CHAPTER 6, GEOPHYSICAL RESPONSES OF I(NOWN ROCI( TYPES 66
CHAPTER 6. CHAPTER 6. GEOPHYSICAI RESPONSES OT KNOWN NOCK TYPES 75
Granite lVlagnetic anomaly
nT
Radiometric anomaly
Oxidation ratio (average)
susceptibility
X 1O-5 SI (average)
Opaque oxides
Genetic type
Magnetìc classifi- cation SYN-TECTONIC GRANITES
PG 350 High 54.t 1000 mt
I
mt-seriesRG r20 High 37.6 1200 mt mt-series
TCG 400 High 43.9 mt mt-series
MI(G
400 Low mt mt-seliesRCG =500 37.7 1000 mt
I
mt-seriesMNG 31.5 5
ilm
? ilm-seriesP OST-TECTONIC GRANITES
MMG r1500
54.8 3000 mtA
mt-seriesMBG =500 34.3 600 mt
I
mt-seriesSG p500 600 mt
I
mt-seriesWG Low ilm-series
Table
6.1:
Magnetic classificationof granites.
Abbreviations- PG: Palmer Granite,
RG:Rathjen Gneiss, TCG: Tanunda Creek Gneiss, MKG:
Mt.
Kitchener Granite, RCG: Reedy Creek Granodiorite, MNG: Monarto Granite, MMG: Mannum Granite, MBG: Murray Bridge Granites, SG: Sedan and Long Ridge Granites, WG: Wellington"Granitet'.
Magnetite is abbreviated to mt and ilmenite toilm.
Oxidation ratios and susceptibiüty measurements are listed in Appendices F,B
and C.CHAPTER 6. GEOPHYSICAL
RESPONSES OFI(NOWN ROCI(
TYPES 76 classifiedby
Fodenet
al.(op. cit.)
as anA-type
granite (high-level, siliceous,"dry"
gra,nite)but
Ishihara's (op. cfú.) study deals onlywith
the original classiflcationby
Chappell and White (I974) of granites asI
or Stype.
The Mannum Granite had the highest measured susceptibilities of all the granites. The magnetic properties of the Monarto Granite are consistentwith it
being a member of the ilmenite series.Ishihara (1981) points out
that
recognition of the two series of granitoids is an important frrst stepin
mineralexploration.
The magnetite-series are relatedto major
sulphide mineralizationand the
ilmenite-seriesto
cassiteriteand wolframite mineralization.
Sincethe
classilication dependson the
magnetic propertiesof
granites,it
canbe
accomplishedby interpretation
of aeromagneticdata
andby
outcrop susceptibility measurements. Evenin
weathered outcrops, completemartitization of
magnetiteto
haematiterarely
reaches 50%, unlessthe
granite has been hydrothermally altered.On
the
basis of magnetic properties, dimension, and location,four
groupsof
granites have been recognized:1.
magnetite-series, generally small (spatial dimensions of the order of a fewkm)
granites inthe CMZ
which have been deformed duringthe
Delamerian Orogeny. These include the Palmer Granite, Rathjen Gneiss, Tanunda Creek Gneiss andMt.
Kitchener Granite and the much larger Reedy Creek Granodiorite.2.
ilmenite-series Monarto Granite which has intruded Kanmantoo Group metasedirnents in the CMZ.3.
magnetite-series,large granites (spatial dimensions of the order of many kilometres) which intrude the EMZ and form a belt of intense magnetic anomalies. These include the granitesat Murray
Bridge, Mannum, Sedan, Swanport and theTruro
Creek"Granite".
4.
probably ilmenite-series granite (though identification based only on magnetic interpreta-tion)
intrusivein
the EMZ-
the Wellington"Granite".
According
to
the magmatichistory
outlinedby
Foden et aI.(in
press), thefirst
two groupsof
granitoids wereintruded during the
Delamerian Orogeny andthe
granitesin the last
two groups were post-tectonic.During the Early
Ordovician, syn-tectonic,I-type granitic
magÍLasintruded
Cambrian metasediments.Most
post-tectonic granites discussed aboveare
severaltimes
more magneticthan
syn-tectonic granitesprobably
dueto the extra magnetite.
Theintrusion of the
post-tectonic granitesis
relatedto
an extensional phase followingthe
close ofthe
Delamerian Orogeny. These granites (andthe
gabbros, basalt, etc. discussed below) form theMurray
Magnetic High(MMH).
As mentionedin
Chapter 5, theMMH
is a major magnetic featurewhich
demarcatesthe
easternlimit of
Precambrianoutcrop. The
extensional phase which resultedin
the intrusion of the granitesis
a significant eventin
the history of the region.6.2.2 Gabbros, amphibolites and dolerites
Small scattered outcrops
of
amphibolites and dolerites(Liu
and Fleming, 1989) have varialile magneticproperties.
Howeverthey
are generallytoo
smallto
be picked up on morethan
one or twoflight
lines andtheir
magnetic response is not known. The Woodside dyke swatm (Pain, 1968) trendsNNW.
Ilmenite has been identified (Alderman, 1931)but not magnetite.
NNW anomaliesin the vicinity of Tinpot
may be causedby
magnetic dolerite dykes. The magnetictrend is
oppositeto the trend of the
arkosesof the
Backstairs Passage Formation as rnappedfrom
aerial photographsby
Mancktelow (1979).CHAPTER 6.
GEOPHYSICAL RESPONSES OF K¡üOWNROCI{
TYPES 77Gabbro intrusions give rise
to
distinctive magnetic anomalies.A
circular magnetic anomaly,5km in
diameter, and around 1000nT in
amplitude(top right
cornerof
Figure 5.4)is
foundin the MMH.
Lewis, P. (1985) recordsthat
adrill
holeinto
the anomaly intersected gabbro at 244m.The Black Hill Norite
gives riseto a
negativeanomaly. The
negativeintensity
implies astrong negative remanent
polarization.
There are several such anomaliesin the vicinity
of the original BlackHill
Norite which have been interpreted as being caused by similar gabbros. Someof these "Black
Hill"
style magnetic anomalies have been drilled and confirmedto
be Blackl{ill Norite
equivalents (Wegmann, 1980). Wake-Dyster (fOZa) suggests afield
reversal during the Ordovicianto
accountfor
the negative polarization. Accordingto
Foden et al.(in
press), these mafic intrusions are post-tectonic. The variable magnetic properties of the post-tectonic glanites and gabbros may ref,ect several phases of post-tectonic intrusion.6.3 Radiometric response
For reasons outlined
in
theIntroduction, it
hasnot
been possibleto
estimatethe
radio isotope contentof the soil and
hence,the
concentrationof
potassiumand
equivalenturanium
andthorium in
the rocks. Nevertheless, the use of images of thetotal
count channel have been usedto
confirm andin
some cases suggest models for the interpretation of the magneticdata.
Colour integration of aeromagnetic and radiometric data helpedin
the mapping of faults, contacts, andin
the correlation of anomalieswith
similar radiometric and magnetic properties.Establishing
"ground truth" or the
correlation between known geologywith
geophysical response isafirst
step before extrapolating beyond the areas ofgeological control. The grey-scale imageof total
radiometric count andthe
colour composite image (Figure 3.5) were comparedwith
geological maps.The main sources of radiometric anomalies include transported and
in
siúu soils, and exposed metasediments, migmatites and granites. Other rock unitsin
the area, e.g. pegmatites, dolerites and amphibolites, are generally too small in spatial extent to be readily identified on atotal
count image, assuming they had a characteristic, anomalousradioactivity. In
the higher metamorphic grade aÌeas, zones of pronounced enrichment and depletionin
the radioactive elements (usually potassium) are associatedwith
metasomatism,faulting
andmigmatization.
There were alsomany anomalous areas which could
not
be readily associatedwith
mapped geology.In
situ soils and bedrock can be generally groupedinto
zones of pronounced enrichment or depletionin
radioactive elements and zones reflectingstratiform
anomalies. The main lithora- diometricunits
are the metasediments andgranitic
rocks. Possible sources ofradioactivity
arethe
K-minerals(particularly
orthoclase, microcline and micas),
and Thand
[/ bearing rninerals (zircon, sphene, monazite,allanite). After the
/(-minerals, zircons are probablythe
most irn-portant
carrierof
radioactiveminerals. They
h,ave been identifledin
biotitesby
means of the pleochroic haloes generated. The relation between anomalies and geology is listed belolv.1.
Transported soils identifiedin the
area includelimited
outcrops of non-radioactive sands and moderately radioactivealluvial of Tertiary or
Quaternaryage.
Stream channel and drainage patterns showup
as radioactive highsor
lows dependingon the
sediment they carry.2. Stratiform
anomalies dueto the
metasediments showup
as curvilinear highs (black andpyritic
shalesand
siltstones), as curvilinear lows (limestones, almostpure
marble and
Dalam dokumen
AEROMAGNETIC INTERPRETATION OF THE KANMANTOO GROUP, SOUTH AUSTRALTA
(Halaman 136-140)