• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

The Improvement Of Student’s Ability In Mastering Vocabulary By Using A Guessing Game Technique In Sdn 067690 Medan

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "The Improvement Of Student’s Ability In Mastering Vocabulary By Using A Guessing Game Technique In Sdn 067690 Medan"

Copied!
16
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

APPENDIX A

LESSON PLAN

 Lesson Plan I

School : SDN 067690 MEDAN

Subject : English

Class : V A

Topic : Things around environment, school tools, food, animals, and

vehicles.

Time : 2 x 35 minutes

A. Standard Competence

Comprehend and express simple instruction and information.

B. Basic Competence

Comprehend the meaning and the function of words in daily context.

C. Indicators

1. Pronounce the words correctly.

2. Spelling the words correctly.

3. Describe characteristic the name of things properly.

D. Objectives

(2)

3. The students are able to identify name of things by its characteristic

properly.

E. Material

Flash Card about the things around environment, school tools, food,

animals, and vehicles.

F. Source/Media

• Source :

-My apple course’s book – Work book

• Media : Flash card; pictures of the things around environment, school

tools, food, animals, and vehicles.

G. Method of Teaching

1. Lecturing

2. Demonstration

3. Discussion

4. Grouping

5. Questioning-Answering

(3)

Teacher’s Activities Student’s Activities

Opening

1. Teacher greeted the students.

2. Teacher checked the student’s

absence

1. The students responded the

teacher.

2. The students answered it.

Main Activities

1. The teacher asked students read

about characteristic of things

(ex: the things around

environment, school tools,

food, animals, and vehicles)

that she gave.

2. The teacher asked students to

comprehend about meaning of

words.

3. The teacher divided students in

the classroom in some group.

4. The teacher asked some

students of group to mention

about characteristic of a word

to the other team.

5. The teacher gave exercises to

1. The students read about

characteristic of things

together.

2. The students translate about

the text through opening

dictionary and asking.

3. The students tried to work

cooperatively.

4. The other students listen

about their friend said and

guess the word correctly.

5. The students answered the

(4)

do the students.

Closing

1. The teacher gave the conslusion

about the lesson.

2. The teacher closed the teaching

learning process and greeted.

1. The students noticed the

conclusion.

2. The students greeted the

teacher.

Medan, January

2016

Headmaster of SDN 067690 MEDAN Researcher

(5)

 Lesson Plan II

School : SDN 067690 MEDAN

Subject : English

Class : V A

Topic : Things in Classroom

Time : 2 x 35 minutes

A. Standard Competence

Comprehend and express simple instruction and information.

B. Basic Competence

Comprehend the meaning and the function of words in daily context.

C. Indicators

1. Pronounce the words correctly.

2. Mention the name of things in the classroom.

3. Define the characteristic and function of things in the classroom.

D. Objectives

1. The students are able understanding about the meaning of word.

(6)

3. The students are able to identify the characteristic and function of the

things in the classroom.

E. Material

Real Object;things in the classroom.

F. Source/Media

• Source :

-My apple course’s book – Work book

• Media : Real Object, picture of things in classroom.

G. Method of Teaching

1. Lecturing

2. Demonstration

3. Discussion

4. Grouping

(7)

H. Learning Activities

TEACHER’S ACTIVITIES STUDENT’S ACTIVITIES

Opening

1. Teacher greeted the students.

2. Teacher checked the student’s

absence

1. The students responded the

teacher.

2. The students answered it.

Main Activities

1. The teacher asked students to

look things in the classroom.

2. The teacher asked the students

to identify the characteristic and

function of the things.

3. The teacher asked students to

make group as they did.

4. The teacher asked students to

describe to another team about

their object in simple words.

5. The teacher gave exercises to

the students.

1. The students mention the

things in the classroom.

2. The students described about

the things.

3. The students work

cooperatively.

4. The other team tried to guess

the correct answer.

5. The students answered the

exercises.

Closing

1. The teacher gave the conslusion

about the lesson.

1. The students noticed the

(8)

2. The teacher closed the teaching

learning process and greeted.

2. The students greeted the

teacher.

Medan, January 2016

Headmaster of SDN 067690 MEDAN Researcher

(9)

APPENDIX B

DIARY NOTES

- Meeting I

In the first meeting, the writer with the English teacher gave students an

orientation test. During the test, many of them seemed very difficult to do the test

because they did not have good preparation. Many of them did not know about

meaning of words. Because in the situation, they did not allow to open dictionary.

Because the test was just for measuring their vocabulary mastery. They were really

surprised about that. Some student’s tend to ignore the test but the teacher try to

persuade them to finish the test by giving a gift.

- Meeting II

In the second meeting, the students did not give a good response because they

still imagine about the difficulties lesson in the last test. They were so noisy in the

class. Then, the writer explained about the topic. Some of them seemed lazy and the

others paid attention and listened her explaining in front of the class. In cycle I

session, the writer gave them a pre-test before playing a guessing game. They were

so confuse and tried to discuss with their friends and the English Teacher about the

question and answer. After the test, the writer gave some instructions and

information to prepare before playing a guessing game for next meeting.

(10)

In third meeting, here all of students started to play the guessing game.

Firstly, the writer gave instructions in playing the game. The writer worked with the

teacher divided the student in 4 groups and there was 7-8 students in each group. She

gave them some flashcards in each team. The flashcard was about familiar object in

environment, such as: animals, plants, tools, etc. One team had 5 words. The students

were given time to discuss about their own word. After that, one team presented in

front of the class and gave some clues about the things to another team. The other

team got one point if they can guess the answer correctly. As playing the game, the

students were so excited be participated in this session. In the last session in cycle-I,

she gave them post-test vocabulary to see the differences their score before and after

playing the game.

- Meeting IV

In this time, the student were so happy to discuss about the last activity they

did. They were so curious about their scores in a test in last week. In cycle-II

session, the students would play a guessing game more but in the different

way. The differences were just in the vocabulary. In this session, the

vocabulary just focused on the things in the classroom. The writer made a

discussion with students about the things in the class and make a describing

word in simply words. After discussing, the students wrote about the

describing words that be read by the writer. Then, the writer divided the

words into some groups. One group had 5 words as usual they did before.

Each group should know and understand about their words. It was needed as

(11)

- Meeting V

In this session, each team had some words to be described to the other teams.

They played the game as they did in cycle-I session. The rules of game were same.

During playing the game, the students were so enthusiastic. They were more

interested to mention word by word in English about the things in the classroom to

their friends. And the others were focus to listen what their friend said in English in

front of the class. Even not all of them mastered the describing words in English but

they tried to ask with their friends. All of the students seemed so enjoy playing in

every part of this game. They paid more concentration and less of noisy than they

were in first meeting. In this time, they played well and used the time effectively to

guess the matched object and guess what object it was. And at the end of game, the

writer gave them a test as a final test in cycle-II session. It was used to see a

comparison with their tests that they did before and to know how about their

improvement in mastering vocabulary. For this test, the students answered the test

(12)

Appendix C

1. The researcher came on the class on time.

2. The researcher greeted the students before

gave the lessons.

3. The researcher gave motivations to the

students before starting teaching and learning

vocabulary.

4. The researcher presented and explained about

the material well.

5. The researcher used a media to present the

material.

6. The researcher gave a chance to students to

ask about the questions.

(13)

7. The researcher asked the students which one

part that they don’t understand yet.

8. The researcher observed students’ activities

and behavior while the class was running.

9. The researcher asked some of students to come

in front of class to do teachers’ instruction.

10. The researcher asked the students to do

exercise.

11. The researcher concluded the material during

teaching and learning process.

12. The researcher using the time effectively.

13. The teacher close the class on time.

1. Students listened/payed attention to the

researcher’s and teacher’s explanation about

the topic by using guessing game as media in

front of the class.

2. The students asked to the researcher about the

topic.

3. The students used dictionary to help them do

their exercise.

4. The students was active in asking the question

about the material.

5. The students was enthusiastic during learning

(14)

vocabulary using media.

6. The students cooperated in their group during

(15)

What am I?

I am in the sky. I am small. I am bright. I am twinkle. I make the sky beautiful every night.

What am I? am always in your birthday party. Touch me with anything sharp. I sound “ Daaar “ papers in me. You always bring me to school. You write on me. Sometimes you read me.

What am I? everywhere. You can sit inside me. Please wear my belt when you want to go.

What am I?

I have buttons. I have numbers. I beep and ring. I ring “ Kriiing. Kriiing “. You can talk to your friend by me. What am I?

(16)

What am I?

I am heavy. I have some pockets. I save your tools and books. You always carry me to school. You put me on your back and shoulder sometimes.

What am I?

I am pointed. Sharpener is my partner. I can write anything on your papers. You always bring me to school. You put me in pencil box

What am I?

I am sweet. I am soft and cold. I can be melted. I am in a cup, stick, or cone. I have some tastes, chocolate, vanilla, and strawberry. What am I?

I am black. I am a pair. You use me on your foot. You take me to school. You tie and untie me.

What am I?

I am long. I am straight. I have numbers and centimeters. Using me to make a line.

What am I?

I have four legs. I am brown. I am made from wood. You can sit on me. I am in your classroom.

Pencil

Ruler

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Sahabat MQ/ Pembangunan kesehatan masyarakat/ selama ini dinilai belum dilandasi dengan paradigma yang tepat// Untuk itulah/ pembangunan pemerintah dibidang

Puji dan syukur kehadirat Allah SWT, karena rahmat dan izin-Nya penulis dapat menyelesaikan penyusunan skripsi ini, sebagai syarat untuk memperoleh gelar Sarjana

Sahabat MQ/ Perihal perlunya wakil menteri tersebut/ telah disebut eksplisit oleh Presiden Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono/ ketika mengumumkan susunan kabinet yang

[r]

Oleh karena itu penulis disini ingin membuat suatu aplikasi kamus yang bisa dijadikan alat bantu untuk mencari istilah Biologi dalam bahasa Indonesia dengan menggunakan Visual C#

[r]

Digunakannya Java-AJAX dalam pembuatan web ini, karena Java-AJAX dalam sebuah website secara direct dapat membuat permintaan kepada browser tanpa membuat halaman baru dengan

Procedural methods can express extruded footprint volume and CSG representations used by related approaches to modelling the built environment4. Procedurally-defined implicit