D IPA 1007050 Bibliography

(1)

Fahyuddin, 2014

Perkuliahan matematika kimia untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir

logis,matematis,,komunikasi matematis,dan pemecahan masalah kimia kuantitatif Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Adey, P., and Shayer, M. (1994). Really Raising Standards: Cognitive Intervention and Academic Achievement. London: Routledge.

Akatugba, A. H. and Wallace, J. (2009). “An Integrative Perspective on Students‟ Proportional Reasoning in High School Physics in a West African

Context”. International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1473–1493.

American Association for the Advancement of Science, (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Anderson, L. W., and Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.

Arlin, P. K. (1989). The problem of The Problem. In J. D. Sinnott (Ed.), Every Day Problem Solving: Theory and applications (pp. 229–237), New York:Praeger.

Arnett , A. and Van Horn, D. (2009).” Connecting Mathematics and Science: A Learning Community That Helps Math-Phobic Students”. Journal of College Science Teaching, July/August.

Atkins, P.W. (1998). Physical Chemistry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ausubel, D.P., (1968), Educational Psychology: a Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Bangash, F.K., and Mustafa, S. (2002). Essentials of Mathematics in Teaching Chemistry. Proceedings of 10th IOSTE Symposium, 2, Parana Brazil: Foz do Iquaso.

Barmetz, J. (1999). “Precursors of Formal Thought: A Longitudinal Study”. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 61-81.

Barrante, J. R. (1998). Applied Mathematics for Physical Chemistry, 2nd edition, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River.

Bassok, M. (2003). Analogical Transfer in Problem Solving. In J. E. Davidson and R. J. Sternberg (Eds.). The psychology of Problem Solving (pp. 343– 369), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Belt, S.T., Leisvik, M. J., Hyde, A. J., and Overton, T. L. (2005). “Using a

Context Based Approach to Undergraduated Chemistry Teaching- A Case Study for Introductory Physical Chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 6(3), 166 -179.

Ben-Hur, M. (2006). Concept rich mathematics instruction: Building a strong foundation for reasoning and problem solving. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

(2)

Fahyuddin, 2014

Berlin, D. F. and Lee, H. (2005). “Integrating Science and Mathematics: Historical Analysis”. School Science and Mathematics, 105, 15-24.

Bird, J. (2002). Basic Engineering Mathematics. 3rd Edition. Alih Bahasa:

Indriasari, R. (Matematika Dasar: Teori dan Aplikasi). Jakarta: Erlangga.

Blaye, A., Light, P. H., Joiner, R., and Sheldon, S. (1991). “Joint Planning and Problem Solving on A Computer-based Task”. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 471–483.

Boaler, J. (1998). “Open and closed mathematics: Students‟ experiences and

Understanding”. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 41–62.

Bossé, M. J., Lee, T. D., Swinson, M., and, Faulconer, J. (2010). “The NCTM Process Standards and The Five Es of Science:Connecting Math and Science”. Journal School Science and Mathematics, 110(5), 261 – 276.

BouJaoude, S. B., Salloum, S., and Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2004). “Relationship between Selective Cognitive Variables and Students‟ Ability to Solve Chemistry Problems”. International Journal of Science Education, 26,63-84.

Bowden, G. M. and Roth, W. M. (2005). “Data and Graph Interpretation Practices Among Preservice Science Teachers”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 1063-1088.

Brady, J. E. and Holum, J. R. (2003). The Study of Matter and Its Changes. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Bragow, D., Gragow, K. A., and Smith, E. (1995). “Back to The Future: Toward Curriculum Integration”. Middle School Journal, 27, 39-46.

Bransford, J., and Stein, B. S. (1984). The IDEAL Problem Solver: A guide for Impr oving Thinking, Lea r ning, and Cr ea tivity. New York: H. Freeman.

Brassel, H. M. and Rowe, M. B. (1993). “Graphing Skill Among High School Physics Students”. Journal of School Science and Mathematics, 93, 63–71.

Brookhart, S. M. (2010).How to Assess Higher Order Thinking Skills In Your Classroom. Virginia USA: ASCD Alexandria.

http://:www.jalt.org/test/bro 12.htm.[12 Desember 2010].

Cakmakci, G., Leach, J., and Donnelly, J. (2006). “Students‟ Ideas about Reaction Rate and its Relationship with Concentration or Pressure”. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1795–1815

Chandran, S., Treagust, D. F., and Tobin, K. (1987). “The Role of Cognitive Factors in Chemistry Achievement”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(2), 145–160.

Chandrasegaran, A.L., Treagust, D.T., and Mecerino, M. (2007). “The

(3)

Fahyuddin, 2014

Chang, H.P et al. (2007). “Investigating Primary and Secondary Students‟ Learning of Physics Concepts in Taiwan”. International Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 465 – 482.

Cheng, P.C. H. (1996). Problem Solving and Learning with Diagrammatic Representations. In D. Peterson (Ed.), Forms of representation (pp. 47– 66). Exeter: Intellect Books.

Cheong, I. P- A., Treagust, D., Kyeleve, I. J., and Oh, P –Y. (2010). “Evaluation of Students‟ Conceptual Understanding of Malaria”. International Journal of Science Education, 32(18), 2497–2519.

Childs, P. (2009). “Improving Chemical Education: Turning Research Into Effective Practice”. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 10, 189-203.

Clark, A.C. and Ernst, J.V. (2007). “A Model for the Integration of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics”. The Technology Teacher, December/January 2007.

Coll, R. K., Ali, A., Bonato, J., and Rohindra. D. (2005). “Investigating First-Year Chemistry Learning Difficulties in the South Pacific: A Case Study from Fiji”. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(2), 241-268.

Cook, M. Wiebe, E.N., and Carter G. (2008).”The Influence of Prior Knowledge on Viewing and Interpreting Graphics With Macroscopic and Molecular Representations”. Science Education. Published online 28 Januari 2008 in Wiley Inter Scinece (www.interscience.wiley.com). (Diakses tanggal 11 Desember 2010).

Costa, A.L. (1985). Developving Minds, A Resource Book For Teaching Thingkin. Association For Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandria, Virginia.

Creswell, J. W., and Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Crippen, K. J. and Brooks, D. W. (2009). “Applying Cognitive Theory to Chemistry Instruction: The Case for Worked Examples”. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 10, 35-41

Crocker, L. and Algina, J. (2008). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.

Crowther, K., Thompson, D., and Cullingford, C. (1997). “Engineering Students are Deficient in Mathematical Expertise – why?” International Journal of Math. Educ. Sci. Technol, 28(6), 785–792.

(4)

Fahyuddin, 2014

Dagher, Z. R. (1995). “Analysis of Analogies Used by Science Teachers”. Journal or Research in Science Teaching, 32 (3), 259-270.

Dahar, R.W. (1996). Teori-Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Davison, D. M., Miller, K.W., and Metheny, D.I. (1995). “What Does Integration of Science and Mathematics Really Mean?” Journal of School Science and Mathematics, 95(5), 226-230.

Donovan, W. J. and Wheland, E. R. (2009). “Comparisons of Success and Retention in A General Chemistry Course Before and After The Adoption of A Mathematics Prerequisite”. Journal of School Science and Mathematics, 109 (7), 371-382.

Douglas, (2002). Fundamental of Analytica Chemistry, 7th Ed., Washington: John Willey Son on Corporation.

Duit, R. (2007). “Science Education Research Internationally: Conceptions, Research Methods, Domains of Research”. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(1), 3-15.

Easter, D. C. (2010).” Factors Influencing Student Prerequisite Preparation for and Subsequent Performance in College Chemistry Two: A Statistical Investigation”. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(5), 535-540.

Eilks, I. and Byers, B. (2010). “The Need for Innovative Methods of Teaching and Learning chemistry in Higher Education – Reflections from a Project of The European Chemistry Thematic Network”. Chem. Educ, Res. Pract., 11, 233-240.

Fah, L. Y. (2006). “Logical Thinking Abilities among Form 4 Students in the Interior Division of Sabah, Malaysia”. Journal of Science and

Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 32(2), 161-187

Fahyuddin, (2011). Analisis Kemampuan Konsep Matematika yang Dibutuhkan dan Miskonsepsi Konsep Matematika Dasar Pada Mahasiswa Prodi Pendidikan Kimia. Tugas Field Study Pada Mata kuliah Pengembangan Program Pendidikan IPABandung: SPS UPI. (tidak dipublikasikan).

Fahyuddin, Liliasari, Sabandar, J., and Martoprawiro, A. K. (2012). Analisis Konsep-Konsep Matematika Esensial untuk Kelancaran Belajar Kimia. Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia Sains, 1(1), 40-57.

Fahyuddin (2013). Pengembangan Alat Ukur Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Matematis dalam Konteks Kimia Bagi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Kimia. Laporan Penelitian Hibah Disertasi Doktor. Kendari, Unhalu, Lembaga Penelitian.

(5)

Fahyuddin, 2014

Matematika yang Dibutuhkan untuk Kelancaran Belajar Kimia Kuantitatif. Prosiding, Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Sains. Suarabaya: SPs UNESA.

Fahyuddin, Liliasari, dan Sabandar, J. (2013b). Pengembangan Tes Diagnosis Penalaran Formal Dalam Konteks Kimia. Prosiding, Seminar Nasional Pendidikan. Palembang: FKIP UNSRI.

Frykholm, J. and Glasson, G. (2005). “Connecting Science and Mathematics Instruction: Pedagogical Context Knowledge for Teachers”. School Science and Mathematics, 105, 127–141.

Furner, J., and Kumar, D. (2007). “The Mathematics and Science Integration Argument: A Atand for Teacher Education”. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,Science, and Technology Education, 3, 185–189.

Gabel, D. (1999). “Improving teaching and learning through chemistryeducation research:A look to the future”. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 548-554.

Gaigher, E., Roga, J.M., and Braun, M. W. H. (2007). Exploring The Development Of Conceptual Understanding Through Structured Problem-Solving In Physics.Inter na tiona l Jour na l of Science Educa tion, 29(9), 1089–1110.

Gall, M.D., Gall, J.P., and Borg, W.R. (2003). Education Research: An Introduction. Seventh Edition. Boston: Allyn anb Bacon.

Gerstner, S., and Bogner (2010). “Cognitive Achievement and Motivation in Hands-on and Teacher-Centred Science Classes: Does an Additional Hands-on Consolidation Phase (concept mapping) Optimise Cognitive L earning at Work Stations?” International Journal of Science Education, 32(7), 849-870.

Gilbert, J. K., Bulte, A. M.W., and Pilot, A. (2011). “Concept Development and Transfer in Context-Based Science Education”. International Journal of Science Education, 33 (6), 817–837.

Gilbert, J. K. (2006). “On the Nature of “Context” in Chemical Education”. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 957–976.

Greeno, J. G. and Hall, R.P. (2004). “Practicing Representation Learning with and about Representational Forms. Online Journal Phi Delta Kappan. from http:/ /www. dkintl.org/kappan /k9701gre.htm. (Diaskes 23 Nopember 2010).

Greeno, J. (1980). Trends in the theory of knowledge for Problem Solving. In D. T. Tuma and F. Reif (Eds.), Problem solving and education: Issues in teaching and research (pp. 9–23). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

(6)

Fahyuddin, 2014

Hahn, K. E., and Polik, W.F. (2004). “Factors Influencing Success in Physical Chemistry”. Journal of Chem. Education, 81(4), 560-572.

Haladyna, T. M. (1997). Writing Test Items to Evaluate Higher Order Thinking. USA: Allyn Bacon.

Hailikari, T. K., and Nevgi, A. (2010). “How to Diagnose At-risk Students in Chemistry: The Case of Prior Knowledge Assessment”. International Journal of Science Education, 32(15), 2079–2095.

Hailikari, T., Nevgi, A., and Komulainen, E. (2008). “Academic Self-beliefs and Prior Knowledge as Predictors of Student Achievement in Mathematics: A Structural Model”. Educational Psychology, 28 (1), 59–71.

Hake, R. R. (1998).”Interactive-engagement Versus Traditional Methods: A six- Thousand-student Survey of Mechanics Test Data for Introductory Physicscourses. American Journal of Physics, 66 (1), 64 – 74.

Harskamp, E., and Ding, N. (2006). “Structured Collaboration versus Individual Learning in Solving Physics Problems”. International Journal of Science Education, 28(14), 1669-1688.

Herron, J. D., (1975). Piaget for Chemist; Explaining What Good Student Cannot Understand, Journal of Chemical Education, 52, 146 – 150.

Higgins, S., Hall, E., Baumfield, V., and Moseley, D. (2005). A meta-analysis of the impact of the implementation of thinking skills approaches on pupils. In Research evidence in education library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London. Hines, C. (1990). “Students‟ Understanding of Chemical Equations in Secondary

Schools in Botswana. School Science Review, 72(258), 138–140. House, J. D. (2001). Relationships between instructional activities and

mathematics achievement of adolescent students in Japan:

Findings from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). International Journal of Instructional Media, 28(1), 93–106.

Hoyles, C., Newman, K., and Noss, R. (2001). “Changing Patterns of Transition from School to University Mathematics, Inter”. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol, 32, 829–845.

Hung, W. and Jonassen, D. H. (2006). “Conceptual Understanding of Causal Reasoning in Physics”. International Journal of Science Education , 28(13), 1601–1621.

Hurley, M. M. (2001). “Reviewing Integrated Science and Mathematics: The Search For Evidence and Definitions From New Perspectives”. Journal of School Science and Mathematics, 101, 259-268.

(7)

SPA-Fahyuddin, 2014

Teamwork dari karya Matt Jarvis: Theoretical Approaches in Psychology. London: Routledge, 2000.

Johnstone, A. H. (1991). “Why is Science Difficult to Learn? Things are Seldom Like They Seem”. Journal of Computer Assisted Learnin, 7, 75– 83.

Jonassen, D. H. (2011). Learning to Solve Problems: A Handbook For Designing Problem-Solving Learning Environments. Routledge: Madison Avenu, New York, NY.

Jones, G., Taylor, A., and Broadwell, B. (2009). “Estimating Linear Size and Scale: Body Rulers”. Inter national Jour na l of Science Education, 31(11), 1495–1509.

Kalender, I. and Berberoglu, G. (2009). “An Assessment of Factors Related to Science Achievement of Turkish Students”. Inter na tiona l J our na l of Science Educa tion , 31(10) , 1379–1394.

Kelly, R.M., Barrera, J. H., and Mohamed, S.C. (2010). “An Analysis of Undergraduate General Chemistry Students‟ Misconceptions of The Submicroscopic Level of Precipitation Reactions”. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(1), 113-118.

Kim, M. and Song, J. (2009). “The Effects of Dichotomous Attitudes Toward Science on Interest and Conceptual Understanding in Physics”. International Journal of Science Education, 31(17), 2385–2406.

King, F. I., Goodson, L., and Rohani, F. (2011). Higher Order Thinking Skills. Virginia USA: ASCD Alexandria.

Koirala, H. P. and Bowman, J. K. (2003). “Preparing Middle Level Preservice Teachers to Integrate Mathematics and Science: Problems and

Possibilities. School Science and Mathematics, 145, 145–154.

Konold, C. and Higgins, T. (2003). Reasoning About Data. In Kilpatrick, J., Martin, W. G., and Schifter, D. (Eds.), A Research Companion to Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (193-215). Reston, VA: NCTM.

Lazear, D. (2004). Higher-Order Thinking: The Mutliple Intelligences Way. Chicago: Zephyr Press.

Lawson, A.E. (1985). “A review of Research on Formal Reasoning and Science Teaching”. Jour nal of Resea r ch in Science Tea ching, 22, 569-617.

Lawson, A. E. (1993). Classroom test of Scientific Reasoning: Revised Paper– Pencil Edition. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University.

(8)

Fahyuddin, 2014

Lemke, J.L. (1998). “Multiplying Meaning: Visual and Verbal Semiotics in Scientific Text”. InJ.R. Martin and R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science (pp. 87–113). London: Routledge.

Leopold, D. G. and Edgar, B. (2008). “Degree of Mathematics Fluency and Success in Second-Semester Introductory Chemistry”. Journal of Chemical Education, 85(5), 724-731.

Leung, F. K. (2002). Behind the high achievement of East Asian students. Educational Research and Evaluation, 8, 87–108.

Liliasari. (2005). Membangun Keterampilan Berpikir Manusia Indonesia melalui Pendidikan Sains. Pidato Pengukuhan Jabatan Guru Besar. Tidak dipublikasikan. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Lunsford, E., Melear, C. T., Roth, W-M., Perkins, M., and Hickok, L. G. (2007). “Proliferation of Inscriptions and Transformations Among Preservice Science Teachers Engaged in Authentic Science”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 538-564.

Maloney, D. P., O‟Kuma, T. L., Hieggelke, C. J., and van Heuvelen, A. (2001). “Surveying Students‟ Conceptual Knowledge of Electricity and Magnetism”. American Journal of Physics, Supplement, 69(7), S12.

Matthews, K. E., Adams, P., and Goos, M. (2009). “Putting it Into Perspective: Mathematics in The Undergraduate Science Curriculum”. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Techonology, 40(7), 891-902.

Meltzer, D. E. (2002). “The Relationship between Mathematics Preparation and Conceptual Learning Gains in Physics: A possible „„Hidden Variable‟‟ in Diagnostic Pretest Scores”. American Journal of Physics, 70, 1259–1268.

Morgen, G.A., Leech, N. L., Gloeckner, G. W., and Barrett, K. C. (2004). SPSS for Introductory Statistics: Use and interpretation. (Second Editian). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.

Morrison, Judith, and McDuffie, A. R. (2009). “Connecting Science and Mathematics: Using Inquiry Investigations to Learn about Data Collection, Analysis, and Display”. Journal of School Science and Mathematics, 109 (1).

Mortimer, R. G. (2005). Mathematics for Physical Chemistry. 3nd Edition, Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.

Munir, R. (2010). Matematika Diskrit. Edisi 3. Bandung: Informatika.

NCTM. (2000). Curriculum and evaluation standards for School Mathematics. Reston: Author.

(9)

Fahyuddin, 2014

Nicoll, G. and Francisco, J. S. (2001). “An Investigation of the Factors Influencing Student Performance in Physical Chemistry”. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(1), 99 – 102.

Niklasson, C., Christie, M., Larsson, S., O¨ hrstro¨ , L., and Bowden, J. (2003). “Integration of Mathematics/Numeric Analysis with Chemistry/Chemical Engineering”. http: //www.math.chalmers.se/_stig/papers

/JEE%20paper%20031101.pdf. (Diakses 21 Desember 2010).

Nitko, A. (1996). Educational Assessment of Students.2th Ed. Ohio: Merrill an imprint of Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs.

NRC. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NSTA(1996). NSTA Board Endorses New Position Statement on Interdisciplinary Learning. PreK-Grade 4. NSTA Reports!, 6, 8.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. 2th Ed. New Delhi: Tata McGrawHill Publishing Company Limited.

Oehrtman, M. and Lawson, A.E. (2008). “Connecting Science and Mathematics: The Nature of Proof and Disproof In Science and Mathematics”. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 377- 403.

Offer, Joey, and Mireles, S.V. (2009). “Mix It Up: Teachers' Beliefs on Mixing Mathematics and Science”. Journal of School Science and Mathematics, 109, (3).

Ostermeier, C., Prenzel, M., and Duit, R. (2010). “Improving Science and

Mathematics Instruction: The SINUS Project as an Example for Reform as Teacher Professional Development”. Inter nationa l Journa l of Science Education, 32(3), 303–327.

Othman, J., Treagust, D.F. and Chandrasegaran, A.L. (2008). “An Investigation Into The Relationship Between Students‟ Conceptions of The Particulate Nature of Matter and Their Understanding of Chemical Bonding”. International Journal of Science Education, 30 (11), 1531–1550.

Oxtoby, D.W., Gillis, H.,P., and Nachtrieb, N.H. (2003). Prinsip-Prinsip Kimia Modern. Jilid 2. Alih bahasa, Achmadi, S.S. Ed. Keempat. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Pang, J. S. and Good, R. (2000). “A review of the Integration of Mathematics and Science: Implications for Futher Research”. School Science and

Mathematics, 100, 73-82.

Poedjiadi, A. (1999). Pengantar Filsafat Bagi Pendidik. Bandung: Cipta Cendrawasih.

(10)

Fahyuddin, 2014

Potgieter, M., Harding, A., and Engelbrecht, J. (2008). “Transfer of Algebraic and Graphical Thinking between Mathematics and Chemistry”. Journal of Research In Science Teaching, 45(2), 197–218.

Prancis, P. G. (1984). Mathematics for Chemists, 1st Editioan, New York: Chapman and Hall Ltd.

Purcell, E.J., Varberg, D., and Rigdon, S. E. (2004). Kalkulus Jilid I. Ed. Kedelapan ). Alih Bahasa, Gresando, J. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Rutherford, J. and Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.

Repko, A. F. (2008). Interdisciplinary Research: Process and Theory. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, Inc.

Resnick, L. B. and L. Klopfer. 1989. Toward the Thinking Curriculum: Current Cognitive Research. Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Rylands, L. J. and Coady, C. (2009). “Performance of Students with Weak Mathematics in First-year Mathematics and Science”. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40 (6), 741–753.

Sabandar, J (2006). “Pertanyaan Tantangan dalam Memunculkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif dalam Pembelajaran Matematika”. Artikel Ilmiah.” Journal Pendidikan, 2(25).

Sadiman, A.S. (2004). Pendayagunaan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi untuk Pembelajaran. Makalah.

Schmidt, P.A., and Rich, B.,(2002). Aljabar Elementer. Ed. Ketiga. Alih Bahasa, Gresando, J. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Schulman, L.S. (2002). Foreword. In M. Taylor Huber and S.P. Morreale (Eds.), Disciplinary Styles in The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Exploring Common Ground. Menlo Park, CA: American Association for Higher Education.

Scusa, T. and Yuma, C. O. (2008). Five Processes Of Mathematical Thinking: Math in the Middle Institute Partnership. University Of Nebraska – Lincoln: Summative Projects For Ma Degree.

Seery, M.K. (2009). “The Role of Prior Knowledge and Students Aptitude in Undergraduate Performance in Chemistry: A Correlation-Prediction Study”. Chemsitry Education Research and Practice, 10, 227-232 Setiono, K. (2000). Psikologi Perkembangan: Kajian Teori Piaget, Selman,

Kohlberg dan Aplikasi Riset. Edisi kedua, Bandung: Widya Padjadjaran.

(11)

Fahyuddin, 2014

Sherrill, J. M. (1983). “Solving Textbook Mathematical Word Problems”. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 29(2), 140–152.

Sherrod, S.E., Dwyer, J., and Narayan, R. (2009). “Developing Science and Math Integrated Activities for Middle School Students”. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Techonology, 40 (2), 247-257.

Silberberg, M. S. (2006). Chemistry: The Molecular Nature of Matter and Change (4th e d.).New York: McGraw-Hill.

Skoog, D.A., Holler, F.J., and Nieman, T.A. (1998). Principles of Instrumental analysis. (5th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Saunders College Publishing.

Sözbilir, M. (2004). “What Makes Physical Chemistry Difficult?” Journal of Chemical Education, 81(4), 573-578.

Stewar, J. (2002). Calculus. (Fourth Edition). Alih Bahasa Susila, I Nyoman and Gunawan, H (Kalkulus Jilid 1). Jakarata: Erlangga.

Stinson, K., Harkness, S. S., Meyer, H., and Stallworth, J. (2009). “Mathematics and Science Integration: Models and Characterization”. Journal of School Science and Mathematics, 109, (3).

Sumarno, U. (1987). Kemampuan Pemahaman dan Penalaran Matematika Siswa SMA Dikaitkan dengan Kemampuan Penalaran Logik Siswa dan Beberapa Unsur Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Disertasi SPS UPI.

Taber, K. S. and Bricheno, P. (2009). “Coordinating Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge to Make Sense of Word Equations: Understanding the complexity of a „simple‟ completion task at the learner‟s resolution”. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 2021–2055

Tai, R. H., Sadler, P. M., and Loehr, J. F. (2005). “Factors Influencing Success in Introductory College Chemistry”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 987-1012.

Tai, R. H., Ward, R. B., and Sadler, P. M. (2006). “High School Chemistry Content Background of Introductory College Chemistry Students and Its Association with College Chemistry Grades”. Journal of Chemical Education, 83, 1703-1711.

Taylor, A. and Jones, G. (2009). “Proportional Reasoning Ability and Concepts of Scale: Surface Area to Volume Relationships in Science”. International Journal of Science Education, 31(9), 1231–1247.

Tan et al. (2008). “Students‟ Conceptions of Ionisation Energy: A Cross-cultural Study. International Journal of Science Education, 30 (2), 263 – 283.

Testa, I., Monroy, G., and Sassi, E. (2002). “Students‟ Reading Images in Kinematics: The Case of Real-time Graphs”. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 235–256.

(12)

Fahyuddin, 2014

Treagust, D. F. (1988). “The Development and Use of Diagnostic Instruments to Evaluate Students‟ Misconceptions in Science”. International Journal of Science Education,10, 159–169.

Tsaparlis, G. and Papaphotis, G. (2009). “High-school Students‟ Conceptual Difficulties and Attempts at Conceptual Change: The Case of Basic Quantum Chemical Concepts”. International Journal of Science Education, 31(7), 895–930.

Tsitsipis, G., Stamovlasis, D., and Papageorgiou, G. (2010). “ The Effect of Three Cognitive Variables on Students‟ Understanding of the Particulate Nature of Matter and its Changes of State”.Inter na tiona l Jour na l of Science Educa tion, 32(8), 987–1016.

Turrell, G. (2002). Mathematics for Chemistry and Physics. New York: Academic Press.

Valanides, N. (1998). “Formal Operational Performance And Achievement of Lower Secondary School Students”. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 24 (1), 1 - 23.

Valanides, N. (1997). “Formal Reasoning Abilities and School Achievement”. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(2), 169-185.

Van de Walle, J.A. (2007). Elementary and middle school mathematics. Teaching Developmentally (6th ed) Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Walsh, L. N., Howard, R. G., and Bowe, B. (2007). Phenomenographic Study of Students‟ Problem Solving Approaches in Physics. Phy. Rev. Spec. Topic-Peb, 3, 020108.

Webb, N. L. and Coxford, A. F. (Eds, 1993). Assesment in Mathematics Classroom. Virginia: NCTM.

White, J. D. and Carpenter, J. P. (2008). “Integrating Mathematics into the Introductory Biology Laboratory Course”. Primus : Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 18(1).

Wilhelm, J. A. and Confrey, J. (2003). “Projecting Rate of Change in the Context of Motion onto the Context of Money, Int”. Journal Mathematics

Education Science Technology, 34(6), 887–904.

Witten, G. Q. (2005). “Designing A Mathematics Course for Chemistry and

Geology Students”. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 58, 1–19.

Wood, P. K. (1983). Inquiring Systems and Problem Structure: Implications for Cognitive Development. Human Development, 26(5), 249–265.

Wright, M., and Chorin, A. (2000). Mathematics and Science. National Science Foundation Report. from http://nsf.gov/pubs/2011/mps0001/mps001. (Diakses 23 Januari 2011).

Wu, Y.T. and Tsai, C. C. (2007). “High School Students‟ Informal Reasoning on a Socio-scientific Issue: Qualitative and Quantitative Analyses”.

(13)

Fahyuddin, 2014

Wu, H.-K., Krajcik, J. S., and Soloway, E. (2001). “Promoting Understanding of Chemical Representations: Students‟ Use of a Visualization Tool in the Classroom”. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 821–842.

Zakaria, E. and Nordin N. M. (2008). “The Effects of Mathematics Anxiety on Matriculation Students as Related to Motivation and Achievement”. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 4(1), 27-30