• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

The Ability Of Using Conditional Sentences By The Students Of Sma Cahaya Medan

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "The Ability Of Using Conditional Sentences By The Students Of Sma Cahaya Medan"

Copied!
2
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

57

REFERENCES

Achirani. 2011. An Error Analysis Of The Use Of Using Present Tense Made By Students of Second Year Junior High School Of Madrasah Tsanawiyah Al Wasliyah 16 Perbaungan. Medan.

Allison, Desmon. 1999. Language Testing and Evaluation. Singapore: Singapore University Press.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1993. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Azar, Betty Schrampfer. 1989. English Grammar. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Inc. Berry, Roger. 2012. English Grammar – A Resource Book for Students. New York:

Routledge.

Carrol, John B. 1993. Human Cognitives Abilities. America: Cambridge University Press.

Calderon, J.F. and C. Gonzales. 2007. Methods of Research and Thesis Writing. Manila: National Book Store Inc.

Depdikbud. 1983. Dirjen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka. Douglas, Dan. 2000. Assesing Languages for Specific Purposes. United Kingdom:

Cambridge University Press.

Djuharie, Otong Setiawan. 2007. Bimbingan Pemantapan BAHASA INGGRIS. Bandung: Yrama Widya.

Ellis, Rod. 1985. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Folsom and friends. 1838. A Short Introduction to English Grammar with Critical Notes. Madison: General Library System.

Gay, L. 1987. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application. Ohio: Merrill.

Greenbaum, Sidney and Gerald Nelson. 2013. An Introduction of English Grammar Third Edition. New York: Routledge.

Hornby. 2000. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary Sixth Edition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hasan, Iqbal . 2002. Pokok-Pokok Materi Metodologi Penelitan Dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Lado, Robert. 1961. Language Testing: The Construction and Use of Foreign Language Tests. London: Longman Group Limited.

Marlina P. Dona. 2010. An Analysis of Year IX Primagama Student’s Ability In Mastering Elliptical Construction. Medan.

MGMP Bahasa Inggris SMA Kota Medan. 2012. English For SMA. Medan: CV. RG Pinem.

Nurkancana, Wayan and P. P. N. Sumartana. 1986. Evaluasi Pendidikan. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Ortega, Lourdes. 2009. Understanding Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge.

(2)

58 Prambandari. 2008. An Analysis On Primary School Students’ Ability To Use

Personal Pronouns: A Case Study On The Sixth Year Students Of SDN NO. 101878 Tg. Morawa. Medan.

Pyle, Michael A. and Mary Ellen Munoz. 1982. TOEFL Preparation Guide. USA: Cliffs Notes.

Robbins, Stephen P. 2007. Perilaku Organisasi (Organizational Behaviour). Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.

Surayin. 2009. Perfect English Grammar. Bandung: Yrama Widya.

U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. 1992. Testing in American

Schools: Asking The Right Questions. Washington DC: U.S. Goverment Printing Office.

Wikipedia. (online), (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data: modified on February 23, 2015).

Wirmanvalkinz.blogspot.com. (online),

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

What errors did the second year students make in learning conditional sentences at MAN 1 Malang in the academic year of 2012/2013. How is the frequency of errors made by the

Siti Rafi’atun: A.320 020 267, AN ANALYSIS OF GRAMMATICAL ERROR IN CONSTRUCTING SENTENCES IN SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE AND SIMPLE PAST TENSE MADE BY THE LEARNERS AT GAMA INTEGRA

analyzing the errors made by the second grade students of SMP Cendrawasih 1 in writing sentences using Simple Present Tense, Simple Past Tense, Present Continuous Tense,

The result of this study showed types of error made by the second year students MTsN-2 of Palangka Raya in writing using continuous and past continuous tense

There are two research questions which are presented in this study: (1) What are the errors made by the fifth semester students of the English Language Study Program

The researchesr also described the dominant type of conditional sentences as follows: Table 4.8 The Dominant Type of Conditional Sentences No Types Mean Score 1 Type I 0.88 2

Data analysis discovered that most of the students still made all of the four error types under the heading of surface strategy taxonomy.The error types that were identified in the

ETNOLINGUAL e-ISSN 2580-0280 Faculty of Humanities Universitas Airlangga Volume 7 Issue 2 November 2023 164 AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN CONSTRUCTING CONDITIONAL