Ethiopia, test by Amhara Bureau of Water Resources 1 Indonesia, test by Bandung Institute of Technology, spring water 3 Indonesia, test by Bandung

(1)

(2)

Ethiopia, test by Amhara Bureau of Water Resources 1 Indonesia, test by Bandung Institute of Technology, spring water 3 Indonesia, test by Bandung Institute of Technology - Well water 5

Indonesia, test by BBTKLPP in 3 villages 7

Indonesia, Test By Padjadjaran University, 10 locations in urban slum 13

Rwanda, Test by Rwanda Bureau of Standards 17

(3)

Ethiopia, test by Amhara Bureau of Water Resources 1

(4)

Ethiopia, test by Amhara Bureau of Water Resources 2

(5)

Indonesia, test by Bandung Institute of Technology, spring water 3

(6)

Indonesia, test by Bandung Institute of Technology, spring water 4

(7)

>t

.rld

Et3

3tE Elo

llll (',aol F

rl e olz

dg o

g- F>

cd)

Uo

to

3i t3

^tl

'-z

ll

Fz. o-q .i>

_coo,cE(,o'

EE oooo

oo

lt

EE oooo o)o

I

,l:

112-c l_olool Eolo

FP

ololc)lc

ol6

_9 t+(trl"EIE5lo'r lF o

z

.ccoo

=

o

Eoolr-E-qEf cod,t('oq)Y

z) ;> dia '6E9

_of=oFO):-! (6

;-o

(tr

^-trtt

a 96 x6B v o.o

Ici

rtr oJ.q -a d)AEFo9 t-.t1o-l (L-il >

tr

€ o 6

(,oIL

.gEd.r

-its o o o

o

cq

(oocc)(L

{,t- q)o('Eco Eooo^.g

o

5 .ic o

FE

o

co([

r

o)IL

!)F oc)Ef

I o

-cE.E OC

e

c)N

o

E

c!E.g

6l otrN

FE

b

o

-coco

oo-Eo

a

o

ii

^.c,o!l

q,

a E€.

o ;'i I-O-i:r(!cc o)::i(trd).=oo

<0-u)

z

N

s 5

6)

<)

c)

:< +:< z3 ; < c.l r

-(}^i

q<s e :=:1 : o96 a o=q oJ_q lrvg !=P 2 =t= 5iE ^$ E fi; Z.i OE- EE FulI =o <F; ;(L ETf(D -c 8f,fi BB <l!: dH io5 0i

EoE

o

c.!o

z

Cv(l)'-cDLoro

2m J of q

< cl c-!!

E NqT J -'- n

!- r(Jc

b -E.F : 3d5

EE P EZ

A

o E o7!.-

jr (! att = E_ ctce-c(! c o)=)!.:EO^-OE.!(':F:0.)ccD oD;,19 9 (D

< F+ootL

Indonesia, test by Bandung Institute of Technology - Well water 5

(8)

(o@@

(',

o

z

di

o

(\_t^t.-c{

i.,.

", o

o_ 8s

co)

E€ E€

o^L

o-u -cb E5

'--t ZllI

,z o-q

-.i

>

$

=

oot@o?

r.- < 5g zB s < c.r

E

-on I 9<B e :s:: : -ra|!x t0=-lL oJ-o gY9 Yior

.lJ

!5t

=

=HE

$

=26 0! E u.to zi o='- iiE

FUJq :O

<F+

ai D-

8ffi Sg I H; 8-r*

cootcEOJd)Y

EE oooo

rto

I -co^.E

o

.{o

z 6x Bf :6 * rf

E

$ R-Fd

r- =Oc<O'=l-

: 8d5

o

z

EocooEo

6

aQ,)IL

"c

l!

Ef o

z 6

o.Eo

a

Eoo

6

oILinF

.E

-g

9 E $9r

- o)c u - c(! C d): =.=

€ori-otr.=co:tr-o) o_F=oc PFEd58 E-

oL

oo o\ i,,

FN

,l: -lz

-c l_

olo Ets

otbOINEl(,)olololc_tF

*l€

:lo

*lo

EIE1lF coo,cg(,^IDY (D<

'6E9

rtr c ct):ct ,: ci-O d

,r oc

69

(!

$aH

I

o

. b3 aOts) @fr8

llz. [l

rL

-il>

oo

o

asooTL

.a

o

q,

o b

o o

o

c(!oC'q,

dtIL

0,F oo^(sErt-c

o

Eol=

6 o

Eo(E

€

a=

o

E

o

R

cog!o(L

oF. (,c,Ea

I 0

p.$c Oc

o

(\t

Eo6t

@

b

c

NEG otr

b

ol

E

o

R

.\lEoc

o

Eo

a

o^LL^Eo!f(,

a

'q(!.-rt'-c

--Ed

!?

tr= -"6tL

E

6: .! o(, <za

o

z

(\

Indonesia, test by Bandung Institute of Technology - Well water 6

(9)

Indonesia, test by BBTKLPP in 3 villages 7

(10)

(11)

(12)

(13)

(14)

(15)

ANALISIS PERBANDINGAN EFEKTIVITAS PRAKTIK pEREBUSAN DENGAN PRAKTIK FILTRASI KERAMIK

TERHADAP KUALITAS MIKROBIOLOGI AIR MINUM

Oleh

AZYY ATI RIDHA ALFIAN NPM.130920150002

TESIS

Untuk memenuhi salah satu syarat ujian Guna memperoleh gelar Magister Kesehatan Masyarakat

Program Studi Magister Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat Konsentrasi : Kesehatan Lingkungan dan Kesehatan Kerja

PROGRAM STUDI M;\GISTER ILMU KESEHATAN MASYARAKAT PASCASARJANAFAKULTASKEDOKTERAN

UNIYERSITAS P ADJ ADJ ARAN BANDUNG

TAHUN 2017

Indonesia, Test By Padjadjaran University, 10 locations in urban slum 13

(16)

JV

ABSTRAK

Ketersediaan

air

minum dan kontaminasi air oleh mikroorganisme masih menjadi masalah utama di wilayah kumuh perkotaan, hal ini merupakan penyebab

masih

tingginya kejadian penyakit tular air di masyarakat. Terdapat beberapa rek:nik pengolahan yang biasa digunakan untuk menghasilkan air minum di masYarakat . terutama praktik perebusan dan praktik filtrasi keramik namun ,

efektivitaS

dari kedua praktik tersebut dalam mengeliminasi mikroorganisme

belum

diketabui

.

Praktik yang tepat daya dan guna diperlukan untuk masyarakat

kumuh

perkotaan dalam menyediakan air layak minum. Penelitian dilakukan

untuk membandingkan efektivitas dan nilai risiko

penyakit tular air antara praktik

perebusan dan

praktik: filtrasi keramik di masyarakat.

Penelitian ini menggunakan teknik Quasi-Experimental Equivalent Pre-test

and

Post-test Design. Data dianalisis dengan menghitung nilai persentase efekti~

i

tas, log removal reduction, dan uji Wilcoxon Rank Sum.

Hasil

analisis menunj ukkan nilai persentase efektivitas praktik filtrasi

keramik

99,84

%

(Coliform)

dan

100% (E.Coli), sedangkan praktik perebusan

adalah

98% (Coliform)

dan

96% (E.Coli). Hasil perhitungan log removal

reduction menunjukan

praktik: filtrasi keramik yang dikategorikan aman (log4 dan

5) sebanyak

76,36% (Coliform) dan I 00% (E.Coli), sedangkan praktik perebusan

sebanyak

40% (Coliform) dan 96,36% (E.Coli) yang dikategori.Ican aman. Hasil

uji sta1isti.k

menunjukkan tidak terdapat perbedaan selisih penurunan

Coliform (p=O. 794) dan E.

Coli (p=0.452) antara praktik perebusan dan praktik filtrasi. Hasil

observasi

menunjukan 54,5% wadah perebusan air tidak dicuci dan dilap, 72, 7%

hanya d-ididihkan

sebagian.

Praktik

filtrasi keramik lebih efektif daripada praktik perebusan dalam

mengeleminasi mikroorganisme dilihat

dari nilai persentase efektivitas dan log

removal reduction

sehingga disimpuikan bahwa praktik perebusan Iebih berisiko terltadap penyakit tular air. Praktik filtrasi keramik dapat disarankan sebagai altematif pengolahan air min um untuk masyarakat kumuh perkotaan.

Kata

Kunci:

Efektivitas, Kualitas MikrobioJogi, Praktik Filtrasi Keramik.

Praktik Perebusan

(17)

V

ABSTRACT

The availability of safe drinking water and watersource contamination by microorganism remain the main problems in urban slum area which increase the chance of waterborne diseases. Boiling and ceramic filtration are the most frequently used of water treatment practices in community, however the effectiveness of these practices to eliminate microorganism contamination have not been evaluated. It is important to find the best practices of water treatment Lo eliminate microorganism contamination to be used in urban slum area. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and annual risk for water borne disease of boiling versus ceramic filtration practices in community.

IL was a quasi-experimental equivalent pre-test and post-test design. Data was analysed by calculating percentage of removal effectivity, log removal reduction and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test.

This study showed that the average effectiveness of ceramic filtration practices was 99,84% (Coliform) and 100% (E.Coli). The average percentage effectiveness of boiling practices is 98% (Coliform) and 96% ( E. Coli). The log removal reduction which categorized as safe (log 4 and 5) of ceramic filtration was 76,63% ( Coliform) and 100% (E.Coli), while the boiling practices was 40%

(Coliform) and 96,36% (E.Coli). There is no statistically difference in decreasing the amount of Coliform (p=0. 794) and E.Coli (p=0.452). Observation showed that 54.5% of the water container were not washed and cleaned and 72. 7% water were not fully boiled.

Ceramic filtration practices is more effective than boiling practices to eliminate microorganism, there for boiling practices is less effective to prevent waterborne disease. From this study can be recommended that the ceramic filtration may became alternative practices for household drinking water

treatment in urban slum area.

Keyword: Boiling Practices, Ceramic Filtration Practices, Effectiveness, Microbiological Quality

(18)

95

3. Praktik Filtrasi Keramik Sederhana

4. Laboratori um

-'. · ..

-- - -~~

(19)

Rwanda, Test by Rwanda Bureau of Standards 17