• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Collaborative work is fluid with students shifting between various simultaneous discussions depending on their needs and interests.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Collaborative work is fluid with students shifting between various simultaneous discussions depending on their needs and interests."

Copied!
35
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)
(2)
(3)

Characteristics

Rarely Sometimes Often

Discussions are led by the students where outside content is brought in and expanded.

These discussions typically reach higher orders of critical thinking.

Collaborative work is fluid with students shifting between various simultaneous discussions depending on their needs and interests.

Content is given context as it relates to real-world scenarios.

Students challenge one another during class on content.

Student-led tutoring and collaborative learning forms spontaneously.

Students take ownership of the material and use their knowledge to lead one another without prompting from the teacher.

Students ask exploratory questions and have the freedom to delve beyond core curriculum.

Students are actively engaged in problem solving and critical thinking that reaches beyond the traditional scope of the course.

Students are transforming from passive listeners to active learners.

Modified from http://www.thedailyriff.com/articles/the-flipped-class-what-does-a-good-one-

look-like-692.php Westerberg 2012

(4)
(5)

Unit study package code: STEN2001

Mode of study: Internal

Tuition pattern summary: Note: For any specific variations to this tuition pattern and for precise information refer to the Learning Activities section.

Lecture: 2 x 1 Hours Weekly Workshop: 1 x 2 Hours Weekly

This unit does not have a fieldwork component.

Credit Value: 25.0

Pre-requisite units:

307529 (v.0) Engineering Mechanics 100 or any previous version OR

MCEN1000 (v.0) Engineering Mechanics or any previous version AND

307533 (v.0) Engineering Materials 100 or any previous version OR

MAEN1000 (v.0) Engineering Materials or any previous version AND

307538 (v.0) Engineering Mathematics 140 or any previous version OR

7062 (v.0) Mathematics 101 or any previous version OR

10926 (v.0) Mathematics 103 or any previous version OR

307537 (v.0) Engineering Mathematics 130 or any previous version OR

MATH1003 (v.0) Engineering Mathematics 2 or any previous version OR

MATH1010 (v.0) Advanced Mathematics or any previous version OR

MATH1004 (v.0) Mathematics 1 or any previous version OR

MATH1001 (v.0) Engineering Mathematics Specialist 2 or any previous version

Co-requisite units: Nil

Anti-requisite units: Nil

Result type: Grade/Mark

Approved incidental fees: Information about approved incidental fees can be obtained from our website. Visit fees.curtin.edu.au/incidental_fees.cfm for details.

Unit Outline

STEN2001 Structural Analysis 1

Semester 1, 2015

(6)

Unit coordinator: Title: Dr

Name: Natalie Lloyd Phone: +618 9266 7574 Email: N.Lloyd@curtin.edu.au Building: 204

Room: 511

Consultation times:

@drnatalielloyd #structstuf

StructuralAnalysis2678@groups.facebook.com

https://www.facebook.com/groups/StructuralAnalysis2678/

Teaching Staff:

Administrative contact: Name: Diane Garth

Phone: +618 9266 7524

Email: D.Garth@curtin.edu.au

Building: 204

Room: 401

Learning Management System: Blackboard (lms.curtin.edu.au)

(7)

Acknowledgement of Country

We respectfully acknowledge the Indigenous Elders, custodians, their descendants and kin of this land past and present.

Syllabus

Statically Determinate Structures: Introduction, Revision of concepts (actions, free body diagrams, shear and bending moment). Stress and Strain, Compatibility of Deformations, Superposition. Deflection: double integration, moment area methods, virtual work. Statically Indeterminate Structures: Concepts, Equilibrium and compatibility. Development of slope deflection equations and application to beams. Development of moment distribution equations and application to beams.

Introduction

This unit presents the theory and application of structural analysis as applied to trusses and statically determinate and indeterminate beams. It emphasizes the skills of modelling and analysing structures in response to applied actions. The methods presented are classical methods of analysis, that is, methods not requiring the use of computers to solve. It highlights the need to develop an understanding of structural behaviour.

Unit Learning Outcomes

All graduates of Curtin University achieve a set of nine graduate attributes during their course of study. These tell an employer that, through your studies, you have acquired discipline knowledge and a range of other skills and attributes which employers say would be useful in a professional setting. Each unit in your course addresses the graduate attributes through a clearly identified set of learning outcomes. They form a vital part in the process referred to as assurance of learning. The learning outcomes tell you what you are expected to know, understand or be able to do in order to be successful in this unit. Each assessment for this unit is carefully designed to test your achievement of one or more of the unit learning outcomes. On successfully completing all of the assessments you will have achieved all of these learning outcomes.

Your course has been designed so that on graduating we can say you will have achieved all of Curtin's Graduate Attributes through the assurance of learning process in each unit.

Curtin's Graduate Attributes

Learning Activities

Lectures (in person) present the theory and application of structural analysis. Active engagement with the lecture content is a learning activity. Essential reading, video tutorials and online module completion tasks are all learning activities. Workshops are essential learning activities. Students must take an active role in the workshops. Preparation is necessary before attending the workshop.

Assessment tasks are learning activities in which students develop and demonstrate their competency.

On successful completion of this unit students can: Graduate Attributes addressed 1 Apply key concepts of stiffness and strength, equilibrium and compatibility to the analysis of

structures

2 Discern the appropriate analysis technique or concepts to quantify and compare key structural responses

3 Effectively communicate structural analysis concepts and applications

Apply discipline knowledge Thinking skills

(use analytical skills to solve problems) Information skills

(confidence to investigate new ideas)

Communication skills Technology skills Learning how to learn

(apply principles learnt to new situations) (confidence to tackle unfamiliar problems)

International perspective

(value the perspectives of others) Cultural understanding

(value the perspectives of others)

Professional Skills

(work independently and as a team) (plan own work)

Find out more about Curtin's Graduate attributes at the Office of Teaching & Learning website: ctl.curtin.edu.au

(8)

Learning Resources

Essential texts

The required textbook(s) for this unit are:

l Custom Text #structstuf compiled from Structural Analysis Eighth Edition SI Units R C Hibbeler available from www.pearson.com.au/9781486022618

OR

Structural Analysis Eighth Edition SI Units R C Hibbeler  

Assessment

Assessment schedule

Detailed information on assessment tasks

1. The Investigations (2 of) are application of the theory to structural analysis problems submitted to the Assignment Office.

2. Exercises are online tests and journals. The tests are have an availability time of one week. The journals have an availability of two weeks. All Exercises are due online before Friday 1700. Online Exercises must be submitted before the due time – do not leave submission close to the deadline.

3. The mid semester may be conducted outside usual lecture times. Venue and time will be advised ASAP. The mid semester test is conducted under exam conditions; Student ID is required for entry to venue. Approved calculators only are permitted.

4. The exam is conducted in Exams Weeks and information is published from the Examination Office closer to the time. Student ID is required for entry to venue. Approved calculators only are permitted.

Pass requirements

Achieve a grade/mark greater than or equal to 5/50

Achieve a minimum of 45% (22.5 out of 50) for the Examination Complete online Structural Language Modules

Fair assessment through moderation

Moderation describes a quality assurance process to ensure that assessments are appropriate to the learning outcomes, and that student work is evaluated consistently by assessors. Minimum standards for the moderation of assessment are described in the Assessment and Student Progression Manual, available from policies.curtin.edu.au/policies/teachingandlearning.cfm

Late assessment policy

This ensures that the requirements for submission of assignments and other work to be assessed are fair, transparent, equitable, and that penalties are consistently applied.

1. All assessments students are required to submit will have a due date and time specified on this Unit Outline.

Task Value % Date Due

Unit Learning Outcome(s)

Assessed

1 Investigations 12 percent Week: 8 ,13

Day: Friday Time: 1600

1,2,3

2 Exercises 18 percent TBA 1,2,3

3

Mid Semester Test 20 percent Week: 5

Day: TBA Time: TBA

1,3

4 Examination 50 percent Week: Examinations

Day: TBA Time: TBA

2,3

(9)

2. Late submission of assessments is not accepted in this unit. Students will receive a zero mark for any assessment item submitted late.

Assessment extension

A student unable to complete an assessment task by/on the original published date/time (eg examinations, tests) or due date/time (eg assignments) must apply for an assessment extension using the Assessment Extension form (available from the Forms page at students.curtin.edu.au/administration/) as prescribed by the Academic Registrar. It is the responsibility of the student to demonstrate and provide evidence for exceptional circumstances beyond the student's control that prevent them from completing/submitting the assessment task.

The student will be expected to lodge the form and supporting documentation with the unit coordinator before the assessment date/time or due date/time. An application may be accepted up to five working days after the date or due date of the assessment task where the student is able to provide an acceptable explanation as to why he or she was not able to submit the application prior to the assessment date. An application for an assessment extension will not be accepted after the date of the Board of Examiners' meeting.

Deferred assessments

If your results show that you have been granted a deferred assessment you should immediately check your OASIS email for details.

Deferred examinations/tests will be held from 22/07/2015 to 24/07/2015 . Notification to students will be made after the Board of Examiners’ meeting via the Official Communications Channel (OCC) in OASIS.

Supplementary assessments

Supplementary assessments, if granted by the Board of Examiners, will have a due date or be held between 22/07/2015 and 24/07/2015 . Notification to students will be made after the Board of Examiners’ meeting via the Official Communications Channel (OCC) in OASIS.

It is the responsibility of students to be available to complete the requirements of a supplementary assessment. If your results show that you have been granted a supplementary assessment you should immediately check your OASIS email for details.

Referencing style

The referencing style for this unit is Chicago.

More information can be found on this style from the Library web site: library.curtin.edu.au.

Academic Integrity (including plagiarism and cheating)

Any conduct by a student that is dishonest or unfair in connection with any academic work is considered to be academic misconduct.

Plagiarism and cheating are serious offences that will be investigated and may result in penalties such as reduced or zero grades, annulled units or even termination from the course.

Plagiarism occurs when work or property of another person is presented as one's own, without appropriate acknowledgement or referencing. Submitting work which has been produced by someone else (e.g. allowing or contracting another person to do the work for which you claim authorship) is also plagiarism. Submitted work is subjected to a plagiarism detection process, which may include the use of text matching systems or interviews with students to determine authorship.

Cheating includes (but is not limited to) asking or paying someone to complete an assessment task for you or any use of unauthorised materials or assistance during an examination or test.

For more information, including student guidelines for avoiding plagiarism, refer to the Academic Integrity tab in Blackboard or academicintegrity.curtin.edu.au.

(10)

Additional information

Engineers Australia competencies assessed and level of thinking

 

ENGINEERS AUSTRALIA  Stage 1 competencies and elements of competency assessed in this unit 1

https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/sites/default/files/shado/Education/Program%20Accreditation/110318%20Stage%201%

20Professional%20Engineer.pdf  

1. KNOWLEDGE AND SKILL BASE

1.1. Science/Engineering fundamentals:  Comprehensive, theory based understanding of the underpinning natural and physical sciences and the engineering fundamentals applicable to the engineering discipline.

1.2. Conceptual understanding: Conceptual understanding of the, mathematics, numerical analysis, statistics, and computer and information sciences which underpin the engineering discipline.

1.3. Specialist knowledge: In-depth understanding of specialist bodies of knowledge within the engineering discipline.

1.4. Development & Research: Discernment of knowledge development and research directions within the engineering discipline.

1.5. Context:  Knowledge of contextual factors impacting the engineering discipline.

1.6. Engineering. Practice: Understanding of the scope, principles, norms, accountabilities and bounds of contemporary engineering Assessment Task EA Professional competencies assessed 1 Level of thinking 2

 Exercises Online 1.1. Science/Engineering fundamentals 1.2. Conceptual understanding 1.3. Specialist knowledge 2.1. Problem solving 3.2. Communication  

 Comprehension

 Investigations 1.1. Science/Engineering fundamentals 1.2. Conceptual understanding 1.3. Specialist knowledge 2.2. Use of techniques 3.2. Communication 3.3. Creativity  

 Application

 Mid Semester Test 1.1. Science/Engineering fundamentals  1.2. Conceptual understanding 1.3. Specialist knowledge 2.2. Use of techniques 3.2. Communication

 Application

Final Exam  1.2. Conceptual understanding

1.3. Specialist knowledge 2.2. Use of techniques 3.2. Communication

Application  

(11)

practice in the specific discipline.

 

2. ENGINEERING APPLICATION ABILITY

2.1. Problem solving: Application of established engineering methods to complex engineering problem solving.

2.2. Use of techniques: Fluent application of engineering techniques, tools and resources.

2.3. Systematic use: Application of systematic engineering synthesis and design processes.

2.4. Project management: Application of systematic approaches to the conduct and management of engineering projects.

 

3. PROFESSIONAL AND PERSONAL ATTRIBUTES

3.1. Professionalism: Ethical conduct and professional accountability

3.2. Communication: Effective oral and written communication in professional and lay domains.

3.3. Creativity: Creative, innovative and pro-active demeanour.

3.4. Information use: Professional use and management of information.

3.5. Self Conduct: Orderly management of self, and professional conduct.

3.6. Team work: Effective team membership and team leadership.

 

Levels of thinking 2 (see: http://www.learningandteaching.info/learning/bloomtax.htm)

Knowledge

Recall of something encountered before but without having to change it, use it or understand it; facts.

Comprehension

Understanding the knowledge that has been acquired without needing to relate it to other information.

Application

Use of a learned concept to resolve some situation or solve a new problem in an appropriate way.

Analysis

Taking something learned apart into separate components for purposes of thinking about the parts and how they fit together.

Synthesis

Generating or creating something different by assembling or connecting ideas in a way that makes a whole.

Evaluation

Looking at the particular value of materials, information or methods in characterizing the whole.

Enrolment

It is your responsibility to ensure that your enrolment is correct - you can check your enrolment through the eStudent option on OASIS, where you can also print an Enrolment Advice.

Student Rights and Responsibilities

It is the responsibility of every student to be aware of all relevant legislation, policies and procedures relating to their rights and responsibilities as a student. These include:

l the Student Charter

l the University's Guiding Ethical Principles

l the University's policy and statements on plagiarism and academic integrity

l copyright principles and responsibilities

l the University's policies on appropriate use of software and computer facilities

Information on all these things is available through the University's "Student Rights and Responsibilities website at:

students.curtin.edu.au/rights.

(12)

Student Equity

There are a number of factors that might disadvantage some students from participating in their studies or assessments to the best of their ability, under standard conditions. These factors may include a disability or medical condition (e.g. mental illness, chronic illness, physical or sensory disability, learning disability), significant family responsibilities, pregnancy, religious practices, living in a remote location or another reason. If you believe you may be unfairly disadvantaged on these or other grounds please contact Student Equity at eesj@curtin.edu.au or go to http://eesj.curtin.edu.au/student_equity/index.cfm for more information

You can also contact Counselling and Disability services: http://www.disability.curtin.edu.au or the Multi-faith services:

http://life.curtin.edu.au/health-and-wellbeing/about_multifaith_services.htm for further information.

It is important to note that the staff of the university may not be able to meet your needs if they are not informed of your individual circumstances so please get in touch with the appropriate service if you require assistance. For general wellbeing concerns or advice please contact Curtin's Student Wellbeing Advisory Service at:

http://life.curtin.edu.au/health-and-wellbeing/student_wellbeing_service.htm

Recent unit changes

We welcome feedback as one way to keep improving this unit. Students are encouraged to provide unit feedback through eVALUate, Curtin's online student feedback system (see evaluate.curtin.edu.au/info/).

Recent changes to this unit include:

This unit has been delivered with increasing on-line lecture delivery in the form of mini lectures and mini worked example lectures on Bentley campus.  In 2015 face to face lectures will be reinstated with a view to enhance student perception of teaching quality and student learning outcomes.   

To view previous student feedback about this unit, search for the Unit Summary Report at

evaluate.curtin.edu.au/student/unit_search.cfm. See evaluate.curtin.edu.au to find out when you can eVALUate this unit.

(13)

Program calendar

Program Calendar – Semester 1 2015

Assessment Due – Exercises TBA on BlackBoard, however, tentative weeks noted in table

Week Begin Date Lecture/

Seminar

Pre-readings Tutorial/Other Assessment Due

Orientation 23 February Orientation Week

1. 2 March Types of Structures and Loads

2. 9 March Analysis of Statically Determinate Structures Exercise

3. 16 March Analysis of Statically determinate trusses

4. 23 March Internal Loadings in Members Exercise

5. 30 March Internal Loadings in Members Mid Semester Test

6. 6 April Tuition Free Week

7. 13 April Tuition Free Week

8. 20 April Deflections of Beams Investigation

9. 27 April Analysis Statically Indeterminate Beams Exercise

10. 4 May Analysis Statically Indeterminate Beams

11. 11 May Slope Deflection Exercise

12. 18 May Slope Deflection

13. 25 May Moment Distribution Investigation

14. 1 June Moment Distribution

15. 8 June Study Week

16. 15 June Examinations

17 22 June Examinations

(14)

Title: Exercise Online Journal

Activity: Exercises Online Journals are short written assessments. They are to be submitted via the BlackBoard online Journal- Graded Writing system. On-line exercises are individual assignments. Collaborating too closely is not acceptable for individual assignments. Refer to the guide page 13 http://academicintegrity.curtin.edu.au/local/docs/StudentPlagiarismGuide.pdf For a detailed Assessment description and specification of work to be done refer to Instructions provided at the Journal.

Typical instructions may be similar to the following:

Write a journal entry __________________. Your journal entry should contain the following:

an introduction

2-3 paragraphs in which you _____________________________________________, and

a conclusion paragraph

Your journal entry should be no longer than ___ (500-1000 typically) words and must include at least ____(2-4 typically) academic references.

Instructions for a typical Exercise are shown here from 2014:

Access help for writing in Structural Language Modules and Resources ad Feedback for Language in BlackBoard.

Assessment criteria and marking distribution and Engineers Australia competencies addressed Value of the assessment based on the rubric provided below 6%

The total assessment mark awarded is made up of the marks awarded to each element assessed.

Each item of the assessment in the rubric shows the EA competencies (ENGINEERS AUSTRALIA Stage 1 competencies) to be demonstrated. ‘Level of learning’ (Levels of learning) is specified for those elements of the assignment when it is appropriate.

Detailed guidelines and feedback

This detailed assessment rubric sets out assessment expectations so that you will be aware of the competencies to be developed and the expected standards. This table will also be used for assessing your work to provide sufficient feedback on how you performed against these standards. Feedback is provided on-line at the time of completion of the journal via the Online Rubric and grades are displayed on-line in GradeCenter.

Words in italics align to the Editing Checklist – refer to this document for further details. Instructions given in the Journals may be explained with the aide of the Directives document – refer to this for details. These documents re found in the Resources and Feedback section of BlackBoard:

(15)

Item

Engineers Australia competencies 1

and (if appropriate) Level of Learning 2

Poor standard BELOW REQUIREMENTS

40%

Good Standard PARTIALLY PROFICIENT 70%

Excellent standard PROFICIENT (C1) 100%

Percentage of assessment

THEMES AND CONCEPTS : TECHNICAL CONTENT

1.2. Conceptual understanding 1.3. Specialist knowledge

3.2. Communication

Summarises, and uses a range of simple vocabulary to express basic ideas. Ability to express more complex thoughts and ideas is unsupported by critical interpretation of other sources or explanation of supporting points.

Technical errors evident.

Does not address the directive given.

Develops an argument systematically, giving

simple reasons and examples to support a particular point of view

or option. Shows synthesis of information

and simple arguments from a number of sources. Technical inaccuracy in some ideas.

Partially addresses the directive.

Journal is a clear, well- structured exposition of a complex argument, highlighting the relevant salient issues; expands and supports points of view at some length with subsidiary points, reasons and relevant examples. Technically accurate information.

Addresses the directive.

50%

STRUCTURE AND

REFERENCING 3.2. Communication

Paragraphs may not be present or may be poorly constructed; minor errors in layout and paragraphing.

Journal includes insufficient, non- academic or inaccurate referencing.

Paragraphs present;

some may be poorly constructed and/or minor errors in required layout or standard paragraphing conventions.

All paragraphs are present and well- constructed; work shows required layout and standard paragraphing conventions.

Report includes extended, accurate and detailed reference list of academic references.

25%

STYLE:

ACADEMIC WRITING 3.2. Communication

Sentence structure errors occur, and some sentences require re- reading to understand.

Writing is not concise or clear with frequent use of redundancies, unclear expressions and informal language.

Report includes minimum required accurate references;

there may be minor errors in referencing.

Writing is clear and smoothly flowing to produce a well- structured text, with variable sentence length, accurate sentences and formal (academic style) language using structural analysis vocabulary.

12.5%

STYLE:

MECHANICS 3.2. Communication

Moderate grammatical control, though with noticeable mother tongue influence.

Punctuation and spelling errors are frequent.

Uses a limited number of linking words to create a clear, coherent text, marking the relationships between ideas, although some disjointedness occurs. Some informal language and/or not concise writing are evident.

Consistently maintains a high degree of grammatical accuracy;

errors are rare and difficult to spot.

Spelling is accurate.

Writing shows controlled use of punctuation devices.

12.5%

Feedback comments will be provided at the time of marking of the Journal assessment via BlackBoard.

Expected time required after completion of all necessary preparation to complete this assessment <2 hours of focused work.

(16)

Feedback may also be provided in the comments section of GradeCenter in addition to specific comments provided within the Rubric.

(17)

Real-life Structural Analysis – short answer

Select a structural system that you can access in person before the Workshop e.g. not an internet image. Record key details, measure or estimate dimensions, take images and think about these aspects of structural analysis:

a) Load path

b) Estimate of Actions c) Support types d) Estimate of Reactions

e) Structural type and determinacy f) Materials or sections choices

As a group in the Workshop, share your structural analysis research.

Describe the structural analysis of one the group members’ structure in a short response (1-2 paragraphs).

The response should contain at least one scholarly reference e.g. refer the essential text for this unit and / or Australian Standards. Use the Chicago Author-Date 16

th

edition referencing style.

http://libguides.library.curtin.edu.au/referencing What structure?

You can choose the structure, the structure should be sufficiently challenging without being impossible to analyse. For example suitable structures could be:

i. pedestrian bridge or walkway

ii. portion of a bus or train station/shelter iii. patio/shed/roof or floor beams

iv. part of a shopping centres where the structure is exposed e.g. Bunning’s, car parks, warehouse type structures such as indoor cricket or soccer

v. shopping centre beams, ramps, roof structures or canopies

Ensure you can safely and legally access the structure to find the dimensions, sections and support.

Use a tape measure/ruler, pace out larger structures to estimate spans or photograph with a known object to scale. Most structural steel sections can be determined by accessing data sheets:

http://www.onesteel.com/publications.asp?category=238&cname=Structural%20Sections

Take care when photographing – seek permission if necessary (e.g. if you are on a business or private property or a public place which is privately owned, you must ask, government property is restricted etc.). If in doubt – ask.

http://www.artslaw.com.au/info-sheets/info-sheet/street-photographers-rights/

• http://www.findlaw.com.au/articles/4193/photographing-your-way-through-an-intellectual- pro.aspx

(18)

Chapter 2 Fundamental Problems F2.1 to F2.6

(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)

• Like to challenge lead and push others to action, can be headstrong and emotional in response to disappointment or frustration.

• Generally make good managers because they generate action and thrive on pressure.

Plant • Innovators and inventors – can be highly creative.

• Often enjoy working on their own away from other members of the team.

• Tend to be introvert and react strongly to criticism and praise.

• Great for generating new proposals and to solve complex problems.

Co-ordinator • Ability to pull a group together to work towards a shared goal.

• Mature, trusting, and confident they delegate readily. They stay calm under pressure.

• Quick to spot an individual’s talents and use them to pursue group objectives.

• Co-ordinators are useful to have in charge of a team with their diverse skills and personal characteristics.

Monitor Evaluator

• Serious-minded, prudent individuals.

• Slow deciders who prefer to think things over – usually highly critical thinking ability.

• Usually make shrewd judgements by taking into account all the factors.

• Important when analysing problems and evaluating ideas and suggestions.

Resource investigator

• Good communicators both with other members of the group and with external organisations.

• Natural negotiators, adept at exploring new opportunities.

• Adept at finding out what resources are available and what can be done.

• Relaxed personalities with strong inquisitive sense and a readiness to see the possibilities of anything new.

• Very good for finding resources and heading negotiations.

Implementer • Well organised, enjoy routine and have a practical common-sense and self discipline.

• Systematic approach to tackling problems

• Reliable and hardworking.

• Will do what needs to be done whether or not they will enjoy the task.

Team worker • Supportive members of the team.

• Flexible and adaptable to different situations and people.

• Perceptive and diplomatic.

• Good listeners

• Avoid conflict

• Good at allowing everyone in the group to contribute.

Completer- Finisher

• Have a great capacity for follow-through and attention to detail, and seldom start what they cannot finish.

• Dislike carelessness

• Reluctant to delegate, they prefer to tackle tasks themselves.

• Good at tasks that involve close concentration and a close degree of accuracy.

Specialist • Pride themselves on acquiring technical skills and specialist knowledge.

• Priorities are to maintain professional standards and advance their own subject.

• Very committed.

• Important in providing the technical expertise and are usually called upon to

make decisions involving in depth experience and expertise.

(23)
(24)
(25)

GOALS: What are our team goals for this project?

What do we want to accomplish? What skills do we want to develop or refine?

EXPECTATIONS: What do we expect of one another in regard to attendance at meetings, participation, frequency of communication, the quality of work, etc.?

POLICIES & PROCEDURES: What rules can we agree on to help us meet our goals and expectations?

CONSEQUENCES: How will we address non-performance in regard to these goals,

expectations, policies and procedures?

(26)

Team member name

Team member name

Team member name

Team member name

Accessed

http://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designteach/design/instructionalstrategies/groupp

rojects/tools/index.html

(27)

Individually, reflect on your group’s dynamics and – anonymously – rate them according to each of the following variables (using a scale from 1 to 5). As a group, discuss the results and brainstorm concrete ways to improve your group processes.

Goals

Goals are unclear or poorly understood, resulting in little commitment to them.

1 2 3 4 5 Goals are clear, understood, and have the full commitment of team members.

Openness

Members are guarded or cautious

in discussions. 1 2 3 4 5 Members express thoughts, feelings, and ideas freely.

Mutual Trust

Members are suspicious of one

another’s motives. 1 2 3 4 5 Members trust one another and do not fear ridicule or reprisal.

Attitudes Toward Difference Members smooth over

differences and suppress or avoid conflict.

1 2 3 4 5 Members feel free to voice differences and work through them.

Support

Members are reluctant to ask for

or give help. 1 2 3 4 5 Members are comfortable giving and receiving help.

Participation

Discussion is generally

dominated by a few members. 1 2 3 4 5 All members are involved in discussion.

Decision-making

Decisions are made by only a few

members. 1 2 3 4 5 All members are involved in

decision-making.

(28)

that members find difficult to

change. situations.

Use of Member Resources Individuals’ abilities, knowledge and experience is not well utilized.

1 2 3 4 5 Each member’s abilities,

knowledge, and experience are fully utilized.

Adapted from Russ Christianson, CoopZone.

Accessed

http://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designteach/design/instructionalstrategies/groupp

rojects/tools/index.html

(29)

your group.

To a very

little extent To a little

extent To a great

extent To a very great extent 1. We work

together.

2. There is group concern for quality performance.

3. We share high performance expectations.

4. Some take our group work too lightly.

5. Some team members with good ideas don’t speak up.

6. Some members of the group would not disagree for fear of what others might think.

7. Some team members act like they know it all.

8. One or two

members tend to

dominate the

discussion.

(30)

feel free to make positive and negative comments.

11. An atmosphere of trust exists in our group.

12. We are

comfortable in the roles we play in the group.

Adapted from Watson, W.E. & Michaelsen, L.K. (1988). Group interaction behaviors that affect performance on an intellective task. Group and Organizational Studies. 13 (4), 495-516.

Accessed

http://www.cmu.edu/teaching/designteach/design/instructionalstrategies/groupp

rojects/tools/index.html

(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Dokumen Pengadaan dapat diambil dalam bentuk softcopy diunduh melalui

DISHUB/ApAblwlZOtt tanggal 18 April 20II untuk kegiatan Pembangunan Dermaga Bawah Jembatan Amperi-Keperluan Dinas Perhubungan Kota Palembang Tahun Anggaran -201t, dungan

Sehubungan dengan telah dievaluasinya dokumen penawaran pelelangan umum pekerjaan kontruksi untuk Pekerjaan Peningkatan Peningkatan Jalan Kartini, Jalan Linggar

Beberapa dasar pengembangan pengelolaan pendidikan berbasis mutu yaitu: Sadar Mutu dalam Pendidikan, Konsep Mutu, Manajemen Mutu Terpadu dalam Pendidikan, Berbagai Standar Mutu,

Pada hari ini Selasa tanggal Satu bulan Oktober tahun Dua ribu tiga belas, dimulai pukul 08.00 WIB dan berakhir pukul 10.00 WIB melalui situs www.lpse.pelalawankab.go.id telah

Pengruh Metode Pembelajaran Latihan (Drill) Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa Pada Kompetensi Dasar Mencatat.. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia |

[r]

Selain itu, Klein dan Kim (1998) mengatakan bahwa karena pertukaran pemimpin- pengikut yang tinggi maka komitmen yang tinggi akan meningkatkan kinerja, sedang dalam