V
ANALYSIS OF PRICE FIXING AGREEMENT ELEMENTS FULFILLMENT WITHIN CARTEL PRACTICES ON COMMISION (KPPU) VERDICT NO.25/KPPU-I/2009 WITH
LAW NO.5 OF 1999 ABOUT THE MONOPOLY PRACTICES PROHIBITION AND UNFAIR COMPETITION
ABSTRACT
The global rise in oil prices that began in 2005 led to significantly participate rising jet fuel prices .Avtur is the primary fuel of the aircraft, so the result of this increase is, the airline request an component called fuel surcharge . Fuel surcharge is applied to the national airlines so that the national airlines can avoid bankruptcy losses, which is led to ending of national aviation industry and resulting to the disruption of the national economy . KPPU stated that 9 ( nine ) airline violated the Law No. 5 of 1999 , with price trend as an evidence. In fact, price trends categorized as a indirect evidence .
This research applies an analytical descriptive method with juridical normative approach using secondary data from literature study. Qualitative analyses from point of view, of law study are applied to acquire a data analyses. The author describes the object matter of fact in the fulfillment element of price fixing agreement inside Commission (KPPU) verdict No.25 KPPU-I/2009 based of prohibition Anti Monopoly Law and the Code of Civil Law .
