Penggunaan Probiotik, Prebiotik dan Kombinasinya
untuk Meningkatkan Respon Imun dan Resistensi
Ikan Nila
Oreochromis Niloticus
terhadap infeksi
Streptococcus agalactiae
Application of Probiotic, Prebiotic and Their Combinations
for Increasing Immune Response and Resistance of Nile Tilapia
Oreochromis Niloticus
against
Streptococcus agalactiae
Infection
WIDANARNI, ACHMAD FAROUQ DAN MUNTI YUHANA
ABSTRACT
Tilapia have been cultured to meet increasing market demand on fish. Some efforts have been done to increase tilapia production. However, some parasitical and bacterial diseases often caused mass mortality in fish culture. One of the bacterial disease that recently attacked tilapia is streptococcosis caused by Streptococcus agalactiae. In this study, fish feed supplemented with probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic were applied to enhance the immune response and fish resistance against Streptococcus agalactiae infection. Treatments used in this study, were as follows : feed containing 1% (v/v) of probiotic, feed containing 2% (v/v) of prebiotic and feed containing mixed of 1% (v/v) of probiotic + 2% (v/v)
of prebiotic (defined as synbiotic). In controls (positive and negative controls), fish were fed by fish feed without containing neither probiotic and prebiotic. In this study, we used all male (monosex) red tilapia with the average of body weight of ± 13 gram. Fish were fed by supplemented feed within the first 30 days before challenge test by injection of 109 CFU/ml of Streptococcus agalactiae. The results demonstrated that the survival rate of the fish challenged by Streptococcus agalactiae in control group (+) was lowest (50%) than others. The survival rate of the fish fed by supplemented feed containing probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic were 76%, 76% and 80%, respectively. These results were statistically different compared to that of control (50%) (P<0.05). The results demonstrated that addition of probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic in fish feed could increase immune response and survival rate against Streptococcus agalactiae infection.
Keywords : tilapia, probiotic, prebiotic, synbiotic, Streptococcus agalactiae
ABSTRAK
Ikan nila telah banyak dibudidayakan oleh masyarakat untuk memenuhi peningkatan permintaan pasar. Beberapa upaya telah dilakukan untuk meningkatkan produksi tilapia. Tetapi penyakit akibat prasit dan bakteria masih sering menyebabkan kematian masal pada ikan budidaya. Salah satu penyakit bakterial yang akhir-akhir ini banyak menyerang ikan nila adalah streptococcosis yang disebabkan oleh bakteri Streptococcus agalactiae. Pada penelitian ini, ikan diberi pakan yang mengandung probiotik, prebiotik dan sinbiotik yang diduga dapat meningkatkan respon imun dan ketahanan ikan terhadap Streptococcus agalactiae. Pakan yang diberikan adalah pakan yang mengandung probiotik 1% (v/v),
prebiotik 2% (v/v) dan probiotik 1% (v/v) + prebiotik 2% (v/v) (sinbiotik). Ikan kontrol (kontrol positif dan kontrol
negatif) diberi pakan yang tidak mengandung probiotik maupun prebiotik. Pada penelitian ini, digunakan ikan nila merah monoseks (all male) dengan ukuran bobot rata-rata 13 gram. Ikan tersebut diberi pakan perlakuan selama 30 hari sebelum diuji tantang dengan disuntik Streptococcus agalactiae dengan kepadatan 109 CFU/ml. Hasil yang diperoleh menunjukkan bahwa tingkat kelangsungan hidup ikan setelah diinfeksi Streptococcus agalactiae memberikan pengaruh yang berbeda nyata (P<0,05) pada perlakuan A (kontrol +) sebesar 50% terhadap semua perlakuan lain, yaitu perlakuan C (probiotik), D (prebiotik) dan E (sinbiotik) yang masing-masing sebesar 73%, 76% dan 80%. Penambahan probiotik, prebiotik dan sinbiotik pada pakan ternyata dapat meningkatkan respon imun dan tingkat kelangsungan hidup ikan terhadap infeksi Streptococcus agalactiae.
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Amlacher, E., 1970. Textbook of Fish Disease. D.A. Courey and R.L. Herman Translation, T.F.H. Publications, Neptune City, Ney Jersey, USA.
Anderson, D.P., Siwicki, A.K., 1993. Basic hematology and serology for fish health programs. Paper presented in second symposium on disease in Asian Aquaculture “Aquatic Animal
Health and Environment”. Phukat, Thailand. 25-29th. October 1993, hlm. 17.
Balcazar, J.L., de Blas, I., Ruiz Zarzuela, I.,Cunningham, D., Vendrell, D., Muzquiz, J.L. 2006. The role of probiotics in aquaculture. Vet Microbiol, 114:173e86.
Blaxhall, P.C., Daisley, K.W., 1973. Routine hematological methods for use with fish blood. Journal Fish Biologys 5, 577-581.
Cerezuela, R., Meseguer, J., Esteban, A. 2011. Current knowledge in synbiotic use for fish aquaculture: a review. J Aquac Res Development. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-95546.S1-008.
Chang, P.H., Plumb, J.A., 1996. Histopathology of experimental Streptococcus sp. infection in tilapia Oreochromis niloticus and channel catfish Ichtalurus punctatus. Journal of Fish Disease 19, 235-241.
Effendie, M.I., 1979. Metode Biologi Perikanan. Yayasan Dewi Sri Bogor, Bogor.
Grisdale, H.B., Helland, S.J., Gatlin, 2008. The effects of dietary supplementation with mannanoligosaccharidae, fructooligo-saccharidae or galactooligosaccharidae on the growth and feed utilization of atlantic salmon Salmo salar. Aquaculture 283, 163-167.
Hernandez, E. Figueroa J., Ireguei C., 2009. Streptococcosis on red tilapia, Oreochromis sp., farm : a case study. Journal of Fish Disease 32, 247-257.
Irianto, A., 2003. Probiotik Akuakultur. Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta.
Jawad, L.A., Al Mukhtar, M.A., Ahmed, H.K., 2004. The relation between hematocrit and some biological parameters of the indian shad Temalosa ilisha. Animal Biodiversity and Concervation 27, 47-52.
Kresno, S.B., 1996. Immunologi: Diagnosis dan Prosedur Laboratorium Edisi Ketiga. Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta.
Lagler, K.F., Bardach, J.E., Miller, R.R., Passiono, D.R., 1977. Ichtyology. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York-London.
Marlis, A., 2008. Isolasi oligosakarida ubi jalar Ipomea batata L. dan pengaruh pengolahan terhadap potensi prebiotiknya. [Tesis]. Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.
Martin, M.L., Namura, D.T., Miyazaki, D.M., Pilarsky, F., Ribero, K., De Castro, M.P., De Campos, C.M., 2004. Physiological and haemotological response of Oreochromis niloticus
exposed to single and consecutive stress of capture. Animal Science, 449-456.
Merrifiled, D.L., Dimitroglou, A., Foey, A., Davies, S.J., Baker, R.T.M., Bogwald, J., Castex, M., Ringo, E. 2010. The current status and future focus of probiotic and prebiotic applications for Salmonids. Aquaculture, 302: 1-18.
Muchtadi, D., 1989. Evaluasi Nilai Gizi Pangan. Depdikbud, Dirjen Dikti-PAU, IPB.
Pasnik, D.J., Evans, J.J., Klesius, P.H., 2009. Fecal strings associated with Streptococcus agalactiae
infection in nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Science Journal, 6-8.
Poernomo, 2009. Nila, andalan produk perikanan. Available at http://www.dkp.go.id/archives/c/34/1854/nila-andalan-produk-perikanan/ [15 September 2010].
Putra, A.N., 2010. Aplikasi probiotik, prebiotik dan sinbiotik untuk meningkatkan kinerja pertumbuhan ikan nila Oreochromis niloticus. [Tesis]. Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor.
Roberts, R.J., 1978. Fish Pathology. Bailliere Tindai, London.
Schrezenmeir, J., Vrese, M., 2001. Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotic-approaching a definition.
Clinical Nutrition Journal, 361-364.
Sniezko, S.F., 1960. Microhematocrit as a tool in fishery research and management. Fish and Wildlife Service Special Scientific Report, 341-315.
Tizard, I.R., 1982. Pengantar Imunologi Veteriner. Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya.
Wang Y., 2007. Effect of probiotics on growth performance and digestive enzyme activity of the shrimp Panaeus vannamei. Aquaculture 269, 259-264.
Wedemeyer, G., Yasutake, W.T., 1977. Clinical methods for the assesment of the effects of environmental stress on fish health. Technical paper 89, USA. Departement of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C.
