Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for
a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and
private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without
the permission of the Author.
GENETIC RESTRICTION IN ESCHERICHIA COLI STRAIN W
A thesis
presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of
Master of Science in Microbiology
at
Massey University
A.F. JAMIESON
.1fil
/1.BSTRACT
The ability of various pha~os to propagate on Escherichia coli strain
l ,r
wus invostig;:i.ted, Phagos P1 , T2, 1r3 ,
T4, T5, T6 and Tycoulcl not be shown to form plnqv.cs on this strain. Phagcs T2, T3, T5 and T6 prevented tho development of a bactcri,'.ll la~,m when ;:i.dded to a plate at an input ratio of about throe phage per bactcriu~; it appears t]103e phagos exerted a killing effect on strain W. Phage P1 and phage T4 did not exhibit this killin,1 effect . Plugo T1 formed
- 4
atypicnl plnques on strain U with an efficiency of plnting of 10 ; it appearc these plaques are due to mutants occurin1 in the T1 population nble to propagate on strain ·r.
ill of tho :.i.bovo phagos adsorbed efficiently to strain W with the exception of T4, explaining its inability to either
propagatG on or kill strQ.in ;'J. 'l'he infection of sti·ain U by P1 was similar in most respects to that of °/\ but in ordGr to 0stablish the occurence of conventional restriction, D~'...'1. degradation would need to be demonstrated.
Phages were isolated which propngatc on strain W; they are similar in morphology to phagcs T5 ;md ~ ,'.l.nd do not readily adsorb to ]. coli strains
n ,
C or K.The supernatant from broth cul tu.res of strain W ,ms shown to contain two closely related phages, one plating on 111.£2.ll. C, and the other on .m, .£Qll K, Ea.ch possesses a characteristic pattern of plating efficiencies on strains C and IC when propagated alternately in these two hosts but the two phages were shown to be co-immune and identical with respect to heat sensitivity, morphology and serolOffY•
Both tended to lose tho .::i.bility to exclude phage P1 on lysogeniDing strain C once havinc mutated to plate on strain K. Thin mn.y be due to the inte:;ration of tho mutated phage at altern.:i.tc 11non-restricting"
sites on the~ coli C chromosome.
A serie:., or conjuGal crosses was cr..iployed to doter:nine tho sites of integration of the pha;;os on t:ho chromosomes of]. coli
strains U ,:md C. 'i'ho phage present in tho :,; supernatant ·which plated on K uas found to ii"tegrate close to the proline loci on the
chromosome of
_g .£ill
W but the phage plating on C -1:ppearod to have more tban one locus, one of eThich !:lay !llap close to tho 85 minute m.J.rk on the linkago oap of Q coli 1!!(36 ,
J?i0m·e 22). ifo inforrnntion has so far been obt.:1i;1ed concornine ti1e 8i'Los of i:nte:;re.tion of -t:he w ph.:.ges in restrictive and non-restrictive l:rsoge.:ns of .m_ ccli C. Tho failure to ob t.ain 2. 'cared' strc.:.in of _i1 coli H by oli1:1inntion or theproph;:,ge inh'cratod nt the two in::-!.1m.::d situs leaves opon the possibility of tl:o existence of noro than one integration si to of phage u. C on the
J.
colt 1:l chromosome.A OOT OWL.sDG EHEf
'££
Tho author wishes to express his sincere thanks to Professor D. F. Bacon for his invaluablG c-uidanco thro1.1.ghout the course of this ,-rork and also for tho supply of many of the bacterial and b~ctoriophage strains.
Thanks are also due to the otaff of tho Pal1:1erston Horth D.S. I .R. electron wicroscope unit for their assistance in the preparation of tho electron o.icrographs, to r-Iiss J. Quigan for her expert typine; nnd to all staff in tho fiicrobiolo:;y ::md Genetics DG})D.rtinent ,;-rho have helped in work loading to tho presonte.tion of this thesj_s.
A. I'. J.ru~IESON
_TABLE OF COETEliTTS
HITRODUCTION
I Superinfection immunity
II Superinfection exclusion
.. . .
III Inhibition by F+
.. . .
IV Restriction
.. . .
V Abortive infection by T5 and the T-even phQgcs
AHIS OF TIIE INVESTI';ATIOE
BACTERE
BJ.CTERIOPHAGES ••
HEDii,.
METHODS
RESULTS AHD DISCUSSIOl~
I Investigation of the abortive infection of
. .
9 9 9
10 11 26
31
32 36
37
40
47
~scllerichia coli W by various pho.gcs 47 II Isolation of phage able to p:ropa:;ate on
Escherichia coli W 63
III Plating efficiencies of phage won
.fil
coli strainsC and IC • • 69
IV Comparison of the properties of phages w.KC and u. CKC 75 V Mapping of the sites of integration of thew prophages
in the chronosomos of E, coli strains C and i;T 87
CONCLUSIONS
. . .. • • 100
BIBLIOGRAPHY 106
"~*********
Table 1 •
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
1
o.
11.
12.
1 3.
1 4.
1 5.
1 6.
17. 18.
LIST OF TABLES
Efficiency of plating of phngo won Dsch0richin coli
strains K and C ••
Efficiency of plating of phage u on Escherichi.:t g_oli
strains Kand C •• ••
Bacterial strains Bactoriophne;os
Plating effects at different input levels of phage w on
!
coli strain 1J • • • • Dotormina tion of the frcq_1.wncv of producti vo infection of!
coli 1'I cells by phage T7. Bi'::fficioncios of platin.~ of phagos on Eschorichin coli strains TT, Band C
Adsorption coefficionts of the 'J" pha::;es o.nd P1 on adsorption to ~ coli strains 1·J, B and K12
Scroonine of ~ .coli isolutcsand sewage samples for tho presence of phai~C .'3.blc to propagntc on strain W
Dimensions of the V-pho.ces ••
The r0lative efficiencies of i)latin:~ of phage from. an ] co]j._ W supernatant on
!
coli str.:~ins C and K ••Adsorption coefficients of w phage to_£ coli strains
C .'.lnd K ••
Hc.'.lt sensitivities of ph.agos 11.CKC and w.KC in O. HI NaCl + O. 5E Cc1..Cl
2
Heat sensitivities of phages w.CKC and w.KC iE
0.1M NaCl ••
Adsorption of pho.ges w e.nd P1 to l~rsogens of
!
coli C Ability of.fil.
coli K and C lysogcnisod. with pho.ge w to support the propagation of various phages ••Aborti vc infection of phage w lysogcms of C by phage P1 Presence of phage able to plate on strains Kand C in the supornatants of broth cultures of substrains of
lJ.
coli i'l ••22
22 32 36
48
51
55 57
63 66
71
72
75
75 81
82 83
88
Table
19. li'rcquG11cy of seloct0d a~d unselected m.::i.rkers in the
cross }lfr H X D2-18-1-0
..
9020. ?rcquoncy of scloc·i;od ::ind unselected narkers in tho
cross Hfr H x D2-8
..
9121 . Frequency of soloctcd and unsoloctcd mark0rs in the
cross Hfr F2-3-27 x C1-a/50
93
22. Frequency of selected and unselected narkors in crosses of Efr H with lysogens of E, ~oli
strainn C and K • • 96
23. }roquency of.' rvcovery of s0lcctei and+ unsc!octod markers in the cross Efr 808 x D2-18-1-0 (pro 1·r .K ) . • 98
Figure 1 •
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
1
o.
11.
LIST OF FIGURES
Restriction und modification of phage
'.A
in Escherichia coli strains Kand C ••The specificity site nucleotide ::;equence of Haemophilus influenzac
Derivation of substrains of Escherichia coli strain W (D.F. i3acon)
Linkage map of Escherichia coli K12
..
. .
Adsorption kinetics of phage T1 to Escherichia .2.Q.ll.
strains B and i'l
Ldsorption kine tics of phage T2 to Eschericlg_?._ coli strains B and W
Adsorption kinetics of phage T3 to JschericJ.iia coli strains Band W
Adsorption kinetics of phage
T4
to ]Escherichia coli strains B .:md W • • • • • •Adsorption kinetics o"! phae;o T4 to _;:.:sc}lcrichia coli st rains B and. C
Adsorption kinetics of phage T5 to Escherichia coli strains B and '.J
Adsorption kinetics of phat;o T6 to ~sche:richi.'.l coli r:Jtra.ins :S and ;1
12. Adsorption kinetics of phage T7 to pscherichia coli strains B and W
1 3.
14.
1 5.
16.
17 .
Adsorption kinetics of phage P1 to J.!scherichia .901i strains IC and W • • • • • •
Plating efficiencies of phage from the supernatant of ]1 coli W on strains K and C
Adsorption kinetics of phage w.K to
.fil
coli strains C and KAdsorption kinetics of phage w.KC to
.fil
coli strains C and K •• ••Adsorption kinetics of phage w.C to
.fil £ill
Wstrains C and K •• ••
. .
12
16
33 34
58
58
59
59
60
60
61
61
62
70
73
73
74
Figure Page 18. Kinetics of Heat Inactivation of phage w. CKC at
70°c in 0.1i'I NaCl +
o.
5li CaC12 76 1 9. Kinetics of Heat Inactivation of phage w.KC at70°C in 0.1 M NaCl + 0.5M CaC12
..
7620. Inactivation of phage w. CKC nnd phage 1-1.KC by w. CKC
antiserum
..
7921. Inactivation of phage w.CKC and phage w .I~C by w.KC
antiserum
. . ..
8022. The tentative locations on the chromosome of ]l coli W of: i) tho W genome hs site; ii) two possible
integration sites of phage w 95
';~*·*-*******
Plate 1 •
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1. 8.
9.
1
o .
11 •
1 2.
1 3.
1 4,
1 J. 16.
17 .
18.
19.
LIST OF PLATES
Plaques formed by phage •r1 . B on .:~. coli R (x3 Plaques formed by ~ uha""e 0 T1. B on
!
.coli W (x3 Plaques formed by phage T2,B onf
coli 13 (x3 Plaques formed by phar,..e- u T2.B on .)l;_ coli_ C (x3
'l'he scrGening method tcsed to detrJct ·:;hagc and active against
1
coliW
Plaques formed by phage Phage V7 (x116,000) Phage V1 0 (x116, 000)
V1 i
..
on
.fil
coli W (x3 )) )
..
)
..
)
colicins
Phage V11 ai:tnchcd to bacterial de:)ris (x11 G, 000) Pha50 V11 attacl~ed to cell debris (x116, 000) Pha,r,e V1 I adsorbed to _m, coli -·!; ap1'"Jro:drnntc phage input ratio= 50:1 (x85,000) .• ..
Phage V1 I and E coli I:; Uimroxim:1t0 pli-:1ze input ratio= 50:1 (x43,000) Co • •
A rose Ho of phage w (::116, GOO) Pl1age w. KC (x11 !; , 000)
Pha1;c w. C::.ZC (x11 6,000)
Plaques of pha,gG w.CKC on _~9oli C (x3)
Screening of lysogens for ability to exclude ptnge P1 A lysogen of
g
coli K K(w.CK) spot ted on a plate previously spread with phage P1 pc1rticlesThe method employed to screen for phage w lysogens of
£J, coli strains K and C • • • •
******·:t***
53 53 56 56
64
64
67 67 67 67
68
68 78 78 78
85 05
86
86