DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, et al. Global causes of maternal death: A WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Heal. 2014;2(6):323-333. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X.
2. RI KK. Infodatin. 2014:1-8.
3. Dinas kesehatan kota semarang. Profil Kesehatan Kota Semarang 2014. 2014.
4. Schlembach D. Pre-eclampsia--still a disease of theories. Fukushima J Med Sci. 2003;49:69-115. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
5. Dekker G a, Sibai BM. Etiology and pathogenesis of preeclampsia: current concepts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179(5):1359-1375.
doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70346-7.
6. Prawirohardjo S. Ilmu Kebidanan. 4th ed. Jakarta: PT. Bina Pustaka Sarwono Prawirohardjo; 2014.
7. Uzan J, Carbonnel M, Piconne O, Asmar R, Ayoubi JM. Pre-eclampsia: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2011;7(1):467-474. doi:10.2147/VHRM.S2018.
8. Barnwal M, Sk R, Chhabra S, Nanda S. Histomorphometry of Umbilical Cord and its Vessels in Pre- Eclampsia as Compared to Normal
Pregnancies. NJOG. 2012;7(1):28-31.
9. Patil NS. Umbilical Cord Coiling Index and Perinatal Outcome. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2013;7(January 2008):1675-1677.
doi:10.7860/JCDR/2013/5135.3224.
10. Chitra T, Sushanth YS, Raghavan S. Umbilical coiling index as a marker of perinatal outcome: an analytical study. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2012;2012:1-6. doi:10.1155/2012/213689.
11. Ezimokhai M, Rizk DE, Thomas L. Maternal risk factors for abnormal vascular coiling of the umbilical cord. Am J Perinatol. 2000;17(8):441-445. doi:10.1055/s-2000-13452 [doi].
12. Image I. Pre-eclampsia and Complexities of Measuring Uteroplacental Blood Flow Pre-eclampsia. obgyn.net. 2011;(10):1-8.
13. de Laat MWM, Franx A, van Alderen ED, Nikkels PGJ, Visser GH a. The umbilical coiling index, a review of the literature. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2005;17(2):93-100. doi:10.1080/14767050400028899.
14. Gupta S, Faridi MMA, Krishnan J. Umbilical coiling index. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2006;56(4):315-319.
15. Tohma YA, Altay MM, Turgut D, et al. Second Trimester Umbilical Cord Coiling Index and Perinatal Outcomes. Gynecol Obstet Reprod Med. 2014;20(3):135-142.
16. Olaya M, Bernal JE. Umbilical cord abnormalities in fetal and neonatal pathology in Bogota. Arch Perinat Med. 2014;20(1):22-27.
17. Feyi-Waboso PA, Omo-Aghoja LO. Umbilical Cord Coiling Index in Women of South-Eastern Nigeria. J Women’s Heal Issues Care Res. 2014;3(4):1-7.
18. Cunningham, Leveno, Bloom Hauth, Rouse S. Obstetric Williams.; 2010. 19. Vanderlelie J. Placental Oxidative Stress in Preeclampsia. 2005.
20. Powe CE, Levine RJ, Karumanchi SA. Preeclampsia, a Disease of the Maternal Endothelium: The Role of Antiangiogenic Factors and Implications for Later Cardiovascular Disease. Circulation.
2011;123(24):2856-2869. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.853127. 21. Di Naro E, Ghezzi F, Raio L, Franchi M, D’Addario V. Umbilical cord
morphology and pregnancy outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001;96:150-157. doi:10.1016/S0301-2115(00)00470-X.
22. Permata MA. Perbedaan Luas Area Wharton’s Jelly Pada Preeklampsia Berat dan Kehamilan Normotensi. 2015.
23. Romanowicz L, Bańkowski E. Lipid compounds of human Wharton’s jelly and their alterations in preeclampsia. Int J Exp Pathol. 2010;91:1-9.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2613.2009.00675.x.
24. Samuel Bimpong. Qualitative Evaluation of Umbilical Cord and Placental Indices and Pregnancy Outcome. 2012:1-109.
25. Mulyani AR. Perbedaan Lumen Arteri Umbilikalis Pada Preeklampsia Berat dan Kehamilan Normotensi. 2015.
26. Hilaliyah. Perbedaan Ketebalan Dinding Vena Umbilikalis Pada Preeklampsia Berat dan Kehamilan Normotensi. 2015.
27. Rana J, Ebert G a., Kappy K a. Adverse perinatal outcome in patients with an abnormal umbilical coiling index. Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85(4):573-577. doi:10.1016/0029-7844(94)00435-G.
28. Kuswani L. Perbandingan Indeks Koil Tali Pusat Terhadap Luaran Berat Badan Bayi Lahir. 2011.
29. Moshiri M, Zaidi SF, Robinson TJ, et al. Comprehensive Imaging Review of Abnormalities of the Umbilical Cord. Radiographics. 2014;34(1):179-196. doi:10.1148/rg.341125127.
30. Ichizuka K, Hasegawa J, Matsuoka R, Okai T. Ultrasonic studies on amniotic fluid umbilical cord and placenta. Donald Sch J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;5:65-72.
31. Lamminpää R, Vehviläinen-Julkunen K, Gissler M, Heinonen S. Preeclampsia complicated by advanced maternal age: a registry-based study on primiparous women in Finland 1997-2008. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:47. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-12-47.
32. Khalil A, Syngelaki A, Maiz N, Zinevich Y, Nicolaides KH.
Maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42(6):634-643. doi:10.1002/uog.12494.
33. Roberts JM, Bodnar LM, Patrick TE, Powers RW. The role of obesity in diabetes. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2011;1(1):6-16.
LAMPIRAN Lampiran 1. Ethical clearance
Lampiran 2. Izin penelitian
Lampiran 4. Spreadsheet data
NO NAMA USIA PARITAS DIAGNOSIS
USIA KEHAMILAN
INDEKS KOIL TALI PUSAT
1 PEB1 37 P2A1 PEB 36 0.84
2 PEB2 27 P2A0 PEB 36 0.37
3 PEB3 31 P4A0 PEB 37 0.25
4 PEB4 38 P3A0 PEB 37 0.21
5 PEB5 34 P2A0 PEB 37 0.27
6 PEB6 37 P3A0 PEB 33 0.23
7 PEB7 39 P4A0 PEB 29 0.79
8 PEB8 25 P1A0 PEB 27 0.35
9 PEB9 21 P1A0 PEB 40 0.63
10 PEB10 45 P1A1 PEB 39 0.24
11 PEB11 43 P3A2 PEB 33 0.26
12 PEB12 28 P2A0 PEB 37 0.23
13 PEB13 40 P3A0 PEB 39 0.24
14 PEB14 30 P2A0 PEB 33 0.29
15 N1 33 P2A0 normotensi 40 0.42 16 N2 26 P2A0 normotensi 39 0.41 17 N3 21 P1A0 normotensi 40 0.4 18 N4 29 P2A0 normotensi 39 0.39 19 N5 32 P2A0 normotensi 38 0.41 20 N6 25 P1A0 normotensi 40 0.42 21 N7 27 P2A0 normotensi 40 0.38 22 N8 23 P1A0 normotensi 40 0.38 23 N9 29 P1A0 normotensi 37 0.46 24 N10 27 P1A0 normotensi 38 0.38 25 N11 28 P2A0 normotensi 39 0.42 26 N12 36 P1A0 normotensi 38 0.48 27 N13 34 P2A0 normotensi 39 0.38 28 N14 25 P1A0 normotensi 37 0.44 29 N15 31 P2A0 normotensi 39 0.3 30 N16 29 P1A0 normotensi 39 0.33
Lampiran 5. Dokumentasi penelitian
Pengukuran indeks koil tali pusat pada preeklampsia berat
Lampiran 6. Hasil analisis statistik Analisis deskriptif umur pasien
Descriptives
diagnosis Statistic Std. Error
umur.pasien
PEB
Mean 33,93 1,900
95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 29,82 Upper Bound 38,03 5% Trimmed Mean 34,03 Median 35,50 Variance 50,533 Std. Deviation 7,109 Minimum 21 Maximum 45 Range 24 Interquartile Range 12 Skewness -,229 ,597 Kurtosis -,850 1,154 normotensi Mean 27,94 ,998
95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 25,81 Upper Bound 30,06 5% Trimmed Mean 27,88 Median 27,00 Variance 15,929 Std. Deviation 3,991 Minimum 21 Maximum 36 Range 15 Interquartile Range 5 Skewness ,462 ,564 Kurtosis -,012 1,091
Uji normalitas pada umur pasien
Tests of Normality
diagnosis Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
umur.pasien
PEB ,167 14 ,200* ,971 14 ,889
normotensi ,155 16 ,200* ,964 16 ,739 *. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Uji T tidak berpasangan pada umur pasien I n d e p e n d e n t S a m p l e s T e s t
t-test for Equality of Means
t df Sig. (2-tailed) umur.pasien Equal variances assumed 2.894 28 .007 Equal variances not assumed 2.792 19.851 .011
Analisis deskriptif umur kehamilan
Descriptives
diagnosis Statistic Std. Error
umur.kehamilan PEB
Mean 35,21 1,012
95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 33,03 Upper Bound 37,40 5% Trimmed Mean 35,40 Median 36,50 Variance 14,335 Std. Deviation 3,786 Minimum 27 Maximum 40 Range 13 Interquartile Range 5 Skewness -,967 ,597 Kurtosis ,383 1,154
normotensi
Mean 38,88 ,256
95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound 38,33 Upper Bound 39,42 5% Trimmed Mean 38,92 Median 39,00 Variance 1,050 Std. Deviation 1,025 Minimum 37 Maximum 40 Range 3 Interquartile Range 2 Skewness -,571 ,564 Kurtosis -,592 1,091
Uji normalitas pada umur kehamilan
Tests of Normality
diagnosis Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
umur.kehamilan
PEB ,225 14 ,053 ,898 14 ,104
normotensi ,236 16 ,017 ,862 16 ,021 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Uji chi–square pada paritas
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 2,625a 1 ,105 Continuity Correctionb 1,539 1 ,215 Likelihood Ratio 2,701 1 ,100
Fisher's Exact Test ,142 ,107
Linear-by-Linear Association
2,537 1 ,111
N of Valid Cases 30
a. 0 cells (0,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5,13. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Analisis deskriptif indeks koil tali pusat
Descriptives
diagnosis Statistic Std. Error
indeks PEB
Mean ,3709 ,05783
95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound ,2460 Upper Bound ,4959 5% Trimmed Mean ,3541 Median ,2636 Variance ,047 Std. Deviation ,21637 Minimum ,21 Maximum ,84 Range ,63 Interquartile Range ,19 Skewness 1,549 ,597 Kurtosis ,982 1,154 normotensi Mean ,4034 ,01029
95% Confidence Interval for Mean Lower Bound ,3815 Upper Bound ,4254 5% Trimmed Mean ,4049 Median ,4050 Variance ,002
Std. Deviation ,04118 Minimum ,30 Maximum ,48 Range ,18 Interquartile Range ,04 Skewness -,531 ,564 Kurtosis 1,941 1,091
Uji normalitas pada indeks koil tali pusat
Tests of Normality
diagnosis Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
indeks
PEB ,296 14 ,002 ,710 14 ,000
normotensi ,182 16 ,160 ,928 16 ,228 a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
Lampiran 7. Biodata mahasiswa
Identitas
Nama : Prika Maulina Agaristi NIM : 22010112130211
Tempat/tanggal lahir : Jakarta, 9 Agustus 1995 Jenis kelamin : Perempuan
Alamat : Jl. Redaksi J-146 Jakarta Timur Nomor HP : 085697186767
e-mail : [email protected]
Riwayat Pendidikan Formal
1. SD : SD Putra I Lulus tahun: 2007
2. SMP : SMPN 115 Jakarta Lulus tahun: 2009 3. SMA : SMAN M.H. Thamrin Jakarta Lulus tahun: 2012 4. FK Undip : masuk tahun 2012
Keanggotaan Organisasi
1. Staf Pengabdian Masyarakat HIMA KU Tahun : 2012-2014 2. Staf Kelompok Studi Kedokteran Islam ROHIS KU Tahun : 2013-2015 3. Ketua departemen Islamic Medical Science Avicenna Tahun : 2015-2016
4. Staf ZIS Center Undip Tahun : 2016-2017
Pengalaman penelitian
