• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

81 LAMPIRAN A SURAT KETERANGAN IDENTIFIKASI DAUN ASAM JAWA

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Membagikan "81 LAMPIRAN A SURAT KETERANGAN IDENTIFIKASI DAUN ASAM JAWA"

Copied!
23
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

81

LAMPIRAN A

(2)

82

LAMPIRAN B

(3)

83

LAMPIRAN C

HASIL PERHITUNGAN SUSUT PENGERINGAN, KADAR ABU,

DAN KADAR SARI LARUT ETANOL

Hasil perhitungan penetapan susut pengeringan serbuk

Replikasi Hasil Susut

Pengeringan(%)

1 8,2

2 8,5

3 8,5

Rerata 8,4

Rata-rata 8,4%

Hasil Perhitungan Penetapan Kadar Abu

No serbuk (g) Berat Berat krus kosong (g) Berat krus + abu (g) Kadar abu (%)

1 2,016 20,269 20,348 3,919

2 2,018 20,269 20,351 4,063

3 2,019 20,269 20,353 4,160

Rerata 4,047

1.

=

(4)

84 2. = 4,063% 3. = 4,160%

Rata-rata 4,047%

Hasil perhitungan kadar sari larut etanol

No Berat cawan + ekstrak setelah diuapkan Berat cawan kosong Berat ekstrak Kadar sari larut etanol (%)

1 64,698 64,623 5,078 1,48

2 78,469 78,400 5,045 1,37

3 72,133 72,062 5,058 1,40

Rerata 1,42

1. Kadar sari larut etanol =

= %

(5)

85 2. Kadar sari larut etanol =

=

= 1,37%

3. kadar sari larut etanol =

=

= 1,40%

(6)

86

LAMPIRAN D

HASIL PERHITUNGAN HARGA Rf

Hasil perhitungan harga Rf pada pemeriksaan secara KLT dengan pelarut n

-butanol : asam asetat : air (4 : 1 : 2)

Pengamatan Rf

UV 254 1 0,65

2

3

0,64

0,4

UV 366 1 0,65

2

3

0,64

0,4

Contoh perhitungan Rf

pada uv : 0,65

0,64

(7)

87

LAMPIRAN E

HASIL PERHITUNGAN LC50

Metode Probit analysis

Confidence Limits

Probabil

ity

95% Confidence Limits for

t_concentration

95% Confidence Limits for

log(t_concentration)b

Estimate

Lower

Bound

Upper

Bound Estimate

Lower

Bound

Upper

Bound

PROBITa .010 6.967 1.975 12.289 .843 .296 1.089

.020 8.521 2.756 14.295 .930 .440 1.155

.030 9.681 3.401 15.752 .986 .532 1.197

.040 10.658 3.980 16.957 1.028 .600 1.229

.050 11.524 4.522 18.015 1.062 .655 1.256

.060 12.317 5.038 18.975 1.090 .702 1.278

.070 13.056 5.537 19.867 1.116 .743 1.298

.080 13.756 6.023 20.708 1.139 .780 1.316

.090 14.425 6.501 21.510 1.159 .813 1.333

.100 15.070 6.972 22.282 1.178 .843 1.348

.150 18.060 9.280 25.874 1.257 .968 1.413

.200 20.854 11.589 29.288 1.319 1.064 1.467

.250 23.594 13.954 32.736 1.373 1.145 1.515

.300 26.359 16.402 36.360 1.421 1.215 1.561

.350 29.210 18.954 40.286 1.466 1.278 1.605

.400 32.200 21.622 44.646 1.508 1.335 1.650

.450 35.383 24.420 49.597 1.549 1.388 1.695

.500 38.824 27.366 55.329 1.589 1.437 1.743

(8)

88

.600 46.811 33.819 70.225 1.670 1.529 1.846

.650 51.602 37.432 80.215 1.713 1.573 1.904

.700 57.183 41.424 92.801 1.757 1.617 1.968

.750 63.886 45.962 109.201 1.805 1.662 2.038

.800 72.277 51.325 131.600 1.859 1.710 2.119

.850 83.459 58.050 164.478 1.921 1.764 2.216

.900 100.019 67.357 219.110 2.000 1.828 2.341

.910 104.489 69.765 235.013 2.019 1.844 2.371

.920 109.571 72.457 253.675 2.040 1.860 2.404

.930 115.445 75.512 275.999 2.062 1.878 2.441

.940 122.378 79.050 303.369 2.088 1.898 2.482

.950 130.795 83.252 338.051 2.117 1.920 2.529

.960 141.427 88.432 384.088 2.151 1.947 2.584

.970 155.688 95.184 449.648 2.192 1.979 2.653

.980 176.897 104.868 554.944 2.248 2.021 2.744

.990 216.343 121.966 774.462 2.335 2.086 2.889

a. A heterogeneity factor is used.

(9)

89

LAMPIRAN F

HASIL OUTPUT SPSS

Jam ke-1

Test of Homogeneity of Variances

d_temp

Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.

.000 4 20 1.000

ANOVA

d_temp

Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig.

Between Groups .430 4 .108 35.867 .000

Within Groups .060 20 .003

(10)

90

Post Hoc Tests

Multiple Comparisons

d_temp

Tukey HSD

(I) t_fr (J) t_fr

Mean

Difference

(I-J)

Std.

Error Sig.

95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound

t1 fr1 t1 fr2 -.08000 .03464 .183 -.1837 .0237

t1 fr3 -.28000* .03464 .000 -.3837 -.1763

t1 k(-) .12000* .03464 .018 .0163 .2237

t1 P -.10000 .03464 .062 -.2037 .0037

t1 fr2 t1 fr1 .08000 .03464 .183 -.0237 .1837

t1 fr3 -.20000* .03464 .000 -.3037 -.0963

t1 k(-) .20000* .03464 .000 .0963 .3037

t1 P -.02000 .03464 .977 -.1237 .0837

t1 fr3 t1 fr1 .28000* .03464 .000 .1763 .3837

t1 fr2 .20000* .03464 .000 .0963 .3037

t1 k(-) .40000* .03464 .000 .2963 .5037

t1 P .18000* .03464 .000 .0763 .2837

t1 k(-) t1 fr1 -.12000* .03464 .018 -.2237 -.0163

(11)

91

t1 fr3 -.40000* .03464 .000 -.5037 -.2963

t1 P -.22000* .03464 .000 -.3237 -.1163

t1 P t1 fr1 .10000 .03464 .062 -.0037 .2037

t1 fr2 .02000 .03464 .977 -.0837 .1237

t1 fr3 -.18000* .03464 .000 -.2837 -.0763

t1 k(-) .22000* .03464 .000 .1163 .3237

(12)

92 Jam ke-2

Test of Homogeneity of Variances

d_temp

Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.

.247 4 20 .908

ANOVA

d_temp

Sum of

Squares df

Mean

Square F Sig.

Between Groups .486 4 .121 24.280 .000

Within Groups .100 20 .005

(13)

93

Post Hoc Tests

Multiple Comparisons

d_temp

Tukey HSD

(I) t_fr (J) t_fr

Mean

Difference

(I-J)

Std.

Error Sig.

95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound

t2 fr1 t2 fr2 -.16000* .04472 .014 -.2938 -.0262

t2 fr3 -.26000* .04472 .000 -.3938 -.1262

t2 k(-) .14000* .04472 .038 .0062 .2738

t2 P -.14000* .04472 .038 -.2738 -.0062

t2 fr2 t2 fr1 .16000* .04472 .014 .0262 .2938

t2 fr3 -.10000 .04472 .207 -.2338 .0338

t2 k(-) .30000* .04472 .000 .1662 .4338

t2 P .02000 .04472 .991 -.1138 .1538

t2 fr3 t2 fr1 .26000* .04472 .000 .1262 .3938

t2 fr2 .10000 .04472 .207 -.0338 .2338

t2 k(-) .40000* .04472 .000 .2662 .5338

t2 P .12000 .04472 .092 -.0138 .2538

t2 k(-) t2 fr1 -.14000* .04472 .038 -.2738 -.0062

t2 fr2 -.30000* .04472 .000 -.4338 -.1662

(14)

94

t2 P -.28000* .04472 .000 -.4138 -.1462

t2 P t2 fr1 .14000* .04472 .038 .0062 .2738

t2 fr2 -.02000 .04472 .991 -.1538 .1138

t2 fr3 -.12000 .04472 .092 -.2538 .0138

t2 k(-) .28000* .04472 .000 .1462 .4138

(15)

95 Jam ke-3

Test of Homogeneity of Variances

d_temp

Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.

.603 4 20 .665

ANOVA

d_temp

Sum of

Squares df

Mean

Square F Sig.

Between Groups .886 4 .222 55.400 .000

Within Groups .080 20 .004

(16)

96

Post Hoc Tests

Multiple Comparisons

d_temp

Tukey HSD

(I) t_fr (J) t_fr

Mean

Difference

(I-J)

Std.

Error Sig.

95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound

t3 fr1 t3 fr2 -.16000* .04000 .006 -.2797 -.0403

t3 fr3 -.28000* .04000 .000 -.3997 -.1603

t3 k(-) .16000* .04000 .006 .0403 .2797

t3 P -.36000* .04000 .000 -.4797 -.2403

t3 fr2 t3 fr1 .16000* .04000 .006 .0403 .2797

t3 fr3 -.12000* .04000 .049 -.2397 -.0003

t3 k(-) .32000* .04000 .000 .2003 .4397

t3 P -.20000* .04000 .001 -.3197 -.0803

t3 fr3 t3 fr1 .28000* .04000 .000 .1603 .3997

t3 fr2 .12000* .04000 .049 .0003 .2397

t3 k(-) .44000* .04000 .000 .3203 .5597

t3 P -.08000 .04000 .302 -.1997 .0397

t3 k(-) t3 fr1 -.16000* .04000 .006 -.2797 -.0403

(17)

97

t3 fr3 -.44000* .04000 .000 -.5597 -.3203

t3 P -.52000* .04000 .000 -.6397 -.4003

t3 P t3 fr1 .36000* .04000 .000 .2403 .4797

t3 fr2 .20000* .04000 .001 .0803 .3197

t3 fr3 .08000 .04000 .302 -.0397 .1997

t3 k(-) .52000* .04000 .000 .4003 .6397

(18)

98 Jam ke-4

Test of Homogeneity of Variances

d_temp

Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.

.564 4 20 .692

ANOVA

d_temp

Sum of

Squares df

Mean

Square F Sig.

Between Groups 1.990 4 .497 67.216 .000

Within Groups .148 20 .007

(19)

99

Post Hoc Tests

Multiple Comparisons

d_temp

Tukey HSD

(I) t_fr (J) t_fr

Mean

Difference

(I-J)

Std.

Error Sig.

95% Confidence Interval Lower Bound Upper Bound

t4 fr1 t4 fr2 -.10000 .05441 .381 -.2628 .0628

t4 fr3 -.46000* .05441 .000 -.6228 -.2972

t4 k(-) .26000* .05441 .001 .0972 .4228

t4 P -.48000* .05441 .000 -.6428 -.3172

t4 fr2 t4 fr1 .10000 .05441 .381 -.0628 .2628

t4 fr3 -.36000* .05441 .000 -.5228 -.1972

t4 k(-) .36000* .05441 .000 .1972 .5228

t4 P -.38000* .05441 .000 -.5428 -.2172

t4 fr3 t4 fr1 .46000* .05441 .000 .2972 .6228

t4 fr2 .36000* .05441 .000 .1972 .5228

t4 k(-) .72000* .05441 .000 .5572 .8828

t4 P -.02000 .05441 .996 -.1828 .1428

(20)

100

t4 fr2 -.36000* .05441 .000 -.5228 -.1972

t4 fr3 -.72000* .05441 .000 -.8828 -.5572

t4 P -.74000* .05441 .000 -.9028 -.5772

t4 P t4 fr1 .48000* .05441 .000 .3172 .6428

t4 fr2 .38000* .05441 .000 .2172 .5428

t4 fr3 .02000 .05441 .996 -.1428 .1828

t4 k(-) .74000* .05441 .000 .5772 .9028

(21)

101

LAMPIRAN G

(22)

102

(23)

103

LAMPIRAN H

Gambar

TABEL UJI F
TABEL UJI F (LANJUTAN)
TABEL UJI R

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalis: (1) kemampuan guru-guru ekonomi dalam menyusun Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP) pada SMA di Sulawesi

Berdasarkan hasil analisis tersebut, maka didapatkan nilai capability level untuk domain proses EDM03 berada pada level 2 dan domain proses APO12 berada pada level 3 serta

Karena dengan proses yang sudah terkomputerisasi pekerjaan apapun akan lebih mudah dilakukan, seperti pendataan pada database yang merupakan pengumpulan informasi

Pengguna Break Event Point secara tepat dapat memberikan keterangan penting pada sejumlah keputusan bisnis dalam membantu menentukan beberapa besar volume penjualan

Manfaat praktis dari penelitian ini adalah sebagai bahan evaluasi bagi individu yang menjalani pernikahan jarak jauh sehingga mereka dapat memahami gaya attachment yang

Yang kedua ialah yang berbentuk khusus (“specific”). c) Skema pemarkahan yang bercorak umum boleh dibuat panduan bagi guru untuk kegunaan dalam bilik darjah atau untuk melatih

Pertanyaan efektif dalam pembelajaran matematika adalah pertanyaan yang dapat merangsang siswa berpikir matematis, tidak sekedar menghafal, menyebutkan definisi, mengerjakan