Kebijakan dan Strategi Ditjen Penguatan
Riset dan Pengembangan IPTEK DIKTI
Dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Mutu PT
Ocky Karna Radjasa
Ranking Systems - Criteria and
Weighting
Academic
Ranking of
World
Universities
(ARWU)
QS World University
Rankings
(QS-WUR)
Times Higher
Education of
World University
Ranking (THE)
Academic Peer Review, 40% Employer Review, 10%Student Faculty Ratio, 20%
Int'l Faculty, 5% Int'l Student, 5%
Citations Per Faculty, 20%
Nobel/Fields Medal Alumni, 10%
Nobel/Fields Medal Winner, 20%
HiCi Reseracher, 20% Nature/Science
Ar-ticles, 20% SCI/SSCI/A&HCI Ar-ticles, 20%
Per Capita Per-formance, 10%
Teaching & learning environment, 30%
Citations, Per Paper, 32.5%
Int'l Staff and Student, 5%
Research Income from Industry, 2.5%
Research volume, income and reputa-tion, 30%
Targetted outputs of Research in
University
Research
Productivity:
-
No. papers
published in
international
peer-reviewed
journal
-
No . competitive
research grants
-
No. IPR
Research
Impact:
-
No. citation
-
No. research
based-teaching
materials
-
No. research
based-teaching
books
-
Outreach
Research
excellence:
-
No. highly cited
papers
-
H-index
-
No. publication in
highly impact
journals
-
No. CoE
Attractiveness and
Competitiveness
Citation index and Impact
factor
•
Science citation index: Indicates how many times
the work of one author has been referred to, or
cited, by another author.
•
Journal Impact Factor (JIF) provided by Journal
THE-QS World University Rankings
Academic Peer Review 40%
Academics indicate which field
they specialise in and then list up to 30 universities they regard as leaders in this field.
Composite score drawn from
peer review survey (which is divided into five subject areas). Results compiled based on three years’ worth of responses
totaling 6,354 in 2008.
Safeguards against individuals
voting for their own university strengthened.
Rise of Asian universities is least
apparent in this ranking.
International Staff 5%
Score calculated based on
the proportion of Full Time Equivalent (FTE) faculty that are international.
Employer Review 10%
Score based on responses to employer
survey. 2,339 responses in 2008.
Recruiter names are sourced through
QS databases, media partners and partner schools & universities.
Responses are weighted by region to
reach a final score.
Staff/Student 20%
Score based simply on the student
faculty ratio, the higher the number of faculty per student the higher the score.
Full- and part-time numbers for staff
and students obtained; FTEs used throughout as far as possible.
Citation/Staff 20%
Score based on research performance factored against the size of the research body . Five years of publication data
with citations from Scopus. Number of citations is divided
by the number of FTE staff to give an indication of the
density of research.
International
Student
5%
Score calculated based on
the proportion of total students that are international.
THE-QS
Ranking
12/6/09
Measuring Research
Quality
Classic
measure of
research quality
Citations per staff
member
(not per paper)
Number of publication
per staff
Source:
Scopus
PERBANDINGAN PUBLIKASI TERINDEKS SCOPUS
PERBANDINGAN JUMLAH SITASI TERINDEKS DI
SCOPUS
Scopus-indexed publications
•
Research article
•
Review
•
Proceeding
Penilaian Kinerja Penelitian PT Pemetaan DP2M DIKTI – TOLOK UKUR
No Komponen
Bobot
(%)
1
Jumlah dosen berdasarkan strata
(SDM)
10
2
Penelitian pada pusat
studi/pusat kajian
10
3
Penelitian dosen dengan dana
DP2M DIKTI
20
4
Luaran Penelitian
35
5
Variabel Pendukung:
Manajemen LP/LPPM
15
Aktivitas pusat studi di luar kegiatan penelitian
Ketersediaan sarana dan prasarana penelitian
Ketersediaan payung penelitian/road map pusat
studi
Student body
1. Publikasi Ilmiah
2. Hak Atas Kekayaan
Intelektual (HKI)
3. Teknologi Tepat
Guna
4. Model/Prototype/De
sain/Karya seni/
Rekayasa Sosial
5. Buku Ajar (ISBN)
6. Angka partisipasi
dosen dalam
penelitian
7. Visiting Lecturer
8. Keynote Speaker
Jumlah Publikasi terindeks di Scopus
(per 17/08/2015)
No
Institution
Documents
1
ITB
4694
2
UI
3855
3
UGM
2185
4
IPB
1760
5
LIPI
1375
6
ITS
1256
7
CIFOR
963
8
UB
877
9
UNDIP
835
RIP INSTITUSI – TOPIK dan ROAD
MAP
RIP INSTITUSI – TOPIK dan ROAD
MAP
ROAD MAP
PENELITIAN
15
2015-17
2015-17
2012-14
2012-14
2018-Level Pusat
Penelitian/Fak
TOPIK PENELITIAN
TOPIK PENELITIAN
RIP INSTITUSI
RIP INSTITUSI
Menteri Riset, Teknologi,
dan Pendidikan Tinggi
Inspektorat
Jenderal
Sekretariat
Jenderal
Staf Ahli*)
Ditjen
Kelembagaan
IPTEK dan
DIKTI
Ditjen
Pembelajaran,
Kemahasiswaa
n dan
Penjaminan
Mutu
Kelompok
Jabatan
Fungsional
Ditjen
Sumber
Daya
IPTEK dan
DIKTI
Ditjen
Penguatan
Riset dan
Pengembanga
n
Ditjen
Penguatan
Inovasi
PUSDIKLAT
P
USDATIN PUSPIPTEKLPNK
STRUKTUR ORGANISASI KEMENTERIAN RISET,
TEKNOLOGI, DAN DIKTI
(Perpres No. 13/2015)
Struktur Organisasi
No
Jenis Luaran
Laporan di Akhir
Kontrak
1
Prototipe (
Laboratorium /
Industri
)
Dokumen (
Desain, Foto,
Deskripsi, Spesifikasi, dll
)
2
Teknologi Proses /
Produk
Dokumen (
Foto/Gambar, Deskripsi, Spesifikasi,
Formula,
dll
)
3
Teori / Konsep / Metode
Baru
Dokumen (
Deskripsi, Kebaruan,
dll
)
4
Paten, PVT, dll
Draft (Paten, PVT, dll)
5
Publikasi Jurnal Nas /
Intnl.
Manuskrip
Surat Keputusan Menristekdikti No. 147
Tanggal 9 April 2015
Surat Keputusan Menristekdikti No. 147
Tanggal 9 April 2015
*) No. 1 & 2 Satu paket (salah satu diperoleh yang lain juga diperoleh).
**) No. 4 & 5 Penyampaian laporan masih berlanjut hingga diperoleh kepastian Granted / terbit atau tidak.
*) No. 1 & 2 Satu paket (salah satu diperoleh yang lain juga diperoleh).
**) No. 4 & 5 Penyampaian laporan masih berlanjut hingga diperoleh kepastian Granted / terbit atau tidak.
DISTRIBUSI LOKASI INSINAS
DISTRIBUSI LOKASI INSINAS
