• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

DAFTAR PUSTAKA. 1. Hill A. Neonatal seizures. Pediatrics in review. 2000; 21:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Membagikan "DAFTAR PUSTAKA. 1. Hill A. Neonatal seizures. Pediatrics in review. 2000; 21:"

Copied!
22
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

47

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

1.

Hill A. Neonatal seizures.

Pediatrics in review

. 2000; 21: 117-21.

2.

Volpe JJ.

Neurology of the Newborn

. Elsevier Health Sciences, 2008.

3.

Markum A, Ismael S, Alatas H, Akib A, Firmansyah A and Sastroasmoro

S. Buku ajar ilmu kesehatan anak.

Jilid I Bagian Ilmu Kesehatan Anak

Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Indonesia Jakarta

. 1991.

4.

Sheth RD. Neonatal Seizure.

Medscape

. 2013.

5.

L Hellstrom-Westas IA-W, J Agren, K Kallen. Incidence and risk factors

for neonatal seizure in Sweden.

Archives of Disease in Childhood

. 2008;

93.

6.

Alberto Verrotti GL, Paola Cicioni, Claudio De Felice. New Trends in

Neonatal Seizures.

Journal of Pediatric Neurology

. 2004.

7.

Swaiman.

Pediatric Neurology Principles and Practice

. 5 ed.

Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier 2012, p.33-46.

8.

Saliba Rima M FJA, Kim Waller D. Risk Factors for Neonatal Seizure: A

Population-based Study, Harris County, Texas, 1992-1994.

American

Journal of Epidemiology

. 2001; 154.

9.

Hannah C. Glass TNP, Beate Danielsen, Dena Towner, David Glidden,

Yvonne W. Wu. Antenatal and Intrapartum Risk Factors for Seizure in

Term Newborn: A Population-based Study, California 1998-2002.

Journal

of Pediatric Neurology

. 2009; 154.

(2)

10.

Saliba RM, Annegers FJ, Waller DK, Tyson JE and Mizrahi EM. Risk

factors for neonatal seizures: a population-based study, Harris County,

Texas, 1992–1994.

American journal of epidemiology

. 2001; 154: 14-20.

11.

Shariati M. Neonatal Seizures in a Rural Iranian District Hospital:

Etiologies, Incidence and Predicting Factors.

Acta Medica Iranica

. 2012;

50.

12.

Soetomenggolo T and Ismail S. Buku ajar neurologi anak.

Jakarta: IDAI

.

2000: 244.

13.

Kosim MS, Yunanto A, Dewi R, Sarosa G and Usman A. Buku Ajar

Neonatologi. Edisi pertama. Jakarta: Ikatan Dokter Anak Indonesia, 2008.

14.

Booth D and Evans D. Anticonvulsants for neonates with seizures.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev

. 2004; 4.

15.

Pettker CM, Buhimschi IA, Magloire LK, Sfakianaki AK, Hamar BD and

Buhimschi CS. Value of placental microbial evaluation in diagnosing

intra-amniotic infection.

Obstetrics & Gynecology

. 2007; 109: 739-49.

16.

Mizrahi EM and Kellaway P.

Diagnosis and management of neonatal

seizures

. Lippincott-Raven Philadelphia, 1998.

17.

Jensen FE. Neonatal seizures: an update on mechanisms and management.

Clinics in perinatology

. 2009; 36: 881.

18.

Prawirohardjo S. Ilmu kandungan.

Yayasan Bina Pustaka Jakarta

. 2002.

19.

Neto EC, Rubin R, Schulte J and Giugliani R. Newborn screening for

congenital infectious diseases.

Emerging infectious diseases

. 2004; 10:

1069.

(3)

20.

Organization WH.

Pocket book of hospital care for children: guidelines

for the management of common illnesses with limited resources

. World

Health Organization, 2005.

21.

Hathaway WE.

Current pediatric diagnosis & treatment

.

Appleton-Century-Crofts and Fleschner Publishing Company, 1991.

22.

Lieberman E, Eichenwald E, Mathur G, Richardson D, Heffner L and

Cohen A. Intrapartum fever and unexplained seizures in term infants.

Pediatrics

. 2000; 106: 983-8.

23.

Lieberman E, Lang J, Richardson DK, Frigoletto FD, Heffner LJ and

Cohen A. Intrapartum maternal fever and neonatal outcome.

Pediatrics

.

2000; 105: 8-13.

24.

Minchom P, Niswander K, Chalmers I, et al. Antecedents and outcome of

very early neonatal seizures in infants born at or after term.

BJOG: An

International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

. 1987; 94: 431-9.

25.

Hall DA, Wadwa RP, Goldenberg NA and Norris JM. Maternal Risk

Factors for Term Neonatal Seizures: Population-Based Study in Colorado,

1989—2003.

Journal of child neurology

. 2006; 21: 795-8.

26.

Scher MS, Aso K, Beggarly ME, Hamid MY, Steppe DA and Painter MJ.

Electrographic seizures in preterm and full-term neonates: clinical

correlates, associated brain lesions, and risk for neurologic sequelae.

Pediatrics

. 1993; 91: 128-34.

(4)

27.

Zhao J, Chen Y, Xu Y, Pi G. Effect of intrauterine infection on brain

development an injury. I

nternational Journal of Developmental

Neuroscience

. 2013;7:543-9.

28.

Soraishama AS, Lodha AK, Singhala N, et al. Neonatal outcomes

following extensive cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the delivery room for

infants born at less than 33 weeks gestational age.

Resuscitation

.

2014;85:238-43.

(5)
(6)
(7)

Lampiran 3.

Biodata Penulis

Nama

: Atika Nurmalitasari

NIM

: 22010110130162

Tempat/Tanggal lahir : Yogyakarta/30 Maret 1992

Jenis Kelamin

: Perempuan

Alamat

: Jalan Bukit Unggul I nomor 15 Sampangan, Semarang

Nomor Telepon/HP : (024) 8317987/081215575792

Email

: [email protected]

RIWAYAT PENDIDIKAN FORMAL

1.

TK : TK Hj ISRIATI SEMARANG 1996-1998

2.

SD : SD Hj ISRIATI SEMARANG 1998-2004

3.

SMP : SMPN 5 SEMARANG Lulus Tahun: 2007

4.

SMA : SMAN 3 SEMAANG Lulus Tahun: 2010

5.

FK UNDIP : Masuk Tahun : 2010

KEANGGOTAAN ORGANISASI

1.

PASKIBRA SD Hj ISRIATI 2002-2004

2.

PASKIBRA SMPN 5 2005-2007

3.

OSIS SMPN 5 2006-2007

4.

OSIS SMAN 3 2008-2009

5.

CEMETI SMAN 3 2008-2009

(8)

Lampiran 4.

Hasil Pengolahan SPSS

KARAKTERISTIK IBU

a. Umur ibu (tahun) Kelompok kasus N Valid 60 Missing 60 Mean 28,40 Median 27,00 Std. Deviation 6,132 Variance 37,600 Skewness ,991 Std. Error of Skewness ,309 Kurtosis 1,145 Std. Error of Kurtosis ,608 Minimum 19 Maximum 48 Kelompok kontrol N Valid 60 Missing 60 Mean 25,22 Median 23,00 Std. Deviation 5,205 Variance 27,088 Skewness 1,288 Std. Error of Skewness ,309 Kurtosis 1,233 Std. Error of Kurtosis ,608 Minimum 17 Maximum 42 Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov(a) Shapiro-Wilk

Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

umur ibu ,150 120 ,000 ,907 120 ,000

(9)

Mann-Whitney Test Test Statistics(a) Umur ibu Mann-Whitney U 239.500 Wilcoxon W 539.500 Z -1.003

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .003 Grouping Variable: kejang neonatus

B. Penyakit Kehamilan

penyakit kehamilan (kelompok kasus)

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent Valid 60 50,0 50,0 50,0 tidak 54 45,0 45,0 95,0 ya 6 5,0 5,0 100,0 Total 120 100,0 100,0

penyakit kehamilan (kelompok kontrol)

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent Valid 60 50,0 50,0 50,0 Tidak 60 50,0 50,0 100,0 Total 120 100,0 100,0 Chi-Square Tests Value Df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 120,000(a) 2 ,365

Likelihood Ratio 166,355 2 ,000

(10)

KARAKTERISTIK NEONATUS

a.

Berat lahir (gram)

Kelompok kasus N Valid 60 Missing 60 Mean 2897,00 Median 2980,00 Std. Deviation 417,459 Variance 174272,20 3 Skewness -,147 Std. Error of Skewness ,309 Kurtosis ,467 Std. Error of Kurtosis ,608 Minimum 1800 Maximum 3900 Kelompok kontrol N Valid 60 Missing 60 Mean 3083,17 Median 3000,00 Std. Deviation 479,178 Variance 229611,83 6 Skewness 1,087 Std. Error of Skewness ,309 Kurtosis 2,980 Std. Error of Kurtosis ,608 Minimum 2200 Maximum 5000 Tests of Normality Kolmogorov-Smirnov(a) Shapiro-Wilk

Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

berat lahir ,147 120 ,000 ,957 120 ,001

(11)

Mann-Whitney Test Test Statistics(a) berat lahir Mann-Whitney U 261.000 Wilcoxon W 561.000 Z -.560

Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .025 a Grouping Variable: kejang neonatus

b.

Jenis kelamin

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

JK kontrol * JK kasus 60 100,0% 0 ,0% 60 100,0%

JK kontrol * JK kasus Crosstabulation

JK kasus Total

1 2 1

JK kontrol LAKI-LAKI Count 33 16 49

Expected Count 35,1 13,9 49,0 PEREMPUAN Count 10 1 11 Expected Count 7,9 3,1 11,0 Total Count 43 17 60 Expected Count 43,0 17,0 60,0 Chi-Square Tests Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided) Pearson Chi-Square 2,456(b) 1 ,195 Continuity Correction(a) 1,433 1 ,231 Likelihood Ratio 2,921 1 ,087

Fisher's Exact Test ,155 ,112

N of Valid Cases 60

a Computed only for a 2x2 table

(12)

FREKUENSI SUBJEK PENELITIAN Kelompok 60 50,0 50,0 50,0 60 50,0 50,0 100,0 120 100,0 100,0 Kasus Kontrol Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e Percent Infeksi IU 10 8,3 8,3 8,3 110 91,7 91,7 100,0 120 100,0 100,0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e Percent Status paritas 65 54,2 54,2 54,2 55 45,8 45,8 100,0 120 100,0 100,0 primipara multipara Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e Percent

cara. persal inan

31 25,8 25,8 25,8 89 74,2 74,2 100,0 120 100,0 100,0 SC Perv aginam Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent Gawat janin 24 20,0 20,0 20,0 96 80,0 80,0 100,0 120 100,0 100,0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e Percent

(13)

HASIL ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG BERPENGARUH

A.

Infeksi intrauterin

Resusitasi 37 30,8 30,8 30,8 83 69,2 69,2 100,0 120 100,0 100,0 Y a Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e Percent Masa gestasi 14 11,7 11,7 11,7 106 88,3 88,3 100,0 120 100,0 100,0 preterm aterm Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulat iv e Percent Crosstab 9 1 10 5,0 5,0 10,0 15,0% 1,7% 8,3% 7,5% ,8% 8,3% 51 59 110 55,0 55,0 110,0 85,0% 98,3% 91,7% 42,5% 49,2% 91,7% 60 60 120 60,0 60,0 120,0 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 50,0% 50,0% 100,0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Kelompok % of Total Y a Tidak Inf eksi IU Total Kasus Kontrol Kelompok Total

(14)

Chi-Square Tests 6,982b 1 ,008 5,345 1 ,021 7,944 1 ,005 ,017 ,008 6,924 1 ,009 120 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (,0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5,00.

b.

Risk Esti mate

10,412 1,275 84,998

1,941 1,455 2,590

,186 ,029 1,207

120 Odds Rat io f or

Inf eksi I U (Ya / Tidak) For cohort Kelompok = Kasus

For cohort Kelompok = Kont rol

N of Valid Cases

Value Lower Upper 95% Conf idence

(15)

B.

Status paritas

Chi-Square Tests ,034b 1 ,855 ,000 1 1,000 ,034 1 ,855 1,000 ,500 ,033 1 ,855 120 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (,0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 27,50. b. Crosstab 32 33 65 32,5 32,5 65,0 53,3% 55,0% 54,2% 26,7% 27,5% 54,2% 28 27 55 27,5 27,5 55,0 46,7% 45,0% 45,8% 23,3% 22,5% 45,8% 60 60 120 60,0 60,0 120,0 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 50,0% 50,0% 100,0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Kelompok % of Total primipara multipara St at us paritas Total Kasus Kontrol Kelompok Total

Risk Esti mate

,935 ,456 1,918

,967 ,676 1,384

1,034 ,721 1,483

120 Odds Rat io f or Status

paritas (primipara / multipara)

For cohort Kelompok = Kasus

For cohort Kelompok = Kont rol

N of Valid Cases

Value Lower Upper

95% Conf idence Interv al

(16)

C.

Cara Persalinan

Crosstab 18 13 31 15,5 15,5 31,0 30,0% 21,7% 25,8% 15,0% 10,8% 25,8% 42 47 89 44,5 44,5 89,0 70,0% 78,3% 74,2% 35,0% 39,2% 74,2% 60 60 120 60,0 60,0 120,0 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 50,0% 50,0% 100,0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Kelompok % of Total SC Perv aginam cara.persalinan Total Kasus Kontrol Kelompok Total Chi-Square Tests 1,087b 1 ,297 ,696 1 ,404 1,091 1 ,296 ,404 ,202 1,078 1 ,299 120 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (,0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 15,50. b. Risk Estimate 1,549 ,678 3,539 1,230 ,849 1,783 ,794 ,502 1,256 120 Odds Ratio f or cara.

persalinan (SC / Perv aginam) For cohort Kelompok = Kasus For cohort Kelompok = Kontrol N of Valid Cases

Value Lower Upper

95% Conf idence Interv al

(17)

D.

Gawat Janin

Crosstab 21 3 24 12,0 12,0 24,0 35,0% 5,0% 20,0% 17,5% 2,5% 20,0% 39 57 96 48,0 48,0 96,0 65,0% 95,0% 80,0% 32,5% 47,5% 80,0% 60 60 120 60,0 60,0 120,0 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 50,0% 50,0% 100,0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Kelompok % of Total Y a Tidak Gawat janin Total Kasus Kontrol Kelompok Total Chi-Square Tests 16,875b 1 ,000 15,052 1 ,000 18,581 1 ,000 ,000 ,000 16,734 1 ,000 120 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (,0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12,00.

b.

Risk Esti mate

10,231 2,855 36,666

2,154 1,619 2,865

,211 ,072 ,615

120 Odds Rat io f or Gawat

janin (Y a / Tidak) For cohort Kelompok = Kasus

For cohort Kelompok = Kont rol

N of Valid Cases

Value Lower Upper 95% Conf idence

(18)

E.

Riwayat resusitasi

Crosstab 30 7 37 18,5 18,5 37,0 50,0% 11,7% 30,8% 25,0% 5,8% 30,8% 30 53 83 41,5 41,5 83,0 50,0% 88,3% 69,2% 25,0% 44,2% 69,2% 60 60 120 60,0 60,0 120,0 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 50,0% 50,0% 100,0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Kelompok % of Total Y a Tidak Resusitasi Total Kasus Kontrol Kelompok Total Chi-Square Tests 20,671b 1 ,000 18,912 1 ,000 21,857 1 ,000 ,000 ,000 20,499 1 ,000 120 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (,0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 18,50.

b.

Risk Esti mate

7,571 2,967 19,318 2,243 1,620 3,106 ,296 ,149 ,589 120 Odds Rat io f or Resusitasi (Y a / Tidak) For cohort Kelompok = Kasus

For cohort Kelompok = Kontrol

N of Valid Cases

Value Lower Upper 95% Conf idence

(19)

F.

Masa Gestasi

Crosstab 6 8 14 7,0 7,0 14,0 10,0% 13,3% 11,7% 5,0% 6,7% 11,7% 54 52 106 53,0 53,0 106,0 90,0% 86,7% 88,3% 45,0% 43,3% 88,3% 60 60 120 60,0 60,0 120,0 100,0% 100,0% 100,0% 50,0% 50,0% 100,0% Count Expected Count % wit hin Kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Kelompok % of Total

Count

Expected Count % wit hin Kelompok % of Total preterm aterm Masa gestasi Total Kasus Kontrol Kelompok Total Chi-Square Tests ,323b 1 ,570 ,081 1 ,776 ,324 1 ,569 ,777 ,389 ,321 1 ,571 120 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by -Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (,0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,00.

b.

Risk Esti mate

,722 ,234 2,224

,841 ,447 1,584

1,165 ,711 1,908

120 Odds Rat io f or Masa

gestasi (preterm / aterm) For cohort Kelompok = Kasus

For cohort Kelompok = Kontrol

N of Valid Cases

Value Lower Upper 95% Conf idence

(20)

ANALISIS MULTIVARIAT REGRESI LOGISTIK

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

66.463 5 .000 66.463 5 .000 66.463 5 .000 -.471 1 .492 65.991 4 .000 65.991 4 .000 St ep Block Model St ep Block Model St ep 1 St ep 2a Chi-square df Sig.

A negat iv e Chi-squares v alue indicates that the Chi-squares v alue has decreased f rom the prev ious step.

a. Model Summary 99.893a .425 .567 100.364a .423 .564 St ep 1 2 -2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R Square

Nagelkerke R Square

Estimation terminat ed at iteration number 6 because parameter est imat es changed by less than .001. a. Classificati on Tablea 43 17 71.7 7 53 88.3 80.0 43 17 71.7 6 54 90.0 80.8 Observ ed Kasus Kontrol Kelompok Ov erall Percentage Kasus Kontrol Kelompok Ov erall Percentage St ep 1 St ep 2 Kasus Kontrol

Kelompok Percent age

Correct Predicted

The cut v alue is . 500 a.

(21)

Step Variabel p OR 95% CI Bawah Atas 2 Infeksi IU 0,008 9,668 1,104 84,669 Gawat Janin 0,000 10,231 2,855 36,666 Resusitasi 0,000 7,384 0,284 19,167 Umur ibu 0,039 0,915 0,841 0,995 BBL 0,064 1,001 1,000 1,002

Variables i n the Equation

-.095 .044 4.599 1 .032 .910 .834 .992 .001 .001 3.458 1 .063 1.001 1.000 1.002 .478 .709 .455 1 .500 1.613 .402 6.471 4.173 1.082 14.866 1 .000 64.891 7.780 541.231 2.367 .743 10.148 1 .001 10.667 2.486 45.768 -13.470 3.675 13.434 1 .000 .000 -.089 .043 4.276 1 .039 .915 .841 .995 .001 .001 3.419 1 .064 1.001 1.000 1.002 4.091 1.075 14.479 1 .000 59.813 7.271 492.023 2.343 .737 10.097 1 .001 10.417 2.455 44.206 -12.819 3.541 13.109 1 .000 .000 Umur.ibu BBL sex Resusitasi gawat.janin Constant Step 1a Umur.ibu BBL Resusitasi gawat.janin Constant Step 2a

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B) Lower Upper

95.0% C.I.f or EXP(B)

Variable(s) entered on st ep 1: Umur.ibu, BBL, sex, Resusitasi, gawat.janin. a.

Model if Term Removed

-52.419 4.946 1 .026 -51.835 3.778 1 .052 -50.182 .471 1 .492 -67.728 35.563 1 .000 -56.240 12.588 1 .000 -52.469 4.575 1 .032 -52.059 3.754 1 .053 -67.904 35.445 1 .000 -56.415 12.466 1 .000 Variable Umur.ibu BBL sex Resusitasi gawat. janin St ep 1 Umur.ibu BBL Resusitasi gawat. janin St ep 2 Model Log Likelihood Change in -2 Log Likelihood df Sig. of the Change

Variables not in the Equation

.458 1 .498 .458 1 .498 sex Variables Ov erall Statistics St ep 2a Score df Sig.

Variable(s) remov ed on step 2: sex. a.

(22)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

terjadi dikarenakan apabila prosentase peningkatan pada surat-surat berharga yang dimiliki bank lebih besar daripada prosentase peningkatan dana pihak ketiga karena

According to available data from 2008 to 2016 and studies on a variety of modeling methods using time series analysis, the modeling is based on polynomial method and

Pihak lain yang bukan Direksi atau yang namanya tidak disebutkan dalam Akta Pendirian/Anggaran Dasar yang dapat mewakili Direksi ataupihak yang

Cara pertama, secara bersama sama Variabel independent berpengaruh signifikan terhadap Variabel Dependent karena dari kedua model pengujian tersebut menghasilkan Sig

Consequently, the actual task for up-to-date digital image processing tools is the development of algorithms for determining the source and model of the DSLR (Digital Single

Dalam rangka melindungi masyarakat terhadap peredaran obat dan bahan obat yang tidak memenuhi persyaratan keamanan, khasiat/manfaat dan mutu maka Direktorat

Hasil penelitian dengan menggunakan 16 set data kasus peramalan yang terdiri dari satu variabel respon dan beberapa variabel bebas menunjukkan bahwa secara

Sebelum memahami kredit rumah syariah, kebanyakan untuk kredit rumah pasti melibatkan untuk proses pendanaan tetapi dengan system pendanaan yang diberikan banyak