BAB V. KESIMPULAN DAN SARAN
C. Saran
3. Untuk Peneliti Selanjutnya
Penelitian selanjutnya diharapkan untuk memperhitungkan
self-esteem yang kemungkinan dapat mempengaruhi hasil penelitian
60
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Amelia, G. (2008). Hubungan Performa Kerja dengan Kompetensi Interpersonal (Studi pada Staf Personal Trainer PT. EI). Phronesis Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi, 10 (1), 54-75.
As’ad, M. (2003). Seri Ilmu Sumber Daya Manusia Psikologi Industri.
Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Azwar, S. (2003). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Azwar, S. (2009). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bernardin, H. J. (2003). Human Resource Management: an Experiential
Approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Buono, P. A. (2009). Hubungan antara Keadilan Distributif dan Keadilan Prosedural dengan Komitmen Organisasi pada Karyawan BUMN Yogyakarta. Skripsi (tidak diterbitkan). Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Cascio, W. F. (1995). Managing Human Resources: Productivity, Quality of Worklife, Profits (4th Ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Chulsum, U. & Novia, W. (2006). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Surabaya: Yoshiko Press.
Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of a Measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (3), 386-400.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, J. M., Porter, C. O. L. H. & Yee Ng, K. (2001). Justice at The Millennium: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (3), 425-445.
Coole, D. R. (2003). The Effects of Citizenship Performance, Task Performance, and Rating Format on Performance Judgement. Thesis. University of South Florida.
Cremer, D. D., Knippenberg, D. V., Dijke, M. V., & Bos, A. E. R. (2004). How Self-Relevant Is Fair Treatment? Social Self-Esteem Moderates Interactional Juctice Effects. Social Justice Research, 17 (4), 407-419.
Damayanti, K. & Suhariadi, F. (2003). Hubungan antara Persepsi terhadap Keadilan Organisasi dengan Komitmen Karyawan pada Organisasi PT Haji Ali Sejahtera Surabaya. Insan Media Psikologi, 5 (4).
Dasalaku, T. A. (2011). Hubungan Keadilan Organisasi dengan Performansi Kerja Perawat di Rumah Sakit Grhsia. Skripsi (tidak diterbitkan). Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Faturochman. (2002). Keadilan Perspektif Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Unit Penerbit Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gajah Mada & Pustaka Pelajar.
Gomes, F. C. (2003). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow.
Journal of Management, 16 (2), 399-432.
Greenberg, J. & Baron, R. A. (2007). Behavior in Organizations. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Handoko, T. H. (2001). Manajemen Personalia & Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE UGM.
Hartzler, F.E. (1973). Pedoman Praktis untuk Pramuniaga Toko. Jakarta: PPM-Bhratara.
Harvey, S., Haines, V. Y. (2005). Employer Treatment of Employees During A Community Crisis: The Role of Procedural and Distributive Justice.
Journal of Business and Psychology, 20 (1), 53-68.
Heslin, P. A., & Walle, D. V. (2009). Performance Appraisal Procedural Justice: The Role of a Manager’s Implicit Person Theory. Journal of Management, 20 (10), 1-20.
Husted, B. W. (1998). Organizational Justice and the Management of Stakeholder Relations. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 643-651.
Johanes. (2011, Januari 29). Ketidakprofesionalan Optik Melawai Samarinda.
Detik.com. Diunduh 20 Januari, 2012, dari http://us.suarapembaca. detik.com/read/2011/01/29/140028/1556537/283/ketidakprofesionalan-optik-melawai-samarinda.
Khairil. (2010, Mei 3). Kesalahan Fatal (Mungkin Sengaja) Voucher Diskon Optik Melawi. Detik.com. Diunduh 20 Januari, 2012, dari http://us.suarapembaca.detik.com/read/2010/05/03/181257/1350396/283/ kesalahan-fatal--mungkin-sengaja--voucher-diskon-optik-melawi
Lam, S. S. K., Schaubroeck, J., Aryee, S. (2002). Relationship between Organizational Justice and Employee Work Outcomes: a Cross-National Study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 1-18.
Mangkunegara, A. A. & Prabu A. (2007). Evaluasi Kinerja SDM. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Mathis, R. L. & John, H. J. (2006). Human Resource Management 10th Ed (Terjemahan). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
McMillan, J. H. & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in Education: Evidence-Based Inquiry (6th ed). Boston: Pearson.
Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Organizatonal Citizenship Behaviors: Do Fairness Perceptions Influence Employee Citizenship?. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76 (6), 845-855.
Muchinsky, P. M. (2006). Psychology Applied to Work. California: Thompson-Wadsworth.
Pidekso, A. (2009). Panduan Praktis SPSS 17 untuk Pengolahan Data Statistik.
Yogyakarta: Andi-Wahana Komputer.
Prabawati, T. A. (2010). Mengolah Data Statistik Hasil Penelitian dengan SPSS 17. Yogyakarta: Andi-Wahana Komputer.
Putra, Y. A. B. (2010). Hubungan Komitmen terhadap Organisasi dan Performansi Kerja pada Perawat di Rumah Sakit Panti Rini. Skripsi (tidak diterbitkan). Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Riggio, R. E. (2009). Introduction to Industrial / Organizational Psychology (5th Ed). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Rizal. (2011, Juni 28). Garansi Lensa Hoya di Optik Melawai Botani Square Bogor Palsu. Detik.com. Diunduh 20 Januari, 2012, dari http://us.suarapembaca.detik.com/read/2010/06/28/155320/1388539/283/ garansi-lensa-hoya-di-optik-melawai-botani-square-bogor-palsu
Robbins, S. P. (2005). Organizational Behavior 11th ed. San Diego: Prentice Hall
Sabatti, P. H. P. D. A. D. (2009). Penilaian Keadilan dalam Pemberian Imbalan di Rumah Sakit PW Purworejo. Tesis (tidak diterbitkan). Yogyakarta: Universitas Gajah Mada.
Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Noel, T. W. (1997). The Effect of Ethical Frameworks on Perfections of Organizational Justice. Academy of Management Journal, 40 (5), 1190-1207.
Setiawan, R. (2012, Juli 17). Delivery Service Carrefour Payah. Kompas. Diunduh 20 Januari, 2012, dari http://www1.kompas.com/suratpembaca/read/ 24922
Setyo, Y. (2011, Juni 29). Transaksi Cancel Optik Melawai Samarinda Uang Belum Kembali. Detik.com. Diunduh 20 Januari, 2012, dari http://us.suarapembaca.detik.com/read/2010/06/29/073732/1388912/283/ transaksi-cancel-optik-melawai-samarinda-uang-belum-kembali.
Silvira, H. (2011, April 25). Pelayanan Pramuniaga Optik Keluarga Bintaro Plaza.
Detik.com. Diunduh 13 September, 2011, dari http://us.suarapembaca. detik.com/read/2011/04/25/130238/1624612/283/pelayanan-pramuniaga-optik-keluarga-bintaro-plaza.
Simamora, H. (2006). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia (Ed 3). Yogyakarta: Bagian Penerbitan STIE YKPN.
Smither, R. D. (1994). The Psychology of Work and Human Performance (2nd Ed). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
Supratiknya, A. (2007). Kiat Merujuk Sumber Acuan dalam Penulisan Karya Ilmiah. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Universitas Sanata Dharma
Syukrianto, Kaho, J. R., & Lay, C. (2003). Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah Aceh Selatan: Studi Kasus pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Aceh Selatan. Sosiohumanika, 16A (2), 475-490.
Timple, A. D. (1992). Seri Ilmu dan Seni Manajemen Bisnis: Kinerja. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
Tjiptono, F. & Chandra, G. (2011). Service, Quality & Satrisfaction (Ed. 3). Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Ulupui, I. G. K. (2005). Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggaran, Persepsi Keadilan Distributif, Keadilan Prosedural, dan Goal Commitment terhadap Kinerja Dinas. Kinerja, 9 (2), 98-112.
Wiyono. (2004). Keadilan Organisaional dan Kepuasaan Kerja: Pengujian Keterkaitan Equity Theory dengan Work Outcomes. Benefit, 8 (2), 201-210.
Yudhistira, D. (2009, Januari 20). Kecewa perlakuan pramuniaga di Keris Gallery.
Wordpress. Diunduh 13 September, 2011, dari http://yudhistira31. wordpress.com/2009/01/20/kecewa-perlakuan-pramuniaga-di-keris-gallery/ .
Zhang, H. & Agarwal, N. C. (2009). The Mediating Roles of Organizational Justice on the Relationships between HR Practices and Workplace Outcomes: an Investigation in China. The International Journal of
Human Resource Management, 20 (3), 676-693.
Salah Tangkap di Matahari. Diunduh 13 September, 2011, dari http://www.geocities.ws/darikonsumen1/tokres06.html.
65
Lampiran 1
Lampiran 2
Skala Kinerja Pramuniaga
Waktu Penilaian : ... Mei 2012 Nama Toko :
Kota : Yogyakarta
Identitas Pramuniaga yang dinilai
Nama / No. Absen :
Identitas Penilai
Nama :
Jabatan : Manajer, Wakil Manajer, Supervisor (lingkari salah satu) Tanda Tangan :
Standar penilaian :
Setiap unsur diberi rentang penilaian dengan angka 1-5.
Angka 5 untuk nilai tertinggi dan angka 1 untuk nilai terendah.
No. Unsur yang dinilai Nilai
1 Ketepatan kerja 2 Kecepatan kerja
3 Penguasaan barang (harga, letak, stok, promo) 4 Kemampuan memecahkan masalah
5 Kemampuan bekerjasama dalam tim
6 Kedisiplinan kerja (kehadiran dan penyelesaian tugas) 7 Tanggung jawab kerja
8 Inisiatif dalam menawarkan barang kepada pembeli 9 Keramahan
10 Kepemimpinan
Catatan : ... (kondisi khusus pramuniaga saat penilaian. misal : sakit)
Lampiran 3
Hasil Seleksi Aitem
Skala Keadilan Organisasi
Hasil Seleksi Aitem Skala Keadilan Organisasi
1. Skala Keadilan Prosedural
Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item-Total Correlation Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted aitem1 28.9747 8.948 .509 .811 aitem2 28.9873 8.808 .481 .814 aitem3 28.7215 8.691 .594 .802 aitem5 28.7342 8.428 .592 .802 aitem6 28.7595 9.621 .342 .826 aitem7 29.0633 9.393 .365 .825 aitem9 28.6456 9.001 .488 .813 aitem10 28.7975 8.625 .560 .806 aitem11 28.8354 8.370 .642 .796 aitem12 28.8228 9.122 .546 .809
2. Skala Keadilan Distributif
Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item-Total Correlation Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted aitem13 27.3165 6.988 .596 .901 aitem14 27.3797 7.264 .707 .889 aitem15 27.4051 7.680 .624 .895 aitem16 27.3797 7.546 .630 .894 aitem17 27.3291 7.249 .734 .888 aitem18 27.4177 7.298 .716 .889 aitem19 27.4684 7.611 .627 .894 aitem20 27.3165 7.065 .737 .887 aitem21 27.4430 7.276 .666 .892 aitem22 27.4177 8.067 .635 .897
3. Skala Keadilan Interaksional Item-Total Statistics Scale Mean if Item Deleted Scale Variance if Item Deleted Corrected Item-Total Correlation Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted aitem23 31.8861 11.692 .487 .882 aitem24 31.9241 10.558 .724 .866 aitem25 32.0759 12.327 .499 .881 aitem26 31.9114 11.236 .580 .876 aitem28 31.9873 11.961 .588 .876 aitem29 31.7089 11.183 .695 .869 aitem30 31.9494 12.356 .430 .884 aitem31 31.8608 10.352 .770 .862 aitem32 31.8228 11.455 .671 .871 aitem33 31.9620 11.832 .548 .878 aitem34 31.9241 11.097 .631 .873
Lampiran 4
Reliabilitas Skala Penelitian
1. Skala Keadilan Organisasi
a. Skala Keadilan Prosedural
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 79 100.0
Excludeda 0 .0
Total 79 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.826 10
b. Skala Keadilan Distributif
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 79 100.0
Excludeda 0 .0
Total 79 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
c. Skala Keadilan Interaksional
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 79 100.0
Excludeda 0 .0
Total 79 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
.885 11
2. Skala Kinerja Pramuniaga
Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 79 100.0
Excludeda 0 .0
Total 79 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha N of Items
Lampiran 5
Hasil Uji t antara Mean Empiris
dengan Mean Teoretis
Hasil Uji t antara Mean Empiris dengan Mean Teoretis
1. Skala Keadilan Prosedural
One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
k_prosedural 105 29.9905 3.59619 .35095
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 25
t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
Lower Upper
k_prosedural 14.220 104 .000 4.99048 4.2945 5.6864
2. Skala Keadilan Distributif
One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
k_distributif 105 29.0190 2.95147 .28803
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 25
t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
Lower Upper
3. Skala Keadilan Interaksional
One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
k_interaksional 105 32.4857 4.00748 .39109
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 27.5
t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
Lower Upper
k_interaksional 12.748 104 .000 4.98571 4.2102 5.7613
4. Skala Kinerja Pramuniaga
One-Sample Statistics
N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
kinerja 105 99.9524 12.93429 1.26226
One-Sample Test
Test Value = 90
t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean Difference
95% Confidence Interval of the Difference
Lower Upper
Lampiran 6
Hasil Uji Normalitas
One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test
k_prosedural k_distributif k_interaksional kinerja
N 105 105 105 105
Normal Parametersa,,b Mean 29.9905 29.0190 32.4857 99.9524
Std. Deviation 3.59619 2.95147 4.00748 12.93429
Most Extreme Differences Absolute .099 .240 .174 .072
Positive .075 .175 .144 .072
Negative -.099 -.240 -.174 -.052
Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z 1.019 2.462 1.788 .742
Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .250 .000 .003 .641
a. Test distribution is Normal.
Lampiran 7
Case Processing Summary
Cases
Included Excluded Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
kinerja * k_prosedural 105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%
kinerja * k_distributif 105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%
kinerja * k_interaksional 105 100.0% 0 .0% 105 100.0%
1. Keadilan Prosedural dengan Kinerja
ANOVA Table
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
kinerja * k_prosedural Between Groups (Combined) 3620.267 16 226.267 1.445 .140
Linearity 821.196 1 821.196 5.245 .024
Deviation from Linearity 2799.071 15 186.605 1.192 .293
Within Groups 13778.495 88 156.574
R R Squared Eta Eta Squared
kinerja * k_prosedural .217 .047 .456 .208
2. Keadilam Distributif dengan Kinerja
ANOVA Table
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
kinerja * k_distributif Between Groups (Combined) 3149.873 16 196.867 1.216 .272
Linearity 68.489 1 68.489 .423 .517
Deviation from Linearity 3081.384 15 205.426 1.269 .239
Within Groups 14248.889 88 161.919
Total 17398.762 104
Measures of Association
R R Squared Eta Eta Squared
ANOVA Table
Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
kinerja * k_interaksional Between Groups (Combined) 3812.601 20 190.630 1.179 .293
Linearity 218.010 1 218.010 1.348 .249
Deviation from Linearity 3594.591 19 189.189 1.170 .303
Within Groups 13586.161 84 161.740
Total 17398.762 104
Measures of Association
R R Squared Eta Eta Squared
Lampiran 8
Hasil Uji Hipotesis
Hasil Uji Hipotesis
Correlations
k_prosedural kinerja
k_prosedural Pearson Correlation 1 .217*
Sig. (1-tailed) .013
N 105 105
kinerja Pearson Correlation .217* 1
Sig. (1-tailed) .013
N 105 105