BAB V KESIMPULAN DAN SARAN
B. Saran
Berdasarkan gambaran temuan hasil penelitian, maka beberapa saran yang diajukan dalam penelitian ini adalah:
1. Mengingat hasil penelitian masih dalam model hipotesis, maka penelitian perlu dilanjutkan untuk mendapat model teruji melalu penelitian uji lebih luas.
2. Terkait dengan saran perbaikan kurikulum, maka mata kuliah ini lebih sesuai diterapkan di semester tujuh dimana mahasiswa telah mendapatkan materi
evaluasi pendidikan dan sedang mengontrak mata kuliah Perencanaan Pembelajaran Fisika (PPF) sehingga dapat saling melengkapi, kemampuan mengembangkan pertanyaan untuk membangun konsep dapat dilatihkan ketika mahasiswa mendalami konsep-konsep fisika sekolah yaitu di perkulihan Fisika Sekolah I, II, dan III, dan kemampuan melakukan penilaian dalam kegiatan eksperimen dapat dilatih pada perkuliahan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Berdasarkan jumlah materi dan tugas yang diberikan cukup banyak, maka perlu dipikirkan untuk penambahan jumlah sks menjadi 3 sks. 3. Mengingat mahasiswa memerlukan sarana untuk menguji rancangan
eksperimen, maka ada baiknya Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika mengembangkan pola kemitraan dengan sekolah. Kegiatan ini dapat membangun hubungan yang saling menguntungkan, dimana guru dan dosen secara bersama-sama berusaha memperbaiki proses pembelajaran di sekolah dan perguruan tinggi akan mendapatkan informasi terkait dengan permasalahan yang ada di lapangan sebagai bahan pengembangan program perkuliahan.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Anonim A. (1998). “Goal of the Introductory Physics Laboratory”, American Association of Physics Teacher. American Journal of Physics, Vol66(6), June 1998, pp 483-485.
Anonim B. (2005). America’s Lab. Report, Investigation in High School Science. [Online]. Tersedia: http://books.nap.edu/open book.php>record id=1311 &page=138 [28 Maret, 2008]
Anonim C. (2007).”Science Syllabus, 2007 Ministry of Education Singapore”.
Allie,Saalih. et al. (1997). “Writing-Intensive Physics Laboratory Report: Task and Asessment”. The Physics Teacher.Vol (35), October 1997, pp 399-405.
Allie,Saalih. et al.(2003). “Teaching Measurement in the Introductory Physics Laboratoory”. The Physics Teacher.Vol (42), October 2003, pp 394-401. Arends, Richard I. (2001).” Learning To Teach”, Fifth Edition. Singapore:
McGraw –Hill Book Co.
Asmawi, Z (2001).Alternative Assessment, Pusat antar Universitas untuk Peningkatan dan Pengembangan Aktivitas Intruksional DIKTI . Bing-Yuan. (2006). “China’s physics education reform in the new century:
Opportunities and challenges”. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Volume 8, Issue 1. [Online]. Tersedia dalam:
http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt [4 April 2008]
Borg & Gall. (1983). Educational Research an Introduction. (Fourth Edition) New York, Longman.
Borghi. et. al. (2003). Secondary shool teacher preparation in Italy: the experience in Pavia. [Online]. Tersedia dalam: http://www1.phys.uu.nl /essera2003/
programme/pdf%5c29954.pdf [5 Juli 2009].
Brotosiswoyo, S. (2000). Hakekat Pembelajaran MIPA (Fisika) di Perguruan Tinggi, Proyek Pengembangan Universitas Terbuka Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi Jakarta, Depdiknas.
Creswell. (1994). Research Design Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches. State publication, London
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, (2003). Kurikulum 2004 Standar Kompetensi Mata Pelajaran Sains Sekolah Menengah Pertama dan Madrasah
________________________, (2006). Kurikulum KTSP ,Mata Pelajaran Fisika ,
Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA)/Madrasah Aliyah (MA), Departemen
Pendidikan Nasional, Jakarta.
Dufresne R.J and Gerace W.J. (2004). “Assessing –To-Learn: Formative
Assessment in Physics Instruction”. The Physics Teacher, Vol 42, October 2004, pp 428-432.
Eckert, M, Jonathan. (2008), “Trends in Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS): international accountability and implication for science
instruction”. USA: Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, USA, melalui
Research in Comparative and International Education. Volume 3 Number 2
2008 [Online]. Tersedia dalam http: www.wwwprds.co.uk/RCIE [10 Maret 2010]
Etkina E. (2005). “Preparing Tomorrow’s Physics Teacher”. Forum on The American Physics Society [Online]. Tersedia dalam: http://units.aps.org/ unit/fed/newsletters/fall2005/ preparing.html[10 April 2009]
_________ (2007). “Acting like a physicst: Student approach study to
experimental design”. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics education research 3, 020106.
Harnet (1991), Model Program for Middle School Teacher Preparation [Online]. Tersesia dalam: http://www.ericdigests.org [2 Juli 2009].
Heller, K.at al. (2001). “Instructors’ ideas bout problem solving – Setting goals”.
Proceedings of Physics Education Research Conference, Rochester, New York, July 2001.
Heller & Heller, Problem-solving Laboratory, Minesotta [Online]. Tersedia dalam http://groups.physics.umn [02 Juli 2007]
Heuvelen, A, A (2001). “Milikan Lecture 1999: The Workplace, Student Minds and Physics Learning System”, Am.J.Phys, Vole 69 (11), pp 1139-1146. Hobson, D (1996). “Practical work in school science, exploring some direction fir
change”, Int.J.Sci.Educ, Vol 18 (7), pp755-760.
Ismail Sahin, (2007), College of Education Faculty Members’ Preferences Towards Internet-based Learning Environments [Online]. Tersedia dalam:
Kaniawati dkk, (2006). “Profil kemampuan Mengajar Calon Guru Fisika dalam Program Pengalaman Lapangan (PPL)”, Laporan Penelitian Pembinaan FPMIPA UPI: tidak diterbitkan.
Lawson, A.E (1995). Science Teaching and the Development of Thinking, California Wad word publishing Company.
Mc.Dermott, L.C. et al. (1996). Physics by Inquiry, Vole I, New York; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
__________________. (1996). Physics by Inquiry, Vole II, New York; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
__________________. (2000). “Preparing Teacher to teach physics and physical science by inquiry”. Physics edu, vole 35 (6) pp 411-416.
__________________. (2005). Preparing K-12 teachers to teach physics and physical science , Forum On Education American Physical Society [Online]. Tersedia dalam: http://units.aps.org/units/fed/newsletters/summer
2005/mcdl.html [11 Juni 2007].
Mueller Jon.(2005).The Authentic Asessment Toolbox: Enhancing Student Learning through Online Faculty Development: Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. Tersedia: http:/www. PALS-Task with student Direction [20 Januari 2008].
Mertler, Craig A. (2001). Designing scoring rubrics for your classroom. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. Tersedia dalam:
http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=7&n=25 . [12 November 2009]. Mundilarto. (2005). “Pembelajaran Fisika Belum Optimal”. Republika [Online].
Tersedia dalam: http//www.republika.co.id [2 Pebriari 2008]
Munir, AR.(2005).”Aplikasi Analisis Jalur (Path Analysis) dengan menggunakan SPSS versi 12”. Lab. Kompetensi Manajemen Fekom Unhas: tidak
diterbitkan.
Nadji Taoufik and Lach Michael. (2003). “Strategies for Laboratory Reports”.
The Physics Teacher , Vol 41, Januari 2003, pp 56 – 57.
Nasional Science Teacher Association in collaboration with the Association for the Education of Teacher Science, (1998). “Standards for Science Teacher Preparation”.
National Science Foundation, “Foundation Inquiry”, Directorate for Education an Human Recourse [Online]. Tersedia dalam:
http://www.ehnnsf,gov/EHR/ESIE/index.html [2 Apri; 2006].
NCVER, (2003). “Defining Generic Skill”, At a Glance [On-line]. Tersedia dalam http://www.ncver.edu.au[21 Desember 2005].
Novak. J. D and Canas, A. J.(2005) “The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them”. Technical Report IHMC Cmaps Tools 2006-01 Rev 2008-01, Florida Institute for Human and Mechine Cognition. Olszewski Chris. (2005).” The Road Less Travelled: A Ph.D Physicst become a
HS Physics Teacher “ [Online]. Tersedia dalam: Http://Physics.buffalostate.edu [12 Januari 2008].
Popov Oleg , (2006). “Developing outdoor activities and a website as resources to stimulate learning physics in teacher education”. J. Phys. Tchr. Educ. 3(3), 2006, pp 18-23.
Poonpan Schada, (2005), “Indicators of Research-Based learning Instructional Process; A Case Study of Bast Practice in a primary School”.
Reif, F, (1995), Milikan Lecture 1994: “Understanding and teaching important science thought processes”, Am.J.Physic, Vole 63 (1), pp 17-32.
Reif, F & L.A Scoot (1999). “Teaching scientific thinking skills; Student and computer coaching each other”. Am, J, Phys, Vole 67(9), pp 819-831. Rutherford, F. J., and Ahlgren, A, (1990) .Science for All Americans. American
Association for the Advancement of Science, Oxford University Press, New York.
Rosalite, Goves (2008); “Bandura and Social Cognitive Theory”. California State University Monterey Bay Instructional Design.
Rustad, S, A. Munandar & Dwiyanto, (2004). Analisis Prasarana dan Sarana
Pendidikan SD, MI, SMP, MTS dan SMA,SMK/MA, Jakarta: Balitbang,
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
Scherr, R (2008). “Gesture analysis for physics education research”, Physical Review Special Topics-Physics education research, 4, 010101.
Schwarz, Christina (2008), Developing Preservice Elementary Teacher’knowledge and Practices Through Modelling-Centered Scientific Inquiry [Online]. Tersedia dalam: http:/www3.interscience.wiley.com[27 Juni 2009].
Sheva n B & Bagno E, (2006). “Research-design model for profesional
development of teacher designing lessons with physics education research”,
Physical Review Special Topics-Physics education research 2, 020106. Stiggin, Richard G . (1994). Student-Centered Classroom Assessment. New York:
McMillan College Pub.Co.
Sugiyono (2010), Statistika untuk Penelitian, Alfabeta, Bandung.
Turner HM,Supovitz (2000),” The Effect of Profesional Development on Science Teaching Practices and Classroom Culture”. Journal of Research in Science Taeching, vol 37, no.9, pp 963-980.
Wang, T.H. (2007). “What strategies are effective for formative assessment in an e-learning environment?” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(3), 171-186
Wiyanto (2005). Kemampuan Merancang dan Melaksanakan Kegiatan Laboratorium Fisika Berbasis Inkuiri bagi Mahasiswa Calon Guru. Disertasi Doktor pada PPS Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia : tidak diterbitkan.
Wenning, C, (2005). “Levels of inquiry:Hierarchies of pedagogical practices and inquiry preicesses”. Journal Physics education, 3(3), pp 3-10.
Wenning, C, (2006). “A generic Model for inquiry-oriented labs in postsecondary introductory physics”, Journal Physics education, 2(3), pp 24-33.
