BAB V. KESIMPULAN, IMPLIKASI DAN REKOMENDASI
C. Rekomendasi
Beberapa hal yang dapat direkomendasikan dari hasil penelitian antara lain: 1. Program IPA Terintegrasi yang telah dikembangkan melalui research
and development ini merupakan mata kuliah yang mampu membekali mahasiswa S1 pendidikan IPA yang memiliki kewenangan menjadi calon guru IPA SMP. Dengan demikian bagi LPTK yang membuka program studi S1 pendidikan IPA perlu menerapkan mata kuliah IPA terintegrasi agar lulusannya memiliki kompetensi sesuai yang direkomendasikan
Standards for Science Teacher Preparation (NSTA, 2003) dan memenuhi Permendiknas, No. 16 Tahun 2007, yaitu memiliki kompetensi interdisipliner bidang IPA.
2. Sub-program-sub-program dan tema-tema dapat dimodifikasi oleh perguruan tinggi untuk disesuaikan dengan visi dan misi kurikulum yang dikembangkan, kekhasan daerah, kondisi kampus dan sarana-prasarana
95
serta kemampuan mahasiswa, namum tetap mengacu pada standar materi dan pedagogi tingkat SMP/MTs sebagai rujukan.
3. Pelaksanaan perkuliahan IPA Terintegrasi dan Pembelajarannya dapat dilaksanakan oleh berbagai LPTK yang membuka Program Studi S1 Pendidikan IPA pada semester dimana para mahasiswa sudah menempuh mata kuliah prasyarat baik dari aspek materi maupun pedagogi.
4. Mata kuliah IPA Terintegrasi dapat dijadikan pendukung kebijakan pemerintah, khususnya Kementrian Pendidikan Nasional Direktorat Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah tentang pelaksanaan Bimbingan Teknis IPA Terpadu bagi para guru, sehingga para mahasiswa sudah memiliki pemahaman pada saat nanti harus praktik di lapangan.
5. Penelitian lanjutan masih sangat diperlukan untuk menguji efektifitas program IPA Terintegrasi, yaitu dengan melanjutkan penelitian pengembangan ke tahap uji pelaksanaan lapangan, penyempurnaan produk akhir dan Implementasi.
96
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
American Assosiation for the Advancement of Science. 1993. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
Arends, Richard I. 1996. Classroom Instructional and Management. The McGraw-Companies, Inc.
Bayer, B. K. 1971. Inquiry in the Social Studies Classroom. A Strategy for Teaching. Colombus Ohio: Charles E. Merril Publishing Company
Borg, W. R. And Gall, M. D. 1983. Educational Research An Introduction 4th Ed. New York: Longman, Inc.
Bround, M., dan Reiss, M. 2006. Toward a More Authentic Science Curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning. International Journal of Science Education, pp. 1373-1388. Tersedia: m.reiss@ioe.ac.uk. [20 Pebruari 2008]
Bruce Joyce & Masha Weil. 1996. Models of Teaching 5th Ed. United States of America: Allyn & bacon. A Simon & Schuster Company
BSNP. 2006. Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Jakarta: BSNP Depdiknas.
Carribbean Examination Council. 2007. Integrated Science. Carribbean Certificate of Secondary Level Competence
Cho, I. Y. dan Anderson, C. W. 2005. Understanding of Matter Transformation in Physical and Chemical Changes: Ecological Thinking. Michigan State
University. 35 halaman. Tersedia:
http://jscemed.chem.wisc.edu/JCEWWW/Features/CQandChP/CQs/Concep t sinventory/Concepts_Inventory.html. [23 Juni 2008]
Clarke, J. A. and Rowe, R. 2007. Learning Science Online: A
Descriptive Study of Online Science Courses For Teachers. TERC, 26 halaman. Tersedia: http://www.terc.edu [23 Juni 2008]
Curriculum Development Center. 2002, Integrated Curriculum for Secondary School (Curriculum Specification. Science Form 2. Ministry of Education Malaysia
Fogarty, R. 1991. How to Integrated The Curricula. United States of America: IRI/Skylight Publishing. Inc.
97 Hakkarainen, K., dan Sintonen, M. 2003. The Integrrogative Model of inquiry
and Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. Science & Education 11: 25-43, 2003. Kluwer Academic Publisher. Printed in the Netherlands. Tersedia : Departement of Philosophy, P.O.Box 24 University of Helsinki, Finland; E-mail: matti.sintonen@helsinki.fi [21 Januari 2008] Huo, Y. 2006. Applying Contemporary Education Strategies to motivate Students’
interests in Studying Physical Chemistry and to develop Lifelong Learning Skills. Departement of Chemistry, Northeast University Shenyang, pp.23- 26. Tersedia: Huoyunqiu@sina.com. [15 maret 2008]
Khishfe dan Khalick, E. L. 2002. Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixt graders’views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39 (7), 551-578. Tersedia : http://ouray. cudenver.edu [15 Pebruari 2008]
Mao, S. L. dan Chang, C. Y. 2005. Impacts of an Inquiry Teaching Method on Earth Science Students’ Learning Outcomes and Attitudes at the Socondary School Level. Departemen of Earth Science National Taiwan Normal University Taiwan, R. O. C. proc. Natl, Sci. Counc. ROC(D) Vol, 8, No.3, 2005, pp. 93- 101. [5 Pebruari 2008]
Meltzer, David E. 2002. The Relationship between Mathemathic Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gain in Physics: A Possible Hidden Variable in Diagnostic Pretest Scores. American Journal of Physics 70 (12), pp. 1259- 1267. Tersedia: http://ojps.aip.org/ajp/. [20 Januari 2009]
NSTA. 1988. Standards for Science Teacher Preparation
NSTA. 2003. Standards for Science Teacher Preparation. Revised 2003
Osman N. Kaya. 2009. The Nature of relationship among the Components of pedagogical Content Knowledge of Preservice Science Teachers: ‘Ozone leyer depletion’ as an example. Internasional Journal of Science Education Vol. 31, No. 7, 1 May 2009, pp. 961-988
Peraturan Pemerintah No. 19 Tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia No. 74 tahun 2008 tentang Guru
Rutherford, F.J. dan Ahlgren, A. 1990. Science for All Americans. New York : Oxford University Press.
98 Saab, N. and Joolingen, W.V. 2005. Supporting Collaborative
Discovery Learning by Presenting a Tool. Procceding of th.2005 Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning. Learning 2005: The next yearst CSCL’05 Publisher International Society on
Learning Sciences. Tersedia: Graduate School of Teaching and Learning University of Amsterdam Nadira@ilo.uva.nl [21 Januari 2007]
Song-Ling Mao dan Chun-Yen Chang. 2005. Impacts of an Inquiry Teaching Method on Earth Science Students’ Learning Outcomes and Attitudes at the Socondary School Level. Departemen of Earth Science National Taiwan Normal University Taiwan, R. O. C. proc. Natl, Sci. Counc. ROC(D) Vol, 8, No.3, 2005, pp. 93- 101. [5 Pebruari 2008]
Sultan. 2008 .Guru Tidak Layak Mengajar, Mau Diapakan?. Tersedia : http://en.wikipedia.org. [6 Juni 2008]
Taurina, T. 2007. Secondary School Teaching and Maori Student Achievement in Science. Intern Research Report 11. 12 halaman. Tersedia : http://www.review.mai.ac.nz. [12 Mei 2008]
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., Semmel, M.I. 1974.
Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. Broomington. Indiana University.
Trefil, J. dan Hazen, R. M, 2007. The Science: An Integrated Approach. United Stated of America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Udin Syaifudin Sa’ud. 2009. Inovasi Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta Wilhelm, J., Thacker,B. , Wilhelm, R. 2007. Creating Constructivist
Physics for Introductory University Classes. Electronic Journal of Science
Education, Vol II, No 2 (2007), 18 halaman. Tersedia:
http://ejse.southwestern.edu[12 Mei 2008]
Yuqiu Huo. 2006. Applying Contemporary Education Strategies to motivate Students’ interests in Studying Physical Chemistry and to develop Lifelong Learning Skills. Departement of Chemistry, Northeast University Shenyang, pp.23-26. Tersedia: Huoyunqiu@sina.com. [15 maret 2008]
Zajkov, O. et. al. 2001. Secondary School Student’s Conceptual and Conventional Knowledge of Mechanics and Some Socioeconomic Parameters. Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Macedonia, 15 halaman. Tersedia; zoliver@iunona.ukim.edu.mk. [21 Januari 2008]
99 Zucker, A.A., et. al. 2007. Increasing Science Learning in Grades 3-8
Using Computers and Probes: Finding From The TEEMSS II Project. Procedings of the NARST 2007 Annual Meeting (New Orleans, LA, United States), 10 halaman. Tersedia : http://teemss.concord.org/. [15 Juni 2008]
---. 2004. Standar-standar Guru Pemula untuk SMP/MTs. Jakarta: Dirjen DIKTI. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
---. 2005. Panduan Pembelajaran IPA Terpadu. Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum. Balitbang. DepDikNas.
---. 2006. Pengembangan Kurikulum Program Studi S1. Jakarta:
Departemen Pendidikan nasional. Direktorat jenderal pendidikan Tinggi. Direktorat Ketenagaan.
---.2007. Kurikulum 2002 FMIPA . Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
---. 2007. Panduan Penyusunan KTSP Lengkap. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia
---. 2010. Panduan Pengembangan Pembelajaran IPA Secara Terpadu. Kementrian Pendidikan Nasional. Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Direktorat Pembinaan SMP