A R C H I V E S O F I N D U S T R I A L H Y G I E N E A N D T O X I C O L O G Y
Title: Plant-Pathogenic Fungi Present on Seeds of Different Pea Cultivars in Poland
Referee: Henik Sukorini
The manuscript is suitable for publication:
The manuscript can be classified as:
– in its present form – scientific paper
– after minor revision – professional paper
– after major revision – review conclusion, In method just mention about isolation, identification,and evaluation weather conditions, but in result author mention about percentage of contaminated seed and mycotoxin, and mycotoxin part was very urgent for your journal, not just telling about pathogen it self like pathology journal. 2. Author observed serially within 2 years, but they don't used statistic for
analysis the data. It is better if they used time series analysis.
3. Number and name of pathogen before observation in first year and second
* Referee's Guidelines. In your comments to the author(s) please include the following considerations. 1. Does the title adequately reflect the subject of the manuscript?
2. Does the summary give all necessary information about the background, results and conclusions?
3. Are the methods (including statistical analysis) clearly presented? 4. Are tables and figures intelligible without reference to the text? 5. Are conclusions firmly based on the results?
A R C H I V E S O F I N D U S T R I A L H Y G I E N E A N D T O X I C O L O G Y
A R H I V Z A H I G I J E N U R A D A I T O K S I K O L O G I J U
AD D R E S S O F T H E E D I T O R I A L O F F I C E:
Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
P.O. Box 291, HR–10001 Zagreb, Croatia
Phone (+385 1) 4673 188; Fax (+385 1) 4673 303; E-mail: arhiv@imi.hr Report for the author(s):
MS no. 2480
-Plant-Pathogenic Fungi Present on Seeds of Different Pea Cultivars in Poland
1. The title reflected to the paper.
2. Summary: mention about mycotoxins in discussion and conclusion but no research about mycotoxin in this paper, although actually this is important part related with this journal. How if this paper added with mycotoxin research.
3. Statistical analysis was needed and because the research used research serially, time series analysis also needed.
A number n pathogen before doing the research in the first and second year should be presented to help in discussion part, so in the discussion part not just writing about happen and not happen and its number.
4. Table 2 not in line with result and discussion that mention about percentage but none in table 2.
A R C H I V E S O F I N D U S T R I A L H Y G I E N E A N D T O X I C O L O G Y
A R H I V Z A H I G I J E N U R A D A I T O K S I K O L O G I J U
AD D R E S S O F T H E E D I T O R I A L O F F I C E:
Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
P.O. Box 291, HR–10001 Zagreb, Croatia
A R C H I V E S O F I N D U S T R I A L H Y G I E N E A N D T O X I C O L O G Y
A R H I V Z A H I G I J E N U R A D A I T O K S I K O L O G I J U
AD D R E S S O F T H E E D I T O R I A L O F F I C E:
Archives of Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology
P.O. Box 291, HR–10001 Zagreb, Croatia
