• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

AN ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION SECURITY GOVERNANCE READINESS IN GOVERNMENT INSTITUTION

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Membagikan "AN ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION SECURITY GOVERNANCE READINESS IN GOVERNMENT INSTITUTION"

Copied!
20
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

LOGO

A. BUDI SETIAWAN

AN ANALYSIS OF INFORMATION SECURITY

GOVERNANCE READINESS IN GOVERNMENT

INSTITUTION

The Center of Research and Development of Informatic

Application.

Agency of Human Resource Research and Development,

Ministry of ICT Indonesia

Delivered at 4

th

International Symposium on Chaos

Revolution in Science, Technology and Society

August, 28-29, 2013 in Jakarta, Indonesia

(2)

INTRODUCTION

• Internet usage is increasing

• ICT is enabler

• The use of ICT in the public sector

• Presidential Instruction No. 3/2003 about Policy & National

Strategy on the Development of e-Government

(3)

Increasing IT Risk in Indonesia

Real incident reported such as phishing, identity theft, data (information resources)

stealing, critical information resources hostages, information leakage, insider

attack (i.e. virus spread)

Cases: cyber war, fraud, web deface, hoax, etc

Malicious code, common vulnerabilities/zero day attack -pirate software are widely

used (not updated)

(4)

Recent Risk Report in Indonesia

Distributed Denial of Service attack on the system of Domain Name Service

(DNS) ccTLD-ID indicates that the attack on the domain "go.id" ​​is the most

(source: Zone-h, 2012)

(source: Id-SIRTII, 2012)

Number of attacks to domain “id” website on

October 2012

(5)

• Observe the readiness of Information Security Governance

implementation in government agencies

• Analysis was performed by using index of e-Government Rank

(PeGI) and Information Security Index (Index KAMI

The Study of IT Security Readiness in Government

PeGI

Index

KAMI

Trianggulation:

Expert

judgemnet

(FGD)

(6)

Indonesia’s Statistics

Internet users: 55,000,000 Internet users as of June.30, 2012, and

22.1% penetration.

(source : http://www.internetworldstats.com/asia.htm#id)

(7)
(8)

National Policy and Law on Internet Security

Indonesia’s Act

“Indonesia’s Telecommunication Act”

(UU Telekomunikasi)

“Information & Electronic Transaction Act”

(UU ITE)

No. 29/PER/M.KOMINFO/10 /2010 about

Securing Telecommunication Network

Utilization based on Internet Protocol

Number: 133/KEP/M/KOMINFO/04/2010

Number: 01/SE/M.KOMINFO/02/2011

Regulation of Minister of CIT

Decree of Minister of CIT

(9)
(10)

The Index of Indonesian e-Government Rank

No. Dimensions

1

Policy

2

Institutional

3

Infrastructure

4

Application

5

Planning

5 Dimensions of Indonesian e-Government Rank:

Provides a reference for the development and utilization of ICT in public sector

Provide impetus for the development of ICT in the government through the

evaluation of a large, balanced, and objective

Provides map of the environment conditions of the use of ICT in the national

government

(11)

Indonesian e-Government Rank 2012:

Ministries

(12)

NO

Ministries

DIMENSION

SCORE

CATEGORY

POLICY

INSTITUTIONAL

INFRASTRUCT

URE

APPLICATION PLANNING AVERAGE

1 Kementerian Keuangan 3.50 3.53 3.52 3.37 3.63 3.51 Good 2 Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum 3.10 3.52 3.11 3.34 3.52 3.32 Good 3 Kementerian Perindustrian 3.13 3.50 3.48 3.40 3.00 3.30 Good 4 Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan 3.17 3.27 3.40 3.22 3.13 3.24 Good 5 Kementerian Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi 3.10 2.96 2.83 2.94 3.16 3.00 Good 6 Kementerian Perhubungan 2.79 2.70 2.90 2.92 2.77 2.82 Good 7 Kementerian Perdagangan 2.73 2.73 3.19 2.92 2.40 2.79 Good 8 Kementerian Pertahanan 2.84 3.10 2.68 2.50 2.75 2.77 Good 9 Kementerian Pemuda dan Olah Raga 2.44 2.73 2.95 2.73 2.83 2.74 Good 10 Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional 2.10 2.43 3.14 2.90 2.73 2.66 Good 11 Kementerian Kesehatan 2.23 2.88 2.74 2.70 2.52 2.61 Good 12 Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral 1.98 2.63 2.98 2.67 2.73 2.60 Good 13 Kementerian Kehutanan 2.54 2.80 2.93 2.62 1.67 2.51 Poor 14 Kementerian Pertanian 2.63 3.03 2.69 2.37 1.67 2.48 Poor 15 Kementerian Luar Negeri 2.15 2.44 2.77 2.40 2.40 2.43 Poor 16 Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia 2.17 2.33 2.26 2.63 2.70 2.42 Poor 17 Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Kesejahteraan Rakyat 2.38 2.70 2.36 2.27 2.27 2.39 Poor 18 Kementerian Riset dan Teknologi 2.10 2.87 2.55 2.60 1.70 2.36 Poor 19 Kementerian Koperasi dan Usaha Kecil dan Menengah 2.25 2.28 2.37 2.58 2.20 2.34 Poor 20 Kementerian Badan Usaha Milik Negara 1.55 2.28 2.40 2.64 2.40 2.25 Poor 21 Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Perekonomian 2.40 2.60 2.10 2.45 1.57 2.22 Poor 22 Kementerian Pariwisata dan Ekonomi Kreatif 2.19 2.57 2.24 2.03 1.67 2.14 Poor 23 Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan 2.02 2.67 2.07 2.38 1.40 2.11 Poor 24 Kementerian Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan

Anak 2.03 2.44 1.80 2.08 1.44 1.96 Poor 25 Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Politik, Hukum, dan

Keamanan 1.50 2.00 1.94 2.10 2.12 1.93 Poor 26 Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup 1.44 1.90 2.24 2.18 1.83 1.92 Poor 27 Kementerian Agama 1.43 2.04 2.46 1.88 1.48 1.86 Poor 28 Kementerian Perumahan Rakyat 1.38 1.83 1.90 2.23 1.30 1.73 Poor 29 Kementerian Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal 1.21 1.63 1.57 1.80 1.40 1.52 Very Poor

(13)

Indonesian e-Government Rank 2012:

Local Government (Provinces)

(14)

NO

Provinces

DIMENSION

SCORE

CATEGORY

POLICY

INSTITUTIONAL

INFRASTRUCTURE

APPLICATION

PLANNING

AVERAGE

1

Jawa Barat

3.46

3.53

3.33

3.10

3.47

3.38

Good

2

Jawa Timur

3.17

3.47

3.10

2.73

2.67

3.03

Good

3

DKI Jakarta

2.88

2.73

2.90

2.77

2.80

2.82

Good

4

Yogyakarta

2.79

2.67

2.90

2.73

2.80

2.78

Good

5

Aceh

2.42

2.87

3.05

2.77

2.47

2.71

Good

6

Bangka Belitung

2.67

3.07

2.38

2.27

2.73

2.62

Good

7

Sumatera Selatan

2.71

2.60

2.67

2.40

2.67

2.61

Good

8

Gorontalo

2.42

2.47

2.48

2.60

2.87

2.57

Poor

9

Jambi

1.83

2.73

2.24

2.53

2.47

2.36

Poor

10

Jawa Tengah

2.08

2.67

2.67

2.40

1.80

2.32

Poor

11

Kalimantan Timur

2.00

2.40

2.43

2.23

2.20

2.25

Poor

12

Kalimantan Tengah

2.21

2.40

2.00

2.03

2.40

2.21

Poor

13

Nusa Tenggara Barat

2.29

2.13

1.71

2.43

1.67

2.05

Poor

14

Sumatera Barat

2.38

2.13

2.05

1.77

1.60

1.98

Poor

15

Kalimantan Barat

1.92

2.20

1.95

2.00

1.80

1.97

Poor

16

Papua

1.67

1.90

1.93

1.98

2.27

1.95

Poor

17

Sulawesi Utara

2.00

2.20

1.67

2.37

1.20

1.89

Poor

18

Kepulauan Riau

1.38

2.47

1.48

1.80

2.13

1.85

Poor

19

Sumatera Utara

1.21

2.20

1.86

1.77

1.47

1.70

Poor

20

Sulawesi Barat

1.50

1.70

1.90

1.70

1.47

1.65

Poor

21

Lampung

1.21

2.07

1.43

1.90

1.47

1.61

Poor

22

Bengkulu

1.50

1.73

1.19

1.63

1.33

1.48

Very Poor

Poor

23

Sulawesi Tengah

1.33

1.80

1.24

1.63

1.00

1.40

Very Poor

Poor

24

Kalimantan Selatan

1.00

1.47

1.00

1.67

1.00

1.23

Very Poor

Poor

(15)

Analysis of Indonesian e-Government Rank

Ministries

31.03%

48.28%

20.69%

Dimension: Policy

Good

Poor

Very Poor

58.62%

41.38%

0%

Dimension: Institutional

Good

Poor

Very Poor

51.72%

44.83%

3.45%

Dimension:Infrastructure

Good

Poor

Very Poor

51.72%

68.28%

0%

Dimension: Application

Good

Poor

Very Poor

3.45%

34.48%

41.38%

20.69%

Dimension: Planning

Very Good

Good

Poor

Very Poor

(16)

Analysis of Indonesian e-Government Rank

Local Government (Provinces)

25.00%

45.83%

29.17%

Dimension: Policy

Good

Poor

Very Poor

37.50%

58.33%

4%

Dimension: Institutional

Good Poor Very Poor

29.17%

50.00%

20.83%

Dimension: Infrastructure

Good

Poor

Very Poor

20.83%

79.17%

0%

Dimension: Application

Good

Poor

Very Poor

0.00%

29.17%

41.67%

29.17%

Dimension: Planning

(17)

Source: Directorate of

Information Security

(18)

1. Coordination between government agencies is still weak

in terms of cyber security

2. The levels of internet safety and cyber security

awareness of government agencies and public are still

low

3. Implementation of ICT security in Indonesia is still

running on silo system

4. ICT governance and information security management

systems in government agencies do not operate

effectively

(19)

1. Need strong commitment form all level management in

government institution related to implement IT Security

governance

2. Information security should become the spirit for all ICT

regulation and policy

3. Need particular policy from the highest level government

management which is mandate for all government

institution to implement IT Security governance

Recommendation for Cyber Security Readiness

in Government

(20)

THANK YOU

A. BUDI SETIAWAN

ICT Researcher at Center of R&D of Informatic Application

Human Resource R&D Agency, Ministry of ICT Indonesia

ahma003@kominfo.go.id

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

[r]

Warga Negara Digital sebagai Instrumen Menuju Warga Negara Global (Penelitian Grounded Theory tentang Dampak Kemajuan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi terhadap

Bedasarkan Penetapan Pemenang Seleksi Sederhana Kegiatan Perencanaan Teknis Dinas Perhubungan Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Barat Nomor : 17 /PPBJ/PEREN/X/DISHUB/2011 tanggal

Pembuatan restorasi gigi setelah perawatan saluran akar merupakan kelanjutan dari serangkaian perawatan saluran akar yang telah dilakukan untuk mengembalikan fungsi

Capaian Program Terpenuhinya keseragaman busana bagi PNS di lingkungan dinas Kominfo&PDE.

Pahlawan Nasional adalah gelar yang diberikan kepada warga negara Indonesia atau seseorang yang berjuang melawan penjajahan di wilayah yang sekarang menjadi wilayah Negara

Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui kepuasan pelanggan dengan meningkatkan kualitas produk yang dapat diidentifikasi melalui metode Six Sigma dengan terlebih dahulu

Jika klien merasa cocok dengan prototype yang disajikan dan berkerasterhadap produk tersebut, maka developer harus kerja keras untuk mewujudkanproduk tersebut menjadi lebih