• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Analisis Pengaruh Fertilitas Terhadap Tenaga Kerja Wanita di Indonesia

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Analisis Pengaruh Fertilitas Terhadap Tenaga Kerja Wanita di Indonesia"

Copied!
12
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Data Tingkat Partisipasi Angkatan Kerja Wanita dan Angka Fertilitas Total di

Indonesia

Tahun

Tingkat Partisipasi

Angkatan Kerja

Wanita

Total Fertility

Rate

1990

51.90

3.122

1991

51.00

3.023

1992

50.10

2.931

1993

51.40

2.844

1994

52.70

2.764

1995

52.80

2.691

1996

53.00

2.628

1997

51.00

2.575

1998

51.50

2.534

1999

52.70

2.503

2000

52.20

2.484

2001

51.70

2.475

2002

51.20

2.474

2003

51.50

2.479

2004

51.70

2.486

2005

52.00

2.493

2006

52.40

2.495

(2)

2008

53.20

2.479

2009

53.20

2.46

2010

53.20

2.434

2011

53.30

2.403

(3)

Hasil Uji Akar Unit Variabel Total Fertility Rate(TFR)

Null Hypothesis: TFR has a unit root

Exogenous: Constant

Lag Length: 4 (Automatic based on AIC, MAXLAG=4)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -4.405288 0.0033

Test critical values: 1% level -3.857386

5% level -3.040391

10% level -2.660551

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Warning: Probabilities and critical values calculated for 20 observations

and may not be accurate for a sample size of 18

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(TFR)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 09/30/14 Time: 23:19

Sample (adjusted): 1995 2012

Included observations: 18 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

TFR(-1) -0.038967 0.008845 -4.405288 0.0009

(4)

D(TFR(-2)) 0.527664 0.336309 1.568983 0.1426

D(TFR(-3)) -0.199986 0.320996 -0.623017 0.5449

D(TFR(-4)) -0.364836 0.229890 -1.587005 0.1385

C 0.091443 0.020992 4.356182 0.0009

R-squared 0.998851 Mean dependent var -0.021889

Adjusted R-squared 0.998372 S.D. dependent var 0.024166

S.E. of regression 0.000975 Akaike info criterion -10.76675

Sum squared resid 1.14E-05 Schwarz criterion -10.46996

Log likelihood 102.9008 Hannan-Quinn criter. -10.72583

F-statistic 2085.624 Durbin-Watson stat 2.320244

(5)

Hasil Uji Akar Unit Variabel Tingkat Partisipasi Angkatan Kerja Wanita (TPAKW) pada

Tingkat Level

Null Hypothesis: TPAKW has a unit root

Exogenous: Constant

Lag Length: 0 (Automatic based on AIC, MAXLAG=4)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -1.810010 0.3661

Test critical values: 1% level -3.769597

5% level -3.004861

10% level -2.642242

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(TPAKW)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 09/30/14 Time: 23:21

Sample (adjusted): 1991 2012

Included observations: 22 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

TPAKW(-1) -0.321514 0.177631 -1.810010 0.0853

C 16.82347 9.258293 1.817124 0.0842

(6)

Adjusted R-squared 0.097788 S.D. dependent var 0.759315

S.E. of regression 0.721234 Akaike info criterion 2.270801

Sum squared resid 10.40357 Schwarz criterion 2.369987

Log likelihood -22.97882 Hannan-Quinn criter. 2.294167

F-statistic 3.276135 Durbin-Watson stat 1.505179

(7)

Hasil Uji Akar Unit Tingkat Partisipasi Angkatan Kerja Wanita pada Tingkat First

Difference

Null Hypothesis: D(TPAKW) has a unit root

Exogenous: Constant

Lag Length: 3 (Automatic based on AIC, MAXLAG=4)

t-Statistic Prob.*

Augmented Dickey-Fuller test statistic -3.953756 0.0082

Test critical values: 1% level -3.857386

5% level -3.040391

10% level -2.660551

*MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values.

Warning: Probabilities and critical values calculated for 20 observations

and may not be accurate for a sample size of 18

Augmented Dickey-Fuller Test Equation

Dependent Variable: D(TPAKW,2)

Method: Least Squares

Date: 09/30/14 Time: 23:22

Sample (adjusted): 1995 2012

Included observations: 18 after adjustments

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

D(TPAKW(-1)) -2.235725 0.565469 -3.953756 0.0016

(8)

D(TPAKW(-2),2) 0.586343 0.303443 1.932303 0.0754

D(TPAKW(-3),2) 0.328474 0.212543 1.545452 0.1462

C 0.189926 0.160975 1.179847 0.2592

R-squared 0.698184 Mean dependent var -0.066666

Adjusted R-squared 0.605317 S.D. dependent var 0.990544

S.E. of regression 0.622297 Akaike info criterion 2.119336

Sum squared resid 5.034302 Schwarz criterion 2.366661

Log likelihood -14.07402 Hannan-Quinn criter. 2.153439

F-statistic 7.518132 Durbin-Watson stat 1.803804

(9)

Hasil Uji Kointegrasi

Date: 09/30/14 Time: 23:24

Sample (adjusted): 1992 2012

Included observations: 21 after adjustments

Trend assumption: Linear deterministic trend

Series: TFR TPAKW

Lags interval (in first differences): 1 to 1

Unrestricted Cointegration Rank Test (Trace)

Hypothesized Trace 0.05

No. of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic Critical Value Prob.**

None * 0.800805 34.95191 15.49471 0.0000

At most 1 0.049634 1.069064 3.841466 0.3012

Trace test indicates 1 cointegrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level

* denotes rejection of the hypothesis at the 0.05 level

**MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values

Unrestricted Cointegration Rank Test (Maximum Eigenvalue)

Hypothesized Max-Eigen 0.05

No. of CE(s) Eigenvalue Statistic Critical Value Prob.**

None * 0.800805 33.88285 14.26460 0.0000

At most 1 0.049634 1.069064 3.841466 0.3012

Max-eigenvalue test indicates 1 cointegrating eqn(s) at the 0.05 level

(10)

**MacKinnon-Haug-Michelis (1999) p-values

Unrestricted Cointegrating Coefficients (normalized by b'*S11*b=I):

TFR TPAKW

11.44358 1.786881

12.18635 -0.050160

Unrestricted Adjustment Coefficients (alpha):

D(TFR) -0.003348 -0.000976

D(TPAKW) -0.398454 0.127715

1 Cointegrating Equation(s): Log likelihood 72.80361

Normalized cointegrating coefficients (standard error in parentheses)

TFR TPAKW

1.000000 0.156147

(0.01413)

Adjustment coefficients (standard error in parentheses)

D(TFR) -0.038316

(0.01301)

D(TPAKW) -4.559741

(11)

Hasil Uji Granger Causality

Pairwise Granger Causality Tests

Date: 09/30/14 Time: 23:27

Sample: 1990 2012

Lags: 1

Null Hypothesis: Obs F-Statistic Prob.

TPAKW does not Granger Cause TFR 22 6.70212 0.0180

TFR does not Granger Cause TPAKW 2.23893 0.1510

Pairwise Granger Causality Tests

Date: 09/30/14 Time: 23:28

Sample: 1990 2012

Lags: 2

Null Hypothesis: Obs F-Statistic Prob.

TPAKW does not Granger Cause TFR 21 4.61267 0.0262

(12)

Lampiran 7

Hasil Estimasi Regresi Sederhana

Dependent Variable: TPAKW

Method: Least Squares

Date: 09/30/14 Time: 23:39

Sample: 1990 2012

Included observations: 23

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C 57.82109 2.173689 26.60044 0.0000

TFR -2.179606 0.835809 -2.607780 0.0164

R-squared 0.244618 Mean dependent var 52.16957

Adjusted R-squared 0.208648 S.D. dependent var 0.906259

S.E. of regression 0.806189 Akaike info criterion 2.489945

Sum squared resid 13.64877 Schwarz criterion 2.588684

Log likelihood -26.63437 Hannan-Quinn criter. 2.514777

F-statistic 6.800519 Durbin-Watson stat 0.909294

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

siswa setelah guru memanfaatkan Masyarakat sebagai sumber belajar, karena.. pemanfaatan Community Resources ini mampu memberikan

Masjid kampus tersebut merupakan kasus yang menarik untuk diteliti secara mendalam dengan berlandaskan alasan-alasan sebagai berikut: (1) Ketiga masjid kampus ini

Kurva merupakan suatu pernyataan dari fungsi aljabar yang diwujudkan dalam bentuk grafis.Untuk menentukan persamaan garis singgung pada kurva yang diketahui titik

Istilah BIOS pertama kali muncul dalam sistem operasi CP/M, yangmerupakan bagian dari CP/M yang dimuat pada saat proses bootingdimulai yang berhadapan secara

[r]

bahwa Retribusi Jasa Umum yang telah ditetapkan dengan Peraturan Daerah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Nomor 11 Tahun 2011 sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Peraturan

Panitia Pengadaan Barang/ Jasa Dinas Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata Provinsi Jawa Tengah tahun Anggaran 2012 akan melaksanakan Pelelangan Sederhana ( ulang ) dengan

Nama paket pekerjaan : BELANJA MODAL PENGADAAN ALAT-ALAT ANGKUTAN DARAT BERMOTOR STATION WAGON.. SOLO