• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

T BING 1302691 Chapter5

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "T BING 1302691 Chapter5"

Copied!
3
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Yustika Nur Fajriah, 2015

COMPREHENSIBLE INPUT, EXPLICIT TEACHING, AND CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN GENRE BASED APPROACH TO TEACHING SPOKEN HORTATORY EXPOSITION

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu 103

CHAPTER V

CONCLUSIONS & SUGGESTIONS

This chapter consists of two sections. The first section discusses the the conclusions

resulting from the findings in this study, and the last phase will deal with the some

suggestions adressed to the teachers, and future related studies.

a. Conclusions

As has been stated in the chapter 1, this study is aimed at investigating the

effectiveness of comprehensible input, explicit teaching, and corrective feedback in

Genre Based Approach to the teaching in spoken hortatory exposition and how

effective those three techniques developstudents’ speaking in hortatory exposition.

This study was undertaken in a case study design using the mixture of quantitative

and qualitative methods. Moreover, the participants in this study were fourty

students in a second grade class in one of State Senior High Schools in Garut and

only six students were purposively chosen as the focus participants.

In line with the purposes of the study above, there are two main conclusions

drawn and some additional conclusions. The first two conclusions are presented

based on the research questions; are comprehensible input, explicit teaching, and corrective feedback effective to develop students’ speaking in hortatory exposition? And how effective do comprehensible input, explicit teaching, and corrective feedback develop students’ speaking in hortatory exposition? Meanwhile, additional conclusions deal with how those three concepts work in developing students’ speaking in hortatory exposition.

The first conclusion is that comprehensible input, explicit teaching, and

corrective feedback are effective to be applied in developing the students’ speaking

of hortatory exposition. This conclusion results from the statistical calculation using

dependent t-test telling that there is a significant difference between the pre-test and

(2)

Yustika Nur Fajriah, 2015

COMPREHENSIBLE INPUT, EXPLICIT TEACHING, AND CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN GENRE BASED APPROACH TO TEACHING SPOKEN HORTATORY EXPOSITION

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu

The second conclusion is that those three techniques develop the students’

speaking of hortatory exposition, particularly in the genre moves of hortatory

exposition and in general aspects of speaking. Seen from genre moves, the

improvements are obviously seen from the focus students who improve their

capacity in a way that they are able to organize the text using appropriate generic

structure; thesis statement, arguments, and suggestions. Additionally, the students

are also able to include all linguistic features of hortatory exposition; such as,

connectives, present tense, judgement and impersonal statements, passive voice,

technical terms, and modality. The improvement of the general concepts of

speaking; especially, on grammar, vocabulary, fluency, and comprehension is also

reflected in the findings. The focus students improve their abilities in using

appropriate vocabulary in correct grammar, pronouncing some words correctly,

conveying the message of the monologue speaking without any frequent disruption

and repetition.

As additional conclusions, this study reveals that comprehensible input,

explicit teaching, and corrective feedback support one to another in developing students’ speaking in hortatory exposition. This conclusion is resulted from the same underlying concepts in each teachnique; as an example, teachers should apply the

clear and unambiguous instruction to students. The result of this study also claims

that optimalizing a teaching program by applying comprehensible input and explicit teaching could minimize the occurance of the students’ errors; therefore, there was no so many error treatments given by the teacher in the teaching program; especially

in Joint Construction of the Text and in Independent Construction of the Text.

In other words, comprehensible input, explicit teaching, and corrective

feedback have been feasible to be applied in a teaching language program;

especially, in Genre Based Approach.

b. Suggestions

In line with the topic under the discussion about developing students’ speaking of hortatory exposition, there are some following suggestions which have to do with

(3)

Yustika Nur Fajriah, 2015

COMPREHENSIBLE INPUT, EXPLICIT TEACHING, AND CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN GENRE BASED APPROACH TO TEACHING SPOKEN HORTATORY EXPOSITION

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu

For teachers, it is recommended to apply comprehensible input, explicit

teaching and corrective feedback in a teaching process. The use of three techniques

will help the teachers do an effective teaching.

For related future research, it is suggested to design a new concept of a

research design on the use of those techniques; comprehensible input, explicit

teaching in more specific aspects of speaking. This is in line with this present

research which focuses more on literacy based instruction; particularly the genre of

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

FOUR SQUARE WRITING METHOD (FSWM) USED IN PROCESS APPROACH TO TEACHING WRITING OF ANALYTICAL EXPOSITION TEXTS.. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | repository.upi.edu |

critical thinking-based reading instruction using Guiding Questions, the instruction was successful to develop students’ positive perceptions and attitudes toward classroom

The first conclusion is that PBL implementation in teaching analytical exposition text improves students’ speaking skill, proved by speaking aspects improvement

TRANSITIVITY SYSTEM IN EXPOSITION TEXTS FOR SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL NATIONAL EXAMINATIONS.. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu

investigate the teacher’s oral corrective feedback strategy for the students of different proficiency levels, three data collection techniques

The first conclusion is that the teacher put high emphasis on form-focused feedback, particularly grammar, when providing the written feedback for the two groups of the

There are four aspects that this study aims to investigate: the teacher written feedback strategies, what teacher’s reasons in using those feedback strategies, students’

Students’ Difficulties in Incorporating Critical Thinking in Writing a Hortatory Exposition Text .... Constructing a Coherent