CHAPTER VII SOCIAL ASSESSMENT
7.6 People's Perception on Sanitary and Drainage condition
(10) Overall status of SWM program in Pourashava:
It is revealed from the RP reflected in the figure 7.27 that 34% expressed good, 35% moderate and 31% unsatisfactory regarding overall status of Pourashava solid waste management (SWM) program.
Notsasfactoiy 131%
Moderate 135%
Good I ]34%
Figure 7.27 RP regarding overall status of SWM program in Pourashava.
-11
Comments on sanitary latrine in Slum area.
Regarding availability of sanitary latrines in slum areas, it is revealed from the RP reflected in the figure 7.29 that 35% expressed yes (available), 23% no (not available), 32% inadequate and 10% not known.
NotKnown 1 10%
Inadequate
No I 123%
Yes
Figure 7.29 RP on sanitary latrine in Slum area.
Latrine usage of younger member in the family:
It is revealed from the RP reflected in the figure 7.30 that 12% expressed not applicable, 58% told in house latrine and 30% expressed special arrangement regarding latrine usage of younger member.
The status of said practice is satisfactory.
Speciat Ta1gement 30%
In house latrine 1 58%
Noicate 12%
Figure 7.30 RP on usage of latrine by younger member in the family.
By whom pan of latrine clean in house:
It is revealed from the RP reflected in the figure 7.31 that 12% expressed servant, 58% expressed self and 30% expressed no comments regarding cleaning the pan of latrine in their houses. The status of said practice is satisfactory.
Nocornments J30%
Self 58%
H
SevantI 1 12%
Figure 7.31 RP on cleaning of pan of latrine by whom in house.
Al
Hand washing material after usage latrine:
It is revealed from the RP reflected in the figure 7.32 that 82% expressed soap, 10% expressed water only and 8% expressed no comments regarding washing of hands after usage. The status of said practice is satisfactory.
Nocommen
War1O%
soL J82%
Figure 7.32 RP on hand washing materials after usage latrine.
Consciousness of PS inhabitants for usage sanitary latrine:
regarding consciousness of PS inhabitants for using sanitary latrine, it is revealed from the RP reflected in the figure 7.33 that 28% expressed enough, 57% moderate and 15% expressed very poor.
The status of said practice is satisfactory.
VerypOor
II,H15°'
Mere[ 47%
Enough 1 28%
Figure 7.33 RP on consciousness of PS inhabitants for usage sanitary latrine.
Providing sanitary latrine at free of cost by Pourashava:
Regarding sanitary latrine given by Pourashava at free of cost, it is revealed from the RP reflected in the figure 7.34 that 51% expressed yes, 27% expressed inadequate and 22% expressed not known.
Not known 2 2 %
Inadequate
Figure 7.34 RP on providing cost free latrine by Pourashava.
Disease attacked during the year 2004:
It is revealed from the RP reflected in the figure 7.35 that 23% expressed not applicable, 7% expressed diarrhea, 4% expressed typhoid and 66% mentioned cold /fever /cough regarding attack by diseases during the year 2004. The status is not a serious problematic one.
Cold/ fever/ cough j 1 66%
Typold
Diarrhoea
[II]
7%Notappticalte 1 23%
Figure 7.35 RP on disease attacked during the year 2004.
Disease attacked to respondent's family member in 2004:
It is revealed from the RP reflected in the figure 7.36 that 24% told not applicable, 10% expressed male, 17% told female and 49% mentioned child regarding attack by diseases during the year 2004.
Child
Female
Male
I
110%Not appicable j 24%
Figure 7.36 RP on disease attacked to family member during the year 2004.
Reason for attack by disease:
It is revealed from the RP reflected in the figure 7.37 that 15% expressed not applicable, 32%
expressed water pollution, 34% expressed solid waste pollution and 19% mentioned season change regarding attack by diseases during the year 2004.
Seasonchange
SWpolluon
F
Walerpollution [ 132%
NotçAicte
Figure 7.37 RP on reason for attacking disease during the year 2004.
82
Disturbance by mosquito in the locality:
It is revealed from the RP reflected in the figure 7.38 that 6% expressed no disturbance, 50%
expressed moderate, 44% expressed much regarding disturbance by mosquito in the locality.
Much 1 J44%
Moderate
No disturbance
176%
Figure 7.38 RP on disturbance by mosquito in the locality.
Time period of disturbance by mosquito:
It is revealed from the RP reflected in the figure 7.39 that 5% expressed not applicable, 29% rainy, 10%
winter, 21% summer and 35% expressed almost the year for disturbance by mosquito.
AImtyear 1 35%
Summer ::..::l21%
Winter I 110%
Rany I 129%
Noicabte I
Figure 7.39 RP on time period of disturbance by mosquito.
Reason for mosquito produce:
It is revealed from the RP reflected in the figure 7.40 that 33% expressed drainage problem, 24% solid waste (SW) problem, 37% told both drainage and SW problems and 6 no comments regarding reason for mosquito produce.
Nocommen I.:.l6%
BOti D & SW
SW problem j 124%
Draine problem
Figure 7.40 RP on reason for mosquito produce.
Where the liquid waste from house fall in:
It is revealed from the RP reflected in the figure 7.41 that 29% expressed Pourashava drain, 14% river Al fcanal 47% told in house low land regarding the liquid waste from houses fallen.
In house LL J47%
RiverIcan 1 14%
PS drain
-- -
I
Figure 7.41 RP regarding the liquid waste fallen (where) from houses fallen.
Connection of household latrine into drain:
It is revealed from the RP reflected in the figure 7.42 that 29% expressed positive (yes), 35% negative (no) and 43% not known regarding connection of household latrine into drain.
NotKnn
No
Yes 22°'
Figure 7.42 RP regarding connection of household latrine into drain.
1.
Status of drain cleanness in the locality:
It is revealed from the RP reflected in the figure 7.43 that 22% expressed good, 35% moderate and 43% expressed not satisfactory regarding cleanness status of drain in the locality.
Notsisfatoy
I%
Merate
H
GOOd 1 1 22%
--
Figure 7.43 RP on cleanness status of drain in the locality.
ME
Overflow of drain water during rainy season:
It is revealed from the RP reflected in the figure 7.44 that 22% expressed overflow, 35% not overflow and 43% expressed sometimes overflow regarding drain water overflow in the rainy season.
SoniemesO/F
NotOIF
.:I35%
Overflow(O/F) 1 122%
Figure 7.44 RP regarding overflow of drain water during rainy season.
Out fall for drain water in Pourashava:
It is revealed from the RP reflected in the figure 7.45 that 72% expressed river/canal, 13% low land and 15% expressed not known regarding outfall for drain water in Pourashava.
NotknyNn 15%
Lowlad 113%
Rive I canal 72%
Figure 7.45 RP regarding out fall for drain water in Pourashava.