S BIO 1004544 Bibliography

(1)

77

Yuni Anggia Purnama, 2014

Analisis Kualitas Argumentasi Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Menggunakan Media Kartun Konsep Sistem Imunitas

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Acar, O, Turkmen, L dan Roychoudhury, A. (2009). Student Difficulties in Socio-scientific Argumentation and Decision-making Research Findings: Crossing the borders of two research lines. International Journal of Science Education.32 (1),pp 1191-1206.

Arikunto. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik, Edisi Revisi VI. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Bell, P., dan Linn, M. C. (2007) Scientific argument as learning artifact: Designning for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education,22(8), 797-817.

Berland, L.K . (2009). Using A Learning Progression To Inform Scientific Argumentation In Talk And Writing. Paper presented at the Learning Progressions in Science (LeaPS) Conference. Iowa City, IA. University of Texas at Austin.

Campbell, Reece, J.B., Urry.L.A., Wasserman, S.A., Minorsky, P.V., dan Jackson, R.B. (2011). Biologi Ninth Edition. United States of America: Pearson.

Campbell, Reece, J.B., Urry.L.A., Wasserman, S.A., Minorsky, P.V., dan Jackson, R.B. (2010). Biologi Edisi Kedelapan Jilid 3. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga

Dahar, R.W. (1996). Teori - Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Dinas Pendidikan Nasional. (2013). Kurikulum 2013 Kompetensi Dasar Sekolah Menengah Atas (SMA)/ Madrasah Aliyah (MA). Dinas Pendidikan Nasional.

Duschl, R.A., Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education. Studies in Science Education. 38(1). 39-72.

(2)

78

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu | perpustakaan.upi.edu

Eggert. S, Ostermeyer. F, Hasselhorn. M, dan Bögeholz. S. (2013). Socioscientifc Decision Making in the Science Classroom: The Effect of Embedded

Metacognitive Instructions on Students’ Learning Outcomes. Education Research International..

Ekici, F., Ekici, E. dan Aydin, F. (2007). Utility of Concept Cartoons in Diagnosing and Overcoming Misconceptions Related to Photosynthesis. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 2(4), 111 – 124.

Erduran, S., Shirley, S., dan J. Osborne. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s Argument Pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88, 915-933 [Online]. Tersedia : http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.20012/pdf (Diakses 21 Januari 2014)

Fardhani, Indra. (2011). Analisis Kualitas Argumentasi Siswa Kelas VII SMP pada Materi Ekosistem dengan Metode Debat. Skripsi Sarjana Pendidikan Biologi UPI Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.

Kabapinar, F. (2005). Effectiveness of Teaching via Concept Cartoons from the Point of View of Constructivist Approach. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 5 (1), 135-146.

Kabapinar, F. (2009). What Makes Concept Cartoons More Effective? Using Research to Inform Practice. Education and Scienc, 34(154), 104-118.

Keogh, B dan Naylor, S. (1999) Concept cartoons, teaching and learning in science: an evaluation. International Journalof Science Education, 21 (4), 431-446.

Kurnadi, K.A. (2011). Dasar-Dasar Anatomi dan Fisiologi Manusia Buku 2. Bandung: Jurusan Pendidikan Biologi FPMIPA UPI.

Liston, Maeve. (2011). Using Concept Cartoons in the Junior Certificate Science Classroom. National Centre for Excellence in Mathematics and Science Teacing and Learning, 2(12).

Manurung, S.R dan Rustaman, N. (2012). Identifikasi Keterampilan Argumentasi

melalui Analisis “Toulmin Argumentation Pattern (TAP)” Pada Topik

(3)

79

Naylor S, Keogh B dan Downing, B (2007). Argumentation and primary science. Research in Science Education, 37 (1), 17-39.

Naylor, S dan Keogh, B. (2013). Concept Cartoon. [Online]. Tersedia: http://conceptcartoons.com/what-is-a-concept-cartoon-.html (Diakses 18 Desember 2013)

Naylor, S dan Keogh, B. (2013). Concept Cartoons: What Have We Learnt?. Journal of Turkish Science Education . 10(1), 3-11.

Özmen, H; Demircioğlu, G; Dan Burhan, Y. (2012). Using laboratory activities

enhanced with concept cartoons to support progression in students’ understanding of acid-base concepts. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching. 13(1).

Peapell, S. (2008). Concept Cartoons Share a thon. [Online]. Tersedia: http://www.schoolscience.co.uk. (Diakses 18 Desember 2013)

Pratiwi, D.A, et.al. (2007). Biologi SMA Jilid 2 untuk Kelas XI. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Roshayanti, F dan Rustaman, N. (2013). Pengembangan Asesmen Argumentatif Untuk Meningkatkan Pola Wacana Argumentasi Mahasiswa Pada Konsep Fisiologi Manusia. Bioma, 2(1), 85-100.

Roshayanti, F. (2012). Pengembangan Asesmen Argumentatif Untuk Meningkatkan Pola Wacana Argumentasi Mahasiswa Pada Konsep Fisiologi Manusia. Disertasi Doktor pada SPS UPI Bandung: tidak diterbitkan.

Roshayanti, F., Rustaman, N., Barlian, A., Lukmana, I. (2009) Profil Sociocultural Prespective dalam Berargumentasi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Biologi pada Perkuliahan Fisiologi Manusia. Proceedings The 3rd

International Seminar on Science Education”Challenging Science Education in The Digital Era”.ISBN: 978-602-8171-14-1.

Sadler. T. D dan Zeidler D. L. (2002). “The Morality of Socioscientific Issues: Construal and Resolution of Genetic Engineering Dilemmas”. Department of Secondary Education, University of South Florida, Tampa,USA.

(4)

80

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.