CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
B. Suggestion
Based on the result of the study, the researcher proposed some suggestion as follows:
1. A teacher needs to apply an appropriate method in the classroom in order to make an enjoyable classroom and to gain the objective of learning.
2. Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) technique can be an alternative learning model due to this method can improve students‟ achievement and students‟ motivations.
3. The researcher used questionnaire to know the students‟ perception on the use of Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) technique, for the next researcher it‟s better to use questionnaire and interview to collect the students‟ data.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Ahen, JA. 2009. Students’ Perception towards English for Self Expression.
Sarawak: University Malaysia Sarawak.
Ak, Sara W. 2011. Planning And Designing An Online Learning Module.
Akram, Muhammad, Qamar Naseem, and Imtiaz Ahmad. 2016. Correlating Students’ Perceptions of Teacher Effectiveness and Student Achievement. The Sindh University Journal of Education. 45(2):1–20.
Anonim. 2012. Model Pembelajaran Student Team Achievement Division (STAD).
(http://modelpembelajarankooperatif.blogspot.com/2012/08/student-team-achievement-division-stad_3721.html?m=1) accessed on 5 December 2018.
Armstrong, Michael. 2006. Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice Edition. London: Kogam Page.
Campbell, Jennifer et al. 2001. Students ’ Perceptions of Teaching and Learning:
The Influence of Students’ Approaches to Learning and Teachers’
Approaches to Teaching.
Chang, Ya-ching. 2010. Students ’ Perceptions of Teaching Styles and Use of Learning Strategies.
Creswell, John W. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. America: Pearson,
Boston.
Deswarni, Dini. 2018. The Effect of Using STAD Strategy toward Students’
Reading Comprehension. Al-Ishlah Journal of Education. 10(1), 72-374, (ISSN 2087-9490 (p); 2597-940X (o)).
Emzir. 2015. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Felder, Richard M. and Eunice R. Henriques. 1995. Learning and Teaching Styles In Foreign and Second Language Education. Foreign Language Annals 28(1):21–31.
Fedler, Richard M. and Linda K. Silverment. 2002. Learning And Teaching Styles. 78(June):674–81.
Ghait, Ghazi. 2001. Learners’ Perception of Their STAD Cooperative Experience.
Pergamon 29(October):289-301.
Ghazali, Imam. 2015. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program SPSS.
Skripsi. Semarang: UNDIP.
Hasib, Mujib. 2018. Students’ and Teachers’ Perception on the Effectiveness of Discussion Technique. Skripsi. Makassar: Muhammadiyah University of Makassar.
Hayen, Nancy Csapo &.Roger. 2006. The Role of Learning Styles in the Teaching / Learning Process. Information Systems VII(1):129–33.
Hidayati, Khusnul. 2014. The Influence of Questioning Strategy on Students’
Achievement in Reading. Skripsi. Jakarta: Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University.
Hong, K.-S., Ridzuan, A. A., & Kuek, M.-K. (2003). Students' attitudes Toward the use of the Internet for Learning: A Study at a University in Malaysia.
Educational Technology &Society, 6(2), 45-49, (ISSN 1436-4522)
Huda, Miftahul. 2016. Model-model Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Jinoddin, Ina. 2019. Students’ Perception of Teachers’ rewards in Teaching English at the First Grade of SMP Negeri 1 Sungguminasa. Skripsi.
Makassar: Muhammadiyah University of Makassar.
Maharani, Hanifah. 2018. The Effectiveness of Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) on Students’ Reading Ability. Skripsi. Surakarta: unismuh Surakarta.
Marble, Stephen and Sandy Finley. 2000. Understanding Teachers’ Perspectives on Teaching and Learning.
Moni, Olivia. 2014. The Implement of STAD Used by Teacher toward Teaching Grammar. Skripsi. Malang: Muhammadiyah University of Malang.
Novitariani, liya. 2018. The Use of STAD Technique to Improve the Students’
skill in Writing Descriptive Text. Skripsi. Semarang: Semarang State University.
Nurhatika. 2018. Students’ Perception toward Teachers’ Talk in English Classroom. Skripsi. Makassar: Muhammadiyah University of Makassar.
Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi Fkip Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar 2014.
Patel, M.F and Jain Preveen M. 2008. Language Teaching-Methods, Tools and Techniques. Jaipur.
Rahmat. 2005. Revolusi Kecerdasan Abad 21. Bandung :172.
Risatina, Hesti. 2015. The Application of Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) Learning Model to Improve Learning Motivation in the Basic Competence Preparing Financial Statement of Service Enterprise.
Robbins, Stephen, .P .2010 .Peningkatan Hasil Beljar Siswa dalam Pembeljaran Bahasa Inggris. Unpublish. Palembang: Universitas PGRI Palembang.
Rosmilawati. 2017. An Analysis of Teachers’ Conception on Learning Teaching and Their Effect on Students’ Learning. Skripsi. Makassar:
Muhammadiyah University of Makassar.
Putri, Adhisty Pramanik. 2013. The Effectiveness of STAD (Student Teams Achievement Divisions) to Improve Students’ Reading Comprehension.
Skripsi. Bandung: UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.
Sani, Ridwan Abdulla. 2014. Inovasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Sidhu, Gurnam Kaur, 2003. Literature In the language classrooms: Seeing through the eyes of learners. In: Ganakumaran & Edwin Malachi (Eds.).
Teaching of literature in ESL/EFL context. Pp.88-110. Petaling Jaya:
Sasbadi-MeltaELT Series.
Slavin, R. E. 2005. Cooverative Learning: Teori, Riset, dan Praktik. Bandung:
Nusa Media.
Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Warayet, Abdullah. 2011. Participation As A Complex Phenomenon In The Efl Classroom Abdalla Warayet. (March).
Yanse, Servinus. 2016. Students’ Perception on The Useof Group Discussion and their Engagement in the Speaking Sessiun of CLS 1. Skripsi. Yogyakarta:
State Dharma University.
Yeung, H.C.H. 2015. Literature Review of the Cooperative Learning Strategy Student Team Achievement Division (STAD). International Journal of
Education. 7(1):31-34.
Yuliani, Nina. 2019. The Role of Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) in Improving Students’ Learning Outcomes. Classroom Action Research Journal, 3(1), 8-15.
Zhou, Mai. 2011. Learning Styles and Teaching Styles in College English Teaching. International Education Studies 4(1):73–77.
Appendix I
QUESTIONNAIRE
“Students’ Perception on the Use of
Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) Technique”
Nama :
Jenis Kelamin : L/P* (lingkari salah satu)
Kelas :
Petunjuk Pengisian:
a. Tulislah identitas anda pada tempat yang sudah disediakan b. Bacalah dengan teliti seluruh pernyataan dibawah ini
c. Berilah tanda silang (X) atau check list (√) pada kolom jawaban yang tersedia dengan alternative jawaban yaitu: d. Jawablah dengan sejujur-jujurnya
No. ITEMS SA A U D SAD
1
Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) is an effective technique.
(Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) adalah teknik pembelajaran yang efektif)
No. ITEMS SA A U D SAD
3
STAD technique can increase my motivation.
(Pembelajaran dengan teknik STAD dapat menambah motivasi saya)
4
Through Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) technique, I can
I‟m active during group activities.
(Saya berperan aktif selama kegiatan kelompok)
6
I work by myself in group due to my friends could not understand the topic.
(saya bekerja sendiri dalam kelompok karena teman-teman saya tidak mengerti topiknya)
7
I couldn‟t participate well in group as long as learning process using Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) technique.
(Saya tidak dapat berpartisipasi dengan baik dalam kelompok selama proses
No ITEMS SA A U D SAD
9
I study hard because STAD is a good technique.
(Saya rajin belajar karena STAD merupakan teknik pembelajaran yang bagus)
10
My group is unable to complete the exercise on time.
(Kelompok saya tidak dapat menyelsaikan tugas dengan tepat waktu)
11
I can solve the exercise given in group.
(Saya dapat memecahkan latihan yang diberikan secara kelompok)
12
STAD technique can increase the talent of leadership.
(Teknik STAD dapat mengembangkan bakat kepemimpinan)
13
I am confident enough to deliver my opinions in group.
(Saya cukup percaya diri untuk menyampaikan pendapat saya dalam group)
14
I cannot understand the material provided properly.
No. ITEMS SA A U D SAD
16
I am not happy if the result of group work gets appreciation from the teacher.
(Saya tidak senang jika hasil kerja kelompok mendapatkan apresiasi dari guru) implement the material in my daily life.
(Teknik STAD tidak dapat membantu saya menerapkan materi dalam kehidupan sehari-hari saya)
19
I feel that I have increased in the learning process using Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) model.
(Saya merasa mengalami peningkatan dalam proses pembelajaran menggunakan model Student Team Achievement Division (STAD))
20
I‟m not happy when Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) technique is applied in other Subject.
(Saya tidak senang apabila teknik Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) diterapkan di mata pelajaran lain)
Appendix II
No. ITEMS STATEMENT
Favorable Unfavorable 1
Student Teams Achievement Divisions
(STAD) is an effective technique.
√
2 The instructions given by the teacher is
clear and not confusing
√
3 STAD technique can increase my
motivation.
√
4
Through Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) technique, I can understand the material easily.
√
5 I‟m active during group activities.
√
6 I work by myself in group due to my
friends could not understand the topic.
√
7
I couldn‟t participate well in group as long as learning process using Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) technique.
13 I am confident enough to deliver my
opinions in group.
√
14 I cannot understand the material
provided properly.
√
15 I cannot answer all the quizzes given by
teacher.
√
16 I am not happy if the result of group
work gets appreciation from the teacher.
√
17 I‟m not proud when my group gets a
reward.
√
18 STAD technique couldn‟t help me to
implement the material in my daily life.
√
19
I feel that I have increased in the learning process using Student Team Achievement Division (STAD) model.
√
20
I‟m not happy when Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD)
technique is applied in other Subject.
√
Resp.
Items Number
Total
Score Category 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
1 5 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 86 Very High
2 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 97 Very High
3 4 4 5 4 3 4 4 5 4 2 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 5 83 Very High
4 5 4 5 5 5 3 5 5 4 2 4 4 3 3 3 4 5 3 4 3 79 High
5 4 5 4 5 3 3 4 2 4 2 3 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 77 High
6 5 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 2 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 3 73 High
7 5 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 82 Very High
8 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 3 2 4 75 High
10 4 4 4 4 3 2 3 4 4 2 4 4 3 3 3 4 5 3 5 3 71 High
11 4 3 4 4 5 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4 5 1 80 High
12 4 4 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 3 2 3 4 4 5 5 3 3 4 70 High
13 4 4 5 4 5 5 2 1 5 5 5 2 5 5 2 5 1 1 4
5
76 High
14 5 5 5 4 5 2 5 5 5 2 4 5 5 5 1 5 5 4 5 5 87 Very High
15 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 5 4 2 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 77 High
16 4 4 5 5 3 2 3 4 4 2 4 4 3 1 1 5 5 3 5 3 70 High
17 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 1 3 4 3 5 5 4 4 1 82 Very High
18 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 1 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 1 5 4 4 5 79 High
19 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 1 3 4 3 5 5 4 5 5 88 Very High
21 4 4 4 4 4 2 3 4 4 2 4 4 3 4 3 4 5 3 5 3 73 High
22 4 4 5 4 3 3 2 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 2 4 4 4 3 73 High
23 4 4 4 5 4 2 3 4 4 2 3 3 4 3 2 3 3 2 4 3 66 High
24 4 5 5 5 4 2 3 3 5 3 4 3 4 4 3 5 5 1 5 5 78 High
25 4 4 5 4 3 5 3 5 4 5 5 4 4 1 2 4 4 4 4 4 61 High
26 4 4 4 4 3 2 3 4 4 2 4 4 3 3 3 4 5 3 4 3 71 High
27 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 4 4 2 4 4 3 3 3 4 5 3 4 3 72 High
28 4 5 5 5 4 2 3 3 4 3 2 3 5 3 3 5 5 3 4 4 75 High
29 4 5 4 4 3 4 3 2 4 3 4 3 3 3 3 4 5 2 3
3
69 High
30 5 4 5 5 4 2 3 2 5 2 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 80 High
32 5 5 5 5 4 3 3 4 5 3 5 1 5 4 2 4 5 4 5 2 79 High
33 5 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 3 2 4 4 4 1 4 4 4 4 5 74 High
34 5 4 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 5 4 3 2 5 4 4 4 4 75 High
35 4 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 3 2 5 5 4 2 5 5 5 4 4 91 Very High
36 5 5 4 4 5 3 3 4 5 4 4 5 5 3 3 5 5 4 4 4 84 Very High
Total 2787
Mean Score: X =
X =
X = 77.41
Sumsriani is a student of Muhammadiyah University of Makassar. She was born on 02nd December 1996 Sumbawa, West Nusa Tenggara.
She is the second child of the marriage of Muhidin and Subaedah. She began her study at SDN 1 Ongko and graduated in 2009. Then, she continued her study in SMPN 2 Empang and graduated in 2012. Afterwards, she continued her study in SMAN 1 Empang and graduated in 2015. During her study at university, she joined internal organization, namely MEC (Muhammadiyah English Community), and UKM Bahasa. She was the treasurer in UKM Bahasa. At the end of the study, she could finish her thesis under the title Students’ Perception on the Use of Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) Technique. (A Descriptive Study of Eighth Grade Students of SMP Muhammadiyah 12 Makassar).