Reading Comprehension Of The First Year Students Of SMK Taruna Satria Pekan Baru. Pekan Baru.
Hendri. (2016). The Correlation Between Teachers’ Teaching Style Toward Students’ Students Reading Proficiency At Third Semester Students Of English Education Program Of The State Institute Of Islamic Studies Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi. Jambi
Hidayad, Ferri. (2015). The Correlation Among Self-Concept, Reading Attitude And Reading Comprehension Achievement The Sixth Semester Of English Education Study Program Students Of PGRI University Palembang.
Palembang.
Huitt, W. (1998). Self-concept and self-esteem. educational psychology interactive.
Retrieved from the World Wide Web:
Http://Chiron.Valdosta.Edu/Whuitt/Col/Regsys/Self.Html
Hurlock, E. B. 1978. Developmental psychology. 4th edition. New Delhi: Tata Mcgraw Hill.
Israel, S. E., Block, C. C., Bauserman, K.L. & Welsch, K. K. (2005). metacognition in literacy learning. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
J, M, D, Willis. (2008). teaching the brain to read, strategies for improving fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. New York: Longman.
Jalendri, M, Fateh. English Tafsir-Jalalayn retrieved from http://myonlinequran.com/surah-96-page-1-ipp-89.html
King, Carroll and Stanley, Nancy. 1989. Building Skill for the TOEFL. Thomas Nelson and Son Ltd.
Kumar, Sunil., & Paramanik, Chandan. (2016). Comparative Study of Self-Concept in Male and Female International Kho-Kho Players of 12th South Asian Games Volume 1 Www.Newresearchjournal.Com/Multieducation
Kuning, Sri, Dewi. (2015). Correlation Among Learning Strategies, Emotional Intelligence and Reading Achievement of The Fifth Semester Students of STKIP Muhammadiyah Kotabumi Lampung Utara Academic Year 2014/2015.
Palembang.
Leonard., & Supardi, U.S. (2010). pengaruh konsep diri, siswa pada matematika dan kecemasan siswa terhadap hasil belajar Matematika. (Online) Http://Matsahudi.Blogspot.Com/2011/07/Pengaruh-Konsep-Dirisikap-Siswa-Pada.Html accessed on October 10th, 2013.
Lestari, Ayu., & Holandiyah, M. (2016). The Correlation between Reading Attitude and Writing Achievement of the Eleventh Grade Students of SMA Muhammadiyah 6 Palembang. Palembang.
Linse, C. T. (2005). Practical English Language Teaching: Young Learners (D.
Nunan, Ed). New York: Mc.Graw Hill.
Madox, H. 1963. How to study. Greenwich: Faweet Premier.
Marsh, H.W. 1999. Self-description questionnaire (sdq) iii: a theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of multiple dimensions of late adolescent self-concept. A Test Manual and Research Monograph. Mac Arthur, New South Wales: University Of Western Sydney.
McKenna, M.C., Kear, D.J. & Ellsworth, R.A. (1995). Children’s attitudes toward reading: a national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 934–956.
Mortini, A, Veto. (2015). The Correlation Among The Fourth Semester Students’
Reading Attitude, Reading Comprehension Achievement And Writing Achievement At English Education Study Program In Pgri University Of Palembang. Palembang.
Mudjiran, Dkk. 2007. Perkembangan peserta didik. UNP Press.
Mulyana, D. (2001). Ilmu komunikasi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nunan, D. (Ed.). (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. New York: Mc.
Graw Hill.
Nunan, D. (Ed.). (2003). Practical english language teaching. New York: Mc. Graw Hill.
Oluwatosin, Oluwafemi, Babatunde & Mercy, Ndidl, Fole. (2015). Internet Addiction Among Undergraduates In University Of Ibadan: Imperative For Counselling Intervention (Vol.18 No.3). Nigeria.
Paci, Gamal, Rury. (2018). the relationship between students anxiety and english reading achievement. Jakarta
Pebriawan, I, S, Nyoman., Hasan, Basturi., & Sudirman. (2016). The correlation between vocabulary mastery and students’ reading comprehension.
Peng, Siew, Ewe. (2010). The relationship between academic self-concept, parent expectations, teacher expectations and academic achievement of SKJ (C) Chee Tong standard 5 students. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Priyatno, dewi. (2014). SPSS 22: pengelola data terpraktis.
Rahmajanti, Sri., & Musthofiyyah, Uning. (2017) The relationship between reading self-efficacy, reading attitude and efl reading comprehension based on gender difference introduction (Vol 1, No 1). Malang.
Rahman, Risqi. (2012). Hubungan antara self-concept terhadap matematika dengan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematik siswa (Vol 1, No.1).
Rakhmat, J. (2007). Psikologi komunikasi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Rider, Nicole. (2005). Reading Achievement and Reading Self-Concept in Year 3 Children. Australia.
Ro’yali, Irwan, Ali. (2010). The Correlation Between Students’ Vocabulary Mastery And Reading Comprehension. Jakarta.
Robson. (1989). Development of A New Report Questionnaire to Measure Self-Esteem. Psychological Medicine.
Setyani, Uni. (2007). Hubungan antara konsep diri dengan intensi menyontek pada siswa sma negeri 2 semarang.
Snow, C. E. (2002). reading for understanding: toward An R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica: RAND.
Sugiyono. (2004). Metode penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sundari, Hanna. (2017). Efl adult learners’ reading attitude and reading comprehension: a preliminary study. Jakarta.
Surip, Rosdiana. (2016). The Relationship Among Self-Concept, Reading Attitude And Reading Comprehension Achievement Of Single Parented Students Of Public Junior High Schools In District Of Ilir Barat I Palembang (Vol. 3, No.
1). Palembang.
Sweet, A. P. And Snow, C. E. (2003). Rethinking reading comprehension. New York: Guilford Press.
Tim Penyusun. (2017). Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi Universitas Islam Negeri Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi.
Tunde-Awe, M, B. (2014). Relationship between Reading Attitudes And Reading Comprehension Performance Of Secondary School Students In Kwara State, Nigeria.
Willing, K. (1987). Learning Styles in Adult migrant Education Adult Migrant Education Programme, Adelaide.
Willis, J. M. D. 2008. Teaching the brain to read, strategies for improving fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. New York: Longman.
Yamashita, Junko. (2013). Effects Of Extensive Reading On Reading Attitudes In A Foreign Language (Volume 25, No. 2). Japan.
(appendix I)
Validation Table
Scale Mean if
Item Deleted
Scale Variance
if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-Total Correlation
Cronbach's Alpha
if Item Deleted Explanation
item1 145.48 183.028 0.399 0.883 Valid
item2 145.59 176.712 0.597 0.879 Valid
item3 146.59 199.943 0.556 0.895 Valid
item4 145.59 172.328 0.778 0.875 Valid
item5 145.52 185.028 0.409 0.886 Valid
item6 145.19 184.618 0.688 0.884 Valid
item7 145.74 177.353 0.531 0.879 Valid
item8 145.63 173.55 0.787 0.876 Valid
item9 145.89 184.487 0.397 0.883 Valid
item10 145.67 185.154 0.176 0.884 Invalid
item11 145.44 177.179 0.588 0.879 Valid
item12 146.59 180.02 0.399 0.882 Valid
item13 146.89 185.949 0.121 0.885 invalid
item14 145.78 173.949 0.678 0.877 valid
item15 145.63 184.088 0.507 0.884 valid
item16 146.48 189.644 -0.085 0.888 invalid
item17 146.07 178.071 0.535 0.88 valid
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 27 100.0
Excludeda 0 .0
Total 27 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
item18 146.48 189.644 -0.085 0.888 Invalid
item19 145.67 185.154 0.176 0.884 Invalid
item20 145.85 183.746 0.397 0.883 Valid
item21 145.85 177.054 0.559 0.879 Valid
item22 145.93 180.379 0.533 0.882 Valid
item23 145.48 183.028 0.299 0.883 Invalid
item24 145.59 176.712 0.597 0.879 Valid
item25 146.59 199.943 0.556 0.895 Valid
item26 145.59 172.328 0.778 0.875 Valid
item27 145.52 185.028 0.123 0.886 Invalid
item28 145.19 184.618 0.238 0.884 Invalid
item29 145.74 177.353 0.353 0.879 Invalid
item30 145.63 173.55 0.787 0.876 Valid
item31 145.89 184.487 0.629 0.883 Valid
item32 146.04 174.806 0.677 0.877 Valid
item33 145.44 177.179 0.588 0.879 Valid
item34 146.59 180.02 0.539 0.882 Valid
item35 146.89 185.949 0.501 0.885 Valid
item36 145.78 173.949 0.678 0.877 Valid
item37 145.63 184.088 0.559 0.884 Valid
item38 146.07 181.148 0.533 0.882 Valid
item39 146.07 178.071 0.535 0.88 Valid
item40 146.04 174.806 0.677 0.877 Valid
item41 146.07 181.148 0.503 0.882 Valid
item42 145.85 183.746 0.397 0.883 Valid
item43 145.85 177.054 0.559 0.879 Valid
item44 145.93 180.379 0.659 0.882 Valid
item45 145.48 183.028 0.699 0.883 Valid
item46 145.59 176.712 0.597 0.879 Valid
item47 146.59 199.943 0.556 0.895 Valid
item48 145.59 172.328 0.778 0.875 Valid
item49 145.52 185.028 0.123 0.886 Invalid
item50 145.93 180.379 0.599 0.882 Valid
(Appendix II)
The Result of Descriptive Analysis of Self-Concept, Reading Attitude And Reading Comprehension
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
Selfconcept 113 66 96 78.71 6.084
Valid N (listwise) 113
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
readingattitude 113 44 78 65.34 6.433
Valid N (listwise) 113
Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation
readingcomprehension 113 16 88 47.83 11.483
Valid N (listwise) 113
(Appendix III)
The Result of Correlation Between Self-Concept And Reading Comprehension
Correlations
selfconcept
readingcompreh ensionachievem
ent
Spearman's rho selfconcept Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .061
Sig. (2-tailed) . .518
N 113 113
readingcomprehension Correlation Coefficient .061 1.000
Sig. (2-tailed) .518 .
N 113 113
(Appendix IV)
The Result of Correlation Between Reading Attitude And Reading Comprehension
Correlations
readingattitude
readingcompreh ension
Spearman's rho readingattitude Correlation Coefficient 1.000 -.092
Sig. (2-tailed) . .331
N 113 113
readingcomprehension Correlation Coefficient -.092 1.000
Sig. (2-tailed) .331 .
N 113 113
(Appendix V)
The Result of Correlation Among Self Concept, Reading Attitude And Reading Comprehension
Correlations
Control Variables selfconcept readingattitude
Readingcomprehension selfconcept Correlation 1.000 -.009
Significance (2-tailed) . .929
df 0 110
readingattitude Correlation -.009 1.000
Significance (2-tailed) .929 .
df 110 0
(Appendix VI)
The Result of Self-Concept, Reading Attitude, And Reading Comprehension
No Respondents Self -Concept
Reading Attitude
Reading Comprehension
1 R1 80 63 46
2 R2 73 70 60
3 R3 79 65 74
4 R4 89 77 44
5 R5 74 59 34
6 R6 75 68 34
7 R7 81 69 42
8 R8 69 59 44
9 R9 79 73 40
10 R10 81 63 40
11 R11 76 62 88
12 R12 83 47 43
13 R13 66 53 70
14 R14 73 64 44
15 R15 69 61 43
16 R16 77 65 32
17 R17 74 67 24
18 R18 72 70 16
19 R19 85 62 46
20 R20 79 67 36
21 R21 80 69 36
22 R22 80 72 32
23 R23 68 70 40
24 R24 79 70 36
25 R25 82 58 32
26 R26 77 65 26
27 R27 82 66 42
28 R28 66 67 48
29 R29 72 74 48
30 R30 83 60 35
31 R31 73 74 63
32 R32 80 59 35
33 R33 80 53 50
34 R34 76 69 60
35 R35 85 59 63
36 R36 81 62 50
37 R37 76 69 30
38 R38 77 67 55
39 R39 75 73 33
40 R40 82 68 45
41 R41 89 71 63
42 R42 96 70 40
43 R43 87 60 63
44 R44 81 67 50
45 R45 82 66 40
46 R46 68 68 65
47 R47 75 63 53
48 R48 81 54 55
49 R49 78 71 48
50 R50 81 67 55
51 R51 78 74 53
52 R52 77 68 48
53 R53 79 75 48
54 R54 79 63 50
55 R55 73 64 45
56 R56 83 68 60
57 R57 85 58 50
58 R58 80 69 48
59 R59 82 78 50
60 R60 68 52 33
61 R61 86 61 43
62 R62 87 64 38
63 R63 74 60 50
64 R64 71 58 48
65 R65 78 70 45
66 R66 75 65 35
67 R67 69 70 38
68 R68 78 63 53
69 R69 77 63 50
70 R70 80 70 38
71 R71 90 60 50
72 R72 78 60 50
73 R73 80 60 38
74 R74 75 63 43
75 R75 74 74 40
76 R76 79 75 40
77 R77 96 72 38
78 R78 69 70 38
79 R79 82 62 75
80 R80 88 59 53
81 R81 73 66 45
82 R82 76 64 43
83 R83 83 66 43
84 R84 82 65 55
85 R85 86 61 55
86 R86 86 65 60
87 R87 87 60 45
88 R88 87 70 55
89 R89 82 73 38
90 R90 76 70 53
91 R91 82 64 50
92 R92 72 72 58
93 R93 77 75 50
94 R94 77 64 45
95 R95 77 77 50
96 R96 75 63 55
97 R97 75 68 68
98 R98 87 67 45
99 R99 85 68 60
100 R100 78 75 40
101 R101 67 71 58
102 R102 80 60 35
103 R103 77 70 60
104 R104 91 66 45
105 R105 83 71 55
106 R106 67 66 60
107 R107 75 66 45
108 R108 80 66 50
109 R109 82 77 60
110 R110 80 65 45
111 R111 81 44 65
112 R112 69 52 70
113 R113 83 50 65
(Appendix VII)