BAB IV ANALISIS HASIL PENELITIAN
C. Saran
Adapun saran yang dapat diberikan oleh peneliti, antara lain
1. Sampel yang digunakan tidak hanya terbatas pada bank yang listing saja sehingga memungkinkan terlihat perbedaannya.
2. Rasio keuangan yang dapat digunakan lebih bervariasi dan dengan periode yang berbeda serta lebih banyak agar dapat memperlihatkan kinerja dan pengaruh dari variabel yang digunakan.
3. Memasukkan indikator ekonomi makro, seperti tingkat inflasi dan pengangguran.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Abdullah, Faisal, 2005. Manajemen Perbankan Teknik Analisis Kinerja Keuangan Bank, UMM Press, Malang
Ali, Mahsyud, 2004. Asset Liability Management, PT. Elex Media Komputindo, Jakarta
Aryati, Titik dan Hekinus Manao, 2002. “Rasio Keuangan sebagai Prediktor Bank Bermasalah di Indonesia,” Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia, vol 5 no 2 Mei 2002. Hal 137-147
Bastian, Indra dan Suhardjono, 2006. Akuntansi Perbankan, Buku Dua, Salemba Empat, Jakarta
Bergevin, Peter M., 2002. Financial Statement Analysis An Integrated Approach,
Pearson Education International. New Jersey.
Dendawijaya, Lukman, 2005. Manajemen Perbankan, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor. Djarwanto, 2004. Pokok-Pokok Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Edisi Kedua, BPFE
Yogyakarta.
Febriyani, Anita dan Rahardian Zulfadin, 2003. “Analisis Kinerja Bank Devisa dan Bank non Devisa di Indonesia,” Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan, vol 7 no 4 Desember 2003. Hal 38-54
Gallagher, Timothy J. dan Joseph D. Andrew, 2003. Financial Management Theory and Practice, 11th edition. Thomson South-Western. USA.
Ghozali, Imam, 2005. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS, Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang
Haryati, Sri, 2006. “Studi Tentang Model Prediksi Tingkat Kesehatan Bank Umum Swasta Nasional Indonesia,” Ventura, vol 9 no 3 Desember 2006, hal 1-19
Jogiyanto, 2004. Metode Penelitian Bisnis Salah Kaprah dan Penglaman-pengalaman, cetakan pertama, BPFE Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta
Lo, Eko Widodo, 2001. “Rasio Keuangan untuk Mengukur Asosiasi Likuiditas, Struktur Modal, dan Kualitas Aktiva dengan Profitabilitas Bank : Analisis Korelasi Kanonikal, ” Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, vol 3 no 1 April 2001, hal 315-334
Merkusiwati, Ni Ketut Lely Aryani, 2007. “Evaluasi Pengaruh CAMEL terhadap Kinerja Perusahaan,” Buletin Studi Ekonomi, vol 12 no 1 Tahun 2007, Hal 100-108
Mishkin, Frederic S and Stanley G Eakins, 2000. Financial Markets and Institutions, 3rd edition, Addison Wesley Publishing Company
Murtanto dan Zeny Arfiana, 2002. “Analisis Laporan Keuangan dengan Menggunakan Rasio CAMEL dan Metode ALTMAN sebagai Alat untuk Memprediksi Tingkat Kegagalan Usaha Bank,” Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing dan Informasi, vol 2 no 2 Agustus 2002. Hal 44-56
Nurhidayati dan Sofyan S. Harahap, 2004. “Rasio Keuangan Sebagai Alat Prediktor Delisting Perusahaan,” Media Riset Bisnis & Manajemen, vol 4 no 1 April 2004. Hal 1-34
Nofianti, Ira, 2007. “Pengaruh Risiko Kredit Terhadap Rentabilitas (ROA) pada PT. Bank BNI 46 (Persero) TBK”, Tesis Jurusan Akuntansi. Universitas Komputer Indonesia, Bandung.
Noor, Slamet B., 1998. Kamus Akuntansi, cetakan kelima, Grafika Sejahtera Offset, Jakarta
Nasser, Etty M, 2003. “Perbandingan Kinerja Bank Pemerintah dan Bank Swasta dengan Rasio CAMEL serta Pengaruhnya terhadap Harga Saham,” Media Riset Akuntansi, Auditing dan Informasi, vol 3 no 3 Desember 2003. Hal 217-236
Riyadi, Selamat, 2004. Banking Assets and Liability Management, edisi kedua, Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta
Rose, Peter, 2002. Commercial Bank Management, 5th edition, Mc Graw Hill Santoso, Wimboh dan Enrico Hariantoro, 2003. “Market Risk Assessment di
Perbankan Nasional, Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan, vol 5 no 4 Maret 2003. Hal 15-43
Sastradipoera, Komaruddin, 2004. StrategiManajemen Bisnis Perbankan Konsep danImplementasi untuk Bersaing, edisi pertama, Kappa Sigma, Bandung Siamat, Dahlan, 2005. Manajemen Lembaga Keuangan, edisi kelima, Lembaga
Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta
Simorangkir, O.P, 2004. Lembaga Keuangan Bank dan Nonbank, cetakan kedua, Ghalia Indonesia, Ciawi-Bogor Selatan.
Sugiyono, 2006. Statistika untuk Penelitian, cetakan kesembilan, Alfa Beta, Bandung
Supriyatin, 2003. “Pengaruh Risiko Kredit Mudharabah Terhadap Tingkat Profitabilitas Bank Syariah”. Skripsi Jurusan Akuntansi. Universitas Komputer Bandung
Sutrisno, 2003. Manajemen Keuangan (Teori, Konsep, dan Aplikasi), BPFE, Yogyakarta
Umar, Husein, 2003. Metode Riset Akuntansi Terapan, cetakan pertama, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta
Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Sumatera Utara Jurusan Akuntansi,2004. Buku Petunjuk Teknis Penulisan Proposal Penelitian dan Penulisan Skripsi, Medan
Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia, 2001. Pedoman Akuntansi Perbankan Indonesia, Jakarta
LAMPIRAN
Data 2005
NO NAMA BANK CAR ROA ROE BOPO LDR
1 PT. Bank Artha Graha Internasional,
Tbk 11,14 0,34 5,22 97,48 85,40
2 PT. Bank (UOB) Buana, Tbk 20,20 3,13 18,91 74,64 79,96 3 PT. Bank Bumiputera Indonesia, Tbk 10,37 -1.24 -16.45 115.86 80.6 4 PT. Bank Central Asia, Tbk 21.66 3.44 28.16 66.82 41.78 5 PT. Bank Century, Tbk 8.08 0.22 7.49 122.69 23.84 6 PT. Bank Danamon, Tbk 22.7 3.12 24.22 48.8 80.82 7 PT. Bank Eksekutif Internasional, Tbk 9.71 -4.2 -40.63 124.52 83.6 8 PT. Bank Internasional Indonesia, Tbk 21.74 1.68 16.26 83.96 60.31 9 PT. Bank Kesawan, Tbk 14.34 0.3 3.82 98.28 55.4 10 PT. Bank Lippo, Tbk 20.8 1.9 15.8 65.7 32.4 11 PT. Bank Mandiri, Tbk 23.7 0.5 2.5 55.6 51.7 12 PT. Bank Mayapada International, Tbk 14.24 0.84 5.29 92.65 82.35 13 PT. Bank Mega, Tbk 11.12 1.25 15.11 88.78 51.25 14 PT. Bank Negara Indonesia, Tbk 15.99 1.61 12.64 84.88 54.24 15 PT. Bank Niaga, Tbk 17.24 2.06 17.25 55.59 85.26 16 PT. Bank NISP, Tbk 19.71 1.52 14.79 86.52 77.62 17 PT. Bank Nusantara Parahyangan, Tbk 10.78 1.59 19.12 86.43 57.03 18 PT. Bank Pan Indonesia, Tbk 28.72 2.27 14.14 56.29 55.17 19 PT. Bank Permata, Tbk 9.8 1.2 14.3 89.3 78.5 20 PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia, Tbk 15.29 5.04 38 70.83 77.83 21 PT. Bank Swadesi, Tbk 24.06 2.06 11.69 82.91 55.36 22 PT. Bank Victoria International 20.28 1.46 11.68 88.94 41.2
Data 2006
NO NAMA BANK CAR ROA ROE BOPO LDR
1 PT. Bank Artha Graha Internasional,
Tbk 11,38 0,40 5,67 97,06 79,52
2 PT. Bank (UOB) Buana, Tbk 30,83 13,18 7,88 74,32 83,03 3 PT. Bank Bumiputera Indonesia, Tbk 12,91 0.26 1.61 98.54 87.42 4 PT. Bank Central Asia, Tbk 22.21 3.8 29.07 68.84 40.3 5 PT. Bank Century, Tbk 11.66 0.38 10.1 93.65 21.35 6 PT. Bank Danamon, Tbk 20.4 1.78 15.6 48.9 75.51 7 PT. Bank Eksekutif Internasional, Tbk 9.37 -0.96 -16.29 110.48 74.8 8 PT. Bank Internasional Indonesia, Tbk 23.3 1.23 12.72 90.03 70.16 9 PT. Bank Kesawan, Tbk 9.43 0.36 3.81 97.65 69.5 10 PT. Bank Lippo, Tbk 23.5 2 23.7 59.7 44.9 11 PT. Bank Mandiri, Tbk 25.3 1.1 10 48.9 57.2 12 PT. Bank Mayapada International, Tbk 13.82 1.55 10.65 88.91 85.35 13 PT. Bank Mega, Tbk 15.73 0.88 9.1 92.78 42.7 14 PT. Bank Negara Indonesia, Tbk 15.3 1.85 22.61 84.79 49.98 15 PT. Bank Niaga, Tbk 16.65 2.11 14.8 49.18 84.69 16 PT. Bank NISP, Tbk 17.07 1.55 11.01 87.98 82.17 17 PT. Bank Nusantara Parahyangan, Tbk 16.64 1.44 15.33 88.18 54.83 18 PT. Bank Pan Indonesia, Tbk 29.47 2.78 14.27 45.02 80.47 19 PT. Bank Permata, Tbk 13.5 1.2 13.1 90 83.1 20 PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia, Tbk 18.82 4.36 33.75 74.38 72.53 21 PT. Bank Swadesi, Tbk 26.55 1.28 7.76 91.12 54.89 22 PT. Bank Victoria International 20.27 1.76 12.11 86.88 51.94
Data 2007
NO NAMA BANK CAR ROA ROE BOPO LDR
1
PT. Bank Artha Graha Internasional,
Tbk 12,24 0,29 3,01 97,69 82,22
2 PT. Bank (UOB) Buana, Tbk 27,94 13,18 7,88 95,23 95,23 3 PT. Bank Bumiputera Indonesia, Tbk 11,86 0,57 4,08 95,56 84,50 4 PT. Bank Central Asia, Tbk 18.79 3.34 26.74 66.73 43.61 5 PT. Bank Century, Tbk 15.91 0.37 7.09 92.58 38.49 6 PT. Bank Danamon, Tbk 19.3 2.4 22.9 47.9 88.1 7 PT. Bank Eksekutif Internasional, Tbk 11.91 0.13 1.01 99.85 78.06 8 PT. Bank Internasional Indonesia, Tbk 20.21 0.75 7.64 95.24 88.34 9 PT. Bank Kesawan, Tbk 10.36 0.35 5.49 95.16 68.46 10 PT. Bank Lippo, Tbk 20.6 2.9 26 56 61.4 11 PT. Bank Mandiri, Tbk 21.1 2.3 15.8 47 109 12 PT. Bank Mayapada International, Tbk 29.95 1.46 5.81 88.46 103.88 13 PT. Bank Mega, Tbk 11.84 2.33 25.52 79.21 46.74 14 PT. Bank Negara Indonesia, Tbk 15.74 0.85 8.03 93.04 60.64 15 PT. Bank Niaga, Tbk 15.43 2.02 15.43 49.66 92.44 16 PT. Bank NISP, Tbk 16.15 1.31 8.71 88.19 89.14 17 PT. Bank Nusantara Parahyangan, Tbk 17 1.29 11.07 87.84 49.39 18 PT. Bank Pan Indonesia, Tbk 21.58 3.14 13.98 46.9 92.36 19 PT. Bank Permata, Tbk 13.3 1.9 18.1 84.8 88 20 PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia, Tbk 15.84 4.61 31.64 69.8 68.8 21 PT. Bank Swadesi, Tbk 20.66 1.17 7.4 90.8 62.16 22 PT. Bank Victoria International 15.43 1.64 15.41 85.59 55.92
Kriteria
NO NAMA BANK 2005 2006 2007 Kriteria
1 PT. Bank Agroniaga, Tbk √ Ditolak 2 PT. Bank Arta Niaga Kencana, Tbk √ √ Ditolak 3 PT. Bank Artha Graha Internasional, Tbk √ √ √ Diterima 4 PT. Bank (UOB) Buana, Tbk √ √ √ Diterima 5 PT. Bank Bukopin, Tbk √ √ Ditolak 6 PT. Bank Bumi Arta, Tbk √ √ Ditolak 7 PT. Bank Bumiputera Indonesia, Tbk √ √ √ Diterima 8 PT. Bank Capital Indonesia, Tbk √ Ditolak 9 PT. Bank Central Asia, Tbk √ √ √ Diterima 10 PT. Bank Century, Tbk √ √ √ Diterima 11 PT. Bank Danamon, Tbk √ √ √ Diterima 12 PT. Bank Eksekutif Internasional, Tbk √ √ √ Diterima 13 PT. Bank Ekonomi Raharja, Tbk √ Ditolak 14 PT. Bank Himpunan Saudara (1906), Tbk √ √ Ditolak 15 PT. Bank Internasional Indonesia, Tbk √ √ √ Diterima 16 PT. Bank Kesawan, Tbk √ √ √ Diterima 17 PT. Bank Lippo, Tbk √ √ √ Diterima 18 PT. Bank Mandiri, Tbk √ √ √ Diterima 19 PT. Bank Mayapada International, Tbk √ √ √ Diterima 20 PT. Bank Mega, Tbk √ √ √ Diterima 21 PT. Bank Negara Indonesia, Tbk √ √ √ Diterima 22 PT. Bank Niaga, Tbk √ √ √ Diterima 23 PT. Bank NISP, Tbk √ √ √ Diterima 24 PT. Bank Nusantara Parahyangan, Tbk √ √ √ Diterima 25 PT. Bank Pan Indonesia, Tbk √ √ √ Diterima 26 PT. Bank Permata, Tbk √ √ √ Diterima 27 PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia, Tbk √ √ √ Diterima 28 PT. Bank Swadesi, Tbk √ √ √ Diterima 29
PT. Bank Tabungan Pensiunan Nasional,
Tbk √ Ditolak
30 PT. Bank Victoria International √ √ √ Diterima 31
PT. Bank Windu Kentjana Internasional,
Hasil Uji Statistik
Statistik Deskriptif Descriptive Statistics
N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Deviation Variance ROA 66 -.04 .33 .0205 .04592 .002 ROE 66 -.41 .38 .1208 .11698 .014 BOPO 66 .45 1.24 .8115 .19257 .037 CAR 66 .08 .31 .1745 .05652 .003 LDR 66 .21 1.09 .6782 .19490 .038 Valid N (listwise) 66 Grafik Histogram
Normal Probability Plot
Uji Kolmogorov Smirnov One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
Unstandardized Residual N 66 Mean .0000000 Normal Parametersa Std. Deviation .18263471 Absolute .112 Positive .048 Most Extreme Differences
Negative -.112 Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z .908 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .382 a. Test distribution is Normal.
Uji Multikolonieritas (1) Coefficient Correlationsa
Model CAR ROE ROA BOPO CAR 1.000 .148 -.251 .508 ROE .148 1.000 -.296 .565 ROA -.251 -.296 1.000 -.079 Correlations BOPO .508 .565 -.079 1.000 CAR .268 .020 -.074 .047 ROE .020 .071 -.045 .027 ROA -.074 -.045 .322 -.008 1 Covariances BOPO .047 .027 -.008 .032 a. Dependent Variable: LDR Uji Multikolonieritas (2) Coefficientsa Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized
Coefficients Collinearity Statistics Model B Std. Error Beta T Sig. Tolerance VIF
(Constant) 1.128 .222 5.073 .000 ROA .129 .568 .030 .228 .821 .805 1.242 ROE -.720 .266 -.432 -2.707 .009 .565 1.771 BOPO -.402 .179 -.398 -2.249 .028 .461 2.171 1 CAR -.222 .518 -.064 -.429 .669 .638 1.568 a. Dependent Variable: LDR
Grafik Scatterplot Uji Glejser Coefficientsa Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.
(Constant) -.026 .113 -.233 .817 ROA .072 .288 .035 .251 .803 ROE .160 .135 .196 1.188 .240 BOPO .111 .091 .224 1.228 .224 1 CAR .397 .263 .234 1.510 .136 a. Dependent Variable: ABSUT
Uji Autokorelasi (1) Model Summaryb Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate Durbin-Watson 1 .349a .122 .064 .18853 1.589 a. Predictors: (Constant), CAR, ROE, ROA, BOPO
b. Dependent Variable: LDR Uji Autokorelasi (2) Runs Test Unstandardized Residual Test Valuea -.00101
Cases < Test Value 33
Cases >= Test Value 33
Total Cases 66
Number of Runs 30
Z -.992
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .321
Uji Autokorelasi (3) Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Coefficients
Standardized Coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig.
(Constant) .161 .239 .675 .503 ROA -.158 .565 -.040 -.279 .781 ROE -.114 .270 -.073 -.423 .674 BOPO -.156 .196 -.165 -.795 .430 CAR -.120 .521 -.037 -.231 .818 1 RES_2 .255 .143 .256 1.781 .080 a. Dependent Variable: Unstandardized Residual
Model Summary Model Summaryb Model R R Square Adjusted R Square Std. Error of the Estimate Durbin-Watson 1 .349a .122 .064 .18853 1.589 a. Predictors: (Constant), CAR, ROE, ROA, BOPO
Uji Statistik t
Uji Statistik F ANOVAb
Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Regression .301 4 .075 2.116 .090a Residual 2.168 61 .036
1
Total 2.469 65 a. Predictors: (Constant), CAR, ROE, ROA, BOPO b. Dependent Variable: LDR
Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Coefficients
Standardized
Coefficients Collinearity Statistics Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. Tolerance VIF
(Constant) 1.128 .222 5.073 .000 ROA .129 .568 .030 .228 .821 .805 1.242 ROE -.720 .266 -.432 -2.707 .009 .565 1.771 BOPO -.402 .179 -.398 -2.249 .028 .461 2.171 1 CAR -.222 .518 -.064 -.429 .669 .638 1.568 a. Dependent Variable: LDR