Rajah 2.1 Kadar ingatan merujuk kepada kaedah perolehan pengetahuan (Neo & Neo, 2001)
2.3.1 Teori Pembelajaran
2.3.1.1 Teori Behaviorisme
Teori behaviorisme merupakan salah satu pendekatan untuk memahami perilaku individu. Behaviorisme memandang individu hanya dari sisi fenomena jasmaniah, dan mengabaikan aspek - aspek mental. Dengan kata lain, behaviorisme tidak mengakui adanya kecerdasan, bakat, minat dan perasaan individu dalam suatu belajar. Peristiwa belajar semata-mata melatih refleks-refleks sedemikian rupa sehingga menjadi kebiasaan yang dikuasai individu. Teori ini diperkenalkan oleh Ivan Pavlov dan dikembangkan oleh Thorndike dan Skinner,berpendapat bahawa pembelajaran adalah berkaitan dengan perubahan tingkah laku. Teori pembelajaran mereka kebanyakannya
RUJUKAN
Abdul Ghaffar, M.N. (2003). Reka Bentuk Tinjauan Soal Selidik Pendidikan. Johor : Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Abtar, K. (2001) Integrating Library Resources In To A Web-Based Learning..Jurnal BTP,L , 25-34.
Alessi, S.M dan Trollip, S.R (2003)Multimedia for Learning : Methods and Development. Third Edition. Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
Alias, B. dan Chong, M. L. (1992). Hubungan di antara stail kognitif dengan jantina, aliran dan kesannya terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar. Jurnal Pendidikan, 17, 61–73.
Arnot, M., David, M. dan Weiner, G. (1995). Educational reforms and gender equality in Schools. London: Falmer Press.
Baker, D. dan Stevenson, D. (1986). Mother's strategies for children's school
achievement: Managing the transition to high School. Sociology of Education, 59(3), 156–166.
Basow, S. A. (1984). Ethnic group differences in educational achievement in Fiji. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 15(4), 435–451.
Bell, Vaughan. (2004). Perceptions and perceptual distortions. Cardiff University, UK. R Persaud
Birenbaum, M. dan Kraemer, R. (1995). Gender and ethnic-group differences in causal attributions for success and failure in Mathematics and language examinations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26(4), 342–359.
Brown, B. L. (2003). Teaching style vs. learning style. Myths and realities. (Dokumen ERIC No. ED 482329), 26, 2-4.
Craig Errey, Paul Ginns, dan Claudia Pitts. . (2006). “Cognitive load theory and user interface design: Making software easy to learn and use.” The Performance Technologies Group
Chan Lin, L.J. (2000) “Attributes of Animation for Learning Scientific Knowledge.” Journal of Instructional Psychology, 27 (4), 228-238.
Cooper, G. (1998) “Research Into Cognitive Load Theory And Instructional Design At UNSW.” Australia: University Of New South Wales.
Cozby, P. C. (2001). Methods in behavioral research (7th ed.). Mountain View, California: Mayfield Publishing Company. American Psychological Association.
Daniel R.J., Clifton, Rachel K., Gullapalli, Vijaykumar, McCall, Daniel D. and. Berthier,
Eccleston, G., Borkin, I. dan Burrows, A. (1990). Sex-related Differences in Academic Performance at GCE(A-)Level. Educational Research, 32(3), 229–240.
Ee A.M. (2003). Pendidikan di Malaysia II. Cetakan Keempat, Alan : Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd.
Faraday, P. (2000). Visually Critiquing Web Pages. 6 th Conference on Human Factors & The Web. Dalam B. Bailey, (2001). Multimedia and learning.
Feij, J. A. (1976). Field independence, impulsiveness, high school training, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(6), 793–799. Frank, B. M. (1986). Cognitive styles and teacher education: Field dependence and
areas of specialization among teacher education majors. Journal of Educational Research, 80(1), 19–22.
Fred T. Hofstetter. (1995). Multimedia Literacy. London: McGraw-Hill,
Gagne,Ellen D. (1985). “ The Cognitive Psychology Of School Learning.” Boston: Little Brown.
Guttormsen-Schär, S. and Krueger, H. (2000). Using New Learning Technologies with Multimedia. IEEE MultiMedia, 7, 3, 40-5.
Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. (2007). What is instructional design? In R. A. Reiser &J. V.Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology
(2nd ed.) (pp. 16-25). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill-Prentice Hall. Hansen, J. W. (1995). Student cognitive style in postsecondary technology programs.
Journal of Technology Education, 6(2), 19–33.
Harding, Jan. (1979). Sex differences in examination performance at 16+. Physics Education, 14, 280–288.
Harun J., dan Tasir Z. (2000). Multimedia Untuk Pendidikan. PTS Publication: Bentong.
Hasan, H.F. (2007). Kesan penggunaan perisian multimedia di kalangan pelajar teknikal yang berbeza gaya kognitif Field Independent (FI) dan Field dependent (FD). Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.
Hergenhahn, B. R. dan Olson, M. H. (1993). An introduction to theories of learning. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Ho, D. Y. F. (1987). Predictions of foreign language skills: A canonical and part canonical correlation study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12, 119– 150.
Hussein.S. (2006). Keberkesanan penggunaan perisian multimedia dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Lokus dalam Dua Matra terhadap pelajar tingkatan dua. Open University Malaysia. Tesis Sarjana Muda.
Ismail, N.A.F. (2010). Pengenalan dan Definasi Multimedia. Fakulti Sains Komputer dan Teknologi Maklumat, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Jabar,H. (2000). Pengenalan Model ADDIE. Kuala Lumpur, Venton Publishing. Jacobs, N. dan Harvey, D. (2005). Do parents make a difference to children's academic
achievement? Differences between parents of higher and lower achieving students. Educational Studies, 31(4), 431–448.
Jamaludin, H. & Zaidatun Tasir,.(2003). Multimedia Dalam Pendikan. PTS Pubication. Jamalludin H. & Zaidatun Tasir .(2001)“Pengenalan Kepada Multimedia.” Kuala
Lumpur, Venton Publishing.
Jonassen, H. D. (1999). Comtructivist learning environments on the Web: engaging students in meaningful learning. Paper Presented at Educational Technology Conference and Exhibition, 9-11 February, SUNTEC City, Singapore.
Kim, T. S. (1996). Perhubungan di antara gaya kognitif, kumpulan etnik, jantina dan pencapaian matematik murid-murid sekolah rendah. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang.
Konting, M.A. (2004). “Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan.” Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa danPustaka
Anglo American and Mexican American students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 27(5), 561–575.
Krishnasamy V. (2007). The Effects Of A Multimedia Constructivist Environment On Students’ Achievement And Motivation In The Learning Of Chemical Formula And Equations. Universiti Sains Malaysia. Tesis Sarjana.
Lau T.K., Zainuddin Awang And Pang. (2006). Statistics For Uitm (In English). Penerbit Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd,
Loo, P. P. (2002). Perhubungan di antara gaya kognitif, jantina, kecerdasan dan pencapaian pelajar tingkatan 4 dalam Biologi, Kimia dan Fizik. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang.
Lourdusamy, A. (1998). Perbezaan gaya kognitif individu dan implikasi terhadap pendidikan. Pulau Pinang: Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.
Mahfurdz A. dan Semail S. (2000). Hubungan Gaya Pembelajaran, Motivasi Dan Pencapaian Pelajar Semester Satu Dalam Modul Matematik Kejuruteraan. Digest Politeknik & Kolej Komuniti Zon Sarawak.
Maznah, I. dan Ng, W. K. (1985). Relationship of locus of control, cognitive style, anxiety, and academic achievement of a group of Malaysian primary school children. Psychological Reports, 57, 1127–1134.
Md. Yunos J., Wan Ahmad W.A.R., Madar A.R. (20017). Field Dependence – Independence Students And Animation Graphic Courseware Based Instruction. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. MEDC Volume 1, December 2007 Messick, Samuel ., Wiley, John & Sons. Individuality In Learning: Implications of
Cognitive Styles and Creativity for Human Development. California. Josey‐Bass Inc. (1976)
Mohamad Yatim, (2011). M.H., Md. Saad M.N. dan Mohamad Rasli, R. Teknologi Maklumat Sekolah Rendah. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Mohamed, O. (2000). Gender Socialization And Learning Style Pathers Of Secondary School Students. Bertanika Journal of Social Science And Humanities. (5) 1, 15-20.
Muhamed Salleh A. (2007). Keberkesanan Kaedah Pembelajaran Berbantukan Komputer (Penggunaan Perisian Power Point Interaktif) Terhadap Peningkatan
Penguasaan Konsep Sains Dalam Tajuk Sel Untuk Sains Tingkatan Satu. Open University Malaysia. Tesis Sarjana.
Mohd Ishak, A., Nor Sakinah Mohamad. (2003). Kesan Interaksi antara Gaya Pertautan, Gaya Pengajaran dan Komitmen terhadap Profesyen Pengurusan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Ng, S. N. (1972). Socio-economic status as related to achievement and some noncognitive variables. Jurnal Pendidikan, 3, 82–92.
Ng, W. K. (1985). Pembolehubah-pembolehubah bukan akademik dan pencapaian. Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan, 7, 43–51.
Nisa, K. (2011). Pendidikan dan Pembangunan Manusia. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Neil E. (1996). Visual Information and Object Size in the Control of Reaching. In Journal of Motor Behavior,. 28 pp. 187-197.
O'Neil H. F. Jr dan Brown. R. S. (1997). Differential Effects of question formats in Mathematic Assesment on metacognition and affect. Applied measurement in Education, 11, 331–351.
Paradise, L. V. dan Block, C. (1984). The relationship of teacher-student cognitive style to academic achievement. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 17(4), 57–61.
Pelan Induk Pembangunan Pembelajaran (PIPP) 2006-2010, Rancangan Malaysia ke-9.
Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia
Perkins‐Gough, D. (2005). Do We Really Have A “Boy Crisis”. Educational Leadership. 93 – 94.
Popham, W. James. (1975). Educational Evaluation. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Prentice-Hall, Inc
Gay L. R. (1985). Educational evaluation and measurement: competencies for analysis and application. C.E. Merrill Pub. Co
Rahmat M.R. (2006). Kesan Pembelajaran Urutan Tertib dan Urutan Kendiri dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Berasaskan Web terhadap prestasi Pelajar Tingkatan
Empat yang berbeza pencapaian dan gaya kognitif. Universiti Teknologi Mara. Tesis Sarjana.
Ramlah, J., Shahabuddin Hashim dan Mahani Razali. (2003). Psikologi Pendidikan. Bentong : PTS Publications and Distributors,
Roberge, J. J. dan Flexer, B. K. (1983). Cognitive style, operativity and mathematices achievement. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 14(4), 344–353. Rozinah Jamaludin.(2005). Multimedia dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan
Publication & Distributor Sdn Bhd
Russell, F. W. (2001). Measuring Ideal and Real Self-Concept on the Same Scale Based on a Multifaceted Hierarchical Model of Self-Concept. Education and Psychological Measurement. 61, 85-102.
Saifuddeen,S.M. (2002). Sistem Multimedia. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Samsudin, D.S. et al. (2011). Rekabentuk Instruksional Berdasarkan Model ADDIE :Analisis Kajian di Emporia State Universiti Korea Selatan dan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Sharifah Md. Nor. (1992). Faktor-faktor latar belakang yang berkaitan dengan pencapaian akademik. Pendidik dan Pendidikan, 11, 61–69.
Sherman, J. (1980). Mathematics. Spatial visualization and related factors : Changes in girls and boys, Grades 8–11. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(4), 476– 482.
Shuman, James E. (2003). Interactive multimedia; Multimedia systems. [Boston, MA] ; United Kingdom : Thomson/Course Technology.
Somyurek S., Guyer T. and Atasoy B. (2008). The Effects of Individual Difference on Learners’s Navigation In a Courseware. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology- TOJET –ISSN :J303-6521 volume 7 issue 2 Article 4. Sow L.S. (2007). Penghasilan Modul Pembelajaran Berasaskan Teori Beban Kognitif Untuk Subjek Teknologi Maklumat Dan Komunikasi. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Tesis Sarjana.
Sulaiman,R., Roziana Ibrahim and Sarah Sabarina Yusoff . (2004). “Globe-Trekker Encyclopedia System (G-TES): Children’s Virtual World Explorer Towards an Interactive LearningEnvironment via Cognitive Mapping”, Proceedings of
Biennial National Conference on ICT (BNCICT) , Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.
Tahir .M.L. (2004). Implikasi Latihan Dalaman Kepada Guru-Guru Sekolah Rendah. Fakulti Pendidikan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Tukiran, A. dan Maizam Alias. (2006). The effect of teacher generated concept maps on learning of secondary school physics. Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Concept Mapping CMC 2006, 5-8 September, University Costa Rica, Costa Rica.
Weller, H. G., Repman, J., & Rooze, G. E. (1994). The relationship of learning, behavior, and cognitive style in hypermedia based instruction: implications for design of HBI.Computers in the Schools, 10(3/4), 401-420.
Wilson, T., Ford, N., Foster, A. dan Ellis, D. (1999). Cognitive styles in information Seeking analysis. Final Report to The British Library Research and Innovation Centre, University of Sheffield, UK.
Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Oltman, P. K., Goodenough, D. R., Friedman, F., Owen, D.
R., Raskin, E. (1977). Role of the field-dependent and field-independent cognitive style in academic evolution: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(3), 197–211.
Witkin, H.A., Moore, C.A., Goodenough, D.R. dan Cox, P.W. (1977). Field‐Dependent And Field‐Independent Cognitive Styles And Their Educational Implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), 1 – 64.
Yahaya, A , dan Nadia Farhana Mohammad Zabidi. (2007). Kualiti Diri Guru Pelatih Berdasarkan Teori. Fakulti Pendidikan,, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Yang, S. C. (2001). Synergy of constructivism and hypermedia from three constructivist
perspectives:social, semiotic, and cognitive. Educational Computing Research 24(4): 321-362.