• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

LAPORAN HASIL PENELITIAN DISERTASI DOKTOR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2010

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Membagikan "LAPORAN HASIL PENELITIAN DISERTASI DOKTOR TAHUN ANGGARAN 2010"

Copied!
10
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

LAPORAN HASIL

PENELITIAN DISERTASI DOKTOR

TAHUN ANGGARAN 2010

Judul : Analisis Pengaruh Kebebasan Ekonomi dan Variabel-variabel Ekonomi Moneter terhadap Harga Saham Di Lima Negara ASEAN

Peneliti : Dwi Wulandari S.E., M.M

Dibiayai Oleh Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi, Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional sesuai dengan Surat Perjanjian Penugasan Dalam Rangka Pelaksanaan

Penugasan Penelitian Disertasi Doktor Tahun Anggaran 2010 Nomor : 492/SP2H/PP/DP2M/VI/2010, tanggal 11 Juni 2010.

Universitas Brawijaya

Malang

2010

(2)
(3)

Ringkasan: Analisis Pengaruh Kebebasan Ekonomi Dan Variabel- Variabel Ekonomi Moneter Terhadap Harga Saham Di Lima

Negara Asean

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimanakah pengaruh kebebasan ekonomi dan variabel-variabel ekonomi moneter terhadap harga saham di lima negara ASEAN yaitu Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Filipina dan Singapura. Karakteristik negara-negara ASEAN yang sangat berbeda dengan negara-negara maju, membuat pasar sahamnya juga mempunyai karakteristik yang juga sangat berbeda. Kebebasan ekonomi di negara-negara ini sangat bervariasi dimana Singapura termasuk dalam kategori “free”, Malaysia dan Thailand termasuk “moderately free” dan Indonesia dan Filipina termasuk “almost unfree”. Kebebasan ekonomi akan menentukan jumlah capital inflow dan outflow yang masuk ke suatu negara. Dari hasil analisis data ditemukan bahwa kelima negara ini memiliki perbedaan-perbedaan dalam variabel-variabel yang mempengaruhi harga sahamnya. Di Indonesia, harga sahamnya lebih dipengaruhi oleh harga saham masa lalu. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa investor di Indonesia cenderung melakukan analisis teknikal dalam melihat harga saham serta cenderung berorientasi pada keuntungan jangka pendek. Di Malaysia, harga sahamnya sangat dipengaruhi oleh nilai tukar. Hal ini menunjukkan kuatnya campur tangan investor asing dalam mempengaruhi pergerakan pasar modal di Malaysia. Sedangkan di Thailand, harga saham lebih dipengaruhi oleh suku bunga. Ini menunjukkan kuatnya campur tangan pemerintah di pasar modal Thailand karena suku bunga merupakan salah satu instrumen dalam kebijakan moneter.

Di Filipina, harga saham dipengaruhi oleh suku bunga dan harga saham sebelumnya. Ini menunjukkan pengaruh pemerintah yang kuat di pasar modal dan investor yang melakukan investasi jangka pendek di pasar modal Filipina. Di Singapura, harga sahamnya dipengaruhi oleh inflasi. Ini menunjukkan bahwa investor Singapura sangat memperhatikan stabilitas makroekonomi Singapura sebelum melakukan investasi di pasar modal Singapura. Di Singapura, harga sahamnya juga dipengaruhi oleh harga saham periode sebelumnya, ini menunjukkan bahwa investor melakukan analisis teknikal terhadap pasar modal di Singapura. Dikaitkan dengan kebebasan ekonomi, dalam penelitian ini . Singapura yang kebebasan ekonominya paling tinggi, justru pasar modalnya tidak banyak dipengaruhi oleh persepsi investor asing. Malaysia yang kebebasan ekonominya sedang justru lebih banyak dipengaruhi oleh persepsi investor asing. Sedangkan untuk Thailand yang mempunyai kebebasan ekonomi moderat dan Filipina yang mempunyai kebebasan ekonomi rendah, pasar modalnya masih banyak dipengaruhi oleh kebijakan pemerintah. Indonesia menunjukkan bahwa variabel moneter maupun kebebasan ekonomi tidak berpengaruh pada pasar modalnya.

Kata Kunci: Harga Saham, inflasi, suku bunga, nilai tukar, jumlah uang beredar,

(4)

Summary: Analysis Of The Impact Of Economic Freedom And Monetary Variables To Stock Prices In Five ASEAN Countries

The purpose of this research is to understand the impact of economic freedom and monetary variables in five ASEAN countries namely Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Philipinnes and Singapore. Different characteristics between ASEAN countries and developed countries have made different characterisctics of their stock markets. Economic freedom of these countries are varied. Singapore can be categorized as “free”, while Malaysia and Thailand are “moderately free” and Indonesia and Philipinne are “mostly unfree”. Economic freedom will determine capital inflow and capital outflow Data analysis shows that each country has a different variable affecting the stock price. In Indonesia, stock prices are affected by stock prices in the past. It shows that investors in Indonesia like to conduct technical analysis and look for short term gain. In Malaysia, stock prices are affected by exchange rate. It shows that foreign investors play a big role there. While in Thailand, stock prices are affected by interest rate. This indicates a big role of government in their stock market since interest rate is one of the instrument of monetary policy. In Philipinnes, stock prices are affected by interest rate and stock prices in the past. This indicates the role of government and investors who are also looking for short term gain. In Singapore, stock prices are affected by the inflation rate. This shows that investors care about Singapore’s macroeconomic condition before they invest in Singapore stock market. In Singapore, stock prices are also affected by stock prices in the past, shows that investors are likely to conduct technical analysis. Related to economic freedom, Singapore which has the highest economic freedom, the stock prices are not affected by the perception of foreign investors. Malaysia which is moderatly free are likely affected by the perception of foreign investors. Thailand and Philipinnes are still affected by their government policies and Indonesia are not affected by monetary variables and economic freedom

Key words: economic freedom, stock price, inflation, money supply, interest rate,

(5)

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Adam, Anokye M. Tweneboah, George. 2008. Macroeconomic Factors and Stock Market Movement: Evidence From Ghana. Munich Personal Repec Archive Adjasi, Charles, K.D. 2009. Macroeconomic Uncertainty and Conditional Stock Price

Volatility in Frontier African Markets. The Journal of Risk Finance vol 10 no 4 Adrangi, Bahran et al. 2000. Inflation, Output and Stock Prices: Evidence from Brazil.

The Journal of Applied Business Research

Agrawalla, Rahman K. 2005. Share Prices and Macroeconomic variables in India Asprem, Mads. 1989. Stock Prices, Asset Portfolios and Macroeconomic Variables in

Ten European Countries. Journal of Banking and Finance vol 13

Atmadja, Adwin. 2004. The Granger causality Tests for The Five ASEAN Countries Stock Markets and Macroeconomic Variables During and Post the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis. Jurnal Universitas Petra

Aydemir, Oguzhan et al. 2009. The Relationship between Stock Prices and Exchange Rates Evidence from Turkey. International Research Journal of Finance and

Economics

Balduzzi, Pierluigi. 1995. The Stock Returns, Inflation and the proxy hypothesis: a new look at the data. Economic Letters vol 48

Banalan et al. 2001. Central Bank Independence, Economic Freedom and Inflation Rates. Economic Inquiry vol 39

Beck et al. 2003.Law, Endowments and Finance.Jornal of Financial Economics Bekaert et al. 1998. Distributional Characteristics of Emerging Market Returns and Asset Allocation. Journal of Portfolio Management

Bernanke, B.S.2003. Monetary Policy and The Stock market: some empirical results.

Banking and Finance Lecture

Bernanke, B.S, Kuttner, K.N. 2003. What Explains the Stock Market’s Relation to Federal Reserve Policy?. Journal of Finance

Bordo, Michael et al . 2008. Inflation, Monetary Policy and Stock Market Conditions.

NBER Working Paper Series

Bradley, et al. 2003. The Effects of macroeconomic Shocks on Sector Spesific Returns. Applied Economics vol 35

Bulmash, S.B., Trivoli, G.W., 1991. Time Lagged Interactions between Stock Prices and Selected Economic variables. Journal of Portfolio Management

Chakravarty, Sangeeta. 2005. Stock Market and Macroeconomic Behavior in India Chatrath, Arjun. 1996. Stock Prices, Inflation and Output: Evidence from India. Journal

(6)

Chaudhuri, Kausik et al. 2004. Stock Market and Aggregate Economic Activity: Evidence From Australia. Applied Financial Economics vol 14

Chen, C.R., Huang, Y.S. 2009. Economic Freedom, Equity Performance and Market Volatility. International Journal of Accounting and Information Managemnt vol

17 no 2

Chen, Naifu et al. 1986. Economic Forces and the Stock Market. The Journal of

Business vol 59

Chiang, Leong et al. 2009. Macroeconomic and Non Macroeconomic Variables Link to Singapore Hotel Stock Returns. Oxford Business and Economics Conference

Program

Crowder, W.J. 2006. The Interaction of Monetary Policy and Stock Returns. The

Journal of Financial Research vol 29 no 4

DeFina, R. H. 1991. Does Inflation Depress the Stock Market. Federal Reserve Bank

of Philadelphia Business Review

DeStefano, M.R. 2000. Macroeconomic Determinants of US Stock Prices: Are the Business Cycle and the Level of Economic Activity Moderating factors.

Demirguc et al.1998. Law, Finance and Firm Growth. Journal of Finance vol 53

Dhakal et al. 1993. Causality between the Money Supply and Share Prices: a VAR Investigation. Quarterly Journal of Business and Economics vol 32 no 3

Erbaykal, Erman. et al. 2006. Real Macroeconomic Variables and Stock Prices: Test of Proxy Hypothesis in Turkey

Fama, E.F. 1981. Stock Returns, Real Activity, Inflation and Money. American

Economic Review 71

Fama, E.F., Scwert, G.W. 1977. Asset Returns and Inflation. Journal of Financial

Economics vol 5

Gan, Christoper et al. 2006. Macroeconomics Variables and Stock market Interactions: New Zealand Evidence. Investment management and Financial

Innovations vol 3

Gay, Robert. D. et al. 2008. Effect of Macroeconomic Variables On Stock Market Returns for Four Emerging Economies: Brazil, Russia, India and China.

International Business and Economics Research Journal

Geske, R., Roll, R. 1983. The Fiscal and Monetary Linkage Between Stock Returns and Inflation. Journal of Finance vol 38

Geyser, JM et al. 2001. The impact of inflation and stock prices in two SADC countries. Meditary Accountancy Research vol 9

Graham, F.C. 1996. Inflation, Real Stock Returns and Monetary Policy. Applied

Financia l Economics vol 6

Gregoriou et al. 2009. Monetary Policy Shocks and Stock Returns: Evidence from the British Market. Financial Market Portfolio Management 23

(7)

Gujarati, D. 1995. Basic Econometrics. 3rd edition. Singapore:McGraw-Hill Book Co. Gunasekarege, Abeyratna et al. 2004. Macroeconomic Influence on the Stock Market

: Evidence from an Emerging Market in South Asia. Journal of Emerging

Market Finance

Hardouvelis, G.A. 1987. Macroeconomic Information and Stock Prices. 1987. Journal

of Economic and Business vol 39

Harjito, Agus et al. 2004. Stock Price and Exchange rate causality: The Case of Four ASEAN Countries. Southwestern Economic Review

Haruman, Tendi et al. 2005. Pengaruh faktor Fundamental dan Resiko Sistematis terhadap Tingkat Pengembalian Saham BEJ. Usahawan no 11

Haryanto, dkk. 2007. Pengaruh Suku Bunga SBI dan Nilai Kurs terhadap Resiko Sistematik Saham Perusahaan di BEJ. Jurnal Keuangan dan Bisnis

Hildebrand, P.M. 2006. Monetary Policy and Financial Markets. Schweizerische

Gesellschaft fur Finanzmarklforschung

Hinda, Yuso, Kuroki, Yoshihiro. 2006. Financial and capital Market’s Responses to Changes in the Central Bank’s Target Interest rate: The Case of Japan. The

Economic Journal vol 116

Horobet, Alexandra et al. 2008. On the causal relationships between monetary, financial and real macroeconomic variables: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe.

Humpe, Andreas et al. 2007. Can macroeconomic variables explain long term stock market movements? A comparison of the US and Japan. Centre for Dynamic

Macroeconomic Analysis Working paper Series

Husnan, S. 1994. Dasar-dasar Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Sekuritas edisi ke-2. UPP AMP YKPN. Yogyakarta

Husnan, S. 1998. Perangkat dan Teknik Analisis Investasi di Pasar Modal Indonesia. penyunting F. Harianto, dan S. Sudomo, PT Bursa Efek Jakarta.

Ibrahim, Mansor et al. 2001. Macroeconomic Variables, Exchange Rate and Stock Price: A Malaysian Perspective. IIUM Journal of Economics and management 9

no 2

Ibrahim, Mansor. 2003. Macroeconomic Forces and Capital Market Integration.

Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy vol 8 no 1

Ibrahim, M.H., Aziz, H. 2003. Macroeconomic Variables and the Malaysian Equity Markets. Journal of Economic Studies vol 30 no 1

Islam et al. 2004. A Time Series Analysis and Modelling of The Thai Stock Market.

International Business Management Conference

Jones, C.M. Kaul. G. 1996. Oil and The Stock Markets. Journal of Finance Jones, Charles P. 2002. Investments, Analysis and Management. John Wiley and Sons Inc. New York

(8)

Kandir, Serkan Y. 2008. Macroeconomic variables, Firm Characteristics and Stock Returns: Evidence from Turkey. International Research Journal of Finance and

Economics

Kaneko, T. Lee, B.S. 1995. Relative Importance of Economic Factors in the US and Japanese Stock Markets. Journal of The Japanese and International

Economies

Karen, M.W., 1971, “Expectations, Money and the Stock Market,” Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, January, p. 27, dikutip oleh Jones, C.P.,

Investments 6th edition, New York: John & Wiley & Sons

Kim, M, Wu, C. 1987. Macroeconomic Factors and Stock Returns. The Journal of

Financial Research vol 10 no 2

Kurihara, Y, Nezu, E. Recent Stock Price Relationships between Japanese and US Stock market. 2006. Studies in Economics and Finance vol 23 no 3

Kwon, C, Shin, T. 1999. Cointegration and Causality between Macroeconomic variables and Stock market Returns. Global Finance Journal vol 10 no 1

La Porta et al. 1998. Law and Finance. Journal of Political Economy vol 106 Laopodis, Nikiforus. 2006. Dynamic Interactions among the Stock Market, Federal Funds Rate, Inflation and Economic Activity. The Financial Review 41

Lambrick, Sydney J. 2006. Economic Variables and the Stock Market. Working Paper

Series School of Applied Economics.

Lee, B.S. 1992. Causal Relations among Stock Returns, Interest Rate, Real Activity and Inflation, Journal of Finance

Lee, C, Ng, D. 2005. Corruption and Internal Valuation: Does Virtue Pay. Cornell

University Working Paper

Liow, Kim Hiang et al. 2006. Macroeconomic Risk Influences on the Property Stock Market. Journal of Property, Investment and Finance vol 24 no 4.

Liow, K.H., Huang, Q. 2006. Interest Rate Risk and Time Varying Excess Returns for Asian Property Stocks. Journal of Property, Investment and Finance vol 24 no

3

Majid, MSA, Yusuf, RM. 2009. Long Run Relationship between Islamic Stock Returns and Macroeconomic Variables. Humanomics vol 25 no 2

Mandelker, Gershon et al. 1985. Common Stock Returns, real activity, money and inflation: some international evidence. Journal of International Money and

Finance vol 4

Martinez, M.A. Rubio, G. 1989. Arbitrage Pricing with Macroeconomic Variables: An Empirical Investigation using Spanish Data, Working Paper

Maysami, Ramin C, et al. 2004. Relationship between macroeconomic variables and stock market indices: Cointegration Evidence from Stock Exchange of Singapore’s All-S Sector Indices. Jurnal Pengurusan

(9)

Maysami, R.C., Koh, T.S. 1998. A Vector Error Correction Model of the Singapore Stock Market. International Review of Economics and Finance vol 9

Merikas, Andreas et al. 2006. Stock Price response to real economic variables: the case of Germany. Journal of Managerial Finance vol 32

Mishkin, F.S. 1982. Does anticipated monetary policy matter? An econometric investigation. Journal of Political Economy vol 90

Muradoglu et al. 1998. Are there trends toward efficiency for emerging markets?Cointegration between stock prices and monetary variables at Istanbul Stock Exchange. Applied Financial Economics

Muradoglu et al. 2000. Causality between Stock Returns and Macroeconomic Variables in Emerging Markets. Russian and East European Finance and

Trade vol 36 no 6.

Muradoglu et al. 2001. Is there a long run relationship between stock returns and monetary variables: evidence from an emerging market. Applied Financial

Economics vol 11

Najand, Mohammad et al. 2002. Causal Relations among stock returns, inflation, real activity and interest rates: Evidence from Japan

Ng, David. 2006. The Impact of Corruption on Financial Markets. Managerial Finance

vol 32 no10

Nishat, M and Shaheen, R. 2005. Macroeconomic Factors and Pakistani Equity Market.

Nopirin. 2000. Ekonomi Moneter. BPFE. Yogyakarta

Oystein, Gjerde et al. 1999. Causal Relations among stock returns among economic variables in a small open economy. Journal of International Financial Markets,

Institutions and Money vol 9

Patra, Theophano et al. 2006. Economic variables and stock market returns: evidence from the Athens stock exchange. Applied Financial Economics.

Paul, S, Mallik, G. 2003. Macroeconomic Factors and bank and Finance Stock Prices: The Australian Experience. Economic Analysis and Policy vol 33 no 1

Perales, Norma A. Hernandez. 2000. The Relationships between Mexican Stock Market Returns and Real, Monetary and Economic Variables.

Poon, S. Taylor, S.J. 1991. Macroeconomic Factors and the UK Stock Markets.

Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting

Pindyck, R.S. dan Rubinfeld, D.L. 1998. Econometric Models and Economic

Forecasts. 4th edition. McGraw-Hill, Inc. New York

Rao, B.B. 1994, Cointegration for the Applied Economist 1st edition. ST. Martin’s Press, Inc. New York

(10)

Ross, S.A., 1976, The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing. Journal of Economic

Theory. 13, 341-360, dikutip oleh Sharpe, W.F., G.J. Alexander, dan J.V.

Bailey. 1999. Investments 6th edition. Prentice Hall, Inc. New Jersey

Rahman, Matiur. Mustafa, Muhammad. 2008. Influences of Money Supply and Oil Price on US Stock Market. North American Journal of Finance and Banking

Research vol 2 no 2

Rajan, R, Zingales, L. 1998. Financial Dependence and Growth. American Economic

Review vol 88

Rapach, D.E. 2001. The Long Run Relationship between Inflation and Real Stock Prices. Journal of Macroeconomics

Rapach et al. 2005. Macro variables and International Stock Return Predictability.

International Journal of Forecasting vol 21

Ratanapakorn, O. 2000. The US Stock market: The Impacts of Internal and External macroeconomic variables

Sellin, Peter. 2001. Monetary Policy and The Stock Market: Theory and Empirical Evidence. Blackwell Publishers Ltd

Shahid, Ahmed. 2008. Aggregate Economic Variables and Stock Market in India.

International Research Journal of Finance and Economics

Shew, Jeffrey A. 2008. Causality Relationship between Foreign Exchange Rates and Stock Market Close: Evidence in Singapore. Bryant Economic Research paper

vol 1

Siamat, Dahlan. 2005. Manajemen Lembaga Keuangan. Edisi Kelima. Lembaga Penerbit FE-UI. Jakarta

Stocker, Marshall. 2005. Equity Returns and Economic Freedom. Cato Journal Vol 25 Sunariyah. 1997. Pengantar Pengetahuan Pasar Modal. UPP AMP YKPN.

Yogyakarta

Tursoy, Turgut et al. 2008. Macroeconomic Factors, the APT and the Istanbul Stock Market. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics

Udegbunam, R, Eriki, P.O. 2001. Inflation and Stock Price Behaviour: Evidence From Nigerian Stock Market. Journal of Financial Management and Analysis vol 14

no 1

Wahlroos, Bjorn et al. 1986. Stock Returns, inflationary expectations and real activy: new evidence. Journal of banking and Finance vol 10

Wongbangpo, P. Sharma, S.C. 2002. Stock Market and Macroeconomic Fundamental Dynamic Interactions: ASEAN Countries. Journal of Asian Economics vol 13

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

yang disampaikan secara online melalui Sistem Pengadaan Secara Elektronik (SPSE) untuk paket kegiatan: Pada hari ini Kamis tanggal Tiga Belas bulan September Tahun Dua Ribu Dua

 Siswa diminta untuk membuka buku atau LKS pada halaman materi yang akan dipelajari.  Tanya jawab yang berhubungan dengan materi.  Guru memberikan kalimat/paragraph

Setelah terbalik ubahlah letak dan ukuran gambar tersebut agar berada di sebelah bawah dari gambar aslinya, dan mungkin akan lebih bagus juga jika diberi prespektif dengan cara

[r]

Berdasarkan latar belakang masalah di atas, maka penelitian difokuskan pada rumusan masalah: “Bagaimana Pengembangan Kemampuan Analisis Hubungan Matematis Siswa SMP

Proses penyesuaian diri yang dilakukan pasangan kader Partai Keadilan Sejahtera merupakan pengetahuan yang penting mengenai pemahaman atau penyesuaian karakter

Demikian Surat Penugasan/Ijin ini di buat untuk dapat di pergunakan .r,:bagai mana mestinya dan setelah selesai tugas di mohon untuk dapat melaporkan hasilnyal. Agar

bahwa berdasarkan pertimbangan sebagaimana dimaksud dalam huruf a dan huruf b, perlu menetapkan Keputusan Bupati Bantul tentang Pembentukan Tim Manajemen Bantuan