47
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
1.
Zen Y
. Pola hubungan antara konveksitas, posisi gigi insisivus, dan posisi bibir dalam analisa Ricketts. 2005; Vol. 63: 160-7.2. Ludwig M. A cephalometric analysis of the relationship between facial
pattern, interincical angulation and anterior overbite changes. Echino, California: Vol. 37, 2004: 195-203.
3. Arnett GW. Facial esthetics, orthodontics and orthognatic surgery. PSCO
Bulletin. 2001 Summer : 21-22
4. Rostina T. Analisa jaringan lunak menurut metode Holdaway pada mahasiswa
FKG USU Suku Deutro-Melayu. Tesis: Medan: USU, 2009: 2-18.
5. Purwanegara MK. Pengaruh penampilan kelainan dentofasial terhadap harga
diri remaja awal. Tesis. Fak. Pasca Sarjana UGM. Yogyakarta, 1985: 2.
6. Moyers RE. Handbook of Orthodontics. Edisi 4. Medical Publishers, Inc,.
1988: 191,535,539-43.
7. Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics. Ed 4. 2007: 207-18.
8. Staley RN. Cephalometric Analysis In Text Book of Orthodontics. Sauders
Company; 2001. 113-31.
9. Erliera, Anggani Haru Setyo. Hal-hal yang harus dipertimbangkan dalam
menentukan indikasi ekstraksi atau non ekstraksi pada perawatan orthodonti. Dentika dental journal 2006; 2(11): 198-201.
10. Fukui T, Tsuruta M. Invisible treatment of Class III female adult patient with
severe crowding and cross-bite. Journal Of Orthodontics. 2002; 29: 267-75.
11. Jamilian A., dkk. Changes in facial profile during orthodontic treatment with
extraction of four first premolar. Orthodontic waves. 2008;67: 47-49
12. Kilic N, Catal G, Kiki A, Oktay H. Soft tissue profile changes following
maxillary protraction in Class III subjects. European Journal of Orthodontics. 2010;32: 419-24.
48
13. Mahyastuti RD, Christnawati. Perbandingan posisi bibir dan dagu antara
laki-laki dan perempuan jawa berdasarkan analisis estetik profil muka menurut Bass. M.I. Kedokteran Gigi 2008; 23: 1-7.
14. Koesoemahardja HD. Pola pertumbuhan jaringan lunak kraniofasial serta
kaitannya dengan pola pertumbuhan jaringan keras kraniofasial dan
pertumbuhan umum; Kajian sefalometri-rontgenografik lateral dan fotometrik
pada anak usia 6-18 tahun. Majalah Ortodonti. FKG Usakti. 1991; 2: 12-21.
15. Mamun MSA BDS, Hyder MLA BDS, Hossain MZ BDS PhD. Changes in
soft tissue profile during the treatment of class III malocclusion treated with Class III activator. Bangladesh Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2012;2: 24-9
16 Proffit, WR, Fields HW, Sarver DV. Contemporary Orthodontic. Edisi III. St.
Louis : Mosby, Inc., 2000.163-170.
17. Rakosi, T. Color atlas of dental medicine, Orthodontic-Diagnosis. 1st ed.,
Germany: Thieme Medical Publishers., 1993: 3-4, 207-235.
18. Kim YH, Lee JS. Reference dose level for dental panoramic In Anyang
City. Korean Journal Of Oral And Maxillofacial Radiology. 2009; 39:
199-203.
19. Jose M, Varghese J. Panoramic radiograph a valuable diagnostic tool in dental
practice-report of three cases. International Journal Of Dental Clinics. 2011; 3(4): 47-49.
20. Rakosi T. Cephalometric Radiography. Wolf Medically; 1982: 55-95.
21. Susilowati. Hubungan antara sudut intersisial dengan derajat konveksitas
profil jaringan lunak wajah pada suku Bugis dan Makassar. Makassar: Unhas,2009: 125-8.
22. Ricketts RM. Cephalometric Analysis And Synthesis. California. 1961:
141-55.
23. Koesoemahardja HD. Pola pertumbuhan jaringan lunak kemancungan hidung,
ketebalab bibir atas, dan ketebalan bibir bawah serta kaitannya dengan pertumbuhan umum. Jakarta: Universitas Trisakti, 1-14.
24. Arnnet GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic and treatment planning -
Part 1. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1993; 103: 299-312.
49
15.
25. Sing G. Textbook of Orthodontics. Ed 2., India: Jp Medical Pub: 2009.
613-39.
26. Foster TD. Buku Ajar Ortodonsi. Ed 3., Jakarta: EGC; 1997. 199-267.
27. Bhalajhi SI. Text Book of Orthodontics, Management of Class II
Malocclusion. W.B. Saunders Company., 2001. 400-14.
28. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. Ed 4.,
Philadelphia; Elvisier; 2007. 201-4.
29. Foster TD. Buku Ajar Ortodonsi. Ed 3., Jakarta: EGC; 1997. 294-5.
30. Janson G., dkk. Soft-tissue treatment changes in Class II division 1
malocclusion with and without extraction of maxillary premolars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132: 1-8
31. Kim Y, Nahm Dong-Seok. Class II division I malocclusion treated with
extraction of upper first premolars: Case report. Orthodontic Waves. 2008; 67: 23-9.
32. Bascitfi FA, Uysal T, Buyukerkmen A, Demir A. The influence of extraction
treatment on holdaway soft-tissue measurement. Angle Orthodontist. 2004;74: 167-73.
.
