• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Cost Accounting, Chapter 9 11ch09

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Cost Accounting, Chapter 9 11ch09"

Copied!
61
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Inventory Costing

and Capacity

Analysis

Inventory Costing

and Capacity

Analysis

(2)

Learning Objective 1

Learning Objective 1

Identify what distinguishes

variable costing from

(3)

Inventory-Costing Methods

Inventory-Costing Methods

The difference between variable costing and absorption costing is based on the

(4)

Variable Costing

Variable Costing

Direct Materials

Variable Factory

Labor

(5)

Variable Costing

Variable Costing

Work in Process Inventory

Finished Goods Inventory

Cost of Goods Sold Fixed Factory

(6)

Learning Objective 2

Learning Objective 2

Prepare income statements

under absorption costing

(7)

Comparing Income Statements

Comparing Income Statements

The following data pertain to Davenport Fixtures: Year 1 Year 2 Total Beginning inventory -0- 2,000

-0-Produced 10,000 11,500 21,500

Sold 8,000 13,000 21,000

(8)

Comparing Income Statements

Comparing Income Statements

The following information is on a per unit basis:

Sales price: $71.00

Variable manufacturing costs:

Direct materials: $ 4.00

(9)

Comparing Income Statements

(Absorption Costing)

Comparing Income Statements

(Absorption Costing)

Total fixed production costs are $54,000 at a normal capacity of 12,000 units.

Fixed nonmanufacturing costs are $30,000 per year.

(10)

Comparing Income Statements

(Absorption Costing)

Comparing Income Statements

(Absorption Costing)

Revenues $568,000

Cost of goods sold 428,000 Volume variance (U) 9,000

Gross margin $131,000

(11)

Comparing Income Statements

(Absorption Costing)

Comparing Income Statements

(Absorption Costing)

Revenues for Year 1 are $568,000. What is the cost of goods sold?

8,000 × $49 = $392,000

(12)

Comparing Income Statements

(Variable Costing)

Comparing Income Statements

(Variable Costing)

Revenues $568,000

Cost of goods sold 392,000 Variable nonmanufacturing costs 16,000

Contribution margin $160,000

(13)

Learning Objective 3

Learning Objective 3

Explain differences in operating

income under absorption

(14)

Operating Income

(Absorption Costing)

Operating Income

(Absorption Costing)

What are revenues for Year 2? 13,000 × $71 = $923,000

What is the cost of goods sold? 13,000 × $53.50 = $695,500

(15)

Operating Income

(Absorption Costing)

Operating Income

(Absorption Costing)

What is the gross margin?

$923,000 – ($695,500 + $2,250) = $225,250 What are the nonmanufacturing costs?

13,000 units sold × $2.00 = $26,000

(16)

Operating Income

(Absorption Costing)

Operating Income

(Absorption Costing)

What is the operating income before taxes? $225,250 – $56,000 = $169,250

What is the operating income for the two years combined?

(17)

Income Statements

(Absorption Costing)

Income Statements

(Absorption Costing)

(18)

Operating Income

(Variable Costing)

Operating Income

(Variable Costing)

Revenues for Year 2 are $923,000. What is the cost of goods sold?

13,000 × $49 = $637,000

(19)

Operating Income

(Variable Costing)

Operating Income

(Variable Costing)

What is the net contribution margin?

$286,000 – $26,000 variable nonmanufacturing costs = $260,000 net contribution margin

What is the operating income before taxes? $260,000 – $54,000 fixed manufacturing costs

(20)

Income Statements

(Variable Costing)

Income Statements

(Variable Costing)

(21)

Income Statements

(Variable Costing)

Income Statements

(Variable Costing)

(22)

Comparison of Variable

and Absorption Costing

Comparison of Variable

and Absorption Costing

Variable costing operating income Year 1: $76,000 Absorption costing operating income Year 1: $85,000 Absorption costing operating income is $9,000 higher.

(23)

Comparison of Variable

and Absorption Costing

Comparison of Variable

and Absorption Costing

Production exceeds sales in Year 1. The 2,000 units in ending inventory

are valued as follows:

Absorption costing: 2,000 × $53.50 = $107,000 Variable costing: 2,000 × $49.00 = $ 98,000

(24)

Comparison of Variable

and Absorption Costing

Comparison of Variable

and Absorption Costing

Variable costing operating income Year 2: $176,000 Absorption costing operating income Year 2: $169,250

Variable costing operating income is $6,750 higher.

(25)

Comparison of Variable

and Absorption Costing

Comparison of Variable

and Absorption Costing

Sales exceeded units produced in Year 2.

(26)

Comparison of Variable

and Absorption Costing

Comparison of Variable

and Absorption Costing

Variable costing combined net income: $252,000 Absorption costing combined net income: $254,250 Absorption costing is higher by $2,250

(27)

Comparison of Variable

and Absorption Costing

Comparison of Variable

and Absorption Costing

Absorption costing operating income

Variable costing operating income

Fixed manufacturing costs in ending

inventory under

Fixed manufacturing costs in beginning

inventory under

EQUALS

(28)

Learning Objective 4

Learning Objective 4

Understand how absorption

costing can provide undesirable

incentives for managers to

(29)

Inventory Buildup

Inventory Buildup

What is the production volume variance? (12,000 – 4,400) × $4.50 = $34,200 U What is the net operating income or loss

for the period?

(30)

Inventory Buildup

Inventory Buildup

Revenues (4,100 × $71) $291,100 Cost of goods sold (4,100 × $53.50) 219,350

Volume variance 34,200

Gross margin $ 37,550

Nonmanufacturing costs 38,200

(31)

Inventory Buildup

Inventory Buildup

4,400 – 4,100 = 300

How much cost is in ending inventory? 300 × $53.50 = $16,050

(32)

Inventory Buildup

Inventory Buildup

Sales remain the same (4,100 units). What is the volume variance?

(12,000 – 9,000) × $4.50 = $13,500 U Suppose that management decides to

(33)

Inventory Buildup

Inventory Buildup

Revenues (4,100 × $71) $291,100 Cost of goods sold (4,100 × $53.50) 219,350

Volume variance 13,500

Gross margin $ 58,250 Nonmanufacturing costs 38,200

(34)

Inventory Buildup

Inventory Buildup

300 + 9,000 – 4,100 = 5,200

How much cost is in ending inventory? 5,200 × $53.50 = $278,200

(35)

Learning Objective 5

Learning Objective 5

Differentiate throughput

(36)

Throughput Costing

Throughput Costing

Revenues $568,000

Variable direct materials

(37)

Throughput Costing

Throughput Costing

Manufacturing Costs:

Labor $21.00 × 10,000 $210,000 Indirect costs $24.00 × 10,000 240,000

Fixed costs 54,000

(38)

Throughput Costing

Throughput Costing

Nonmanufacturing Costs:

Variable $2.00 × 8,000 $16,000

Fixed 30,000

(39)

Throughput Costing

Throughput Costing

Variable costing operating income: $76,000 Throughput costing operating loss: $14,000

(40)

Throughput Costing

Throughput Costing

The 2,000 units in ending inventory are valued as follows:

Variable

2,000 × $49 = $98,000

Throughput

(41)

Throughput Costing

Throughput Costing

Absorption costing operating income: $85,000 Throughput costing operating loss: $14,000

(42)

Throughput Costing

Throughput Costing

The 2,000 units in ending inventory are valued as follows:

Absorption

2,000 × $53.50 = $107,000

Throughput 2,000 × $4

(43)

Comparison of Inventory

Costing Methods

Actual CostingActual Costing

Absorption Costing Absorption Costing Throughput Costing Throughput Costing Variable

(44)

Comparison of Inventory

Costing Methods

Normal CostingNormal Costing

Absorption Costing Absorption Costing Throughput Costing Throughput Costing Variable

(45)

Comparison of Inventory

Costing Methods

Standard CostingStandard Costing

Absorption Costing Absorption Costing Throughput Costing Throughput Costing Variable

(46)

Learning Objective 6

Learning Objective 6

(47)

Alternative Denominator-Level

Concepts

Alternative Denominator-Level

Concepts

Theoretical capacity

Practical capacity

(48)

Budgeted Fixed Manufacturing

Overhead Rate

Budgeted Fixed Manufacturing

Overhead Rate

Lloyd’s Bicycles produces bicycle parts for domestic and foreign markets.

(49)

Budgeted Fixed Manufacturing

Overhead Rate

Budgeted Fixed Manufacturing

Overhead Rate

Assume that the theoretical capacity is 10,000 machine-hours, practical capacity

is 85%, normal capacity is 75%, and master-budget capacity is 60%.

(50)

Budgeted Fixed Manufacturing

Overhead Rate

Budgeted Fixed Manufacturing

Overhead Rate

Theoretical 100%:

$200,000 ÷ 10,000 = $20.00/machine-hour Practical 85%:

$200,000 ÷ 8,500 = $23.53/machine-hour Normal 75%:

(51)

Learning Objective 7

Learning Objective 7

Understand the major factors

management considers in choosing

a capacity level to compute the

(52)

Choosing a Capacity Level

Choosing a Capacity Level

What factors are considered in choosing a capacity level?

Product costing

Pricing decision

Performance evaluation

(53)

Decision Making

Decision Making

Assume that Lloyd’s Bicycles’ standard hours are 2 hours per unit.

(54)

Decision Making

Decision Making

Theoretical capacity: $20 × 2 = $40.00

Practical capacity: $23.53 × 2 = $47.06

(55)

Learning Objective 8

Learning Objective 8

Describe how attempts to

recover fixed costs of capacity

may lead to price increases

(56)

Downward Demand Spiral

The downward demand spiral is the continuing reduction in demand that occurs when the prices

(57)

Learning Objective 9

Learning Objective 9

Explain how the capacity

level chosen to calculate

the budgeted fixed overhead

cost rate affects the

(58)

Effect on Financial Statements

Effect on Financial Statements

Assume that Lloyd’s Bicycles actually used 8,400 machine-hours during the year.

(59)

Production Volume Variance

Production Volume Variance

Production volume variance

= (Denominator level – Actual level)

× Budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead rate Theoretical capacity:

(60)

Production Volume Variance

Production Volume Variance

Normal capacity:

(7,500 – 8,400) × $26.67 = $24,003 Master-budget capacity:

(61)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Gedung H, Kampus Sekaran-Gunungpati, Semarang 50229 Telepon: (024)

 Pengurangan kas di bendahara pengeluaran adalah belanja operasi sebesar Rp. Rincian sisa UYHD dan penyetorannya dapat dilihat pada Lampiran 1a. Tidak ada penerimaan

Hubungan balok dan kolom menyatu sehingga nilai Mpj adalah nilai terkecil di antara. M pc dan

El modelo de las 5 fuerzas de Porter no aporta una mera fotografía estática de un sector, sino que trata de desentrañar la dinámica de dicho sector, identificando los factores

Pelanggaran tersebut terjadi karena para Mahasiswa dengan tanpa izin membuat sebuah situs Internet yang berisikan lagu-lagu Top 40 yang populer sejak tahun 1989 (Angela Bowne,

Puji syukur kehadirat Allah SWT atas segala rahmat dan hidayah-Nya sehingga penulis dapat menyelesaikan Laporan Kerja Praktik yang berjudul “Rancang

[r]

WANDRA CIPTA ENGINEERING CONSULTANT Perum M ut iara Permai / Int an F11 Tuah Karya / Tampan Benni Wandra, ST Tidak M em enuhi 57,44 - Tidak Menghadiri Pembuktian Kualifikasi..