Vol 3, No 2, April-June 1994
109
A
Comparative Study
between
the Use
of
Honey
and
Sterile
Nonviable
Lyophillized
Amniochorionic Membrane
for
the
Treatment
of
Infected
Wound
in Type
3
Open Fractures
Charles
A.
Simanjuntak,
H.
SoelartoReksoprodjo
Abstrak
Telah dilakukan penelitian klinis terhadap luka 40 kasus dalam kurun waktu
l0
bulan. Duapuluh
kasus luka dirawat tlen tnenggunakan selaput anniochorion kering sterilyang diperoleh daNasional secara curna-cuna. Dilakukan penelitian terhadap latna perawatan
di
rutnah sakit, biaya dan respon luka terhadap kedua bahan dians' Dari hasil penelitian didopal bahwa kedua bahan rtenpunyai efek yang sama baik.'tidak terlihat perbedaan bennakna antara kedua bahan tersebut, kecuali madu nurni lebih nrurah, atnan'rnuâoh tnencari dan nenggunakannya selatna perawatan.
Abstract
A clinical trial had been perfonned on
40
e epe 3 in the orthopaedic ward of Fatrnawati Hospital, Jakarta during 10 months' Twenty cases weret
vtound, the other 20 cases were treated by using sterilewere donated by The Centre for Application to cotnpare the duration ofstay in hospital, d atnniochorionic nembrane as biological 3 open lrocture treatrnent. There was no statistically signifi.cant biological dressing is inexpensive, save, eosy to get and to apply.
Keyword: Woundtreat,nent, Sterile nonviable lyophitlized anniochorionic tnetnbratte, Horrcy
Infected wounds in open fracture usually produce
alot
of
problems
in
the healing
processof
the fracture.
It
can cause
osteomyelitis
and alsonon-union
or pseudo_arthrosis.
As
aresult,
the patient hasto stay longer
in
the
ho.sp-ita_lfor
treatment,
and
cost
will
behigher.''z'r'a't Muny
methods has been
tried
to
solvethis
problem, including the duration
of the use of
During the
second
World War, Trueta,
used
amethod
for
the
treatment
of
open fractures,
using a
circular
cast and keeping
it
until
the fracture
healed,although the
cast gave an unpleasant
odour.
At
thattime
the
wound
had been
granulated
or
healed spon-taneously.SIn
the
literature,
honey
or
sterile nonviable
lyo_phillized amniochorionic
membrane
is
used as abio-logical
dressingto promote wound
healing.a,s'e'to'l tA
prospective study was carried out
to
study the
benefits
of
using
thesematerials
in
the
treatment
of
woundsof
type
3 open fracture.The
purpose
of
this study was
to
compare
theduration
of
stay inhospital, the expenses and
the
res_ ponseof
healing using honey and nonviable
lyophilli_
zed amniochorionic membrane as
biological
dreising.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Since
March
l,
1992until
December
31, 1992,forty
patients
(thirty
seven males and three females)
with
type
3
open
fractures who were hospitalized
in
theOrthopaedic Ward
of Fatmawati Hospital,
Jakarta(Table
l)
were included
in
this study
and dividedinto
I
l0
Sitnanjunrok et al.two groups. The
first
group consistsof twenty patients
using honey
andthe second
group
consistsof
twenty
patients using sterilenonviable
lyophillized
amniocho-rionic
membranein
the treatmentof their
wound.
Table 1. Sex distribution
Group
I
: cases using HoneyGroup
II
: cases using Sterile nonviable amniochorionic membraneThe
age rangedfrom
12 - 60 years. Thediameter
of
the wound were larger than 5 centimeters. Patients
with
ahistory
of
any disease that alterswound healing
such as
diabetic,
leprosy, vascular
disease,etc, were
excluded
from
the
study
group.
Also
in
severebrain
concussion orpsychosis. Patients
who
refusedto
con-tinue the
treatment
for
any reason
will
also
be
ex-cluded
from
the study.All
patients
will
be treatedin
the usual procedureof treatment
for
type
3 open fracture.A
swabfrom
thewound was taken
for
microorganism
study
before
debridement was performed
in
the operating
theatre.Every odd number
casewas
grouped
into
Group
I
usingHoney
asbiological
dressing which was changedevery six hour.
Every
evennumber
case was groupedinto Group
II
using Sterile nonviable lyophillized
amniochorionic membrane
as biological
dressingand
will
be
changed
every two
days.
No
antibiotics
were given
to
the
patients,
neither topical, oral
nor
parenteral.With
the usual procedure, antibiotics weregiven during
anduntil
three daysafter operation.
The
honey
that
was used was bought
from
anymarket;
thepurity
of the honey
can be testedby:
I
pu-ting
someof
the honey on adisk
and exposedit in
theroom.
Pure
honey
will
not attract or
surrounded by
ants. 2 Thesolubility in
water and alcohol:
pure honeywill
not solve
in
water nor alcohol.
The sterile nonviable lyophillized
amniochorio-nic
membrane was prepared and given free
of
charge by The Centre forApplication
of Isotops andRadiation
Med
J
Univ Indonof
theNational Atomic
Energy
Agency
(Pusat
Pene-litian Aplikasi
Isotop dan Radiasi, Badan TenagaAtom
Nasional
-
PAIR"BATAN).
The
membrane
was
atta-ched
to
one side
of
a
gauze measuring
ten
by
ten centimeters and packedin
asterile plastic package.
Recording was done every
two
weeks. Criterias
that wererecorded
include:
1 typeof
microorganism,
2
suppuration,
3
diameter
of
the wound,
4
time of
granulation tissue that
appears, at the endof
the study.If
at the endof
the study the diameterof
the wound ismore
than2,5
cm, the presenceof
healty granulation
tissue and haemoglobin
level above
10g/dl
is anindica-tion for
skin grafting.
Results were expressed as mean + SD.
Differences
in
mean values between the two groups were evaluatedby
the unpaired
r-test
with
p
< 0,01
considered
sig-nificant.
RESULT
The mean age
in Group I was 28,9 years
+
10,7, andin
Group
II
24,4 years
+
8,
(Table
2).
There was
no [image:2.595.46.286.177.303.2]significant
difference
(p
> 0.05).Table 2. Age Distribution
Group
I
: cases using HoneyGroup
II
: cases using Sterile nonviable amniochorionic membraneThe diameter
of
the wounds rangedfrom
5 to 20cm (Table 3)
with
an avarageof 5
-
10cm (67,5
%). The meandiameter in Group I was
10,5cm
+ 4,83 cm,while
in
Group
II
8,75
+
2,68
cm;
there was
nosignificant difference (p
> 0.05). Ag"(years)
Group
Total '/o
I II
t2 -20
2t-30
3l
- 404l-50
>508
4
2
5
I
7
9
J
I
0
l5
135
6
I
37,5 32,5
12,5
15,0 2,5
Total Mean SD
20 28,9 to,7
20 24,4
8.0
40 100,0
Sex
Group
Total %
I n
Male
Female
l8
2
t9
I
37
3
92,5
'1,5
[image:2.595.311.545.450.639.2]Wound Diameter
(cm)
Group
Total %
I
tr5-10
11-15
16-20
>20
ll
6
3
0
16 3
I
0
27 9 4
0
67,5
t)<
10,0 0,0
Total Mean
SD
20 10,5
4,83
20 8,75 2"68
40 r00,0
Vol 3, No 2, April-June 1994
Table 3. Wound Diameter Distribution
: cases using Honey
: cases using Sterile nonviable amniochorionic
membrane
Duration
of
stay
in
ahospital
for
treatment
of
awound
rangedfrom
twelve to
thirty-eight
days (Table4). Mean
of
duration
of
stay (hospitalized)
in
Group
I
[image:3.595.49.282.101.284.2]was 3,6 weeks (25
days)
+
1,28 weeks (9 days),while
in
Group
II
2,8 weeks (20days)
+ 0,87week
(6 days); there wasno
significant
difference (p
> 0,01).Table 4. Duration of Hospital Stay
Group
I
: cases using HoneyGroup
II
: cases using Sterile nonviable amniochorionicmembrane
The
microorganism
that had been isolated before treatment of thesetwo
groups were inthirty-three
cases (82,57o) Staphylococcus and therest
were Streptococ-cus.There was no
Gram
Negative staining nor other
Gram positive staining microorganism other
than
Staphylococcus
and
Streptococcus isolated
from
thewound.
There
were
eleven
casesof
Group
I
and
fifteen
cases
of
Group
II
who did
not
needskin grafting
due111
to
the
fact that
the diameter
of
the wound after four
weeks
of
treatment
became
less than
2,5 cm
with
minimal
suppuration.Nine
cases (45 %)of
GroupI
andfive
cases(25%) of
GroupII
needskin grafting
and theresult
wasexcellent (Table
5).Table 5. Results of Skin Grafting
Group
I
: cases using HoneyGroup
II
: cases using Sterile nonviable amniochorionicmembrane
At
the
endof
thestudy,
thecost
for
eachpatient
was calculated. Group
I
needed 69bottles
(650ml/bot-tle)
of
honey;
each
bottle costing Rp. 12.000,-
Theaverage need
for
one patient was 3,45 bottles
(Rp.41.400,-). Group
II
needed 138 piecesof
Sterile
non-viable
lyophillized
amniochorionic membrane
or
about seven pieces
for
eachpatient.
These membrane was freeof
charge, donatedby
the Centrefor
Applica-tion
of Isotops andRadiation
ofNational
Atomic
Ener-gy
Agency,
sowe could not
calculate the costfor
eachpatient
if they
hadto
pay
for
the membrane
prepara-tion.
DISCUSSION
A
prospective comparative
studyof
patientswith
openfracture type
3
using honey
or
sterile
nonviable
lyophillized
amniochorionic
membrane as abiological
dressingin
treating their wounds
has beencarried
out.Group
I
andII
arecomparable
sincevariant
werenot
statistically
different.
This
study showed
that
those
two
materials
canpromote wound healing. None
of
thepatients
becameworse, although
none
of
them
received
any
type of
antibiotic topically, orally
nor parenterally.
The mean
duration
of
hospitalization
of
Group
I,
25 + 9
days and group
II
20 + 6
days, was
not
sig-nificantly different
(p > 0,01).Hanafiah,
in their study
of
17 casesusing Sterile nonviable lyophillized
am-niochorionic
membrane,
found that the duration
of
hospitalization
was
9-
13 days(mean
11,67 days)but
Group
I
GroupII
Successful
(%)
Group
Total
I
II
o
-24
25-49
50-75
>75
0 0 0
9
0 0 0
5
0 0 0
t4
Total 9 5
l4
Length
of
Stay (weeks)
Group
Total %
I
II
o-2
2-4
4-6
6-8
>8
I
l3
5
I
0
3
l6
I
0 0
4 29 6
I
I
10,0 72,5
r5,0
2,5
0,0
Total Mean
SD
20 3,6
r,28
20 2,8
o,87
[image:3.595.308.542.188.339.2] [image:3.595.49.282.418.603.2]Il2
Simanjuntaket al.they
did
not
mention
the
size
of
diameter
of
thewound,4
Risantosoreported
of
30 casesusing
honey,the
time
of
hospitalization
was 2 - 4 weeksto
cure thewound.
Seventeenof
them were
establishedsterile
atthe
endof
the study. The diameter
of
the wound
wasnot mentioned
eithËr.sStaphylococcus
is
the most common
microor-ganism
that
had beenisolated
from
thewound,
as hasbeen
reported
by
record
authors.l'2'6'12'1314Th"
bu"-tericidal effect
of
Sterile nonviable lyophillized
am-niochorionic
membrane
had
been
reported
and published.a'e'11Wotton
wrote that honey
cànhins
In-hibin which
acts asantibacterial.
Thesetwo materials,
honey and sterile nonviable
lyophillized
amniocho-rionic
membrane, have
an effect
to
promote wound
tissue
granul"tion.4'lo'14
All
of
the patients healedwell
although nine
cases(45%) of
Group
I
andfive
cases(25%)
of
Group
II
neededskin grafting
with
excellent
result.
Patients
of
Group
I
only
spentRp. 41.400
(aboutUS$ 20)
for
thehoney they
used;if
they needed oral
antibiotics,
first
or
secondgeneration cephalospo-rin
for
about three weeks, the cost wasapproximately
Rp.120.000,-
(US$ 60)
or in
severe
caseswhere
morepotent antibiotics were
needed such asquinolon,
then they had to spend about Rp. 270.000(US$
135) orthey
might
need parenteralantibiotics which
are 3 to 4times
more expensive than orals.
In
treating patients
of
Group
I,
the
dressing
was
changed
every six
hours;because
the
hygroscophic effect of
thehoney
that has thebactericidal effect
decreases.Honey
is easilyavail-able
in
themarket. Sterile nonviable
lyophillized
am-niochorionic
membrane
is
given free
of
charge
andsupplied
by
the
National
Atomic
Energy
Agency. In
the
United
Kingdom, Yorkshire
TissueBanking,
eachpiece
of
15X
l0
centimeters costs
8.2 pound
ster-ling
(Rp 25.000).
Soif
it
is calcuted, eachpatient
needRp
175.000.More
attention
of
thedoctors
and nursesis
necessaryin
the treatment
using
sterile nonviable
lyophillized
amniochorionic
membrane.In
early
pha-ses, the patients
of Group
II
wereusually complaining
of
unpleasantodor from
the wound dressing
becausethe dressing was changed,
usually, every
two
days.CONCLUSION
The result
of
acomparative study
in
thetreatment
of
infected wounds
in
type
3 openfractures using
honeyand sterile
nonviable
lyophillized
amniochorionic
membrane
had
been
reported. The wound
diameter
were
all
more
than
five
centimeters.
This
study
wascarried out on patients treated in the Orthopaedic
Ward
at
Fatmawati
Hospital
Jakarta
during
a
ten-monthsMed
J
Univ Indonperiod
from March to
December
1992.Twenty
casesusing honey and
the
rest
using sterile
nonviable
lyophillized amniochorionic
membrane
asbiological
dressing
fot
wound treatment
of type
3 openfracture
gave
excellent
results.The conclusion is that
in
both groups,
the useof
this
biological
dressing hadthe
same and goodeffect
in
the
treatment
of
infected
wounds
of
type 3
openfractures. There
were no statistically significant
dif-ferences between these
two
groups, except that the useof
honey
asbiological dressing is
inexpensive,
save,and easy
to
get andto apply.
REFERENCES
l.
Gustillo RB, Anderson JT. Preventionof
Infection in theTreatment of One Thousand and Twenty Five Open
Frac-tures ofLông Bones. JBJS 1976;58A (4):453 - 8.
2. Gustillo
RB,
MerkowRL,
TemplemanD.
TheManage-ment ofOpen Fractures. IBJS 1990;
72A(2):299
-303.3. Gustillo RB, Mendoza RM, William DN. Problems in the
Management of Type
III
(Severe) Open Fractures:A
New Classification of TypeIII
Open Fractures. J Trauma 1984;24 (8):742 - 6.
4. Hanafiah
D,
Reksoprodjo S, HilmyN.
Clinical Studies onApplication
of
Sterile Lyophillized
Amniochorion
Membrane on Open Wound: Symposium on Surgical Tissue
Banking. 1989 In press.
5. Risantoso
T,
Reksoprodjo S. Aplikasi Madu pada LukaPatah Tulang Terbuka. Majalah Orthopaedi Indonesia 1992;
XX
(l):
52 - 60.6. Fitzgerald RH. Infection; In Orthopaedic Knowledge Update Home Study Syllabus. American Academic of Orthopaedic Surgeon 1987;49 - 55.
7. Lange
RH,
BachAW,
Hansen ST, JohansenKH.
OpenTibial Fractures with Associated Vascular Injuries:
Prog-nosis fot Limb Salvage.
I
Trauma 1985; 25 (3): 203 - 8.8. Djojosugito
AM,
RushadiD,
Reksoprodjo S. Treatment ofInfected Union and Fracture
by
Papineau Methods. Maj. Orthop Indone 1979;Y (2):92- lÙl.
9. Bartholdson
L.
Antibacterial Effect of Biological Dressing in the Treatment of Infected Wound. Scan J Plast 1977;ll
(l):
33 - 7.10. Efem
SE. Clinical
Observation on the Wound HealingProperties of Honey. British J Surg 1988; 75 (7):679 - 81.
I
l.
Egan TJ. Human Amniotic in Management of Cfuonic Ulcerof
LowerLimb.
A
Clinical Pathology Study. Angiology1983; 34 (3): 197 - 203.
12.
Bower
WH,
Wilson
FC,
Greene
WB.
Antibiotic
Prophylaxis
in
Experimental BoneInfection.
JBIS 1973;55A (4): 795 - 807.
13. Fitzgerald
RH,
ThompsonRL.
Current Concepts Review: Cephalosporin Antibiotics in the Prevention and Treatment ofMusculoskeletal Sepsis. JBJS 1983; 65A (8):l20l
- 5. 14. PatzakisMI,
Harvey JP, IvlerD.
The Role of Antibiotics in