i
UM Surabaya
Muhammadiyah University of Surabaya
A THESIS
A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF DONALD TRUMP’S SPEECH:
JERUSALEM AS A CAPITAL OF ISRAEL
CITRA KURNIAWATI NIM. 20131111123
THE ADVISORS
Armeria Wijaya, S.S. M.Pd. Linda Mayasari, S.Pd. M.Pd.
ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF EDUCATION AND TEACHER TRAINING MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURABAYA
ii A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF DONALD TRUMP’S SPEECH:
JERUSALEM AS A CAPITAL OF ISRAEL
A THESIS
Presented to
Muhammadiyah University of Surabaya in Partial Fulfillment of the
Requirements for Degree of Sarjana Pendidikan in English Language
Education Program
CITRA KURNIAWATI
NIM. 20131111123
ENGLISH DEPARTEMENT
FACULTY OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURABAYA
iii MOTTO:
Do it or Leave it!
DEDICATION:
The Thesis Dedicated To:
My Beloved Parents
My Husband
My Brother and Sister
vii ABSTRACT
Kurniawati, Citra. 2018. Critical Discourse Analysis of Donald Trump’s Speech: Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel. Skripsi, English Department Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Muhammadiyah University at Surabaya. Advisor I : Armeria Wijaya, S.S. M.Pd. Advisor II: Linda Mayasari, S.Pd. M.Pd.
Based on the title of this thesis which is A Critical Discourse Anlaysis of Donald Trump: Jerusalem as a the Capital of Israel, it is known that the data used is a speech of Donald Trump. In speech there is relationship between intended meaning, ideology and also power relation. Therefore Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is conducted which aims to describe intended meaning, ideology and also power relation of Donald Trump’s speech.
The analysis of this thesis based on theory of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) and its analysis methods which were represented by Van Dijk’ Theory as a main theory and Searl’s as a support theory. Whereas the discussion used descriptive qualitative research method which deals with data that are in the form of word, rather than statistics and attempts to arrive at a rich description of something systematically. It starts by analyzing intended meaning in the script. Then, it is continued by analyzing ideology. The last is analyzed power relation.
The result shows that intended meaning used Donald Trump want to fulfill a campaign promise before he become a President. The ideology of Donald Trump’s speech is ideology fascism it is because Donald Trump as a President which famous with controversy statement. The last is power relation indicates that Donald Trump try to fulfill his campaign promise to be Jerusalem as a Capital of Israel. Moreover he also shows his power as President of United State that he feels all of parties have to follow him.
viii ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Praise be to allah SWT, the almighty God for the blessing and the most
merciful, given the researcher guidance and bless, so that the reasearcher can
finish this thesis entitled Critical Discourse Analysis of Donald Trump’ Speech:
Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel. Sholawat and salam are also delivered to the
prophet muhammad SAW. Who has brought islam as rohmatan lil alamin.
In preparing this thesis, the researcher has received many helps and
supports from various parties. Therefor, on this occasion the researcher would like
thanks to :
1. Endah Hendarwati, S.E, M.Pd. as the Dean of the Faculty of Teacher
Training and Education.
2. Drs. Wijayadi, M.Pd. as the chairman of Department of English,
Faculty of Teacher Training and Education
3. Armeria Wijaya, S.S. M.Pd. as my first great advisor who give me
knowledge, guidance, helpful correction to help me finish my thesis,
thanks for guide me well
4. Linda Mayasari, S.Pd. M,Pd. as my second advisor, who always give
me suggestion to complet my thesis, thanks for the patience.
5. All of the lecturer in Muhammadiyah University of Surabaya,
Especially in English Departmen Program.
6. My beloved parents Umbar Susilowati and Agoes Boediono, thanks
for being perfect parents to me, for their support spiritually and their
patience to pray for me daily. To my mother in law Nur Fauziyah who
always support me till finishing my thesis and also my father in law M.
Aksan Hidayat who has been in heaven.
7. My brother Wanda Dio Laksono and my sister Riskita Dinda Mulia
thanks for being the good brotherhood
8. My partner in life and my super husband, Mohamad Shofil Mubarrok
who is always give me spirit, motivation, prayer and all of I need to
ix 9. The last is to all of my friends in Campus Muhammadiyah especially
in Karyawan Class, Anggi, Alifa, Desy Dwi, Arini, Dwi Deassy, Nia,
Nimas, Siti and also Pak didit thanks to support each others.
Finnaly, the researcher realizes that this final project is still far from
being perfection.The researcher hopes that this final project would be
beneficial to everyone.
Wassalamualaikum Wr,Wb
Surabaya, 10 Agustus 2018
x TABLE OF CONTENTS
COVER ...ii
MOTTO AND DEDICATION ...iii
HALAMAN PERNYATAAN TIDAK MELAKUKAN PLAGIAT ...iv
HALAMAN PERSETUJUAN PEMBIMBING ...v
HALAMAN PENGESAHAN UJIAN ...vi
ABSTRACT ...vii
ACKNOWLADGEMENT………...viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ...x
LIST OF FIGURE ………...xiii
LIST OF APPENDIX………...xiv
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of The Research ...1
1.2 Problem of The Research ...3
1.3 Purpose of The Research ...3
1.4 Scope and Limitation of The Research ...4
1.5 Significance of The Research ...4
CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE 2.1 Discourse Analysis ...5
2.2 Critical Discourse Analysis ...6
2.3 Critical Discourse Analysis Theoretical Framework By Van Dijk. ...7
2.4 Analyzed The Data Uses Van Dijk and Searles’s Theory. ...8
xi
2.4.1.2.4 Expressive ...10
2.4.1.2.5 Declaration ...10
2.4.2 Ideology ...11
2.4.2.1 Fascism Ideology ...11
2.4.3 Power Relation ...12
2.5 Speech ...12
2.6 Previous Studies ...13
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD 3.1 Research Design ...15
3.2 Unit of Analysis ...16
3.3 Data Sources and Data ...16
3.4 Data Collection Technique ...17
3.5 Data Analysis Technique ...17
CHAPTER IV RESEARCH RESULT AND DISCUSSION 4.1 The Finding...19
4.1.1 Context...19
4.1.2 Topic ...20
4.2 Intended Meaning ...26
4.2.1 Microstructure ...26
4.2.1.3 Rhetorical Structure ...30
4.2.1.3.1 Hyperbole ...30
xii
4.3.1 Membership Criteria ...35
4.3.2 Typical Activities ...35
4.3.3 Overall Aims ...35
4.3.4 Norms and Values ...36
4.3.5 Position ...37
4.3.6 Resources ...37
4.4 Power Relation ...39
4.4.1 Position and Status ...39
4.4.2 Power Involves Control ...39
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGESTION 5.1 CONCLUSION ...40
5.2 SUGESTION ...40
xiii LIST OF FIGURE
xiv LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix 1.1 Donald Trump’ Speech ...i
Appendix 1.2 Statement of Fulfill a Campaign Promise ...v
Appendix 1.3 Biography of Donald Trump ...vii
xv
A.Dijk, Teun. Handbook of Discourse Analysis.
A.Kretzchmar Jr, William. 2009. The Linguistic of Speech. Cambridge:
Cambridge University press.
cnnindonesia.com/international/20171102121910-134-252967/seabad-deklarasi-balfour-awal-pendudukan-yahudi-di-palestina
Cornbleet, Sandra & Carter, Ronald. 2001. The Language of Speech and Writing.
London: Routledge.
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. New York: Longmana, Inc.
Haryatmoko, DR. 2016. Critical Discourse Analysis (Analisis Wacana Kritis).
Jakarta:Rajagrafindo Persada.
Jorgensen, Marianne & J. Phillips, Louise. 2012. Discourse Analysis as Theory
and Method. London: SAGE publication, Inc.
Kreidler, Charles W. 1998. Introduction English Semantic. London: Routledge
L. Mey, Jacob. 1993. Pragmatics An Introduction. Cambridge, Massachusetts
0214, USA
m.detik.com/news/internasional/3759255/akui-yerusalem-ibu-kota-israel-trump-penuhi-janji-kampanye
xvi Sheyholislami, Jaffer. January, 4th, 2015. Critical Discourse Analysis.
Suhardi. 2015. Dasar Dasar Ilmu semantik. Sleman: Arruzz Media.
W.Creswell, John. 2012. Fourth Edition Educational Research. Boston: Perason
Education, Inc.
W.Creswell, John. 2014. Fourth Edition Research Design. California: SAGE
publication, Inc.
Wodak, Ruth & Meyer, Micahel. 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis.
London: SAGE pubilcation, Inc.
www.yuksinau.id/ideologi-fasisme-pengertian-unsur-sifat-tujuan
Yule, George. 1985. The Study of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University
