Joumal Economic, Business, a,d Accouotancy
ventura
Volume 13, No.l,Apr
2010, page9l-lo{
Acreditatioa No. I I 0/DIKTUKep/2009
AI\TECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES
OFINTERNAL QUALITY OF PRODUCTS IN THE MANUFACTURING COMPAIYIES HOLDNVC
SNI
IN EASTJAVA Rovila El Maghviroh
STIE Perbanas Surabaya E-mail: [email protected]Jl. Nginden Semolo 34-36 Surabaya, Indonesia
ABSTRACT
This study is a confirmatory srud) rhat wds
ca*ied
outby
testing severalhypothes*
inorder
to
figure
out the causal relationship ofail
the stated variables.in ou"*ptii *ch effoi,
the syytly took thepopulation
of-205 manufacturingcompani* in
EastJ)va.,eil ofThen hold
sNI (standardreagnision of product).
This study enployed complete enumerafilonor
census method;lor
that reason, the sample and sampling technique were not required. The technical analysis applied to test the research hypothesis wasstntctural
Equation iylodeling (sEM)with
the support ofAmos sptogram.
The resurtsof
this research shiw that thereipositie and
signdrcantrelationship
between co_mmunication tevelof
objectives, frequencyol Teeau*,
efectiveness
of
incentive system of the quatity onproduct internal ira *"*a q"aii .ra
on change
offinancial
performance. The benefitof
this research isfor
scientific iryorrnotionaarding
the variablesof
communicarion lever of objectives,fuqiency of feedlback, and
efectiveness of incentive system of the quatity on intemal and externatjuaity olpruauct and
on changeoffinancial
pedormance of the manufactwing companiesin
Eastiori.
Kqt
words:
communication levelof
objectives, frequencyof
feedback, rheefeaiveness of
incentive of quality, internal qualiry and exrernal quality
of
product, changeojfinancial per-
formance.INTRODUCTION bility
creation between perceived self_interest The business competitionin
each industryat witl
interest of the organization.the era
ofglobalization
is increasing sosharp- To
incrreasthe quality of product
and ly currently. This condition can motivatebusi-
product competitiveness,manufa.to.iog.o-_
tressmetr
for
payingfull
attentionto quality.
panies in lndonesia in general aad in East JavaThis is
becausefull
attentionto quality can
especially, needsto
focus on the quality. Thegive impact on industrial world in winning
focus on thequality
should be implemented business competition. Tbe productquality is by
the company to access the market bothof
then considered as one
of
majorsqmpetitive national, intemational or regional
and givepriorities for
attaining a sustainablecompeti-
protectionto
customers. Some products aretive
advantage(HilI,
1997).It
is assumedtha
relatedto
security, healthy, safety, and con- failures the product quality of some firmsmay tinuity of
environment and they are exported have been caused byinability
of theircontrol or
circulatedin
domestic market. Thus, this systemsto
influenceproduction workers to
needsto
observetheir quality
tbrough prod- focus thek efforts on accomplishing theunit's uct
certification processby uring oistandar product-quality goals (Goold and euinn, Nasional lndonesia (SM) or other
standar 1993; Young andselto, l99l). Furthermore,
admittedby
theInstitute of product certifi-
Anthony and Govindarajan (1998) arguethat cation
(LembagaSertifikasi produk) which control
systemof
management aimto create
have been accreditedby
National Accredita-field
goal congruencewhich
meanscompati- tion committee (Komite Akredihsi
Nasion-91
l
ISSN 2085‐7381
al). This certification means that the company or producer is entitled to use sign
SM
for cer- tain produced products, and guarantee that the products havefulfilled
specified standard. .Beside the
quality of
product, the other purpose of the company is bothof
short-termor
long-tenn programs, that isto
increasefi-
nancial performance. The increasing fiaancial performance
is
considered aneffort to
keep upcontinuity
and extend the company going cotrcem concept.A
good changeof
financial performance can be shownby
the existenceof
increasing growthin
sales, retum on sales andretum on
assets(ROA). Financial
per- formance increase can be achieved when the companyis
ableto
acteffectively
andeffi-
ciently.The
increasingquality
canin tum in-
crcase earningsof
company.In
that case, the perforrnanceof
quality product should affectthe extemal quality indicator of
customer satisfactioni.e.
complaints, wan-anty,litiga- tion. A lower
percentageof
defective prod-uc8
should help afirm to
reinforce positive customer experience (Crosby, 1979; Hardie, 1998). Product-quality perfonnance is in term of reductionin
scrap, rework and defects. So, fewer warranty claims decreases the material aodlabor
requiredto repair
defective prod- ucts, and a low-cost producer can use its cost advantage to increaseprofit
margin or tolow- er
pricesfor
improved sales (Sheny, 1988).High
external productof
quality implies highloyalty of current
customers.Tkough im-
provemeDtof
loyalty, customers' satisfactionwill
guarantee eamings in thefuhre
(Fomell,1992; Rush et al., 1995). Some previous shrd-
ies
havefound a relation which is
positive between extemalquality of
productwhich
isproxy by
customer satisfactionand
changeof
financial performance(Ittrer
and Larckeq 1998a and 1997; Shetry, 1998; Jacobs et al., 1998;Banker et al., 2000;
Sedatole, 2003;Behn and
Riley,
1999).Based on the description above, this re- search peeps out some
ofthe
problems which are ofvital
importance to be studied especial-Anticedetrts and Concequences... (Rovila El Maghviroh)
ly for the
manufacturing companieswhich
haveSM
product in East Java related with the problems of management control system con- sistsof
communicationlevel of
objectives, Aequencyof
feedbaclg effectivenessof in-
centive systemofthe
quality which can affecf intemal quality of product. Iatemal qualityof
product can affect extemal quality
ofproduct
and change
of
financial performance and ex- temalquality
of product can effect shangeof
financial performance.
THEORITICAL FRAMEWORK A}iD HYPOTHESIS
Communication Level of Objectives of the Quality
Objectives
which have
beenspecified will
affect the workers
to
make strategyto point them to goal
achievement.For that
reason,the
companymust
settleobjectives clearly
and challenges which should be faced so that they can make the workerstrust
onthe
ob- jectiveswhich
are reachable. They also haveto
make the workersto
behavein line with
the aims at specific performance objectives as specified by compaoy.
It is
statedby Harrel
andTuttle
(2001)that compatibility of individual activity in
information system and organizatiotral strate-gic
objectives are required so asto
compre- hend the factorsto
produce the behaviorof
the inforrnation system professionals. What is specified by organization is assumed to affect
the behavior through objectives,
feedback and economic incentive. So byproviding
the inforrnationofthe
objectives specifed by the company, the workerswill
be directed toward the behavior specifed in the company's objec- tives.Like Hanel and Tuttle (2001),
Lockeet al.
(1981) and EreszM.
and F.H.Kanfer
(1983) also stated that goal settingwill
affect theworkers'
performance.In additiou,
goal setting can alsoaffect the workers to work
hard to reach the objectives or targets.it is ar- gued that such goal setting
will
heighten mo- tivation. This means that the targets receivedwill
strengthen and motivate the workersin
J。︲ Ac
81:
面 ヽ nc
D m is d p dt p p
“ it
d
t e t C
C
・︰
く 1
,1
Joumal Economic, Busine.ss, and Accountaocy Vetrtura Acreditation No. I I 0/DIKTI/Kep/2009
Volume 13, No.l, April 2010, page
9l-l04
6iming to the goal achievement.
Practice ofmanufacture has just based on the process
activity of
improvementof
qual-ity
for theworken
that is by guiding the busi- ness and communicating their quality taryets.By doing so, communication of
improve- ment targetsof
businessunit
productquality is
also expectedto
affect the workers'effort
directionto
improve thequality of
theirunit
product.TQM
asncw
manufachre practice, developed as philosophy can emphasize that processof
manufacturewith
continuousim-
provementwill
eliminate waste and improve- mentto
quality.ln
this case, the respoosibil-ity
of quality of product is often passed to the deparunent of quality control.In TQM, the workers have responsibility to perform improvement
of
manufacfure and execute some activites. Theresponsibitty for
investigating inappropriate itemswill
change ovcrfrom
deparfirent of controlof
qualityto
each personnel.For
that reason, continuous improvernent philosophy requires eachwork-
er to have responsibility for quality and stop- ping the production when defecets are found.Shim
andKillough
(1998),Daniel
and Reitsperger(1992)
describedthat
manufac-ture practice of TQM
should communicate the quality target for continuous improvemet.This is
intendedto alfect the intemal
qual-ity of
company product.By
communicatingquality
targets such as costof
scrap, rework, defect, the company can motivate the workers to reach the target. Consequently, the low cost levelof
scrap,rcwork,
and defectwill
make intemal quality of high product.Specific performance objectives
will
mo- tivates and pont out the strategy, guide the be- haviorof
the workers to reach quality targets which are specified by manufacturing compa- nies. Such targets must be communicatedin explicitly
in temr of numeric so that thework-
ers can be motivated to attain the target.
With
this attainmentof
the target,it
meens tbat tbelow
costof
scrap, rework and defectwill in-
crease the intemal quality of product.
Quality targets which are communicated
to
the workerswill
motivate the workersia their
attainmentto
process improvementof quality continuously as specified in TeM.
Goal setting
of
the performance sizes whichexplicit without any
communicationswill
make quality targets and
it will
not be ableto
increase intemal quality ofproduct. The qual-ity
targets consist ofcost ofscrap, rcwork, de- fectwhich
are communicated to the workerswill
motivate them to rcachlow
cost of scrap, rework. Finally, thelow of
costof
scrap, re-work
and defectwill
make qualityof
intemal product high.Hl:
Commuuicationlevel of
objectivesof
the
quality
has apositive
effect onin-
ternal qualities of productFrequency
ofFeedbacks of
theQualiter
Frequencies
of
feedbacksof
the qualities are the ftequency the company evaluates, analyz- es, anddisributes,
such as the dataof
quali- ties (scrap,rework,
and defect)to all
facto- ries. Thisis
intended toprovide
direction tomotivate the workers and
detect errorsfor
process
activity of
improvementof
product quality. So increasingly, often a company per-foms
evaluation, analysis, anddistribution of
dataof
qualitiesto all
factories. Then, the companywill
be able to improve the processof
quality improvement andfinally s6tair in-
ternal quality of the product.The frequency of feedbacks
ofthe
quali-ties can provide information about worker
performance, in which in the endwill
increase theclarity of
the roleor
dutywhich
must be executedby
the workers(Kluger
and Denisi, 1996;Early et al.,
1990; Bandura, 1986, pp 50-51). Some research of behaviorof
organi- zational has indicated that feedback assisted can increase the behaviorwith duty
orietrta-tion (Ashford
andCumming,
1983; Hgen etal.
1979).IGplan
(1983),Howell
and Soucy (1987) explained that operating the feedbackcorrectly
anon time
aswell
as relevant re-quires the company to have
management quality everyday. lnformation of qualitieslike
costof
scrap, rework, and defect can provide 93ISSN 2085‐7381 Anticedeots and Concequences... (Rovila El Maghviroh)
thc sigpals
oferror
detection and guida^cefor
expressed that when reward and recogDitioDimprovemcnt (Otlcy
andBerry,
1980;Ash-
packed into specific performance can be mea-ford aodTsui 1991).
sured so thatthe
behavior of the workers cao lead to the desire to optimize the performance H2: The frequency offeedbacksofthe
quali-ties has a positive effect on intemal qualities
of
the productThe
cffectlvenessof lncentive System of Qudlty
Classical
Utility
Theorytells
that valueto
a goods is measuedby
the levelof
satisfaction(utility) which is given by
the goodsto
irc user (Jevonsin
Medema and Samuels, 2003, pp.418419).
Goal setting theory also states that every worker ought to have specific per- formaoce target in order that he can mobilize the business by the workers. It also afrects the strategJ/ usedby
the workers to finalize their duty @esimonc, Werner and Harris 2002, pp.5l-55; Locke in
Gomez-Mejia,Balkin
and Cardy 1995, pp. 92-93).In this case, the effectiveness of incentive systems
ofquality
is a reward system and rec-ognition
botbof individual
and groupin at'
tainment of the target which consists of scrap, rcwork and defect aswell
as for processa$iv- ity of
improvement of product quality. lncen- tive covers both offinance dimension and non finance where which finance there referredre'
wardwhile which
non finance there referred recoguition. Govindarajan andGupa
(1985)measure.
H3:
Effectivenessof incentive
systemsof
quality has a positive effect on intemal qualities of the product.
Internal Qualldes
ofProduct
Intemal qualities
ofproduct
arc qualityoffin-
ishing the goods the assessing them as
prior to delivery in
relationto
thequality of pm-
cess
(Crosby
1979;Garvin
1987; Juran andGyma
1993). These can be seen through the existence of decrease in the internal failureto
gel tbe quality, such as scrap rate,rewort
rate, defect rate and improvementof
productrcli- ability level
before shipping. These intemal qualities of product are collected anddistrib-
ut€d to the factory for determining what must be taken into account first by the workers(Il-
gen, Fisher andTaylor
1979). Dawson and Patrickson (1991),Ahire
(1996),Ahire
andDreyfus (2000)
usedindicator of
improve-ment of quality during three years in measur- ing performance quality
ofthe
company.Internal
qualities includethe ability of
a
manufacturingplant to
produce the prod- ucts conformingto their
designedquality
at an economic production cost. So,it
can be vicwed as the "conformance to requirement"RESEARCH MODEL
---l
Joumal Economic, Business, and Accountatrry Ventua Acreditation No. I I 0/DIKTVKep/2009
Volume 13, No.l, April2010, pagc
9l-l04
dimension
of quality
as specifiedby
Crosby (1979, 1996).Ahire
and Dreytus (2000) con- siderfive
measurementsof intemal
qualiry:scrap rate, rervork rate, defect rate, intemal
reliability
test perfonnance before shipping,and manufacturing
productivity.
The Perfor- manceof
finished productsin
thefinal
tcsts and the proportionof
defective unitsof
pro- duction arewidely
used as indicatorsofcon-
formance quality at the end
of
the productionTable l
SEM Results,「reasurement Model
…
Si。ユVig菫
・
X13 X13 Xll
X23
X23
X2コ X2■
X25
X2■
秘
X22
X2_1
X3』
X3'
X3■
X35 X3`
X33
鶏
2
X3.1
Yl■
T13 Y12
Yl_1
理 』
■2■
Y2_1
Y33
■
2
‐
CL∞
3‐ ∝
OQ2
‐
COQl
‐
ERQ3 - ITQ 8
‐ 鞭 7
‐
FFQ6 -
喚 5←
rQ4
←
「
-
ヨR22Q3
‐ FFQユ
‐ ErSQ8
- 1ロ
ヨ27‐ ESQ 6
‐
EEQ5 -
コDQ`
―
E3Q3
‐ IEヨ12
- E■
Xセl‐
=QP4
‐ IcP3
‐
IQp2 - 30Pl
―
EQP3
‐
EQp2
‐
EQpl
‐
ぃr3
‐ CFp2
…1000
1_135 1897
1001 ,71
1■15 1046 1049
1■52
1即
1■50 コ蟄
“
0
聾 1.139
917
1■27 1000
_?84
,S3
駆
120 _100
C■
94``
S,6S
0004 155'5
043
■514 047 22.142 056 1■722 003 16598" 20■
98043 21』爆0 095 7570
¨ 一 ¨ ¨ 一 ¨
●●●
●●●
_113 112 .125
_12
123
■95 121
7514
8■54 ,33マ
7512 8341
833
6212
●●●
師 卵 鯉 躙
059 1■ 128 .058 8■4マ
044 19■31
●●●
●●●
633 1136
1■00
1915
1_953
_111
1“
5コ08 7143
●●●
●●●
183
^192
10478
10_153
ー
ISSN 2085‐7381
process
(Crosby
1979,1996). The
Cost ef-ficicncy of
a production processis
reflected in thc scrap and rework generated during pro- duction. They represcntintemal quality fail-
ur€ costs (Iuran and Gyma 1993).
Like
Juran and Gyna,Flynn
et al. (1995) also use Scrap and rework for an appropriate indicatorof
in- temal quality.H4 :
Internal qualities of product has a posi-tive effect on
extemal qualitiesof
the productH5 :
Inrcmal qualities of product has a posi- tive effect on ChangesofFinancial
PerfonnanceE(ernal Quelides
ofProduct
Customers
form their impression about
a firm's products based oD upon their current and past exp€riencewith
these products (Garvin 1987). A satisfactory field perfonnance of the productsis
accompaniedby lower
customer dissatisfaction,it
can cause greater customerloyalty, and improved market
share (Cros-by
1979,pp.
70-71;Bu-'le
andGale
1987,pp.54-56; Hardie
1998).Ahire
andDreyfis
(2000) pay attentionto four
long-rangeindi-
cators of extemal quality: warranty works,lit- igation
claims, cuslomer complaints, market share. Warranty,litigation claims,
customercomplains
refers to the extemalqualiry fail- ur€ costs (Juran
1993).Market
share also has beendirectly
associatedwith
customer perceptionof a firm's product of
based on recent and past usage (Flynn etal.
1995; Har-die
1998). Basedon
supportfrom
literarureTQM,
Dawson and Patrickson (1991),Ahire
(1996), Ahire and Dreytus (2000),
They used improvementin
these indicators over a 3-years time Fame to measurefirms'
perfor- mance along extemalquality
outcomes. So, extcmal qualities are related to the customer's perspcctiveofthe
producc upon field usage.Chaoges
of fnancial
performance can beidentifed
by theability
of the companyin
increasing growth of sale,profitability
(retum on sales), r€tum on assets(ROA). Growth
isAnticedents and Coocequenc€s... @ovila El Maghviroh)
divided into
tkee
major performance aspectsthat are growth in rctum on
asset, growthin
sale,growth in return on
sale. Usageof
growth as performance measure has fascina-
tion in
research.In
the beginningof
the year 1982 when&ta
were collectedfor
researchof
Swamidass andNewell
(1987), industries which were usedin
this research given on to recessioncondition
and sodo at the
heightof
competitionof
overseas. ROA not usedin
research
of
Swamidass andNewell
(1987) relatedto following
reason: industrieswhich
were included at their research in general were matured.Many
companieswhich
participatein
researchof
Swamidass andNewell
(1987) tendto
delaynew
invesmentin their facili
ties and prefer to operate
with
asset basis.For
companieswith very
smallwill
have higher ROA compared to companies with modem fa-cility
and larger fixed asset. This can becomea
considerationin
measuring performance.Though objective performance measures are preferred as perfomrance measure,
gro*th in
retum at sale has been used and recommend- ed in the place the objective measures arenot
made available.H6 : Extemal qualities of product have
a positive effecton
changesof
financial performanceRESEARCH METHOD
Manufacturing
businesswith SNI
(lndone- siaNational
Standard) productin
East Javaare the
subjectsof this
study.The
survey method is used to gather the data. Thercfore, questionnaires are distruibuted directly to the subjects through census sampling technique.The validity of the
instruments usedin
this studyis
assessed throughbuilding
measure- ment model.Next,
thereliability is
assessedtlvo'tglr
composite(contruct) rcliability
by cutoffvalue ue
minimum 0,7. Finally, to test the hypothesis, this study performs structural equation modelling.DATA AI\ALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
Manufacturing
companieswhich has SM
product locatedin
East Javaup to
2007 areJomal EconoIIuc,Bushess,and Accountancy Venma vOlumc 13,Nol,ApH12010,page 91‐ 104 AcredittdoュNo.HO/DIKT1/Kcp/2009
205
manufacturing companies.Of the
205 questionaires disseminated, 126renrned
but 19 questionaires were incomplete. Therefore,only
107(52,20%) ofthem
were changeable and analysed.To
assessvalidity, this
studybuilt
measure- mentmodel with
theresult
as shown Tabell. Most of
the goodness-of-fit
statistics has goodfit.
CoBstructs CR
CLOQ
FFQ EISQ
IQP
EQP CFp
0,872954
0ρ73813
0メ
Ю 0,921477 `791
° 3817989 0,13969
Based on the result
of
examinationof
directeffect line coefficient, it
indicatesthat
theeffect of
communicationlevel of
objectivesof
the quality on intemal qualitiesof
product hasline
coeffici entof
0,225with probability
0,003. This can be interpreted that
communi
cationlevel of
objectivesof
tbequality
has an effect significantly oD internal qualitiesof
product.
Target which has been specified
will
af- fect the workersto
make strategy topoint it to goal
achievement. Companymust
settle target clearly and challengeswhich
are facedand
givestrust to the workers that the
tar- get can be achieved. Therebywill
make the workers have behaviorof
which aims at spe-cific
performance targetswhich
are specified by company.Harrel
andTunle
(2001) expressed thatcompatibility
of individual activitiesin infor- mation
systemuth
orgamzational strategictarget
arerequied to
comprehendthe
fac- torswhich
impactsto
behavior the ioforma-tion
system professionals. What specifiedby
organizationwill
affect behaviorof
tbrough target, feedback and economic incentive. Soby giving
informationof target will
affecteffort direction of the information
syst€m professional.Locke et al. ( 198 I ) argue that goal settiag
will
affects performaoce.Goal
settingwill
poitrts business
of
the workers at hardefrort to
reach the target. EreszM.
andFH. Kan-
fer (1983) told that goal settingwill
heightensmotivation. This
meansthe target
receivedwill
sEengthens or weakeDs determined targct andwill
motivate the workers in aiming to the goal achievement.Communication level of objectives of
thequality which is
performedby
manufactur- ing business through managerquality
or fac- tory managerwill
affects the workers to have behaviorof
which its pointing to the strategy specifiedby
companyin goal
achievement'When company settles clearly targets of
scrap,
rework,
defectwill
make the workers have behavior of aimed at targets which have been specifiedby
company. Soby
commu- nicating targetsof
scrap, rework, defectwill
affect
effort direction of
the factory workersto
improve productquality of
their utrits aod eliminate waste.97
Yl嗣 .137 0632.173030 Yl― X31 1.054 .1228.651
●●●理″ YJ .603 .066'.198`“
種 ≡翻 湧 ::壺 ::::艦
―Square 411,369
offreedom
399IⅢ
6Cancc Probability O,052 MSEA O,072
H O,942GH O,908
F l,0310,957
ISSN 2085‐7381
As
statedby
Shim aodKillough (198),
Daniel and Reitsperger ( 1992) that communi-
catirg
targetquality
for continuous improve- meutwill afect
inrcmal quality of productof
the company. This means that
if
qualrty taryetcommunicated
in
targetsof
costof
scrap, re-worh
defect either in monetary term (rupiah) or unitwill
reach quality targets ttrat the com- pany expected.Based on the result
of
examinationof di- rect
efrectline coefficient
indicatesthat
the efrect offrequency offeedbacksofthe quality on intemal quality of
product hasline
coef-ficient of
0,137with probability
0,030. This producesa finding that fiequency of
feed- backs of&e
quality has a significant effect on internal qualitiesof
product. Based on resultofthe
cxamination then can be concluded that Hypothesis2 (two) in this study
expressestbat frequenry of feedbacls of the quality
has a significantefect
on intemal qualitiesof
product is proven
or
supportedby
fact. This studyfinding
indicates supportto
the theorywhich expresses
existenceof sipiicant
efrect offrequency offeedbacks
ofthe
quality on intemal qualities of product.Specific feedbacks
will
increase perfor-maoc€ than
feedbackwhich
generally, be- causeby giving
the fcedbackwhich
has the characterof
specificwill
giveclarity of
roleofa
duty. Specific feedback also giveswork-
ers the opportunityto
use any good strategyto
execute the duty (Early etal.,
1990). Ash- ford andCunming
( I 983) expressed research bchaviorof
organizational has indicated that feedback assisted incrcasesduty
orientated behavior.It
meansthat by giving
feedback to the workers about what have been reachedwill
makethe
workers have behaviorto fi- nalize duty which have been
specifiedby
company.
lnformation of
qualitieslike
scrap,rework,
and defect cangive
a baseto
error detecting and as a guidanceto
see improve- ment areas(Otley
andBerry
1980; AshfordandTzui
1991).Kaplan (1983),
Howell
and Soucy (1987)told that operating of feedback
correctlyAnticedents and Concequences,... @ovila El Maghviroh)
time and rclevant are required to mstugc- ment daily quality. Information of
qualitieslike
scrap,rework
and dcfcct can give a baseto enor
detecting. Banker etal.,
(1993)pro
vided empirical proof that increasingly oftea manufacture performance measures informed
to
the workerswill
conelatepositively with
practiceTQM.
Sowith
frequently company gives feedbackto
the workers then practiceTQM will
more can increases company per- fonnance.The result
of this
study supports the re- search performedby
Daniel and Reitsperger (1991), and providesempiric proof
showing that the Japanese car and electronic companies use improvement strategy continuously and more rcgularly provides feedback to heighten performance. From thepenpectivc of
analy-sis, often
measuresof
manufacture perfor- mance reported to the workers often quicken theeffectivenes of duty
strategywhich
canimprove
perfonnance. So,the more
regular exist€nce of performance feedback, the more the levelof
workers increase when receiving nonfnancial perfonnaoce measures.Based
on the result of examination of diect
effectline coefrcient, it
indicates that the effect of effectiveness of quality incentive system on internal qualities ofproduct hasline coefficient of
1,054with probability
0,000.This
produces afinding
that effectivenessof quality incentive
systemhas an
significant effect on intemal qualitiesof
product. Based on the resultof
the examination then can be summarized that Hypothesis 3 (three)in
this study expresses that effectivenessof quality
incentive system has aasignificant
effect oD intemal qualities of product is proven or sup- portedby fact. This
studyfinding
indicates supportto
thetheory which
expresses exis- tenceof
sigrrificant effectof
effectivenessof
quality
incentive system on intemal qualities of product.This finding is
consistentwith the
sur-vey ftom KPMG
PeatMarwick in
1991,in
which it
found that 60% organizationwhich
have five years or more experienceofTQM in
卜 一 霧
, 崚 薇 饉 畔二
一
,
〓 暉
“
“ 腱 一二
” 撻 菫 re lg cf
〓
糞 通
e s ヽ
・ n 卜 s
F
!f s aa
!:
r,.
lf
Joumal Ecooomic, Busioess' and Accouotancy
Veotura
Volumel3'No l'Apil
2010'page9l'104
Acreditation No. I l0/DIKTVKep/2009
explicitgaverewardtothevorkersforattain.externalqualitiesofproducthaslinecoef.
ment
of
performance qualrtv;iil;';;;;;- ficient
ofb'603 with probabilitv 0'000'
Thisaist, t992). Blackbum -d-it;;;; (iss:) rnr*r
thatintemal
qualitiesof
product haveindicated that the wiuners
"f B;]dri; i;;
ansipificant
effecron
extemal qualitiesof
perform re-orientation of
tneir-'lJati Jeme product' Based on result of the
examina-emphasizes
at
improvement-a "t**tt tion
then canbe
concludedthat
Hypothesiswith
continuousty.tre organ;;ioi. g.n.r- a (four) in this
srudy expresses that intemalally
usefinancial -a nonno-i;ii."**., quutiti.r
of product has a significaot efrect onto motivate the
managers*"tt' q*fity tar-
extemal qualities of product is proven orsup
sets (Eccles, 1991). IncentivJs
toi* U"'f' of
portedby
fact' Thisfinding
indicates supportinancial
and nonfinanciarai*."rlort. io the theorv which
expresses existenceof Empirical ,*ay .*pr"r.Jl--rr,L r a significantert'ectof intemalqualitiesofprod'
p"#;;';rffi; i"*."'
rqrt,,ru"d
usageof
uc1or
extemal qualities of product'nonfinancial measures
,, tJ;il;# Gu fhe
r.elultof this
study supports the re-nerr
andLarcker
1995-a iiszt';;"I tt '""'ch w,^ich is performed
by Cronin
andat.
1995; rttner andL*"k , i;;;:s;;is Taytor (1992) what found causal
relationand Jacobs (1g95) found
""i ..#Jivu.- *hi.h
are oositive and strong between qual- based onTQM in production;;;;til ity
performancewhich
is proxywith
intemally sigrificant effect on "p;;;;i;;tlbt- qrtoiiti"' of oroduct and
customer satisfac- mance. This meansl'r"n t"t'uJ' li it'*""
tioowhicb
is proxy^ w^ith^extemal qualitiesof and nonfinanciat (reward ;;1"""*it ""l
product.romet (tgsz) found in
a research'are
packedioto by
"omp"I"tioo ""oo*o, ixistence of
correlation betweenquality
per-the workers
harmonizeoJiu.io.., more
formaorces which is proxywith
intemal quali- atthe
measues, whetherit"fiJ;;;odu;tt titt o{ Pt:d*' with the
customer satisfac-imorovement
io p.rro*uo.. ftJr,[o et ar.
tionwrich
is proxywith
external qualitiesof
#fi;."J;;ffiil;ish; i;il;: i*;' nlodu3t I"temar
quaritiesor product
meanand Larcker (1995),
cxpressJd;;;;ft;;- ofreduction
of scrap'rework'
and defectwill
ness
of quality
incentive,y#i; ,1" um""-
affect.extemal quality of product. This means dvenessof reward *d t";;;; ;;;; ;:t:
is-imoroviment of customer realization'which
are passea tooe worrl[io, i-irou"- what
represetrtspositive
differcoce between ment, notjust for
goal"til;;;;;Jt"t-
totur*ir"hcss
which is rcccivedwith
"sacri- get. So, reward and'"t"s;;;;t;;;;fi Cte" of c*to-"r
to receive the usetulness' arc passed to theworken
'l't#"ti" if tut Improvement of product quality
repre-incentive
madethe *o*tli ;;;;;';;t sents ;lementary of contemporary qualitv
pursue attainment"t *r'i" Jtraol-"*oti t*orution which
can increase business per- and defectbut
also'o p'o'Jt'-toi'inuously
formanc-e (George and Weirsmerskirch 1994'Rewardandrecognruonsystemtoo.,"tiuuitity.tesiwillaffectsexperienceofcus-
workers
will
make them Uaveiigh inuolve'
tomerswhich
use the productsin two
ways' ment at decision.'k'tg, ;;; ;;t iu'io"" First'
the customers perceive product qualityto duty
and motivatesto ;;;;;ance' in
terms of their net value' defined as ratioof
Reward aod recognition
,*i.*l-";;; the
perform-onceto cost (Are
1992)and/or' in
workers are not
mrr.rv
ro,u*ini.n
oftarget
terms of "customer realization" the differencebuttoprocesscot'iot"*;;;;;;;;ent'- ^ between
sacrifrceof customer and
benefit Basedon result of ilJt'*"rnio"'ion of of
customer' Sofor
productswith the
sameeffect line coefficient dJ;Uil;; that perfoTance levels' lower price will
driveinfluence
of intemal q*ritlr. of
producton
customer choice and satisfaction because the 99ISSN 2085-7381
customer's "net value" and customer realiza- tion
will
improve. Second, customerswilling
to spend alimited
amountof
money due to a budget constraintwill
choose the products thatoffer
maximum performancefor
that money or sacrifice(Ahire
and Dreyfus 2000).The customers form their impression to a company product based on at experience
with
the product(Garvin
1987). Performancesof product
strouldaffect
indicatorsof
extemalqualities of customer satisfaction (for
ex- ample, customer complains, warranty,litiga-
tion). Lower percentage at defect ought to as- sist company strengthens positive experienceof
customer (Crosby1979,pp.35-37;
Hardie 1998). The customers use measuresof
exter- nal qualitiesin
formattingof
complacence or uosatisfred.Intemal
qualities include theability of
a manufacturing plant to produce product con-forming to their
desigDedquality at
an eco- oomic productioa cost. So,it
can be viewed as the "conformanceto
requirement" dimen- sionofquality
as specifiedby
Crosby (1979, 1995).Ahirc and Dreyfus (2000)
considerfive
measuresof intemal quality:
scrap rate,rework rate, defect rarc, internal reliability
tcst performance before shipping, and manu-
facturing productivity. The
Performanceof
faished
products iD final tests and the propor- tion ofdefcctive units ofproduction arcwidely
used indicatorsof
conformance quality at the endof
the production process(Crosby
1979,1996).
The Costefhciency of
a production processis
reflectedin
the scrap andrework
generatedduring
production. They rcprcsent internsl quatity failure costs (Juran and Gyma 1993). Scrap andrework
have been used as appropriate indicatorof
intemal quality(Fly-
Dn et
al.
1995).Based
on the result of the
examinationof
effectline
coefficientdirectly, it
indicates tbat efectof
internal qualitiesof
product on changeof
financial performance hasline
co- efficient of 0,193with
probability 0,031 . This shows that intemal qualitiesof
product havea sigrificant effect on
changeof
financialAoticedents and ConcequeDces... (Rovila El Maghviroh)
performance. Based
on
resultof
the exami- oation then can be concluded that Hypothesis5 (five) in this
study expresses that internal qualitiesof
product has ansigrifrcant
effect on change of financial performance is provenor
supportedby
fact.This
shows supponto
the theorywhich
cxpresses existenccof
sig- nificant effectof
intemal qualitiesof
product on chaoge of financial performance.Empirical finding
expressed that there is relation between saleof
a periodof
the com- ing with currently nonfnancial crircria (defect goods andtimely
delivery) andfnancial
(ex- penseof failure
and extemal)of quality for
manufacturing business. They found
ttut
bothof
financial or nonfinancial measuressigrif-
cantly predict sale of (one-quarter-ahead) (Na- gar and Rajan, 2001). Criticisms
to
financial measures are caDnotdirectly
catch influenceof
defect productto
thingswhich
have the characterof intangible like
customer good-will
that is tendencyof
customer buys prod- uct a period of the coming(Deming
1982).Nonfinancial measures provide better
in-
dication to lossof
customergoodwill
relatcdto quality.
Researchto the
argumentis im-
portant because oneof
major roleof
productquality is to
interest and keepsup
customer.Defect
product,will
lessen customer good-will which in
tumwill
lessen eamingsin
thefuture
becauscdissatisfaction of
customerwill
take their business to other place or cus- tomerwill
pay lessfor
the company product.Extemal
failure of
product comesfrom
cus-tomer complain which
meansthat the
cus- tomer have visited company to have recourse.This customer complain, usually requhe
timc for
companyto provide
serviceto
improve any failure. And so do customers need timeto
evaluate service and makes decision purchas-ing in
the future. Thereis
a gap (lag) before externalfailure
affects sale.The result
of
this study supports the re- searchwhich
is performedby Maiga
and Ja- cobs(2005)
expressingthat
company starts improvementin intemal
qualitiesof
productif
they expected intemal qualitiesof
productJoumal Economic, Business, and Accoutrtancy
Ventua
Volume 13, No.l, April 2010, page9l-lo4
Acreditation No. I l0/DXTI/Kep/2009
will
increase eamings is bigger than impmve- mentsof
expense. So, degradationlevel of
scrap,
level of rework, level of defect
and improvementof
productreliability
levelwill
reduce product cost therefore price becomes competitive. Competifive price
will
increase sale. Growth of salewill
increase eamings.Based
on the result of the
examinationof
effectline
coefficient directly,it
indicates that effectof
extemal qualities of product onslange of
financial performance hasline
co- efficient of 0,372 with probabiliry 0,009. This shows that extemal qualitiesof
product have asipificant
effect on change of financial per- formance. Based on result of the examination then can be concluded that Hypothesis 6 (six)in this
study expresses that extemal qualities of product has an significant effect on changeoffinancial
performance is proven or support- edby
fact.This
studyfinding
indicates sup-port to
the theorywhich
expresses existenceof effect of
extemal qualitiesof
product on change of financial performance.Customer
satisfaction is
customer per- ceptionof
productquality of
usagein field so'called with extemal quality.
Extemal qualities happenedwith
lowering of the war- ranty claimed,litigation,
and customer com-plaint. Quality of extemal is
used as proxyfor
customer satisfaction becauselower of extemal failure, then
customer satisfaction of excelsior(Ahire
and Dreyfus 2000; Shims andKillough
1998). Customer satisfactionsare
customer perceptionto product quality
in condition from their net value
so-calledwith
performance to cost(Artz
1992). So cus- tomerwill
choose productwith lower
price for productwith
the same performance levelor
customerwill
release a numberof
certain moneysto
choose the productwhich
offersmaximum
performance(Flynn et al.
1995;Hardie 1998).
The customers form their
impression about a productby
virtueof
current and past expcrience about the product(Garvin,
1987).Satisfactory performances of the product
will
be achieved
ifthere
is high customer satisfac-tion, big
customerloyalty,
and improvementon market
share(Crosby
1979,pp.70-71;
Hardie 1998). Ahire and Dreyfus (2000) gave
attention focus on four
long-range indica-tors of external quality: claimed
warranty,litigation,
customer complaint, market share.Claimed warranty,
litigation,
customer com-plaint
refersto failure
costof
external qual-ity
(JuraD 1993). Market share is alsodirectly
relatedto
customer perceptionof
company product based on usagewhich
isjust
or haspast
(Flynn
etal.
1995;Hardie
1998).Ahire and Dreyfus (2@0) used indicator of im-
provementduring
three yearsin
measuriog extemal quality of product.Many studies have found that higher level customer satisfaction
will
push custooerloy- alty (Alderson
andSullivan
1993; Beardcn andTeel
1983;Fomell,
1992). Throughim-
provement of loyalty,will
assists to guarantee earningsin
the future(Fornell,
1992), lessen expenseof
transactionin
thefuture
(Reich- held and Sasser, 1990), reduce priceclasticity (Anderson
1996),and minimize possibility
customer leaved productif'quality
falters"(Anderson and Sullivan 1993). Intemally,
im-
prove thequality
and satisfied customerwill
lessen the cost
which
relatedto
defect prod-uct like
warranty cost, replacementof
defect product, handling of complain (Crosby 1979;Fomell and Wemerfelt 1988;
Garvin
1988).CONCLUSION
Based on the result
of
this research and dis- cussion,it
can be concluded as thefollowing.
Communication
level of
the company's ob- jectivesofthe
quality has an effect on intemal qualities of product of manufacturiag compa- nies. The frequencyof quality
feedbacks has an effecton intemal
qualitiesof
productof
manufacturing comprnies. Furthuremore, the effectiveness
of
qualiry incentive system has an effecton internal
qualitiesof
productof
manufacturing compaoies,
lntemal
qualitiesof
product has an effect on extemal qualitiesof
productof
manufacturing companies. Be- side, internal qualities ofproduct has an effect on the changeof finance
performanceof
l0l
ISSN 2085-7381
manufacturing compaoies,.
Finally,
extemal qualityofproduct
hes an effect on the changeof fiaancial
performanceof manufachring
companiesREFERENCES
Ahire, S.L.
1996.TQM
age versus quality:Empirical investigation.
Production and Inventory ManagementJoumal
3'7(1): l8-23.
Arthony ard V.
Govindarajar
2004. Man- agemenlControl
Systems. Homewood.IL: Irwin/McGraw-Hill
Ashford and L.L. Cummings.
1983. Feed- back as an individual resource penonal strategiesof
creatinginformation.
Or- ganizational Behavior and Human Per- formance 32 (3): 370-398.and A.S.
Tsui.
1991.Self-
regu- lation for managerial effectiveness: The role effective feedbackseeking.
Aca- demyof
ManagementJoumal 34
(2):251-280.
Atkinson,
A.A,
Banker R.D, KaplanRS, azd Young S.M, 1995.
ManagementAc'
counting, EnglewoodCliffs, New
Jer- sey: PrenticeHall
IntemationalBandura, A. 1986. Social Foundation of
Thought and Actions. Englewood
Cliffs
NJ PrenticeHall.
Banker
R.D,
Datar andD.
Srinivasan. 2000.An
empirical investigationof
an incen-tives plant that includes nonfnancial
performancemeuutes.
The Accounting ReviewT5(l):
65-92.Behn, B., ozd R.Riley. 1999. Using nonfinan- cial information to predict financial per- formance: The case
of
the U.S. airline industry.Journal
of Accounting,Audit-
ing and Finance 14: 29-56.Crosby, P.B. 1979. Quality is Free. New York.
NY.
McGraw-Hill.
1996. Quality is
Still
Free. New York.NY.McGmw-Hill.
Cronin,
J.J.k and S.A. Taylor.
1992. Mea- suring service quality: A reenamination and extension. ../ournal of Marketing 56Anticedents 8Dd Concequences... (Rovila El Maghviroh)
(3): 55-68.
Dailel
andW.D
Reitsperger 1992. Manage-ment control
systemsfor q,'ality: An empirical
comparisooof the US
and Japanese electronics industries."/ozrzal
of
ManagementAccounting
Research4:64-83.
and T. Gregson.1995. Qual-
ity
consciousnessin
Japanese and US elecEonics manufacturers:An
Exami- nationof
impact of quality strategy and management control system otr percep- tions of the importance of quality to ex- pected management rewards. Manage- ment Accounting 6(4):367-382.
Dawson, P. and M. Patrickson.
1991. To-tal quality
managementia
Australian banking industry.Inter
ationalJownal
of Quality andReliability
Management 8 (5): 66-76.Desimone, RL, JM Wemer,
DM
Harris.2002.Human Resource Development.
Uaited
Stated of America: Thomson Leaming.
Early, P.C., G.B. Northeraft. C. Lee aod
T.R Lituchy
1990.Impact of
process andoutcome
feedbackon the relation of
goal setting to task performance.
Aca&
emy of Management
Journal33 (l):87-
105.
Erez,
M.
and F.H. Kanfer- 1983. The roleof
acceptance in goal seuing and
ask
per-formance. Academy of
ManagementReview. Yol S:
454463
Flynn, B.B, R.
Schroeder,S.
Sakakibara.1995. Determinants
of Quality
Perfor- mance inHigh
andLow
Quality Plaots. Quality
ManagementJournal. Hal.
8-25
Fomel
1992.A national
customer satisfac-tion:
The Swedish experieoce.Journal
ofMarketins.56 (l):
6-21.Garvin, D.A.
1987. Competingon
the eight dimension of quality.Harvard
Business Review. 65(6):
101- 109.George, S.
azdA.
Weimerskirch 1994. TotalQuality
Management: Strategiesatd
Techniques
Proven al
Today's|,Iost
yl
Joumal Economic, Business, and Accountancy VeDtura Acreditation No. I I 0/DIKTI/IGp/2009
Successful Companies. New york,
NY:Wiley
and Sons.Goold, M. and l.l. Quinn.
1993.Stategic Contrcl:
Milestonefor
Long-Tbrmper-
formance. London.U.K.:
Pitmann pub-lishing.
Govindarajan, Y. and A.K. Gupta.
1985.Linking contol
system to businessunit strategy: knpact on
performance.Accounting otganization and
society.l0 (l):
51-66.Hgen,
D.R.,
Fisherand M.S. Taylor.
1979.Consequences
of individual
feedback on behaviorin
organization.Journal of
Applied psychologt 64
(4):
349-369.Hardie,
N.,
1998.The
effectsof quality
onbusiness performance. Quality
Management Journal
5(3),
65-83.Hanel,
A.M.
andB.M.
Tuttle 2001. Theim-
pactof unit goal priorities:
Economic incentives, and interim feedback on the plannedeffort of information
system professionals.Journal of Information
System 15(2):
81-98.Hill, T.
1997.Manufacnring
strategy, Keep-ing it
relevantby
addressing the needsof
the market. IntegratedManufacUr- ing
Systems.I
(5): 257-2il.
Howell, RA.
andS.R
Soucy. 1987. Operat-ing contol in the new
manufacturing environment. Management Accounlingl 25-31.Ittner, C. andD.F. Larcker. 1995.
Total
Qua-lity
Management and choiceof infor-
mation and reward tystefrs. Journalfor
a Accounting
Research (Supplement):1-34.
and_1997
. Quality strategy, stra- tegic control systems, and organization- al performance. Accounting,Organba-
tions, and society 22 (314): 293-314.α′グ 1998a Are nottancial mea‐
sures leading indicators of
finaocialmeasures?
An analysis of
customer satisfaction.Journal
ofAccounting
Re- search (Supplement) 36(3): l-35.
Jacobs,
EA.,
C.K. Latham, and C.Lee. 1998.Volume 13, No.t, April2010, page 91-104
The
relationshipof
customer satisfac-tion to
strategic decisions.Journal of
Managerial
Issuesl0(2):
165-182.Jaworski, B.J. 1988. Toward a Theory of
Mar- keting Con[ol: Environmental
Con- text, Control Types, and Consequences,Journal
of Marketing Research,yol
52(July
1988),pp.23 -29
IGplan, R.S.
1983. Measuring manufactur-ing
performance:A
new challengefor menagerial accounting
rcsearch.Tle
Accounting Review: 686-7 05.
Kluger,
A.N. andA. DeNisi. 1996.
Theeffects of feedback interventions
onperformance. psychological Bulletin
tt9 (2):2s4-2M.
Locke, E.,
I(N.
Shaw,D.M.
Saari, ond G.P.Latham.
198 I. Goal setting and
task performance:
1969-1980. Psychologi- calBulletin:
125-152.Macieriello, l. and C. Knby. t994.
Management Contrul
System. Upper Sadde River N.J: PrenticeHall.
Maig4
A.S.andF.A.
Jacobs. 2005. Anteced- ents and Consequencesof Quality
Per- formance.Behavioral
ResearchIn
Ae- counting.l7:
(1Il-131)
Nagar, V. and
M.Y.
Rajan. 2001. The Reve- nue implicationsoffinancial
and opera- tional measurcsof
productqtnlity.
The Accounting Review 76(4):495-513) Otley, D.T. and A.J. Berry.
1980. Control,o4ganizations
a\d
accolnt' 4 E. Account-ing,
Organizations,and Society:
231-2U.
Sedatole,
K.I.
2003.The efect of
measure-ment altenratives on a
nonfinancialquality measure's forward looking
properties. The Accounting Review 78 (2): 550- 580.Sim,
K.L. andL.N. lfillerrgh.
1998. The per- formance effectsof
complementarities betweenmanufacturing practices
and management accounting systems. -Iorlr-nal of
ManagementAccounting
Re- searchl0:325-346.
Symons, R.T.
ard RA.
Jacobs. 1995.A
total 103‐
ISSN 2085‐7381
quality
management-based incentives systemsupporting total quality
man-agemetrt implementation.
Productionand Operations
Management4
(3):33t-347.
Anticedents and Concequences... (Rovila El Maghvkoh)
Young, S.M., and E.H. Selto. 1991.
Newmanufacturing practices and
costmaDagemeut: A review of the literature and dircctions
for
rcsearch.lournal of
Accounting