• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Some integral inequalities for operator monotonic functions on Hilbert spaces

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Some integral inequalities for operator monotonic functions on Hilbert spaces"

Copied!
10
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Some integral inequalities for operator monotonic functions on Hilbert spaces

This is the Published version of the following publication

Dragomir, Sever S (2020) Some integral inequalities for operator monotonic functions on Hilbert spaces. Special Matrices, 8 (1). pp. 172-180. ISSN 2300- 7451

The publisher’s official version can be found at

https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/spma-2020-0108/html

Note that access to this version may require subscription.

Downloaded from VU Research Repository https://vuir.vu.edu.au/43057/

(2)

Open Access. © 2020 Silvestru Sever Dragomir, published by De Gruyter. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution alone 4.0 License.

Research Article Open Access

Silvestru Sever Dragomir*

Some integral inequalities for operator monotonic functions on Hilbert spaces

https://doi.org/10.1515/spma-2020-0108 Received May 6, 2020; accepted June 24, 2020

Abstract:Letf be an operator monotonic function onIandA,B∈ SAI(H) , the class of all selfadjoint op- erators with spectra inI. Assume thatp: [0, 1]Ris non-decreasing on [0, 1]. In this paper we obtained, among others, that forABandfan operator monotonic function onI,

0 ≤ Z1

0

p(t)f((1 −t)A+tB)dt− Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

f((1 −t)A+tB)dt

≤1

4[p(1) −p(0)] [f(B) −f(A)]

in the operator order.

Several other similar inequalities for eitherporfis differentiable, are also provided. Applications for power function and logarithm are given as well.

Keywords:Operator monotonic functions, Integral inequalities, Čebyšev inequality,Grüss inequality, Os- trowski inequality

MSC:47A63, 26D15, 26D10.

1 Introduction

Consider a complex Hilbert space (H,h·, ·i). An operatorTis said to be positive (denoted byT≥ 0) ifhTx,xi≥ 0 for all xH and also an operatorTis said to bestrictly positive(denoted byT > 0) ifT is positive and invertible. A real valued continuous functionf(t) on (0, ∞) is said to be operator monotone iff(A) ≥ f(B) holds for anyAB> 0.

In 1934, K. Löwner [7] had given a definitive characterization of operator monotone functions as follows:

Theorem 1. A function f: (0, ∞)Ris operator monotone in(0, ∞)if and only if it has the representation f(t) =a+bt+

Z

0

t

t+sdm(s) where a∈Rand b≥ 0and a positive measure m on(0, ∞)such that

Z

0

dm(s) t+s < ∞.

*Corresponding Author: Silvestru Sever Dragomir:Mathematics, College of Engineering & Science, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne City, MC 8001, Australia

DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in the Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, School of Computer Science & Applied Mathemat- ics, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

E-mail: [email protected], http://rgmia.org/dragomir

(3)

We recall the important fact proved by Löwner and Heinz that states that the power functionf : (0, ∞)R, f(t) =tαis an operator monotone function for anyα[0, 1] .

In [3], T. Furuta observed that forαj∈[0, 1] ,j= 1, ...,nthe functions g(t) :=

n

X

j=1

tαj

−1

andh(t) =

n

X

j=1

1 +t−1αj

are operator monotone in (0, ∞).

Letf(t) be a continuous function (0, ∞)(0, ∞). It is known thatf(t) is operator monotone if and only ifg(t) =t/f(t) =:f*(t) is also operator monotone, see for instance [3] or [8].

Consider the family of functions defined on (0, ∞) andp∈[−1, 2] \{0, 1}by fp(t) := p− 1

p

tp− 1 tp−1− 1

and

f0(t) := t 1 −tlnt, f1(t) := t− 1

lnt (logarithmic mean).

We also have the functions of interest f−1(t) = 2t

1 +t(harmonic mean),f1/2(t) =t(geometric mean).

In [2] the authors showed thatfpis operator monotone for 1 ≤p≤ 2.

In the same category, we observe that the function gp(t) := t− 1

tp− 1 is an operator monotone function forp∈(0, 1], [3].

It is well known that the logarithmic function ln is operator monotone and in [3] the author obtained that the functions

f(t) =t(1 +t) ln

1 + 1 t

, g(t) = 1 (1 +t) ln 1 +1t

are also operator monotone functions on (0, ∞) .

Letfbe an operator monotonic function on an interval of real numbersIandA,B∈SAI(H) , the class of all selfadjoint operators with spectra inI. Assume thatp: [0, 1]Ris non-decreasing on [0, 1]. In this paper we obtain, among others, that forABandf an operator monotonic function onI,

0 ≤ Z1

0

p(t)f((1 −t)A+tB)dt− Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

f((1 −t)A+tB)dt

≤ 1

4[p(1) −p(0)] [f(B) −f(A)]

in the operator order.

Several other similar inequalities for eitherporf is differentiable, are also provided. Applications for power function and logarithm are given as well.

2 Main Results

For twoLebesgue integrablefunctionsh,g: [a,b]R, consider theČebyšev functional: C(h,g) := 1

ba

b

Z

a

h(t)g(t)dt− 1 ba

b

Z

a

h(t)dt 1 ba

b

Z

a

g(t)dt. (2.1)

(4)

It is well known that, ifhandghave the same monotonicity on [a,b] , then 1

ba

b

Z

a

h(t)g(t)dt≥ 1 ba

b

Z

a

h(t)dt 1 ba

b

Z

a

g(t)dt, (2.2)

which is known in the literature asČebyšev’s inequality.

In 1935, Grüss [4] showed that

|C(h,g)|≤1

4(Mm) (Nn) , (2.3)

provided that there exists the real numbersm,M,n,Nsuch that

mh(t) ≤M and ng(t) ≤N for a.e.t∈[a,b] . (2.4) The constant 14is best possible in (2.1) in the sense that it cannot be replaced by a smaller quantity.

Letfbe a continuous function onI. If (A,B)SAI(H) , the class of all selfadjoint operators with spectra inIandt∈[0, 1] , then the convex combination (1 −t)A+tBis a selfadjoint operator with the spectrum inI showing thatSAI(H) is a convex set in the Banach algebraB(H) of all bounded linear operators onH. By the continuous functional calculus of selfadjoint operator we also conclude thatf((1 −t)A+tB) is a selfadjoint operator inB(H) .

ForA,B∈SAI(H) , we consider the auxiliary functionϕ(A,B): [0, 1]B(H) defined by

ϕ(A,B)(t) :=f((1 −t)A+tB) . (2.5) ForxHwe can also consider the auxiliary functionϕ(A,B);x: [0, 1]Rdefined by

ϕ(A,B);x(t) :=

ϕ(A,B)(t)x,x

=hf((1 −t)A+tB)x,xi. (2.6) Theorem 2. Let A,B∈ SAI(H)with AB and f an operator monotonic function on I.If p : [0, 1]Ris monotonic nondecreasing on[0, 1] ,then

0 ≤ Z1

0

p(t)f((1 −t)A+tB)dt− Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

f((1 −t)A+tB)dt (2.7)

≤1

4[p(1) −p(0)] [f(B) −f(A)] . If p: [0, 1]Ris monotonic nonincreasing on[0, 1] ,then

0 ≤ Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

f((1 −t)A+tB)dt− Z1

0

p(t)f((1 −t)A+tB)dt (2.8)

≤1

4[p(0) −p(1)] [f(B) −f(A)] . Proof. Let 0 ≤t1<t2≤ 1 andAB. Then

(1 −t2)A+t2B− (1 −t1)At1B= (t2t1) (BA) ≥ 0 and by operator monotonicity off we get

f((1 −t2)A+t2B) ≥f((1 −t1)A+t1B) , which is equivalent to

ϕ(A,B);x(t2) =hf((1 −t2)A+t2B)x,xi

hf((1 −t1)A+t1B)x,xi=ϕ(A,B);x(t1)

(5)

that shows that the scalar functionϕ(A,B);x : [0, 1]Ris monotonic nondecreasing forABand for any xH.

If we write the inequality (2.2) for the functionspandϕ(A,B);xwe get Z1

0

p(t)hf((1 −t)A+tB)x,xidt≥ Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

hf((1 −t)A+tB)x,xidt, which can be written as

*

 Z1

0

p(t)f((1 −t)A+tB)dt

x,x +

*

 Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

f((1 −t)A+tB)

dtx,x +

forxH, and the first inequality in (2.7) is obtained.

We also have that

hf(A)x,xi = ϕ(A,B);x(0) ≤ϕ(A,B);x(t) =hf((1 −t)A+tB)x,xi

ϕ(A,B);x(1) =hf(B)x,xi and

p(0) ≤p(t) ≤p(1) for allt∈[0, 1] .

By writing Grüss’ inequality for the functionsϕ(A,B);xandp, we get 0 ≤

Z1

0

p(t)hf((1 −t)A+tB)x,xidt− Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

hf((1 −t)A+tB)x,xidt

≤1

4[p(1) −p(0)] [hf(B)x,xi−hf(A)x,xi] forxHand the second inequality in (2.7) is obtained.

A continuous functiong : SAI(H) B(H) is said to beGâteaux differentiableinA ∈ SAI(H) along the directionB∈B(H) if the following limit exists in the strong topology ofB(H)

gA(B) := lims

0

g(A+sB) −g(A)

s B(H) . (2.9)

If the limit (2.9) exists for allB∈ B(H) , then we say thatgisGâteaux differentiableinAand we can write g∈G(A) . If this is true for anyAin an open setSfromSAI(H) we write thatg∈G(S) .

Ifg is a continuous function onI, by utilising the continuous functional calculus the corresponding function of operators will be denoted in the same way.

For two distinct operatorsA,B∈SAI(H) we consider the segment of selfadjoint operators [A,B] :={(1 −t)A+tB|t∈[0, 1]}.

We observe thatA,B∈[A,B] and [A,B]SAI(H) .

Lemma 1. Let f be a continuous function on I and A, B ∈ SAI(H) ,with AB.If f ∈ G([A,B]) ,then the auxiliary functionϕ(A,B)is differentiable on(0, 1)and

ϕ0(A,B)(t) =f(1−t)A+tB(BA) . (2.10) In particular,

ϕ0(A,B)(0+) =fA(BA) (2.11)

and

ϕ0(A,B)(1−) =fB(BA) . (2.12)

(6)

Proof. Lett∈(0, 1) andh≠ 0 small enough such thatt+h∈(0, 1). Then ϕ(A,B)(t+h) −ϕ(A,B)(t)

h = f((1 −th)A+ (t+h)B) −f((1 −t)A+tB)

h (2.13)

= f((1 −t)A+tB+h(BA)) −f((1 −t)A+tB)

h .

Sincef ∈G([A,B]) , hence by taking the limit overh→0 in (2.13) we get ϕ0(A,B)(t) = lim

h0

ϕ(A,B)(t+h) −ϕ(A,B)(t) h

= lim

h0

f((1 −t)A+tB+h(BA)) −f((1 −t)A+tB) h

= f(1−t)A+tB(BA) , which proves (2.10).

Also, we have

ϕ0(A,B)(0+) = lim

h0+

ϕ(A,B)(h) −ϕ(A,B)(0) h

= lim

h0+

f((1 −h)A+hB) −f(A) h

= lim

h0+

f(A+h(BA)) −f(A) h

= fA(BA)

sincefis assumed to be Gâteaux differentiable inA. This proves (2.11).

The equality (2.12) follows in a similar way.

Lemma 2. Let f be an operator monotonic function on I and A, B ∈ SAI(H) ,with AB, AB.If f ∈ G([A,B]) ,then

f(1−t)A+tB(BA) ≥ 0for all t∈(0, 1) . (2.14) Also

fA(BA) , fB(BA) ≥ 0. (2.15)

Proof. LetxH. The auxiliary functionϕ(A,B);xis monotonic nondecreasing in the usual sense on [0, 1] and differentiable on (0, 1) , and fort∈(0, 1)

0 ≤ϕ0(A,B);x(t) = lim

h0

ϕ(A,B),x(t+h) −ϕ(A,B),x(t) h

= lim

h0

ϕ

(A,B)(t+h) −ϕ(A,B)(t)

h x,x

=

hlim0

ϕ(A,B)(t+h) −ϕ(A,B)(t)

h x,x

=

f(1−t)A+tB(BA)x,x . This shows that

f(1−t)A+tB(BA) ≥ 0 for allt∈(0, 1) .

The inequalities (2.15) follow by (2.11) and (2.12).

The following inequality obtained by Ostrowski in 1970, [9] also holds

|C(h,g)|≤ 1

8(ba) (Mm) g0

, (2.16)

provided thathisLebesgue integrableand satisfies (2.4) whilegis absolutely continuous andg0L[a,b] . The constant 18is best possible in (2.16).

(7)

Theorem 3. Let A, B ∈ SAI(H)with AB, f be an operator monotonic function on I and p : [0, 1] R monotonic nondecreasing on[0, 1] .

(i) If p is differentiable on(0, 1) ,then 0 ≤

Z1

0

p(t)f((1 −t)A+tB)dt− Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

f((1 −t)A+tB)dt (2.17)

≤1 8 sup

t(0,1)

p0(t) [f(B) −f(A)] . (ii) If f ∈G([A,B]) ,then

0 ≤ Z1

0

p(t)f((1 −t)A+tB)dt− Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

f((1 −t)A+tB)dt (2.18)

≤1

8[p(1) −p(0)] sup

t(0,1)

f(1−t)A+tB(BA) 1H. Proof. LetxH. If we use the inequality (2.16) forg=pandh=ϕ(A,B);x, then

0 ≤ Z1

0

p(t)hf((1 −t)A+tB)x,xidt− Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

hf((1 −t)A+tB)x,xidt

≤1 8 sup

t(0,1)

p0(t) [hf(B)x,xi−hf(A)x,xi] , for anyxH, which is equivalent to (2.17).

If we use the inequality (2.16) forh=pandg=ϕ(A,B);xthen by Lemmas 1 and 2

0 ≤ Z1

0

p(t)hf((1 −t)A+tB)x,xidt− Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

hf((1 −t)A+tB)x,xidt (2.19)

≤1

8[p(1) −p(0)] sup

t(0,1)

f(1−t)A+tB(BA)x,x , for anyxH, which is an inequality of interest in itself.

Observe that for allt∈(0, 1) ,

f(1−t)A+tB(BA)x,x

f(1−t)A+tB(BA) kxk2 for anyxH, which implies that

sup

t(0,1)

f(1−t)A+tB(BA)x,x

≤ sup

t(0,1)

f(1−t)A+tB(BA)

h1Hx,xi (2.20) for anyxH.

By making use of (2.19) and (2.20) we derive 0 ≤

Z1

0

p(t)hf((1 −t)A+tB)x,xidt− Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

hf((1 −t)A+tB)x,xidt

≤1

8[p(1) −p(0)] sup

t(0,1)

f(1−t)A+tB(BA)

h1Hx,xi for anyxH, which is equivalent to (2.18).

(8)

Another, however less known result, even though it was obtained by Čebyšev in 1882, [1], states that

|C(h,g)|≤ 1 12

h0

g0

(ba)2, (2.21)

provided thath0,g0exist and are continuous on [a,b] and h0

= supt[a,b]

h0(t)

. The constant121 cannot be improved in the general case.

The case ofeuclidean normsof the derivative was considered by A. Lupaş in [5] in which he proved that

|C(h,g)|≤ 1 π2

h0 2

g0

2(ba) , (2.22)

provided thath,gare absolutely continuous andh0,g0L2[a,b] . The constantπ12 is the best possible.

Using the above inequalities (2.21) and (2.22) and a similar procedure to the one employed in the proof of Theorem 3, we can also state the following result:

Theorem 4. Let A, B ∈ SAI(H)with AB, f be an operator monotonic function on I and p : [0, 1] R monotonic nondecreasing on[0, 1] .If p is differentiable and f ∈G([A,B]) ,then

0 ≤ Z1

0

p(t)f((1 −t)A+tB)dt− Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

f((1 −t)A+tB)dt (2.23)

≤ 1 12 sup

t(0,1)

p0(t) sup

t(0,1)

f(1−t)A+tB(BA) 1H

and

0 ≤ Z1

0

p(t)f((1 −t)A+tB)dt− Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

f((1 −t)A+tB)dt (2.24)

≤ 1 π2

 Z1

0

p0(t)2 dt

1/2

 Z1

0

f(1−t)A+tB(BA) 2dt

1/2

1H, provided the integrals in the second term are finite.

3 Some Examples

We consider the functionf : (0, ∞)R,f(t) = −t−1which isoperator monotoneon (0, ∞) . If 0 <ABandp: [0, 1]Ris monotonic nondecreasing on [0, 1] , then by (2.7)

0 ≤ Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

((1 −t)A+tB)−1dt− Z1

0

p(t) ((1 −t)A+tB)−1dt (3.1)

≤ 1

4[p(1) −p(0)]

A−1B−1 .

Moreover, ifpis differentiable on (0, 1) , then by (2.17) we obtain 0 ≤

Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

((1 −t)A+tB)−1dt− Z1

0

p(t) ((1 −t)A+tB)−1dt (3.2)

≤ 1 8 sup

t(0,1)

p0(t)

A−1B−1 .

The functionf(t) = −t−1is operator monotonic on (0, ∞), operator Gâteaux differentiable and

fT(S) =T−1ST−1

(9)

forT,S> 0.

Ifp: [0, 1]Ris monotonic nondecreasing on [0, 1] , then by (2.18) we get 0 ≤

Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

((1 −t)A+tB)−1dt− Z1

0

p(t) ((1 −t)A+tB)−1dt (3.3)

≤1

8[p(1) −p(0)] sup

t(0,1)

((1 −t)A+tB)−1(BA) ((1 −t)A+tB)−1 1H

for 0 <AB.

Ifpis monotonic nondecreasing and differentiable on (0, 1) , then by (2.23) and (2.24) we get 0 ≤

Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

((1 −t)A+tB)−1dt− Z1

0

p(t) ((1 −t)A+tB)−1dt (3.4)

≤ 1 12 sup

t(0,1)

p0(t) sup

t(0,1)

((1 −t)A+tB)−1(BA) ((1 −t)A+tB)−1 1H

and

0 ≤ Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

((1 −t)A+tB)−1dt− Z1

0

p(t) ((1 −t)A+tB)−1dt (3.5)

≤ 1 π2

 Z1

0

p0(t)2

dt

1/2

 Z1

0

((1 −t)A+tB)−1(BA) ((1 −t)A+tB)−1

2dt

1/2

1H, for 0 <AB.

We note that the functionf(t) = lntis operator monotonic on (0, ∞) .

If 0 <ABandp: [0, 1]Ris monotonic nondecreasing on [0, 1] , then by (2.7) we have 0 ≤

Z1

0

p(t) ln ((1 −t)A+tB)dt− Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

ln ((1 −t)A+tB)dt (3.6)

≤ 1

4[p(1) −p(0)] (lnB− lnA) .

Moreover, ifpis differentiable on (0, 1) , then by (2.17) we obtain 0 ≤

Z1

0

p(t) ln ((1 −t)A+tB)dt− Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

ln ((1 −t)A+tB)dt (3.7)

≤ 1 8 sup

t(0,1)

p0(t) (lnB− lnA) .

The ln function is operator Gâteaux differentiable with the following explicit formula for the derivative (cf. Pedersen [10, p. 155]):

∇lnT(S) = Z

0

(s1H+T)−1S(s1H+T)−1ds (3.8) forT,S> 0.

Ifp: [0, 1]Ris monotonic nondecreasing on [0, 1] , then by (2.18) we get 0 ≤

Z1

0

p(t) ln ((1 −t)A+tB)dt− Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

ln ((1 −t)A+tB)dt (3.9)

≤ 1

8[p(1) −p(0)] sup

t(0,1)

Z

0

(s1H+ (1 −t)A+tB)−1(BA) (s1H+ (1 −t)A+tB)−1ds

1H

(10)

and ifpis differentiable on (0, 1) , then

0 ≤ Z1

0

p(t) ln ((1 −t)A+tB)dt− Z1

0

p(t)dt Z1

0

ln ((1 −t)A+tB)dt (3.10)

≤ 1 12 sup

t(0,1)

p0(t) sup

t(0,1)

Z

0

(s1H+ (1 −t)A+tB)−1(BA) (s1H+ (1 −t)A+tB)−1ds

1H

for 0 <AB.

Acknowledgement.The author would like to thank the anonymous referee for valuable suggestions that have been implemented in the final version of the paper.

References

[1] P. L. Chebyshev, Sur les expressions approximatives des intègrals dèfinis par les outres prises entre les même limites,Proc.

Math. Soc. Charkov,2(1882), 93-98.

[2] J. I. Fujii, Y. Seo, On parametrized operator means dominated by power ones,Sci. Math.1(1998) 301–306.

[3] T. Furuta, Concrete examples of operator monotone functions obtained by an elementary method without appealing to Löwner integral representation,Linear Algebra Appl.429(2008) 972–980.

[4] G. Grüss, Über das Maximum des absoluten Betrages von b1a

Rb

a f(x)g(x)dx 1

(ba)2

Rb

a f(x)dxRb

a g(x)dx,Math. Z., 39(1935), 215-226.

[5] A. Lupaş, The best constant in an integral inequality,Mathematica(Cluj, Romania),15(38) (2) (1973), 219-222 [6] E. Heinz, Beiträge zur Störungsteorie der Spektralzerlegung,Math. Ann.123(1951) 415–438.

[7] K. Löwner, Über monotone MatrixFunktionen,Math. Z.38(1934) 177–216.

[8] F. Kubo, T. Ando, Means of positive linear operators,Math. Ann.246(1980) 205–224.

[9] A. M. Ostrowski, On an integral inequality,Aequat. Math.,4(1970), 358-373.

[10] G. K. Pedersen, Operator differentiable functions.Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci.36(1) (2000), 139-157.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Dengan menggunakan operator-operator di ruang Hilbert, kami memperkenalkan dan mempelajari suatu subclass dari fungsi analitik multivalen A k p ( α, β, δ, T ) dengan koefisien

——————————————————————————————————————— A WEAK-p, q INEQUALITY FOR FRACTIONAL INTEGRAL OPERATOR ON MORREY SPACES VIA HEDBERG TYPE INEQUALITY Idha Sihwaningrum Jenderal Soedirman

On Ostrowski Like Integral Inequality for the Čebyšev Difference and Applications This is the Published version of the following publication Dragomir, Sever S 2002 On Ostrowski Like

In this paper, by making use of Green’s identity for double integrals, we establish some integral inequalities for Schur convex functions defined on domainsD⊂R2 that are symmetric,

Ribiˇci´c, “Companion inequalities to Jensen’s inequality form-convex andα, m-convex functions,”Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol.. Peˇcari´c, “Note on some

Hermite-hadamard type inequalities for composite log-convex functions This is the Published version of the following publication Alam, NMFHNB, Akbarally, AB and Dragomir, Sever S

3 The fractional integral operator equation 3 has been proved to satisfy the weak- 1, q an inequality in Lebesgue spaces over metric measure spaces of nonhomoge- neous type

This document introduces the boundedness of fractional integral operator Iα on ℝ and elaborates on the Morrey's space and the boundedness of Iα toward the classic Morrey's