VERTICAL GRADIENT CONTOURS
CHAPTER 3. CHAPTER 3. EFFECTIVE DISPLAY OF DATA 36
Where vertical gradient data have not been collected,
it
is possibleto
approximate both the one-dimensional (Paine, 1986) andthe
two-dimensional gradient usingthe profile
and griddedtotal
magnetic fleld data sets respectively. The computed one-dimensional gradient ovet horizonswhich
are continuous, and whosestrike
doesnot
parallelthe flight path direction,
compares favourablywith the
measured gradient overthe
same.The
two-dimensionalvertical
gradient was computedfrom
a 15x
15 convolution operator suppliedby T.H. Whiting.
Unlike the relatively smoothly varying
total
magnetic field which can be effectively displayedin
many different formats, the dominance of high frequenciesin
the gradient data does not lenditself to clarity in
contour map dìsplays.This
can be observedby
comparing Figures 3.2 and 3.3. The map needs to bein
colour to enable easy recognition of highs and lows (this is desirablein
maps ofthe total
fieldbut
indispensablein
those of gradientdata).
Contouring algorithms designedto
handle smoothlyvarying data
causea
large numberof
closuresto be
drawn on gradient maps, andthe
choiceof
contour levelsis
restrictedby the
large order of magnitudesof
gradient va.lues. Imagesof the
gradient avoidthe
problems associatedwith
contouring thefunction. In
any case, the two-dimensional computation introduces spurious anomalies. Stacked profiles of the vertical gradient are a much more satisfactory form of display (compare Figures 3.9 and 3.3) andwill
be dealtwith in
Section 3.2.3.1.5 Interpretation stages
As the interpretation proceeds from the
initial
evaluation of the survey and terrain, through the various stages,to
thefinal writing
of the report, the map requirements of the interpreter varies.The
flow chart
shownin
Figure 3.4 suggests a possible selectionof
displaysat
different stagesin
theinterpretation
process.Survey and terrain evaluation
Once located data tapes are made available, the data should be represented as a small scale map of the
total field.
Gridding the data (either coarsely or on thefinai grid)
and thenplotting
as acontour map
is
a goodstart.
Fromthis
map, the interpreterwill
be able to judge whether the survey wasflown
successfully andthe
data correctly levelled and reduced.The
mapwill
alsoshow
what the
magneticterrain is
lil<e andthe
number and characteristicsof
different zones.This information is used
to
planfurther
displays.If
the map indicates an unacceptable amount of noise(in
theform
of stripes, herringbone patterns. . .),
additional processingto
smooth andfilter the
data may be recluired. Poorly levelled and noisy data sets can bebetter
displayed aspixel images rather
than
as contour maps.P
reliminary interpretation
The next
stage involvesthe
productionof
mapsat a
suitable working scale. Black and white contour maps of thetotal
field are standard and relatively inexpensive compared to hard copiesof
digital
images. Thegrid
spacing should be intermediate betweenthe
nominalflight
line and sample spacing- the
closenessto the
sarnple spacingwill
depend onthe quality of
the data.The
scaleof the map
shouldbe
suchthat
adjacentflight
lines are lessthan 1cm apart. A
scalelarger than this
makestrend
analysisdifûcult.
Colouringthe
contour maps serves the dual purpose of promotingfamiliality with
the data and providing a displayin
which magnetic zones may be more easily identifled.A
photographically reduced coloured version of the contourFigure
3.5:
Colour composite imageof total
magneticintensity (blue) and total
garnma ra-diation
count(red).
The image was displayed onthe AUDIA
system (see Section 3.3.1) and photographically reduced and compiled. The colour scale is an increasing scale withlight
colours representing high values. Datafor
the lowerright part of the study
area wasnot
available at the time the image was produced. The single mostimportant
advantage of using colour rather than grey-scales isthat
two or more data sets may be merged.CHAPTER 3. EFFECTIVE DISPLAY
OF DATA 37 maps ofthe
study area has been reproducedin
Figure5.4.
The scale of the original maps was 1 : 50 000.Detailed interpretation
At this
stage, working scale maps of thetotal
magneticfield,
and possiblyits
vertical gradient and upward continued field, and of the geology are desirable. The frequency content of the data set andthe aim of the interpretation
are usedto
decidewhich
displays are mostsuitable. If
geological maps aïe available
at
scales largerthan
the working scale, then the interpreter may wishto
produce magnetic mapsat that
same scalefor
easy comparison. Overlays of black andwhite
geological maps are convenientto
use. Stacked profiles of the vertical magnetic gradient(or
someother
derivative) can be usedin trend
analysis and mappingof
magnetic horizons.Regional
structural
features may be delineated from enhanceddigital
images.Q
uantitative interpretation
Side by side
with
maps for qualitative interpretation, the interpreterwill
need ready access to the recordedtotal fleld
data,at
avertical
scale suitablefor quantitative interpretation.
Modellingof
anomaliesis
usually carriedout
on graphsof
profilesof the total
magneticfield,
and these may be displayed on papetor
on a graphicsterminal
connectedto
a computer. The graph for eachline
should display some combination of the followingfunctions:
thetotal
magnetic field,the
ground cleanance,flight path,
and perhaps functionsof the total field
such asits
upward continued values and derivatives. Stacked profiles of thetotal
field are not usually recommended:they take up
too
much paper, are cumbersometo
handle and are unsuitablefor
trend analysis.Integration of inforrnation
Overlaying maps on
light
tablesis the
conventional methodof
integrating geological and geo- physicalinformation.
The difficulties associatedwith
this method (mainly the problems of exact positioning and of comparing data collectedat
different scales and formats) can be overcome by using imaging techniclues.Any data
set whichis
availablein digital form, or
can be digitized (e.g. geological maps), can be integratedwith
aeromagnetic data through imaging.Radiometric total count data
integratedwith total
magneticfield data
are presented in Figure 3.5. Such an image permits the visual correlation between the radiometric and magnetic properties of various rocks types.In this
flgure, a l-ightpink
(nearlywhite)
colour characterizes rocks (migmatites and granites)wliich
give riseto
magnetic anomalies and radiometric highs.Such rocks are seen
in
the centralportion
of the figure.Light
blue patterns indicate rocks which have a high magnetic anomaly associatedwith
thembut
low radiometric count.3.2 Stacked Profiles
Stacked profiles provide an alternative map display
to
contour maps anddigital
images. The mostimportant
difference isthat
no gridding of the data is required and thereforefldelity
of thedata
can bemaintained.
Stacked profiles can be usedto
locate anomalies accurately, providequality
control on the survey, and present another perspective.6109000 6109000
6090000 6090000
29s000
EASTING (metres)
31Figure 3.6: Stacked prolìles of vertical magnetic gradient using a sm*J vertical scale.
6109000 6109000
6090000 6090000
295000
EASTING (metres)
31at,
o o E
(5z
t-
fEo z
U,
o o
E
o z
T Þ
fE
o z
Figure 3.7: Stacked profiles of vertical magnetic gladient using a large vertical scale.