Air Quality Monitoring Study.

(1)

Air Quality Monitoring

-Bali Tobacco Control

(2)

Partners

• Universitas Negeri Sebelas Maret (Solo)

• Universitas Airlangga (Surabaya)

• Universitas Negeri Jember (Jember)

• BTCI (Bali)

• Universitas Mataram (Lombok)

• Universitas Hassanudin (Makassar)

(3)

AQM Backgrounds

• National Health Research Data :

• There are i creasi g prevale ce of s oker aged ≥

15 th from

34,2% (2007), 34,7% (2010) to 36,3% (2013).

• > 97 million Indonesian people are second hand smokers.

• Many people are spending most of their time at indoor areas.

(4)

• One of the efforts to control the air quality is by implementing Smoke Free Law (SFL).

• The concept of SFL implementation is to protect and guarantee a

healthy air without tobacco smoke, through ban the indoor smoking activity.

• It is important to monitor the SFL compliance through monitoring the air quality at public places as smoke free area.

• The air quality is identified by measuring the concentration of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and observation using observation form.

(5)

Aims

• To describe the effectiveness of Smoke Free Law to increase the indoor air quality.

• To measure particulate matter (PM_2.5) in public places that are ruled as smoke-free area.

• To compare the measurement results of particulate matter (PM_2.5) in publics by the compliance of local smoke-free legislation.

(6)

• Will be beneficial for advocacy to initiate the establishment of SFL.

• For advocacy to revise SFL.

• To evaluate the implementation of SFL.

• To inform and promote the harmful effect of smoking to indoor air quality to the wider community.

(7)

Methods

• Design

• Cross sectional descriptive

• Sample

• Public places as smoke-free area located in Denpasar,

Jakarta, Kota Bogor, Kab. Bogor, Bandung, Surabaya,

Jogjakarta, Mataram, Medan, Pontianak, Jember, Solo dan

Makasar.

(8)

Methods

(lanjutan)

• Instrument

• Observation

• Dylos air quality monitor PM

_2.5

(9)

(10)

(11)

The Characteristics of Venue (Sample)

Characteristics N %

Type of Venue

Education Facility 95 7%

Health Facility 116 8%

Hotel 203 14%

Market 128 9%

Office 127 9%

Playground 14 1%

Public Place 307 21%

Restaurant/ Entertainment 450 31%

Type of Room

Allow Smoking 628 44%

Complete Ban 658 46%

Separation Within 154 11%

Open/Closed Area

Closed 1063 74%

(12)

(13)

(14)

(15)

(16)

(17)

(18)

(19)

(20)

SBY02113 ( ON MY WAY CLUB ) / Public Place / TEMPAT UMUM [Surabaya] Evidence of Smoking : Evidence

Type of Venue : Closed

Smoking Outside : No Smoking Outside

Type of Room : 1 (1. Allow Smoking | 2. Complete Ban | 3. Separation Within) Number of Smoking : 18/4 19/9 21/9 0" 15" 30" : Number of People/Number of Smoking

Location : Club / Entertainment

(21)

Evidence of Smoking : Evidence Type of Venue : Closed

Smoking Outside : SmokeOutside

Location : Modern Market (Mall)

(22)

Evidence of Smoking : No Evidence Type of Venue : Closed

Location : Restaurant

(23)

Location : Hotel

(24)

Location : Modern Market

(25)

(26)

(27)

(28)

Type of Room : 1 (1. Allow Smoking | 2. Complete Ban | 3. Separation Within) Number of Smoking : 46/7 49/10 62/50" 15" 30" : Number of People/Number of Smoking

(29)

(30)

(31)

(32)

(33)

(34)

(35)

(36)

(37)

(38)

(39)

(40)

(41)

(42)

(43)

Conclusion & Reccomendation

• Most of the area is still not comply to Smoke Free Law.

• Most of the area has poor air quality (above the WHO standard)

• It is proven that smoking activity will worsen indoor air quality, it can even reach 20 times above the WHO threshold.

• Complete ban of indoor smoking will assure the provision of clean

and healthy air, hence, all type of indoor smoking activities should be prohibited.

(44)