Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for
a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and
private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without
the permission of the Author.
A STUDY 0!1' TILl..t.G:S HSC::A.:HSl·~S
rn
P.i:LA'.I'Imi ':'O SOIL PROPERTIES AND CROP GROW?'n.Mechanisation at f'ilissey university.
Keith .Andrew Eughes
1975
Three tillaqe systems ·•:2-c:e co:npareci ov2r the 1973-74 sprir,g-s"Jr.trner se~son on two trial sites.
was tilled a:-:d left to falbw over the ·::inter, while the ether v.·2s left in ?asture.
studied were:-
The three ti 11 age sys terr:.S
1. t!·adi ticnal plough/Jisc/harrow 2. C:ircct-d::-iliing er d 1-:sical ".:illage 3. rotary-cultivation.
There v;ere ;-io sig!"1i ficant di -:'ferences betv:eer. tre:;.t:lierfS in ~he subsequent est3.blishr::en-'c and yield of d:::-y matte:::· cf a ere? of chou moellier on the trial site which h':1d teen 1 eft
to
fall ow.On
the non-fa::'..lowed d ir·ect-d:cil l fog ..
,res1J1 :.ec in a significar,tly lc:;ier number ci plants comparsc.! to -:he
yields '.Vere h:.gi:est C'.1 the cirect-dr:i..lled plots 2f:Ci ~.C\'i2St
in the rutavateci treat~ent.
Soil which 'r,ac !:>een direct-d:-illeo re!r:;:;.ineo tLe r.io~t
stable as determi~ed by wet-sieving of soil s3moies.
·decrease
te>
a r~1rs2te:- extent t!-:c.n under :oloug:b.ing 2Etr. e
length of t:.r::e o:..1t of pas tur-= increased.
samples sho~eci the same effect. Lhe :rctc.:~::y cultivaticn treatment resulted in the grec.test pro;xJrticn d soil in the srr.aller 2gT-egate si:::2 fractiori (less thc.n dia:::et2r l .676m.';1).
o~served in scil :resistance as measurc:d by a ;:::e112t:!:'1.T.ns·:er, -:and resistance to Nheel co!npaction between the nor:-tilled
and the ·°'-wo mechanically tilled treatments. In g~nei·al
the
ploughed and rota=y-cultivated soil required a lo~erpenetrometar force than the undisturbed direc-c-drilled
·profile. Or. the tracked areas,
.
increase in t:Jer.etru-ti.:ig . force oftr,e
twc nechanicall y "'.:::!.lled olots was on ave.rage12 times the increase on the direct-drilled ?lots.
It is probable that soil moisture levels w'?re not affected by cultivation treatment. Differer.ces which occurred, particularly in the non-fal lciwed trial, were thought to have been an effect of diff e~ences in plant density- soil water loss increasing with ?lant density.
Data frcm the two trials showed that total fuel consurr:ption for direct-drilled and rotc.ry cultivated treatments to be 9.7 and 1.9 tiTies respectively, less than the trad2.tional ploug!ling treatment. This did not include the fuel requhem2nts of weed contro~ which varied between treatments.
Throughout the whole of this work Yer C.J.
Bc....~erand
Mr·D.G. Bowler of the Agrcno!!!y and Soil Department at Massey University gave
considerabls amounts of their time
tooffer constructive advice and criticism. Their
contri~u-tion
s are ffiuch appreciated
.I also wish to thank Mr R. 3iru;ns
ofthe Agronomy Depart;nent :or his i:iterest and suggestions
.Various
membersof the
Ae_;::·cnomy Department
1s technical staff also shm .. -ed considerable interest
inthis prcj
acta..'ld
oftengave valuable practice.l !-lelp
.T
heir contribution i
s alsomuch
appreciated,especially that
of Vir VL.Badger.
I
wish to tha11.c various othe r persons irho offered
suggestions and in some cases gave p:-actica1 helpr and
my
parentswho did the typing
a.rid.binding of tills t2ieais .
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
2.1.
2.2.
2.
2
.1.2.2.2.
2.3.
LIST OF CO::I~TTS
Ir..troduction Literature 3.evi er,..r
G-eneralTne objects and effects of tillage
T:.~e
objects of t
illage Theeffects cf
tillagelfainte.na
.. 11ce e..nd I:'.lcdification ofscil
str-:lc tu.re.2 .. 3.1. Soil
aggre;,;a.tes
an.dtheir
breakdown2.4. Tillage
3..L.ri pla...1t g.rm.rth2.6.
,... n
.:::.. I•
2 .. 7. I.
2,.7.2.
2.7. J .
C
hapter 3
Crop gro:;.;ths an.d
yields
Energy requira:nents of tilla.ge
An introduction to
experiJlental
tec.r..niques The measurer:en to: str·uettlre and
stability.
~he use of
penetrowsters
Heasl.:2'ing pmmr
out out
-:1:rough fuel cons·.lmptionExperimer.tal ::net:iods a.rd.
;nateriG.ls 3.1.
Orga.nisat~onof
trialsJ.1.1. E_xper~ental cite J.1.2. Design of trials
J.1.3. Plot layout
J.1. 4. Till age
operations 3.1.5. Sowi:r;.g of t~e crops3.2.
Nee.slli'e:nen.t of energy ;nputs
3.2 .. 1.Design of
~e~suringappa!'atus
J.2.2. Accuracyof fuel m
easuring method3.2.J. Tractor operation
inthe
e~uerimerrtsDrilling
a.~dfuel
use3A2.5. Correction
for i!::lplement
widths3.3.
Penetrometer measuremen~s3 ... 3
.1. 'l'h3 pe:1et!'j::;.eter.Page 1
2 2
4 4
716
1624 26 30 34
38 38
3838 41
42 42
46
49
5052 52
Disadvanta.;cs
of t..!.ie u.enetromet0r method 55
3. 3 . 3.
3. 4.
3. 5.
3. 6
3. 6 • .3 . 3. 6. 4.
3. 6. 5.
J . 6. 6.
J . 6. 7.
J . 7.
3. 8 3. 9.
Cha}:'ter
4
!.:,. 1.
4.
1 .1.4.1. 2.
4. 2.
4. 2.1.
4. 3.
Penetr ometer mesaurei:ents aYi.d data.
Soil
moist
1.ll'e measurements
Organic matter deter::i.in&ticns Wetsieving and
drysieving
Dry sier...ng Wet sieving
Preparation of samples
Pra--wetting of tte soil samples Nllihber and size of si eves
Time period o: sievtng
Expressior. of sieving results Harvesting 0f crcps
?~oto5raphs
and -risual assessment of soil
and ·crops
Surface crusting eva.lu.aticns Evaluat ion of the
crust3Discussio~
of
res~ltsHeasu.re::ient of energy i nputs
Compari son of tne two
till~dplot3 C o:rmarison o: direct-:iril1ed, nl• JugheQ
and-rotar:;;-c~ltiva~e~ treat~~nts
Results of :pen3tr·o;neter
analy3isWheel compactton
Soil
moisturer es-.U.ts
Page 55 56 57 58 58 60 61 63 64 66 67 70
70 72
75
75 75 75 77
30
83
884. 4. Surface cFJ.sting ar:d o!'ga.nic matter
ri:;sl~_,_ ~::: 9L4 . 4. 1. Surface
crust~~g94
4.4.2. Organic rratter rest:lts 97
4. 5.
Drysieving results
1004 . 6. Wet sieving results 106
4.
7. Cropping ::.·e sul
ts 1121,..8. Visual appraisals and
general disc11ssion
of
trials
119C
hapter 5
SU!!!Uary a.~dconcl usions
126.Bibliogrs.phy
131LIST OF T_~LES
Page 1.. Mites and Springtail distribution 12 2. Soil changes in 0-10cm tilled horison 17 3. Properties of skins around soil aggregates 18
4. Soil losses as a result of cultivation 21 5. Yield of potatoes on light sandy loam 29 6. Stand densities of (means of wheat barley and oats) 29 7. Fuel consumption during cultivation JO
8.Machine system and energy input 30
9. Fuel used
byrotary cultivator 47
10. Mean amount of petrol used
bytractor
alcne 4811. Fuel used
indrilling 50
12. Implement
~1idthconversion factors 51 13. Bulk density l!2easured by soil sampler 52 14. Moisture content of random soil samples taken
frompa
sture57
15. Computing method for mean-weight-diameter 68
16. Fuel used in cultivation 75
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
Comparative penetrometer r
eadings, cultiva·(,ed.
a.nduncultivated soil
Soil moisture (wet basis)
Soil organic matter percentages Dry-sieving of cultivated soil
Wet-sieving cf soil under cultivation Results of herbage yield analysis
82
89 97
100 i O'i
116
1.
2.
3.
4.
5 ..
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
LIST 0:5'
P~AT~SFuel measurement apparatus T'ne penetrometer
Penetr ometer graphs Wet-sieving apparatus
Surface coil sampler
Barley establishment Fallowed plots Barley establishment :fon-fallowed olots
Non-fallowed direct-drilled plant establishment Fallowed direct-drilled nla!:t
est~blishm6ntWeeds in rotary-cultiva.ted
chemmoellier crop Apparent lo"'vl nu.rnber of nla.nts
indir 8ct-drill2d crop
Freedom from weeds
inplo;igl.:.ed c:;:·llp
Poor establishment of pl&nts on non-fallm.mci direct-drilled plots
Surface of fallowed
C. i ;-ect-d:::-2.~l;3d.plot Weediness in rotavated fallowed flot Water damage on ploughed fallowed plot Ploughed
a..~drotavated plot (Spring 1973) Surface of fallowed rotavateci plot on 5-11-73
Tl II II 11 11
on 28-3-74 Ploughed surface on 23-3-74
Page 44 53 54
60 77
112113
114 114 115115
115115
120 120123 123
l25
1.
2.
...,
~-
4.
5.
o. /
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
LIST OF FIG;:.T?2S
?lan of trials
Diagram of fuel ~easuring apparatus
Wet sieviI1g, percents.ge oversize Vs sieving time Total fuel useage by implemer~ts in crop
establishment
Soil resistance to penetrometer probe - fallowed plots
(16-7-73)
Comnarison of soil resistance to penetrometer probe
(4-1-74)
Soil resistance to penetromever probes
(15-11-73)
Soil moisture at
0- 75IlllJ
depth - fallowed plots Soil moisture at75-125L1ill
depth - fc..llo;.rsd plots Soil moisture - unfallo',;ed plotsPenetrometer force requi:remer ... ts - culti1.rs.ted c_nd
ul.J. • - t d • , ( 29 I " j )
unc t..lva e sci..L -";.- /4
Dry sieve analysis - cll.ltive.ted soil Dry sieving 1in.alysi2 - cultiv5."Led. soil
Wet sieving of cul ti va ted and. non- ci.:1 ti va. ted soil Trial 1 (fallowed plots)
Wet sieving of cultivated a..'1d non-cultivated soil Trial 2 (non-fallowed plots)
Page
39
45
6579
84 85
86
9'1 9..29 3
98
l04
105 i10 111