• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Project variance analysis Standard costs

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Project variance analysis Standard costs"

Copied!
6
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Project variance analysis Standard costs

• Absence in the construction industry

o Leads to lack of control

o Leads to inability to increase productivity • Approach

o How construction method should be accomplished o How much construction method should cost • Advantages

o Allows comparison among alternative methods o Permits effective analysis of cost data

o Emphasizes budget control

o Promotes cooperation between production and estimating staffs

Types of standard costs

• Ideal

o Represents level of performance achieved under best possible conditions o Maximum possible output at minimum possible cost

o Practically unattainable • Normal

o Represents level of performance, in general, over complete business cycle o Does not take into account economic effects within the cycle

o Deviations may represent economic effects • Expected

o Represents level of performance based upon current economic conditions o Short-run: revised as necessary

o Deviations may represent inefficient operations o Attainable

Material standards

• Factors

o Quantity of material to be used o Price or cost of the material • Determining quantity standards

o Average all past data

o Average best and worst performances

o Develop a range: determine probabilities of reaching various points within

the range and their corresponding risks and benefits

• Determining cost standards

(2)

o Median of recent purchases o Other cost estimating

Material variances

Usage variance results from using more or less materials than was anticipated due to:

o Variations in material yield

o Variations in job-operation efficiency o Variations in waste, spoilage, etc. o Use of substitute materials

Price variance results from paying more or less for materials than was anticipated due to:

o Unforeseen purchase contracts or terms o Unforeseen market changes

o Unforeseen changes in delivery costs o Unforeseen timing of material purchases

Material variance computation

Actual units Actual units Standard units x x x

Actual price Standard price Standard price

Price variance Usage variance (fav, unf) (fav, unf)

Total variance (fav, unf)

Material variance example

• Pouring a concrete slab

o Standard quantity = 190 cy o Actual quantity = 200 cy o Standard price = $70 o Actual price = $65

Actual units Actual units Standard units x x x

(3)

Price variance Usage variance

Total variance

Labor standards

• Factors

o Quantity of labor to be used o Price or cost of the labor • Determining quantity standards

o Average past performances on similar work

o Make time-and-motion studies of various operations o Use professional judgment

• Determining cost standards

o Union contracts

o Average wage based upon a composite crew

Labor variances

Efficiency variance results from using more or less labor than was anticipated due to:

o Variations in equipment support o Variations in material flow o Variations in working conditions o Variations in economic climate

Rate variance results from paying more or less for labor than was anticipated due to:

o Union contract changes o Composite crew changes

Labor variance computation

Actual hours Actual hours Standard hours x x x

Actual rate Standard rate Standard rate

Rate variance Efficiency variance (fav, unf) (fav, unf)

(4)

Labor variance example

• Forming a concrete wall

o Standard efficiency = 0.025 hrs/sf o Actual quantity = 70 hrs for 3000 sf o Standard rate = $20/hr

o Actual rate = $21/hr

Actual hours Actual hours Standard hours x x x

Actual rate Standard rate Standard rate

Rate variance Efficiency variance

Total variance

Job (variable) OH standards

• Factors

o Quantity applied as a function of a base o Rate applied as a function of the same base • Determining standards

o Historical data

o Professional judgment

Job OH variances

Efficiency variance results from using more or less labor than was anticipated

Spending variance results from realizing higher or lower variable OH than was anticipated

Job OH variance computation

Actual units Actual units Standard units x x x

Actual rate Standard rate Standard rate

(5)

Total variance (fav, unf)

Job OH variance example

• Base is project labor hours

o Standard quantity = 1950 hrs o Actual quantity = 2000 hrs o Standard rate = $4/hr o Actual OH = $8200

Actual units Actual units Standard units x x x

Actual rate Standard rate Standard rate

Spending variance Efficiency variance

Total variance

General (fixed) OH standards

• Factors

o Quantity applied as a function of a base o Rate applied as a function of the same base • Determining standards

o Historical data

o Professional judgment

General OH variances

Volume variance results from supporting more or less field labor than was anticipated

Budget variance results from realizing higher or lower fixed OH than was anticipated

General OH variance computation

(6)

Budget variance Volume variance (fav, unf) (fav, unf)

Total variance (fav, unf)

General OH variance example

• Base is monthly labor hours

o Standard quantity = 10,000 hrs o Actual quantity = 12,000 hrs o Standard OH = $50,000 o Actual OH = $62,000

Actual units Standard units Actual units x x x

Actual rate Standard rate Standard rate

Budget variance Volume variance

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

kulit singkong memiliki kandungan karbohidrat, nitrogen, magnesium dan fosfor yang cukup tinggi sehingga dapat dijadikan pupuk organic sebagai

Pada selang [a,b], fungsi keanggotaan himpunan fuzzy pada representasi linear TURUN direpresentasikan dengan garis lurus yang melalui dua titik, yaitu dengan koordinat (a,1)

[r]

Dari penjabaran Tabel matriks hubungan antara sub sistem teknologi dan kebudayaan PT Alove Bali untuk keadaan ideal dan Tabel matriks hubungan antara sub sistem

Hasil penelitian ini konsisten dengan penelitian yang dilakukan oleh Sembiring (2005) yang menyatakan bahwa ukuran dewan komisaris berpengaruh signifikan

Faktor lain seperti Likuiditas (FDR), Risiko Kredit (NPL), Inflasi, Owner, Herfindhal-Hirschman Index (HHI) dan BI Rate tidak mempengaruhi profitabilitas bank

Adapun nilai signifikansi yang diperoleh dari hasil uji perbedaan rerata (mean) normal gain antara kelas kontrol dengan kelas eksperimen lebih kecil dari 0,05 (0,000

Sebagai mana amanat Undang-undang Nomor 25 tahun 2004 pasal 5 ayat 2, Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Daerah (RPJMD) merupakan penjabaran dari Visi, Misi dan