AN ERROR ANALYSIS OF USING INFLECTIONAL
MORPHOLOGICAL STRUCTURE IN WRITING RECOUNT
TEXT BY THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS
A THESIS
Submitted to Fulfill the Partial Requirements For the Degree of Sarjana Pendidikan
By :
FANI FADHILLAH
Reg. Number: 2112121007
ENGLISH AND LITERATURE DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF LANGUAGES AND ARTS
ABSTRACT
Fadhillah, Fani. Registration Number: 2112121007. An Error Analysis of Using Inflectional Morphological Structure in Writing Recount Text by the Eleventh Grade Students. A Thesis. English Educational Program, State University of Medan, 2015
This research deals with the eleventh grade students’ inflectional morphological structure errors in writing recount texts. The objectives of the study are (1) to identify and classify the types of inflectional morphological structure errors which are found in writing recount text by the eleventh grade students in four schools at Binjai, (2) to find out the causes of inflectional morphological structure errors which are found in writing recount text by the eleventh grade students in four school at Binjai. The research uses a qualitative design in which the data are taken from the sentences of texts. The data are collected and described based on Valero’s model as a guideline. The errors found are classified into causes of errors based on Erdogan’s Model. The researcher applies random technique to get a representative sample; from four schools at Binjai, 100 students are chosen as the sample. The analysis found that there are four types of affixation errors occurred; they are omission 58 cases (47.5%), addition 19 cases (15.6%), substitution 29 cases (23.8%), and miss-ordering 16 cases (13.1%). Besides, intralingual contributes 90 cases (73.8%) and interlingual 32 cases (26.2%) in causing errors happened. So, the most dominant type of inflectional morphological structure errors made by the eleventh grade students in writing recount text is omission. It is hoped that the result of this research is useful for everyone who wants to study about affixation errors.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The greatest thankfulness to Allah SWT for blessing, strength, capability,
and patience, so the writer can accomplish this thesis as a partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree of Sarjana Pendidikan at the English Department of
Faculty Languages and Arts, State University of Medan.
The scintillating, historical, and meaningful process of realizing this thesis,
surprisingly has created the involvement between the writer and a great number of
people who gave guidance, suggestion, and assistance for which the writer would
like to extend her wholehearted and special gratitude for:
Prof. Dr. Syawal Gultom, M.Pd., the Rector of State University of
Medan.
Dr. Isda Pramuniati, M.Hum., the Dean of Faculty of Languages and Arts, State University of Medan.
Prof. Dr. Hj. Sumarsih, M.Pd., the Head of English and Literature
Hartoyo, S.Pd., M.Hum., her thesis reviewers.
All the lecturers of English department who have taught, guided,
and advised her throughout the academic years.
Her beloved parents, Juli Umar (alm) and Suwarsini, for their love,
things they gave that can make the writer understands and appreciates
the meaning of struggle in life. The writer’s sincere gratitude also goes
to her dearest brothers, M. Syahrizal, Agus Prayudha, and Ari
Handoko and her lovely sisters, Windi Astari, and Rina Pradita Sari and all families.
Mas Marwansyah, for love, time, laughter, happiness, supports,
togetherness and everything he gave that can make the writer
experienced other sides of life.
Regular A 2011 of English Educational Program,especially for her
best friends Ricka Setiawati, Risa Afianti and Ricka Setiawati as
their great classfor the love and togetherness throughout four years;
her friends in PPLT SMK Swasta Harapan Stabat for many
experiencies and togetherness.
Headmasters, English Teachers and Students of SMA Negeri 5
Binjai, SMA Negeri 7 Binjai, SMA Swakarya Binjai, and SMA Melati Binjai for time and cooperation. Thank you.
Medan, January 2016 The Writer,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
E. The Significance of the Study……….. 7
CHAPTER II REVIEW OF LITERATURE
8. Advantages of Error Analysis……… 23
9. Types of Errors……… 23
a. Omission………. 24
b. Addition……… 24
d. Miss-ordering………. 24
10. Causes of Errors……….. 25
a. Interlingual Transfer……… 25
b. Intralingual Transfer……… 25
B. Relevant Studies……… 26
D. The Procedure of Collecting Data……… 30
E. The Technique of Analyzing Data………. 31
LIST OF TABLES
Pages Table 1.1 The Percentage of the Eleventh Grade Students’ Score in
Writing……… 2
Table 2.1 The Examples of Prefix………... 12
Table 2.2 The Examples of Suffix……….. 14
Table 2.3 The English Inflections………... 16
Table 2.4 The Example of Recount Text……… 19
LIST OF APPENDICES
Pages
Appendix A. Writing Test……….. 56
Appendix B. Students’ Work Sheet……… 57
Appendix C. The Classification of Errors (I)……… 61
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. The Background of the Study
Language is a tool which is used to communicate in social life.
Especially, English that is the International language that has been learned by the
students since they were in the basic level of education. When students learnt
English, they are focused on mastering four language skills: Listening, Speaking,
Reading, and Writing. Among the basic skills, writing is considered to be the most
complicated skill because in writing the writer should be able to combine and
express her/is opinions or ideas in good written form. Ansyar et.al (2011) state
that in writing, the writer should not neglect the language components (structure,
vocabulary, and spelling) because the content of writing can only be understood if
those language components are written in correct form.
Based on the preliminary observation of the English teacher of SMA
Negeri 5 Binjai on April 9th 2015, the researcher asked the teacher about the
students’ writing score list for the first semester. The researcher saw the minimum
criteria mastery (KKM or Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimum) was applied 75
meanwhile the students’ writing score were still low. Most of students could not
exceed the minimum criteria mastery (KKM) which applied by school for English
lesson. For more detail, the students’ accumulated score are shown on the table
Table 1.1 the Percentage of the Eleventh Grade Students’ Score in Writing
1st Semester >75 ≥75 <75
XI-1 19 Students(51.4%) - 18 Students(48.6%)
XI-2 18 Students(45.0%) 1 Student(2.5%) 21 Students(52.5%)
XI-3 14 Students(35.0%) 2 Students(5.0%) 24 Students(60.0%)
XI-4 18 Students(56.3%) 1 Students(3.1%) 13 Students(40.6%)
XI-5 20 Students(58.8%) 3 Students(8.8%) 11 Students(32.4%)
Source: The students’ accumulated score of the eleventh grade students at SMA Negeri 5
Binjai academic year 2014/2015
From the previous data, it can be concluded that the students’ ability in
writing is still low. It can be seen from the most of students’ score percentage are
under the KKM.
Referring to the Educational Unit Oriented Curriculum (Kurikulum
Tingkat Satuan: KTSP) 2006 of Senior High School, the students are required to
be able to write various types of writing genres, such as descriptive, narrative,
recount, procedure, spoof, report and anecdote. But in this study the researcher
only uses the recount text as the writing genre.
Recount text is one of the kinds of the text which is purposed to inform
the reader or people about the last experience in the past that describe about
events or sequence. One of the existences of the language in writing a text does
not suddenly emerge, but it experiences morphological processes to make various
According to Syarifah (2015), word formation is a fundamental that
should be known well before using the more complex language units. And one of
the ways in forming words is through affixation.
Affixation is one or more bound morpheme (prefix and suffix) is attached
to free morpheme (root or stem) which change the meaning, category or
grammatical function of the word. Katamba (2005) states that affixation is divided
into two forms; derivation and inflectional. The affixation which changes the
word class or creates new lexeme from basic lexeme is called derivation. While
the affixation which creates new word formations from the basic lexeme is called
inflectional. In this study, the researcher only focuses on the inflectional form.
As the researcher’s preliminary observation of the eleventh grade
students at SMA Negeri 5 Binjai on April 9th 2015, the researcher found some
inflectional affixes errors in their English writing. Some sentences which are
indicated have errors are:
1. It make me happy to tell you about my vacation. (It makes me happy to tell
you about my vacation)
In this sentence, suffix –s must be added to indicate verb for third singular
person.
2. I have some friend in Jakarta. (I have some friends in Jakarta)
3. I always studied with my sister in the evening. (I always study with my sister
in the evening)
The suffix –ed in the sentence must be deleted to indicate verb for simple
present tense.
4. Our English teacher, Miss Renita teaches us patient. (Our English teacher,
Miss Renita teaches us patiently)
In this sentence, the word patient must be added with suffix –ly to indicate
adverb.
Affixation also becomes problem for foreign students in Bandung
international school. Based on the research, Indonesian affixation is a subject
which is difficult to be understood by the foreign students. This matter occurs
because of Indonesian grammar is different from their mother tongue’s grammar
(Widawati, 2012).
The research about English mastery found that the dominant errors
produced by the students are morphological aspects of language. Affixes, verbs,
prepositions are some of the categories that students find problem with. The
research which is conducted by Hariri (2012) in Iran indicated that this happens
because the different morphological structure between the learner’s L1 and L2.
Furthermore, the research which is conducted by Sitepu (2014) found that
The facts above indicate that affixation still becomes the problem for the
students in language using, but some teachers are not aware of correcting the
students’ errors in writing. They think that the error correction spends their time.
This situation makes the students do the mistakes repeatedly, because they do not
get the understanding of error correction from the teacher.
Erdogan (2005) states that error analysis enables teachers to find out the
sources of errors and takes pedagogical precautions towards them. Error analysis
is an activity to identify, classify or describe the errors made by someone in
speaking or in writing. In this study, it can be said as an activity done by the
teacher to correct the students’ error in writing.
The analysis of students’ errors in inflectional affixes is important
especially in writing. Some advantages of error analysis are to show the
inflectional error made by the students, to know the cause of error and to know
students’ needs then finding the solution for it. The researcher hopes that the
findings in analysis of students’ errors in Inflectional affixation can be useful for
educational progress.
B. The Problems of the Study
Based on the background of the study on the previous, the problems of
1. What are the types of inflectional morphological structure errors found in
writing recount text by the eleventh grade students in four schools at Binjai?
2. What are the causes of inflectional morphological structure errors found in
writing recount text by the eleventh grade students in four schools at Binjai?
C. The Scope of the Study
The study deals with the errors analysis. The study focuses on
inflectional morphological structures error, and the causes of errors on using
inflectional morphological structures in recount writing by the eleventh grade
students in four schools at Binjai.
D. The Objectives of the Study
Related to the problems, the objectives of this study are:
1) to identify and classify the types of inflectional morphological structure
errors which are found in writing recount text by the eleventh grade students
in four schools at Binjai.
2) to find out the causes of inflectional morphological structure errors which
are found in writing recount text by the eleventh grade students in four
E. The Significance of the Study
This study is expected to have both theoretical and practical perspectives.
1. Theoretical Perspectives
a. The result of this research can be useful for teaching inflectional
morphological structure in recount writing.
b. The result of this research can be used as a reference for those who
want to conduct a research about the inflectional morphological
structure in recount writing.
2. Practical Perspectives
a. For the teachers
The researcher hopes that this research gives the advantageous
information and will be inspiring for English teacher to give
correction and more exercises about inflectional morphological
structure clearly.
b. For the students
The students are able to increase their awareness about inflectional
morphological structure in writing recount text in order to avoid
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
This chapter presents the conclusions of the result of study that has been
discussed in previous chapter and also suggestions for English teachers, students
and other researchers.
A. Conclusions
Based on the data analysis of research at eleventh grade students of SMA
Negeri 5 Binjai, SMA Negeri 7 Binjai, SMA Swasta Swakarya Binjai, and SMA
Swasta Melati Binjai, the writer wants to present the conclusions. The conclusions
consist of several points that are related to the problems of the study. They are:
1. The types of inflectional morphological structure errors in recount
texts written by the eleventh grade students in four schools at Binjai
are omission 58 cases (47.5%), addition 19 cases (15.6%),
substitution 29 cases (23.8%), and miss-ordering 16 cases (13.1%).
2. The causes of inflectional morphological structure errors in recount
texts by the eleventh grade students were interlingual and intralingual
transfer. Intralingual transfer 90 cases (73.8%) dominantly causes the
errors occur because the students still have limited knowledge about
the rules and the structure of English and the inability to apply what
they have learned. Besides, the transfer of Indonesian language or
B. Suggestions
Considering the conclusions above, some suggestions are presented in
this part. As discussed in chapter I, this study hopefully can give advantageous
information both theoretically and practically.
1. For the Teachers
a. The teachers are expected to give stronger emphasis about
affixation to students.
b. The teachers are expected to discuss and remind students about the
inflectional morphological structure related to the English topics
that they learn, by doing this students will be more aware about
affixation.
c. The teachers are expected to give more exercises continuously to
the students and discuss it together if the errors in affixation
especially in inflection occur.
2. For the Students
a. The students should be able to comprehend about the words
formation in inflectional affixation.
b. The students are expected to be more aware about affixation rules
53
c. Students are expected to learn more about English inflectional
affixations.
d. Students are expected to do exercises and practice more about the
inflectional affixation to train their ability in using it.
3. For the other Researchers
It is eagerly suggested to the other researchers to conduct varied
researches about derivational affixation in other kinds of texts which
REFERENCES
Ansyar., Muhtar, Andi., & Suharyadi. 2012. Error in Using Simple Past Tense in Recount Text Written By the Eighth Graders of SMP LAB UM. Unpublished Thesis: State University of Malang
Aronoff, Mark & Fudeman, Kirsten. 2010. What is Morphology?. Second Edition. India: Pondicherry
Ary, D. Jacobs, L.C. & Razaevich. 2002. Introduction to Research in Education. Six Edition. United States of America: Wadsworth Group
Brown, H.D. 2007. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Fifth Edition. Englewood Cliffs: Wesley Longman
Clark, Herbert V & Clark, Eve V. 1977. Psycholinguistic and Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. United States of America: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich
Emmaryana, F. 2010. An Analysis on the Grammatical Errors: A Case Study of First Year Students of SMA Negeri 1 Cigudeg-Bogor. Unpublished Thesis.
Jakarta: Syarif Hidayatullah’ State Islamic University
Erdogan, Vacide. 2005. Contribution of Error Analysis to Foreign Language Teaching. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, I (2)
Gass, S.M. et al. 2008 Second Language Acquisition an Introductory Course. Third Edition. New York: Routledge
Hariri, Mahsa. 2012. Taxonomy of Morpho-Syntactic Errors and Error Analysis. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, IV (22) 4856-4860
Hyland, Ken. 2002. Second Language Writing. United States of America: Cambridge University Press
Jackson, H & Amvela, E. 2002. Words, Meaning and Vocabulary an Introduction to Modern Lexicology. New York: Cromwell Press
Katamba, Francis. 2005. English Word. London and New York: Taylor and Francis e-Library
Knapp, P & Watkins, M. 2002. Genre, Text, Grammar: Technologies for Teaching and Assessing Writing. Australia: UNSW Press
Mansur. 2008. An Error Analysis in Recount Text on the Use of Simple Past Tense by the Tenth Year Students at Smk PGRI 2 Tuban. Unpublished Thesis. Tuban: University of PGRI Ronggolawe (Unirow) Tuban
Saragih, Anggraini T., Erlita, Y., Nuran, A,. Suswati, R. 2011. Course Book for Vocabulary. Medan: State University of Medan
Sitepu, Roselina. 2014. An Error Analysis of Regular and Irregular Verbs in Writing Recount, Narrative, Procedure and Descriptive Text by the Eleventh Grade Students at SMA Negeri 2 Tanjungbalai. Journal. Medan: State University of Medan
Syarifah. 2015. Error Analysis of Affixation on Eleventh Grade Students in Writing Analytical Exposition Text. Unpublished Thesis. Medan: State University of Medan
Verawati. 2002. Error Analysis of the Inflectional Morphemes Produced by Speaking I Student of English Department of Petra Christian University. Unpublished Thesis. Petra Christian University
Valero, A.L. et.al. 2008. Teacher’s Attitude Towards Correcting Students’ Written
Error and Mistake. Teacher Research Journal of the Murcia University, pp. 21- 30