• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

RESPON STS TS N S SS kemanfaatan sistem informasi (perceived usefulness (PU))

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Membagikan "RESPON STS TS N S SS kemanfaatan sistem informasi (perceived usefulness (PU))"

Copied!
12
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

KUESIONER PENELITIAN

“Faktor

-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penerimaan Wajib

Pajak Orang P ribadi terhadap

E - filing

Identitas Responden

Nama :

Jenis Kelamin :

Usia :

Pekerjaan :

KPP :

Jenis alat komunikasi / elektronik yang digunakan :

□ Smartphone □ PC Tablet □ Komputer □ Handphone

□ Android □ Laptop □ iPhone □ Menggunakan semua

Intensitas menggunakan inte rnet :

□ Setiap hari □ Cukup sering □ Kadang

-

kadang □ Tidak pernah

E-filing

adalah sarana pelaporan pajak secara online dan realtime

menggunakan media internet dengan melalui penyedia layanan aplikasi atau

Application Service Provide r . Apakah Anda me ngetahui / menggunakan

E -

filing

?

□ Ya □ Tidak

Jika Anda menjawab Ya, silahkan melanjutkan menjawab pertanyaan kuesioner

yang

(2)

Petunjuk Pengisian

Dimohon mengisi dengan tanda (X) pernyataan-pernyataan di bawah ini sesuai

dengan kondisi yang Anda rasakan, yaitu:

1. Sangat tidak setuju (STS)

2. Tidak setuju (TS)

3. Netral (N)

4. Setuju (S)

5. Sangat Setuju (SS)

PERNYATAAN

RESPON

STS

TS

N

S

SS

kemanfaatan sistem informasi (perceived usefulness (PU))

1.

E-filing

mempercepat kegiatan pelaporan

SPT saya.

2.

E-filing

mempermudah kegiatan pelaporan

SPT saya.

3.

E-filing

bermanfaat bagi saya.

4.

E-filing

lebih efisien tempat daripada harus

melapor langsung ke kantor pelayanan pajak.

Persepsi Kemudahan Penggunaan Sistem Informasi (Perceive Ease of Use (PEOU))

1. Mengakses

e-filing

bagi saya mudah

dipelajari.

2. Mengakses

e-filing

tidak sulit bagi saya

3. Mengakses

e-filing

sangat jelas dan mudah

dipahami.

(3)

STS

TS

N

S

SS

Niat untuk me nggunakan (be havioral intention to use)

1. Saya berniat untuk menggunakan

e-filing

.

2. Saat ini saya lebih berniat untuk

menggunakan

e-filing

dibandingkan dengan

melapor SPT ke kantor pelayanan pajak /

gerai pajak.

3. Saya berniat menggunakan

e-filing

karena

saya benar-benar ingin menggunakannya,

bukan karena paksaan dari kantor pelayanan

pajak.

Pemakaian nyata (actual system use)

1. Saya menyukai

e-filing.

2. Saya akan menggunakan

e-filing

.

3. Saya akan terus menggunakan

e-filing

.

(4)

OUTPUT SPSS

3.4.1 STATISTIK DESKRIPTIF

Descriptive Statistics

N Minimum Ma ximum Mean Std. Deviation

PU1 100 3,00 5,00 4,3600 ,55994

PU2 100 3,00 5,00 4,3700 ,54411

PU3 100 3,00 5,00 4,3300 ,56951

PU4 100 3,00 5,00 4,6100 ,51040

PEOU1 100 2,00 5,00 4,1100 ,88643

PEOU2 100 2,00 5,00 4,0200 ,94259

PEOU3 100 2,00 5,00 4,0100 ,90448

PEOU4 100 2,00 5,00 4,0500 ,84537

BITU1 100 3,00 5,00 3,8400 ,66241

BITU2 100 2,00 5,00 3,9800 ,69602

BITU3 100 2,00 5,00 4,0600 ,89691

AU1 100 2,00 5,00 3,8500 ,72995

AU2 100 2,00 5,00 3,8800 ,79493

AU3 100 2,00 5,00 3,9000 ,84686

Valid N (listwise) 100

3.4.2 UJI INSTRUMEN

3.4.2.1 UJI VALIDITAS

Correlations

PU1 PU2 PU3 PU4 PU

PU1

Pearson Correlation 1 ,885** ,416** ,426** ,853**

Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000

N 100 100 100 100 100

PU2

Pearson Correlation ,885** 1 ,450** ,452** ,871**

Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000

N 100 100 100 100 100

PU3 Pearson Correlation ,416

**

,450** 1 ,517** ,748**

(5)

N 100 100 100 100 100

PU4

Pearson Correlation ,426** ,452** ,517** 1 ,735**

Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000

N 100 100 100 100 100

PU

Pearson Correlation ,853** ,871** ,748** ,735** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000

N 100 100 100 100 100

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Correlations

PEOU1 PEOU2 PEOU3 PEOU4 PEOU

PEOU1

Pearson Correlation 1 ,892** ,389** ,235* ,801**

Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,018 ,000

N 100 100 100 100 100

PEOU2

Pearson Correlation ,892** 1 ,450** ,290** ,838**

Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,003 ,000

N 100 100 100 100 100

PEOU3

Pearson Correlation ,389** ,450** 1 ,779** ,820**

Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000

N 100 100 100 100 100

PEOU4

Pearson Correlation ,235* ,290** ,779** 1 ,714**

Sig. (2-tailed) ,018 ,003 ,000 ,000

N 100 100 100 100 100

PEOU

Pearson Correlation ,801** ,838** ,820** ,714** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000 ,000

N 100 100 100 100 100

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Correlations

BITU1 BITU2 BITU3 BITU

BITU1

Pearson Correlation 1 ,650** ,594** ,832**

Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000

N 100 100 100 100

BITU2

Pearson Correlation ,650** 1 ,762** ,905**

Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000

N 100 100 100 100

(6)

Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000

N 100 100 100 100

BITU

Pearson Correlation ,832** ,905** ,901** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000

N 100 100 100 100

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Correlations

AU1 AU2 AU3 AU

AU1

Pearson Correlation 1 ,839** ,793** ,858**

Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000

N 100 100 100 100

AU2

Pearson Correlation ,839** 1 ,882** ,890**

Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000

N 100 100 100 100

AU3

Pearson Correlation ,793** ,882** 1 ,892**

Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000

N 100 100 100 100

AU

Pearson Correlation ,858** ,890** ,892** 1 Sig. (2-tailed) ,000 ,000 ,000

N 100 100 100 100

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

3.4.2.2 UJI RELIABILITAS

Reliability Statistics PU

Cronbach's Alpha

Cronbach's Alpha Based on

Standardized

Items

N of Items

(7)

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if

Item Deleted

Scale Variance

if Item Deleted

Corrected Item

-Total Correlation Squared Multiple Correlation Cronbach's

Alpha if Item Deleted

PU1 13,3100 1,711 ,715 ,783 ,728

PU2 13,3000 1,707 ,752 ,793 ,711

PU3 13,3400 1,903 ,537 ,326 ,814

PU4 13,0600 2,017 ,548 ,329 ,805

Reliability Statistics PEOU

Cronbach's

Alpha

Cronbach's

Alpha Based on Standardized

Items

N of Items

,805 ,804 4

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if Item Deleted

Scale Variance if Item Deleted

Corrected Item -Total Correlation Squared Multiple Correlation Cronbach's Alpha if Item

Deleted

PEOU1 12,0800 4,842 ,632 ,796 ,750

PEOU2 12,1700 4,486 ,681 ,808 ,725

PEOU3 12,1800 4,695 ,659 ,661 ,737

PEOU4 12,1400 5,374 ,512 ,612 ,804

Reliability Statistics BITU

Cronbach's

Alpha

Cronbach's

Alpha Based on Standardized

Items

N of Items

(8)

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if

Item Deleted

Scale Variance

if Item Deleted

Corrected Item

-Total Correlation

Squared

Multiple Correlation

Cronbach's

Alpha if Item Deleted

BITU1 8,0400 2,241 ,658 ,446 ,850

BITU2 7,9000 1,949 ,798 ,641 ,725

BITU3 7,8200 1,523 ,749 ,598 ,787

Reliability Statistics AU

Cronbach's Alpha

Cronbach's Alpha Based on

Standardized

Items

N of Items

,938 ,939 3

Item-Total Statistics

Scale Mean if

Item Deleted

Scale Variance

if Item Deleted

Corrected Item

-Total Correlation

Squared

Multiple Correlation

Cronbach's

Alpha if Item Deleted

AU1 7,7800 2,537 ,840 ,716 ,936

AU2 7,7500 2,230 ,911 ,831 ,879

(9)

3.4.3 UJI AUMSI KLASIK

3.4.3.1 UJI NORMALITAS

One-Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test

Unstandardized Residual

N 100

Normal Parametersa,b Mean 0E-7

Std. Deviation 1,86792472

Most Extreme Differences

Absolute ,085

Positive ,071

Negative -,085

Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z ,852

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) ,463

a. Test distribution is Normal. b. Calculated from data.

DATA > 0,005 JADI DATA NORMAL

3.4.3.2 UJI MULRIKOLINEARITAS

Coefficientsa

Model Unstandardized

Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig. Collinearity Statistics

B Std. Error Beta Tolerance VIF

1

(Consta

nt) 5,626 1,944 2,894 ,005

PU ,415 ,119 ,366 3,471 ,001 ,820 1,219

PEOU -,066 ,074 -,094 -,894 ,374 ,820 1,219

a. Dependent Variable: BITU

(10)

3.4.3.3 UJI HETEROKEDASTISITAS

Coefficientsa

Model Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig. Collinearity Statistics

B Std. Error Beta Tolerance VIF

1

(Consta

nt) 4,510 1,113 4,054 ,000

PU -,115 ,068 -,181 -1,684 ,095 ,820 1,219

PEOU -,061 ,042 -,155 -1,444 ,152 ,820 1,219

a. Dependent Variable: ABS_RES

SIG > 0,05 TIDAK TERJADI MASALAH HETEROKEDASTISITAS

3.4.4 UJI HIPOTESIS

3.4.4.1 UJI STATISTIK T

Coefficientsa

Model Unstandardized

Coefficients

Standardized

Coefficients

t Sig. Collinearity Statistics

B Std. Error Beta Tolerance VIF

1

(Constan

t) 5,626 1,944 2,894 ,005

PU ,415 ,119 ,366 3,471 ,001 ,820 1,219

PEOU -,066 ,074 -,094 -,894 ,374 ,820 1,219

a. Dependent Variable: BITU

JIKA SIG < DARI 0,05 MAKA TERDAPAT PENGARUH YANG

SIGNIFIKAN

PU SIGNIFIKAN

(11)

3.4.4.2 UJI STATISTIK F

ANOVAa

Model Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

1

Regression 44,365 2 22,182 6,229 ,003b

Residual 345,425 97 3,561

Total 389,790 99

a. Dependent Variable: BITU b. Predictors: (Constant), PEOU, PU

Sig < dari 0,05 maka terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan thdp BITU

3.4.4.3 UJI R2

Model Summary

Model R R Square Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1 ,337a ,114 ,096 1,88708

a. Predictors: (Constant), PEOU, PU

3.3.5 UJI VARIABEL INTERVENING

Coefficientsa

Model Unstandardized

Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t Sig. Collinearity Statistics

B Std. Error Beta Tolerance VIF

1

(Constant

) 5,626 1,944 2,894 ,005

PU ,415 ,119 ,366 3,471 ,001 ,820 1,219

PEOU -,066 ,074 -,094 -,894 ,374 ,820 1,219

(12)

Coefficientsa

Model Unstandardized Coefficients Standardized Coefficients

t Sig. Collinearity Statistics

B Std. Error Beta Tolerance VIF

1

(Consta

nt) ,997 2,041 ,488 ,626

PU ,113 ,128 ,087 ,889 ,376 ,730 1,371

PEOU ,087 ,074 ,107 1,162 ,248 ,814 1,229

BITU ,601 ,102 ,520 5,878 ,000 ,886 1,128

Referensi

Dokumen terkait